Comparison of the expected damage patterns from two- and three-dimensional nonlinear dynamic analyses of a roller compacted concrete dam

REFERENCES

• Akkar, S. (2011). Probabilistic seismic hazard assesment for Andiraz dam (BAP Report No. 2010-03-03-1-01-04). 34 pp.Turkey: Department of Civil Engineering Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Akpinar, U., Aldemir, A., & Binici, B. (2011). Different analysis strategies for RCC dam design. 5th international conference on Advanced Computational Engineering and Experimenting (ACE-X2011), Algarve, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Alliard, P.M., & Leger, P. (2008). Earthquake safety evaluation of gravity dams considering aftershocks and reduced drainage efficiency. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 134(1), 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arici, Y., & Binici, B. (2011). Seismic safety assessment of Andiraz dam (BAP Report No. 2010-03-03-1-00-20). 74 pp.Turkey: Department of Civil Engineering Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Aznarez, J.J., Maeso, O., & Dominguez, J. (2006). BE analysis of bottom sediments in dynamic fluid–structure interaction problems. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 30(2), 124–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee, S.S., & Leger, P. (1994). Application of NLFM models to predict cracking in concrete gravity dams. Journal of Structural Engineering, 120(4), 1255–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougacha, S., & Tassoulas, J.L. (1991). Seismic analysis of gravity dams: I. Modeling of sediments. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 117(8), 1826–1837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, R.W. (1972). Concrete dam construction using earth compaction methods. Proceedings of conference on Economical Construction of Concrete Dams (pp. 143–152). New York: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, R.W. (1974). Compaction of mass concrete with vibratory roller. ACI Journal, 71(10), 506–513.
   Google Scholar
• Chávez, J.W., & Fenves, G. (1995). Earthquake response of concrete gravity dams including base sliding. Journal of Structural Engineering, 121(5), 865–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, A.K. (1970). Earthquake response of concrete gravity dams. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, 96(4), 443–454.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A.K. (1978). Earthquake resistant design of concrete gravity dams. Journal of Structural Division, 104(6), 953–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, A.K., & Zhang, L. (1991). Earthquake-induced base sliding of concrete gravity dams. Journal of Structural Engineering, 117(12), 3698–3719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuhan, Z., Guanglun, W., Shaomin, W., & Yuexing, D. (2002). Experimental tests of rolled compacted concrete and nonlinear fracture analysis of rolled compacted concrete dams. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 14(2), 108–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez, J., & Maeso, O. (1993). Earthquake analysis of arch dams. II: Dam–water–foundation interaction. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 119(3), 513–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun, B., & Gokcol, C. (2011). The role of hydroelectric power and contribution of small hydropower plants for sustainable development in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 36, 1227–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenves, G., & Chopra, A.K. (1984a). Earthquake analysis and response of concrete gravity dams (Report No. UCB/EERC-84/10). 236 pp. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Fenves, G., & Chopra, A.K. (1984b). EAGD-84: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of concrete gravity dams (Report No. UCB/EERC-84/11). 102 pp.Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Fenves, G., & Chopra, A.K. (1985). Simplified analysis for earthquake resistant design of concrete gravity dams (Report No. UCB/EERC-85/10). 144 pp. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Fok, K., Hall, J.F., & Chopra, A.K. (1986). EACD-3D: A computer program for three-dimensional earthquake analysis of concrete dams (Report No. UCB/EERC-86/09). 159 pp. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Ghanaat, Y. (2004). Failure modes approach to safety evaluation of dams. 13th World conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gogoi, I., & Maity, D. (2005). Seismic safety of aged concrete gravity dams considering fluid–structure interaction. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9(5), 637–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J.F. (1997). Efficient nonlinear seismic analysis of arch dams: User's manual for SCADA (Report No: EERL 96-01). 123 pp. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J.F., & Chopra, A.K. (1980). Dynamic response of embankment, concrete-gravity and arch dams including hydrodynamic interaction (Report No. UCB/EERC-80/39). 246 pp. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Hamidreza, A., & Lotfi, V. (2008). Earthquake response of concrete gravity dams including dam–foundation interface nonlinearities. Engineering Structures, 30(11), 3065–3073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y.W., Du, C.B., & Jiang, S.Y. (2011). Innovative design and construction of a high RCC gravity dam in high seismic intensity region. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 16(2), 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, S., Du, C., & Liu, Z. (2009). Seismic safety evaluation of cracked concrete gravity dam. Conference proceedings TCLEE 2009: Lifeline earthquake engineering in a multihazard environment. ASCE, Reston, Virginia, USA, 20191–4400.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, J.S. (1982). Fluid structure interactions: Added mass computations for incompressible fluid (Report No. UCB/EERC-82/09). 126 pp. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Léger, P., & Javanmardi, F. (2006). Structural stability of concrete gravity dams strengthened by rockfill buttressing: Hydrostatic load. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132(12), 1592–1599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leger, P., & Leclerc, M. (1996). Evaluation of earthquake ground motions to predict cracking response of gravity dams. Engineering Structures, 18(3), 227–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotfi, V., & Espandar, R. (2004). Seismic analysis of concrete arch dams by combined discrete crack and non-orthogonal smeared crack technique. Engineering Structures, 26(1), 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotfi, V., Roesset, J.M., & Tassoulas, J.L. (1987). A technique for the analysis of the response of dams to earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 15(4), 463–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, F., Dominguez, J., & Tassoulas, J.L. (1990). Response of dams to earthquakes including effects of sediments. Journal of Structural Engineering, 116(11), 3108–3121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills-Bria, B., Nuss, L., & Chopra, A.K. (2008). Current methodology at the bureau of reclamation for the nonlinear analyses of arch dams using explicit finite element techniques. The 14th world conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, October 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, J.M. (1971). The optimum gravity dam. Proceedings of conference on Rapid Construction of Concrete Dams (pp. 221–247). New York: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Rashed, A.A., & Iwan, W.D. (1984). Hydrodynmic pressure on short-length gravity dams. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 110(9), 1264–1283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rots, J.G. (1988). Computational modeling of concrete fracture (PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands).
   Google Scholar
• Selby, R.G., & Vecchio, F.J. (1993). Three-dimensional constitutive relations for reinforced concrete (Technical Report No. 93-02). Toronto, Canada: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, H., & Chopra, A.K. (1996). EACD-3D-96: A computer program for three-dimensional earthquake analysis of concrete dams (139 pp.). Berkeley: UCB/SEMM-1996/06, Structural Engineering, Mechanics, Materials, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Tekie, P.B., & Ellingwood, B.R. (2003). Seismic fragility assessment of concrete gravity dams. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(14), 2221–2240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TNO DIANA (2008). User's Manual (Version R. 9.3). TNO DIANA BV: Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• US Bureau of Reclamation (1976). Design of gravity dams (pp. 586. Denver, CO: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (1995). Seismic design provisions for roller compacted concrete dams (Report No. EP-1110-2-12).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Chopra, A.K. (2008). EACD-3D-2008: A computer program for three dimensional earthquake analysis of concrete dams considering spatially-varying ground motion. (Report No. UCB/EERC-2008/04). 151 pp. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Westergaard, H.M. (1933). Water pressures on dams during earthquakes. Transactions of ASCE, 98, 418–434.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Jianwen, P., & Jinting, W. (2009). Influence of seismic input mechanisms and radiation damping on arch dam response. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 1282–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar