Publication Cover
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance
Volume 10, 2014 - Issue 9
431
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Reliability-based service life assessment for deteriorating reinforced concrete buildings considering the effect of cumulative damage

Pages 1101-1118 | Received 07 Jul 2012, Accepted 01 Mar 2013, Published online: 03 Jun 2013

REFERENCES

  • Ang, A., & Tang, W. (1984). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design. Decision, risk and reliability (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.
  • AIJ (1997). Recommendations for practice of survey, diagnosis and repair for deterioration of reinforced concrete structures. Tokyo: Architectural Institute of Japan (in Japanese).
  • AIJ (2005). Guidelines for performance evaluation of earthquake resistant reinforced concrete buildings (Draft). Tokyo: Architecture Institute of Japan (in Japanese).
  • Arias, A. (1970). A measure of the earthquake intensity in seismic design for nuclear power plants (pp. 438–468). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • ATC (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (ATC-40 report). Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
  • Chiu, C.K., & Jean, W.Y. (2010). Seismic reliability analysis of reinforced concrete framed buildings attacked by chloride. Journal of Architecture, 73, 51–68.
  • Chiu, C.K., Noguchi, T., & Kanematsu, M. (2008). Optimal maintenance plan for RC members by minimizing life-cycle cost including deterioration risk due to carbonation. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 6(3), 469–480.
  • Chiu, C.K. & Wang, R.X. (2012). A risk-based estimating method for the lifetime reparability of an RC building damaged by earthquake. Journal of Architecture, 80, 45–62.
  • Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G., & Polese, M. (2009). Simplified method to include cumulative damage in the seismic response of single-degree-of-freedom systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, 135(10), 1081–1088.
  • Frangopol, D.M., & Liu, M. (2007). Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3(1), 29–41.
  • Handou, M., Minegishi, T., & Shibuya, J. (2001). Estimation of inelastic displacement response using response spectrum and equivalent linearization method – Part I: Method of estimation. Summaries of Technical Papers of AIJ Annual Meeting, C-2 Structures IV (Reinforced concrete structures prestressed concrete structures masonry wall structures) (pp. 673–674). Tokyo, Japan: Architectural Institute of Japan.
  • Izawa, J., & Matusima, M. (2004). The corrosion quantity of concrete crack induced by corrosion expansion (Master thesis), Kagawa University, Japan.
  • JBDPA (2005). Seismic evaluation and retrofit. Tokyo: The Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (English Version).
  • Japan Concrete Institute (JCI) (2004). Committee report of estimation models for long-term performance of concrete structures. Tokyo: Japan Concrete Institute (in Japanese).
  • Kato, Y., & Uomoto, T. (2005). Proposal for quantitative evaluation methodology of inspection value in maintenance of concrete structures based on repair-risk. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 3(3), 363–370.
  • Kong, J.S., & Frangopol, D.M. (2003). Life-cycle reliability-based maintenance cost optimization of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 129(6), 818–828.
  • Kumar, R., & Gardoni, P. (2011). Modeling structural degradation of RC bridge columns subject to earthquakes and their fragility estimates. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 138(1), 42–51.
  • Kumar, R., Gardoni, P., & Sanchez-Silva, M. (2009). Effect of cumulative seismic damage and corrosion on the life-cycle cost of reinforced concrete bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 38, 887–905.
  • Lee, H.S., Noguchi, T., & Tomosawa, F. (2002). Evaluation of the bond properties between concrete and reinforcement as a function of the degree of reinforcement corrosion. Cement and Concrete Research, 32(8), 1313–1318.
  • Li, C.Q. (2004). Reliability based service life prediction of corrosion affected concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 130(10), 1570–1577.
  • Minegishi, T., Handou, M., & Shibuya, J. (2001). Estimation of inelastic displacement response using response spectrum and equivalent linearization method – Part II: Inspection of estimation. Summaries of Technical Papers of AIJ Annual Meeting, C-2 Structures IV (Reinforced concrete structures prestressed concrete structures masonry wall structures) (pp. 675–676). Tokyo, Japan: Architectural Institute of Japan.
  • Manfredi, G. (2001). Evaluation of seismic energy demand. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30, 485–499.
  • MOI (2005). Seismic design code for buildings. Taipei: Minister of the Interior of Taiwan.
  • MOTC (2010). Environmental corrosivity classification for structures (1/2). Taipei: Ministry of Transportation and Communications of Taiwan.
  • MOTC (2011). Environmental corrosivity classification for structures (2/2). Taipei: Ministry of Transportation and Communications of Taiwan.
  • NCREE-08-023 (2008). Technology handbook for seismic evaluation and retrofit of school buildings. Taipei: National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering.
  • Niu, D.T. (2003). Durability and life forecast of reinforced concrete structure. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese).
  • Okano, H., & Miyamoto, Y. (2002). Equations derived from equivalent linearization method – Consideration based on energy balance and its application to evaluation of probability of excess of deformation capacity. Journal of Structural Construction Engineering AIJ, 562, 45–52.
  • Padgett, J.E., Dennemann, K., & Ghosh, J. (2010). Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost-benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment. Structural Safety, 32, 165–173.
  • Park, Y.J., & Ang, A.H.-S. (1985). Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Journal of the Structural Engineering ASCE, 111(4), 722–739.
  • Takahashi, N., Nakano, Y., & Shiohara, H. (2006). Reparability demand spectrum of R/C buildings due to the lifecycle seismic loss estimation, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (1st ECEES), Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Takahashi, Y., Der Kiureghian, A., & Ang, A.H.-S. (2004). Life-cycle cost analysis based on a renewal model of earthquake occurences. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 33(7), 859–880.
  • Takahashi, T., Sakai, M., Seki, H., & Matsushima, M. (2005). Calculation of LCC and selection system of repairing method for reinforced concrete members exposed to sea environments. Concrete Research and Technology JCI, 16(3), 21–29, (in Japanese).
  • Takeda, T., Sozen, M.A., & Nilson, N.N. (1972). Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquake. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 96(12), 2557–2573.
  • Tottori, S., & Miyagawa, T. (2004). Deterioration prediction of concrete structures concerning rebar corrosion due to carbonation. Journal of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 767(V-64), 35–46, (in Japanese).
  • Sanchez-Silva, M., Klutke, G.A., & Rosowsky, D.V. (2011). Life-cycle performance of structures subject to multiple deterioration mechanisms. Structural Safety, 33(3), 206–217.
  • Schiessl, P. (2005). New approach to service life design of concrete structure. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing), 6(5), 393–407.
  • Sung, Y.C., Huang, C.H., Liu, K.Y., Wang, C.H., Su, C.K., & Chang, K.C. (2010). Life-cycle evaluation of deteriorated structural performance of neutralized reinforced concrete bridges. Structure and Infrastructure, 6(6), 741–751.
  • Veletsos, A.S., & Newmark, N.M. (1960). Effect of inelastic behavior on the response of simple systems to earthquake motions. Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (Vol. 2) (pp. 895–912). Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan: Science Council of Japan.
  • Williams, R.J., Gardoni, P., & Bracci, J.M. (2009). Decision analysis for seismic retrofit of structures. Structural Safety, 31(2), 188–196.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.