A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management

REFERENCES

• Abrishamchi, A., Ebrahimian, A., Tajrishi, M., & Marino, M.A. (2005). Case study: Application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 131(4), 326–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Taleb, M.F., & Mareschal, B. (1995). Water resources planning in the middle East: Application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method. European Journal of Operational Research, 81(3), 500–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afshar, A., Marino, M.A., Saadatpour, M., & Afshar, A. (2011). Fuzzy TOPSIS multicriteria decision analysis applied to Karun reservoirs system. Water Resources Management, 25(2), 545–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghdaie, M.H., Zolfani, S.H., & Zavadskas, E.K. (2012). Prioritizing constructing projects of municipalities based on AHP and COPRAS-G: A case study about footbridges in Iran. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, VII(2), 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlawat, A.S., & Ramaswamy, A. (2001). Multiobjective optimal structural vibration control using fuzzy logic control system. Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(11), 1330–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Barqawi, H., & Zayed, T. (2006). Assessment model of water main conditions. Conference proceedings on pipeline division specialty. Chicago, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Barqawi, H., & Zayed, T. (2008). Infrastructure management: Integrated AHP/ANN model to evaluate municipal water mains performance. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 14(4), 305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, N.B.H., Sellami, M., Cutting-Decelle, A.F., & Mangin, J.C. (2009). Multi-stage production cost optimization of semi-rigid steel frames using genetic algorithms. Engineering Structures, 31(11), 2766–2778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kloub, B., & Abu-Taleb, M.F. (1988). Application of multicriteria decision aid to rank the Jordan–Yarmouk basin co-riparians according to the Helsinki and ILC rules. Water International, 23(3), 164–173.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Kloub, B., Al-Shemmeri, T., & Pearman, A. (1997). The role of weights in multi-criteria decision aid, and the ranking of water projects in Jordan. European Journal of Operational Research, 99(2), 278–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rashdan, D., Al-Kloub, B., Dean, A., & Al-Shemmeri, T. (1999). Environmental impact assessment and ranking the environmental projects in Jordan. European Journal of Operational Research, 118(1), 30–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Shemmeri, T., Al-Kloub, B., & Pearman, A. (1997). Model choice in multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research, 97(3), 550–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zubi, Y.A., & Al-Kharabsheh, A. (2003). Multicriteria analysis for water productivity in the Jordan valley. Water International, 28(4), 501–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zubi, Y., Shatanawi, M., Al-Jayoussi, O., & Al-Kharabsheh, A. (2002). Application of decision support system for sustainable management of water resources in the Azraq basin-Jordan. Water International, 27(4), 532–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, K.P., Gratziou, M., & Vavatsikos, A.P. (2007). Using the fuzzy hierarchy process for selecting wastewater facilities at prefecture level. European Water, 19(20), 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, K.P., Petalas, C., & Pisinaras, V. (2005). Water resources planning using the AHP and PROMETHEE multi criteria methods: The case of NESTOS River-GREECE. Proceedings of 7th Balkan conference on operational research (BACOR). Constanta, Romania.
   Google Scholar
• Anand Raj, P.A. (1995). Multicriteria methods in river basin planning – A case study. Water Science & Technology, 31(8), 261–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand Raj, P.A., & Kumar, D.N. (1996). Ranking of river basin alternatives using ELECTRE. Hydrological Sciences, 41(5), 697–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anton, J.M., & Grau, J.B. (2004). Madrid-Valencia high-speed rail line: A route selection, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Transport, 157(3), 153–161.
   Google Scholar
• Antucheviciene, J., & Zavadskas, E.K. (2003). The indicator model for sustainable revitalisation of rural property. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 26(4), 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Antucheviciene, J., & Zavadskas, E.K. (2008). Modelling multidimensional redevelopment of derelict buildings. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 35(2/3/4), 331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antucheviciene, J., Zavadskas, E.K., & Zakarevicius, A. (2010). Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(1), 109–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragones-Beltran, P., Mendoza-Roca, J.A., Bes-Pia, A., Garcia-Melon, M., & Parra-Ruiz, E. (2009). Application of multicriteria decision analysis to jar-test results for chemicals selection in the physical–chemical treatment of textile wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 164(1), 288–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ares, J., & Serra, J. (2008). Selection of sustainable projects for floodplain restoration and urban wastewater management at the lower Chubut River valley (Argentina). Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(3–4), 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE (2009). Report card for America's infrastructure, 2009 progress report. http://www.asce.org/reportcard.
   Google Scholar
• Augusti, G., Ciampoli, M., & Frangopol, D.M. (1998). Optimal planning of retrofitting interventions on bridges in a highway network. Engineering Structures, 20(11), 933–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S., & Omrani, H. (2011). Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12270–12280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A., & Omrani, H. (2009). A hybrid approach based on AHP and belief theory for evaluating sustainable transportation solutions. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 9(3), 212–226.
   Google Scholar
• Azis, I.J. (1990). Analytic hierarchy process in benefit-cost framework: A post evaluation of the Trans-Sumatra highway project. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 38–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balali, V., Zahraie, B., Hosseini, A., & Roozbahani, A. (2010). Selecting the appropriate structural system by application of PROMETHEE decision making method. Proceedings of 2nd IEE international conference on system engineering and application, Sharjah, UAE, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Balali, V., Zahraie, B., & Roozbahani, A. (2012). Integration of ELECTRE III and PROMETHEEII decision making methods with interval approach: Application in selection of appropriate structural systems. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000254.
   Google Scholar
• Banai, R. (2006). Public transportation decision-making: A case analysis of the Memphis light rail corridor and route selection with analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Public Transportation, 9(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Banias, G., Achillas, C., Vlachokostas, C., Moussiopoulos, N., & Tarsenis, S. (2010). Assessing multiple criteria for the optimal location of a construction and demolition waste management facility. Building and Environment, 45(10), 2317–2326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardossy, A., Bogardi, I., & Duckstein, L. (1985). Composite programming as an extension of compromise programming. Mathematics of Multi Objective Optimization (pp. 375–408). Wien: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bella, A., Duckstein, L., & Szidarovszky, F. (1996). A multicriterion analysis of the water allocation conflict in the Upper Rio Grande basin. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 77(2–3), 245–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellehumeur, C., Vasseur, L., Ansseau, C., & Marcos, B. (1997). Implementation of a multicriteria sewage sludge management model in the Southern Québec Municipality of Lac-Mégantic, Canada. Journal of Environmental Management, 50(1), 51–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benayoun, R., Roy, B., & Sussman, N. (1966). Manual de Reference du programme electre, Mote de Synthese et Formaton, No. 25, Direction Scientifique SEMA, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, M.J., & Simonovic, S.P. (1997). Consensus as the measure of sustainability. Hydrological Sciences, 42(4), 493–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, M.J., & Simonovic, S.P. (2000). A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115(1), 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzerra, A., Cherrared, M., Chocat, B., Cherqui, F., & Zekiouk, T. (2012). Decision support for sustainable urban drainage system management: A case study of Jijel, Algeria. Journal of Environmental Management, 101(30), 46–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bobylev, N. (2007). Sustainability and vulnerability analysis of critical underground infrastructure. In I.Linkov, R.J.Wenning & G.A.Kiker (Eds.), Managing critical infrastructure risks: Decision tools and applications for port security (pp. 445–469). Venice, Italy: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bocchini, P., & Frangopol, D.M. (2011). A probabilistic computational framework for bridge network optimal maintenance scheduling. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(2), 332–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocchini, P., & Frangopol, D.M. (2012). Optimal resilience- and cost-based post-disaster intervention prioritization for bridges along a highway segment. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 17(1), 117–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, M., Montastruc, L., Pibouleau, L., Azzaro-Pantel, C., & Domenech, S. (2011). A multiobjective optimization framework for multi contaminant industrial water network design. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(7), 1802–1808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolar, A., Tesfamariam, S., & Sadiq, R. (2013). Condition assessment for bridges: A hierarchical evidential reasoning (HER) framework. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(7), 648–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., Comino, E., & Riggio, V. (2011). Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26(10), 1211–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard, C., Abi-Zeid, I., Beauchamp, N., Lamontagne, L., Desrosiers, J., & Rodriguez, M. (2010). Multicriteria decision analysis for the selection of a small drinking water treatment system. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology, 59(4), 230–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, J.P. (1982). Lingenierie de la decision. Elaboration dinstruments daide a la decision. Methode PROMETHEE. Laide a la Decision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives Davenir (pp. 183–214). Quebec, Canada: Presses de Universite Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Brans, J.P., & Mareschal, B. (1992). PROMETHEE V-MCDM problems with segmentation constraints. INFOR, 30(2), 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, J.P., & Mareschal, B. (1995). The PROMETHEE VI procedure. How to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. Journal of Decision Systems, 4(3), 213–223.
   Google Scholar
• Brans, J.P., & Vincke, P. (1985). A preference ranking organization method (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision making). Management Science, 31(6), 647–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgman, P.W. (1922). Dimensional analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brito, A.J., Almeida, A.T., & Mota, C.M.M. (2010). A multicriteria model for risk sorting of natural gas pipelines based on ELECTRE TRI integrating utility theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(3), 812–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Neil-Adger, W., Tompkins, E., Bacon, P., Shim, D., & Young, K. (2001). Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management. Ecological Economics, 37(3), 417–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, T.J., Finnie, S., & Wightman, D. (2007). Identification of potential highways maintenance schemes. Proceedings of the ICE-Transport, 160(3), 139–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, I.M., Kim, K., & Yamashita, E. (2012). Identifying optimal transit alignments using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems. TRB annual meeting. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, C., & Frangopol, D.M. (2006). Optimization of lifetime maintenance strategies for deteriorating structures considering probabilities of violating safety, condition, and cost thresholds. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 21(1), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafiso, S., Graziano, A.D., Kerali, H.R., & Odoki, J.B. (2002). Multicriteria analysis method for pavement maintenance management. Transportation Research Record, 1816, 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Cagno, E., Caron, F., Mancini, M., & Ruggeri, F. (2000). Using AHP in determining the prior distributions on gas pipeline failures in a robust Bayesian approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 67(3), 275–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, X., Lasdon, L., & Michelsen, A.M. (2004). Group decision making in water resources planning using multiple objective analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130(1), 4–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiko, J., Kunicina, N., Patlins, A., Pelnikis, A., & Ribickis, L. (2008). Development of decision-making procedure of choice of the equipment for railway crossing at stations. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on transport means (pp. 151–154). Kaunass, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Calizaya, A., Meixner, O., Bengtsson, L., & Berndtsson, R. (2010). Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for integrated water resources management (IWRM) in the Lake Poopo Basin, Bolivia. Water Resources Management, 24(10), 2267–2289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Infrastructure Report Card (2012). http://www.canadainfrastructure.ca/en/report.
   Google Scholar
• Carriço, N., Covas, D.I.C., Almeida, C.M., Leitao, J.P., & Alegre, H. (2012). Prioritization of rehabilitation interventions for urban water assets using multiple criteria decision-aid methods. Water Science & Technology, 66(5), 1007–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caterino, N., Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G., & Cosenza, E. (2006). Multi-criteria decision making for seismic retrofitting of an underdesigned RC structure. Proceedings of first European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology. Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Caterino, N., Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G., & Cosenza, E. (2008). Multi-criteria decision making for seismic retrofitting of RC structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(4), 555–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caterino, N., Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G., & Cosenza, E. (2009). Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for seismic structural retrofitting. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(6), 432–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.L., Chiueh, P.T., & Liou, Y.T. (2008). Applying VIKOR to determine the land-use restraint strategies in a watershed. Environmental Engineering Science, 25(9), 1317–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.H., & Yeh, C.H. (2001). Evaluating airline competitiveness using multiattribute decision making. Omega, 29(5), 405–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.T., Zhao, M.Y., Chau, K.W., & Wu, X.Y. (2006). Using genetic algorithm and TOPSIS for Xinanjiang model calibration with a single procedure. Journal of Hydrology, 316(1–4), 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S.J., & Hwang, C.L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, methods and application. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, S., Chan, C.W., & Huang, G.H. (2002). Using multiple criteria decision analysis for supporting decision of solid waste management. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 37(6), 975–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, D.J., & Park, H. (2001). Analysis of water privatization scenarios in Korea with multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology – Aqua, 50(6), 335–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, S.Y., Chang, Y.H., & Shen, C.Y. (2008). A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 132–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, T.Y., Lin, W.T., Lin, C.Y., & Chou, W.C. (2007). Application of fuzzy theory and PROMETHEE technique to evaluate suitable ecotechnology method: A case study in Shihmen Reservoir Watershed, Taiwan. Ecological Engineering, 31(4), 269–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, E.S., & Lee, K.S. (2009). Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multicriteria decision making techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(3), 1502–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho-Rodrigues, J., Simao, A., & Antunes, C.H. (2011). A GIS-based multicriteria spatial decision support system for planning urban infrastructures. Decision Support Systems, 51(3), 720–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabous, S.A., & Alkass, S. (2010). A multi-attribute ranking method for bridge management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(3), 282–291.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, J., Qi, J., Chi, J., Chen, S., Yang, J., Ju, L., & Chen, B. (2010). Integrated water resource security evaluation of Beijing based on GRA and TOPSIS. Frontiers of Earth Science in China, 4(3), 357–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawotola, A.W., van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M., & Vrijling, J.K. (2009). Risk assessment of petroleum pipelines using a combined analytical hierarchy process – Fault tree analysis (AHP-FTA). Proceedings of the 7th international probabilistic workshop. Delft, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado-Galvan, X., Perez-Garcia, R., Izquierdo, J., & Mora-Rodriguez, J. (2010). An analytic hierarchy process for assessing externalities in water leakage management. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(7–8), 1194–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, J., Li, J., & Fang, X. (2011). Condition evaluation of existing long-span bridges using fuzzy based analytic hierarchy process. Advanced Materials Research, 163-167, 3328–3331.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Balteiro, L., & Romero, C. (2008). Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: A review and an assessment. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(8–9), 3222–3241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djenaliev, A. (2007). Multicriteria decision making and GIS for railroad planning in Kyrgyzstan (MSc dissertation), Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Duckstein, L., Treichel, W., & El Magnouni, S. (1994). Ranking ground-water management alternatives by multicriterion analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 12(4), 546–565.
   Google Scholar
• Duckstein, L., Gershon, M., & McAniff, R. (1982). Model selection in multiobjective decision making for river basin planning. Advances in Water Resources, 5(3), 178–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, D.J., Ross, Q.E., & Merkhofer, M.W. (2000). Multiattribute utility analysis; best technology available; adverse environmental impact; Clean Water Act; Section 316(b). Environmental Science and Policy, 3(1), 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhard, R., & Joubert, A. (2001). An evaluation of alternative water supply augmentation and water demand management options for the City of Cape Town using multi-criteria decision analysis ( Report No: 3216/9026). Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S.M., & Mojtahedi, S.M.H. (2009). A fuzzy decision-making model for risk ranking with an application to an onshore gas refinery. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 1(1), 38–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S.M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Hashemi, H., & Vahdani, B. (2012). A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(9), 4197–4217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, K.V., & Tang, S.L. (1991). Wastewater treatment optimization model for developing world. I: Model development. Journal of Environmental Engineering Division, 117(4), 501–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, K.V., & Tang, S.L. (1994). Wastewater treatment optimization model for development world. II: Model testing. Journal of Environmental Engineering Division, 120(3), 610–624.
   Google Scholar
• Elmahdi, A., Kheireldin, K., & Hamdy, A. (2006). GIS and multi-criteria evaluation: Robust tools for integrated water resources management. Water International, 31(4), 440–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshorbagy, A. (2006). Multicriterion decision analysis approach to assess the utility of watershed modeling for management decisions. Water Resources Research, 42, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Farhan, J., & Fwa, T.F. (2009). Pavement maintenance prioritization using analytic hierarchy process. Transportation Research Record, 2093, 12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattahi, P., & Fayyaz, S. (2010). A compromise programming model to integrated urban water management. Water Resources Management, 24(6), 1211–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fishburn, P.C. (1967). Additive utilities with incomplete product set: Applications to priorities and assignments. Baltimore, MD: Operations Research Society of America (ORSA).
   Google Scholar
• Flintsch, G., & Chen, C. (2004). Soft computing applications in infrastructure management. Journal of Infrastructure System, 10(4), 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M. (1995). Reliability-based optimum structural design. Probabilistic structural mechanics handbook (pp. 352–387). New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M. (1998). Probabilistic structural optimization. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 1(2), 223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M. (2011). Life-cycle performance, management, and optimization of structural systems under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7(6), 389–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Bocchini, P. (2012). Bridge network performance, maintenance, and optimization under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8(4), 341–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., Enright, M.P., Gharaibeh, E., & Estes, A.C. (1999). Towards optimal reliability-based bridge maintenance planning. Case studies in optimal design and maintenance planning of civil infrastructure systems (pp. 73–88). Reston, VA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Maute, K. (2003). Life-cycle reliability-based optimization of civil and aerospace structures. Computers & Structures, 81(7), 397–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Maute, K. (2005). Reliability-based optimization of civil and aerospace structural systems. Engineering design reliability handbook (pp. 24–32). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., Maute, K., & Liu, M. (2007). Design optimization with uncertainty, life-cycle performance and cost considerations. Optimization of structural and mechanical systems (pp. 291–329). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Co. Ptc. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Messervey, T.B. (2011). Risk assessment for bridge decision-making. Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for natural hazards (pp. 52–64). Monograph No. 5. Reston, VA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., Miyake, M., Kong, J.S., Gharaibeh, E.S., & Estes, A.C. (2002). Reliability- and cost-oriented optimal bridge maintenance planning. Recent advances in optimal structural design (pp. 257–270). Reston, VA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Neves, L.C. (2004). Probabilistic maintenance and optimization strategies for deteriorating civil infrastructures. Progress in computational structures technology (pp. 353–377). Stirling: Saxe-Coburg Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Neves, L.C. (2006). Life-cycle maintenance of structures by condition, reliability and cost oriented probabilistic optimization. Innovation in computational structures technology (pp. 95–110). Stirling: Saxe-Coburg Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Neves, L.C. (2008). Optimization of life-cycle maintenance strategies under uncertainties: Role of inspections. Trends in computational structures technology (pp. 55–74). Stirling: Saxe-Coburg Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Okasha, N.M. (2009a). Multi-criteria optimization of life-cycle maintenance programs using advanced modeling and computational tools. Trends in civil and structural computing (pp. 1–26). Stirlingshire: Saxe-Coburg Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Okasha, N.M. (2009b). Multi-criteria optimization of life-cycle performance of structural systems under uncertainty. Risk and decision analysis in maintenance optimization and flood management (pp. 99–112). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Liu, M. (2006). Multiobjective optimization of risk-based maintenance and lifecycle cost of civil infrastructure. System modeling and optimization (pp. 123–136). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Liu, M. (2007a). Bridge network maintenance optimization using stochastic dynamic programming. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(12), 1772–1782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., & Liu, M. (2007b). Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3(1), 29–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M., Lin, K.Y., & Estes, A.C. (1997). Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(10), 1390–1401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, G., & Frangopol, D.M. (1990a). Reliability-based vector optimization of structural systems. Journal of Structural Engineering, 116(8), 2143–2161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, G., & Frangopol, D.M. (1990b). Balancing weight, system reliability and redundancy in a multiobjective optimization framework. Structural Safety, 7(2–4), 165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuta, H., Frangopol, D.M., & Nakatsu, K. (2011). Life-cycle cost of civil infrastructure with emphasis on balancing structural performance and seismic risk of road network. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7(1–2), 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuta, H., Kameda, T., Nakahara, K., Takahashi, Y., & Frangopol, D.M. (2006). Optimal bridge maintenance planning using improved multi-objective genetic algorithm. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2(1), 33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganoulis, J., Skoulikaris, H., & Monget, J.M. (2008). Involving stakeholders in transboundary water resource management: The Mesta/Nestos ‘HELP’ basin. Water SA, 34(4), 461–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J., Zhao, R., Zou, Z., Xu, W., & Yu, B. (2007). Study on multi level blur comprehensive evaluation methods of highway traffic based on AHP. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 31(2), 243–246.
   Google Scholar
• Gauffre, P.L., Haidar, H., Poinard, D., Laffrechine, K., Baur, R., & Schiatti, M. (2007). A multicriteria decision support methodology for annual rehabilitation programs of water networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22(7), 478–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gercek, H., Karpak, B., & Kilncaslan, T. (2004). A multiple criteria approach for the evaluation of the rail transit networks in Istanbul. Transportation, 31(2), 203–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon, M., & Duckstein, L. (1983). Multiobjective approaches to river basin planning. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 109(1), 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervasio, H., & Simões da Silva, L. (2012). A probabilistic decision-making approach for the sustainable assessment of infrastructures. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(7), 7121–7131.
   Google Scholar
• Gololov, I., & Yezioro, A. (2007). A computer system for multi-criteria comparative evaluation of building envelopes. Proceedings of Building Simulation, Beijing, China, 1895–1902.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Lopez, M.D., Bayo, J., Garcia-Cascales, M.S., & Angosto, J.M. (2009). Decision support in disinfection technologies for treated wastewater reuse. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(16), 1504–1511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner, R., Herr, A., Brodie, J., & Haynes, D. (2005). A multi-criteria approach to great barrier reef catchment (Queensland, Australia) diffuse-source pollution problem. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 51(1–4), 128–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guangming, Z., Jiang, R., Huang, G., Xu, M., & Li, J. (2007). Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 82(2), 250–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghigh, F. (2011). Application of a multi-criteria approach to road safety evaluation in the Bushehr province. Iran. Traffic & Transportation, 23(5), 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajeeh, M., & Al-Othman, A. (2005). Application of the analytical hierarchy process in the selection of desalination plants. Desalination, 174(1), 97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajkowicz, S., & Collins, K. (2007). A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resource Management, 21(9), 1553–1566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajkowicz, S., & Higgins, A. (2008). A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(1), 255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamouda, M.A., Anderson, W.B., & Huck, P.M. (2012). Employing multi-criteria decision analysis to select sustainable point-of-use and point-of-entry water treatment systems. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply, 12(5), 637–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harboe, R. (1992). Multiobjective decision making techniques for reservoir operation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 28(1), 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, K. (2000). Multicriteria analysis for agricultural resource management: A critical survey and future perspectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 122(2), 486–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herath, G. (2004). Incorporating community objectives in improved wetland management: The use of the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Environmental Management, 70(3), 263–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, C.M., & Erickson, J.D. (2007). Multicriteria decision analysis: Overview and implications for environmental decision making. Advances in the Economics of Environmental Resources, 7, 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Herva, M., & Roca, E. (2012). Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corporate environmental evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 355–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, B., Chankong, V., Hamadeh, W., & Stakhiv, E. (1992). Does choice of multicriteria method matter – An experiment in water-resources planning. Water Resources Research, 28(7), 1767–1779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hokkanen, J., & Salminen, P. (1997). Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(1), 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holguin-Veras, J. (1995). Comparative assessment of AHP and MAV in highway planning: Case study. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 121(2), 191–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hongyan, L., & Yan, T. (2007). Bidding-evaluation of construction projects based on VIKOR method. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, Jinan, China, 1778–1782.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, T.H. (1999). Public transport system project evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process: A fuzzy Delphi approach. Transportation Planning and Technology, 22(4), 229–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, T.J., Chen, W.P., Zeng, G.M., Chen, X.C., Yang, S.F., & Xie, Z. (2000). The optimal scheme selection of the Xiawan, Zhuzhou municipal wastewater treatment plant using the analytic hierarchy process. Environmental Engineering, 1, 61–63.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, I.B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of the Total Environment, 409(19), 3578–3594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugonnard, J., & Roy, B. (1982). Le plan dextension dumetro en banlieue parisienne, uncas type d application delanalyse multicritere. Les Cahiers Scientifiques de la Revue Transports, 6, 77–108.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C.L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making, in lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems 186. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, K.M., & Maier, H.R. (2006). Distance-based and stochastic uncertainty analysis for multi-criteria decision analysis in Excel using Visual Basic for applications. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(12), 1695–1710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iniestra, J.G., & Gutierrez, J.G. (2009). Multicriteria decisions on interdependent infrastructure transportation projects using an evolutionary-based framework. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 512–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaber, J.O., & Mohsen, M.S. (2001). Evaluation of non-conventional water resources supply in Jordan. Desalination, 136(1–3), 83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakimavicius, M., & Burinskiene, M. (2009a). Assessment of Vilnius city development scenarios based on transport system modelling and multicriteria analysis. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15(4), 361–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakimavicius, M., & Burinskiene, M. (2009b). A GIS and multi-criteria-based analysis and ranking of transportation zones of Vilnius city. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(1), 39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janic, M. (2003). Multicriteria evaluation of high-speed rail, transrapid maglev and air passenger transport in Europe. Transportation Planning and Technology, 26(6), 491–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, R., Ou, D., Zhang, J., & Shibiao, F. (2011). The construction and application of green residential community water-saving evaluation system. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 71–78, 393–398.
   Google Scholar
• Joubert, A., Leiman, A., de Klerk, H., Katua, S., & Aggenbach, J. (1997). Fynbos (fine bush) vegetation and the supply of water: A comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis. Ecological Economics, 22(2), 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutila, A., & Sundquist, H. (2007). Bridge life cycle optimisation – ETSI project (Stage 1). Helsinki University of Technology Publications in Bridge Engineering, TKK-SRT-37, 1–167.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, G. (2012). Multiple criteria inventory classification under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, 2(4), 76–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, G. (2013). Consultant selection for quality management using VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, G., & Hasin, M.A.A. (2012a). Integrating modified Delphi method with Fuzzy AHP for optimal power substation location selection. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, G., & Hasin, M.A.A. (2012b). Integrating fuzzy AHP with TOPSIS method for optimal power substation location selection. International Journal of Enterprise Network Management, Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, G., & Hasin, M.A.A. (2013). Multi-criteria inventory classification through integration of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and artificial neural network. International Journal of Industrial and System Engineering, 14(1), 74–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, G., & Sumi, R.S. (2012a). Selection of concrete production facility location integrating fuzzy AHP with TOPSIS method. International Journal of Productivity Management and Assessment Technologies, 1(1), 40–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, G., & Sumi, R.S. (2012b). Integrating modified Delphi with fuzzy AHP for concrete production facility location selection. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S., & Lee, S.M. (2007). AHP-based decision-making process for median barrier installation. International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering. Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, A.R., Mehrdadi, N., Hashemian, S.J., Nabi Bidhendi, G.R., & Tvakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2011). Selection of wastewater treatment process based on the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 8(2), 267–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassab, M., Hipel, K., & Hegazy, T. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis for infrastructure privatisation using conflict resolution. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7(9), 661–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsuki, S., Frangopol, D.M., & Ishikawa, N. (1993a). Holonomic elastoplastic reliability analysis of truss systems. I: Theory. Journal of Structural Engineering, 119(6), 1778–1791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsuki, S., Frangopol, D.M., & Ishikawa, N. (1993b). Holonomic elastoplastic reliability analysis of truss systems. II: Applications. Journal of Structural Engineering, 119(6), 1792–1806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2011). Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7326–7333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil, W.A., Shanableh, A., Rigby, P., & Kokot, S. (2005). Selection of hydrothermal pretreatment conditions of waste sludge destruction using multicriteria decision making. Journal of Environmental Management, 75(1), 53–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khasnabis, S., Alsaidi, E., Liu, L., & Darin, R. (2002). Comparative study of two techniques of transit performance assessment: AHP and GAT. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128(6), 499–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khasnabis, S., & Chaudry, B.B. (1994). Prioritising transit markets using analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 120(1), 74–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatri, K.B., Vairavamoorthy, K., & Akinyemi, E. (2011). Framework for computing a performance index for urban infrastructure systems using a fuzzy set approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 17(4), 163–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheireldin, K., & Fahmy, H. (2001). Multicriteria approach for evaluating long term water strategies. Water International, 26(4), 527–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khelifi, O., Lodolo, A., Vranes, S., Centi, G., & Miertus, S. (2006). A web-based decision support tool for groundwater remediation technologies selection. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 8(2), 91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiker, G.A., Bridges, T.S., Varghese, A., Seager, P.T., & Linkov, I. (2005). Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1(2), 95–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., & Bernardin, V. (2002). Application of an analytical hierarchy process at the Indiana department of transportation for prioritizing major highway capital investments. Proceedings of 7th transportation research board conference on the application of transportation planning methods (pp. 266–278). Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Frangopol, D.M. (2012). Probabilistic bi-objective optimum inspection/monitoring planning: Applications to naval ships and bridges under fatigue. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8(10), 912–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Frangopol, D.M., & Zhu, B. (2011). Probabilistic optimum inspection/repair planning of deteriorating structures. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 25(6), 534–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.M., Kim, C.H., & Hong, S.G. (2006). Fuzzy based state assessment for reinforced concrete building structures. Engineering Structures, 28(9), 1286–1297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, B., Drechsler, M., & Messner, F. (2002). Multi-criteria analysis more under uncertainty with IANUS-method and empirical results. Leipzig, Germany: UFZ Centre for Environmental Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, J.S., & Frangopol, D.M. (2004). Cost-reliability interaction in life-cycle cost optimization of deteriorating structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(11), 1704–1712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, J.S., & Frangopol, D.M. (2005). Probabilistic optimization of aging structures considering maintenance and failure costs. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(4), 600–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, D.H., & Ariaratnam, S.T. (2008). Application of a sustainability model for assessing water main replacement options. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(8), 563–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, E., Lundie, S., & Ashbolt, N.J. (2008). Review of multi-criteria decision aid for integrated sustainability assessment of urban water systems. Urban Water Journal, 5(4), 315–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, J.H., Wu, Y.J., You, H., Clarens, A., & Brian Smith, B. (2012). Climate change influence on priority setting for transportation infrastructure assets. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 19(1), 36–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy, F., Bolte, J., Santelmann, M., & Smith, C. (2002). Development and evaluation of multiple-objective decision-making methods for watershed management planning. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 38(2), 517–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, C.D., & Forman, E.H. (2007). Application of analytic hierarchy process to select project scope for videologging and pavement condition data collection. Transportation Research Record, 1990, 0–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.Y., Park, W., Ok, S.Y., & Koh, H.M. (2011). Preference-based maintenance planning for deteriorating bridges under multi-objective optimisation framework. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7(7–8), 633–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leviakangas, P., & Lahesmaa, J. (2002). Profitability evaluation of intelligent transport system, investments. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128(3), 276–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, R., & Pensomboon, G. (2010). Multicriteria decision-making approach for highway slope hazard management. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 16(1), 50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaudanskiene, R., Ustinovicius, L., & Bogdanovicius, A. (2009). Evaluation of construction process safety solutions using the TOPSIS method. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 64(4), 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C.C., Wang, W.C., & Yu, W.D. (2008). Improving AHP for construction with an adaptive AHP approach (A3). Automation in Construction, 17(2), 180–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F.K., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T., & Ferguson, E. (2006). From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: Recent developments and applications. Environment International, 32(8), 1072–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Fei, W., Wu, P., & Chen, F. (2011). The research on building up the hierarchy process and fuzzy evaluation model and evaluation system about the cement concrete pavement on the basis of the fuzzy mathematics theory. Advanced Materials Research, 255-260, 3228–3233.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Frangopol, D.M. (2004). Optimal bridge maintenance planning based on probabilistic performance prediction. Engineering Structures, 26(7), 991–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Frangopol, D.M. (2005a). Maintenance planning of deteriorating bridges by using multiobjective optimization. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, CD 11-S, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC491–500.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Frangopol, D.M. (2005b). Balancing connectivity of deteriorating bridge networks and long-term maintenance cost through optimization. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10(4), 468–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Frangopol, D.M. (2005c). Bridge annual maintenance prioritization under uncertainty by multiobjective combinatorial optimization. Computer Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20(5), 343–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Frangopol, D.M. (2005d). Multiobjective maintenance planning optimization for deteriorating bridges considering condition, safety and life-cycle cost. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(5), 833–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Frangopol, D.M. (2006). Optimizing bridge network maintenance management under uncertainty with conflicting criteria: Life-cycle maintenance, failure, and user costs. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132(11), 1835–1845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macary, F., Ombredane, D., & Uny, D. (2010). A multicriteria spatial analysis of erosion risk into small watersheds in the low Normandy bocage (France) by ELECTRE III method coupled with a GIS. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 1(1), 25–48.
   Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., Springael, J., de Brucker, K., & Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 307–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., Witte, A.D., & Ampe, J. (2008). The multi-actor, multi-criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: Theory and practice. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 43(2), 183–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machiwal, D., Jha, M.K., & Mal, B.C. (2011). Assessment of groundwater potential in a semi-arid region of India using remote sensing, GIS and MCDM techniques. Water Resources Management, 25(5), 1359–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, M.R., & Garcia, L.A. (2000). Comparison of different multicriteria evaluation methods for the Red Bluff diversion dam. Environmental Modelling and Software, 15(5), 471–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 703–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malekly, H., Mousavi, S.M., & Hashemi, H. (2010). A fuzzy integrated methodology for evaluating conceptual bridge design. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 4910–4920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareschal, B., & Brans, J.P. (1988). Geometrical representations for MCDA. The GAIA module. European Journal of Operational Research, 34(1), 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler, R.T., & Arora, J.S. (2004). Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26(6), 369–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow, D.R., Beale, D.J., & Mashford, J.S. (2012). Risk-based prioritization and its application to inspection of valves in the water sector. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 100, 67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C., Ruperd, Y., & Legret, M. (2007). Urban stormwater drainage management: The development of a multicriteria decision aid approach for best management practices. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(1), 338–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzouk, M., & Omar, M. (2012). Multiobjective optimisation algorithm for sewer network rehabilitation. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.666254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masami, S. (1995). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based multi-attribute benefit structure analysis of road network systems in mountainous rural areas of Japan. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 7(1), 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Maskeliunaite, L., & Sivilevicius, H. (2011). Applying AHP technique to the assessment of railway trip quality (RTQ). Proceedings of 8th international conference on environmental engineering (pp. 1133–1141). Vilnius, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Michaud, D., & Apostolakis, G.E. (2006). Methodology for ranking the elements of water-supply networks. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12(4), 230–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D.W., & Starr, M.K. (1969). Executive Decisions and Operation Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Milojkovic, I., & Andric, S. (2009). VIKOR method for asset management in Serbian Belgrade wastewater services. Proceedings of the tenth international conference on computing and control for the water industry (CCWI) (pp. 741–747). Sheffield, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Moghaddam, M.R.S., Yavari, A., Ghariblu, F., & Anbari, Y. (2011). Ranking of strategic management indicators in improvement of urban management by using multiple attribute decision method of TOPSIS. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 99–100, 524–530.
   Google Scholar
• Morais, D.C., & Almeida, A.T. (2006). Water supply system decision making using multicriteria analysis. Water SA, 32(2), 229–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais, D.C., Cavalcante, C.A.V., & Almeida, A.T. (2010). Water network rehabilitation: A group decision-making approach. Water SA, 36(4), 487–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais, D.C., & De Almeida, A.T. (2007). Group decision-making for leakage management strategy of water network. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(2), 441–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura, P.M., Baptista, M.B., & Barraud, S. (2006). Comparison between two methodologies for urban drinage decision aid. Water Science & Technology, 54(6–7), 493–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustajoki, J., Hamalainen, R.P., & Marttunen, M. (2004). Participatory multicriteria decision analysis with Web-HIPRE: A case of lake regulation policy. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19(6), 537–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtnebel, H.P. (1994). Comparison of multi-criterion modelling techniques and guidelines for selection. Multicriteria decision analysis in water resources management (pp. 203–234). Paris, France: IHP of UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Netto, O.C., Parent, E., & Duckstein, L. (1996). Multicriterion design of long-term water supply in Southern France. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 122(6), 403–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves, L.A.C., Frangopol, D.M., & Cruz, P.J.S. (2006). Probabilistic lifetime-oriented multiobjective optimization of bridge maintenance: Single maintenance type. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132(6), 991–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves, L.A.C., Frangopol, D.M., & Petcherdchoo, A. (2006). Probabilistic lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimization of bridge maintenance: Combination of maintenance types. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132(11), 1821–1834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, X., & Wang, L. (2011). Construction site layout evaluation by intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS model. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 71–78, 583–588.
   Google Scholar
• Novacko, L., Cavar, I., & Dubravka, H. (2008). Selection of LRT system track gauge using multi-criteria decision-making (City of Zagreb). Urban transport XIV: Urban transport and the environment in the 21st Century (pp. 167–173). Ashurst, Southampton: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrom, B., & Soderholm, P. (2010). Selection of maintenance actions using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): Decision-making in railway infrastructure. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 6(4), 467–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okeola, O.G., & Sule, B.F. (2012). Evaluation of management alternatives for urban water supply system using multicriteria decision analysis. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences, 24(1), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Onta, P., Gupta, A., & Harboe, R. (1991). Multistep planning model for conjunctive use of surface- and ground-water resources. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 117(6), 662–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S. (2009). A compromise solution in water resources planning. Water Resources Management, 23(8), 1549–1561.
   Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S. (2011). Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12983–12990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2002). Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 17(3), 211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okasha, N.M., & Frangopol, D.M. (2009). Lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimization of structural maintenance, considering system reliability, redundancy, and life-cycle cost using GA. Structural Safety, 31(6), 460–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okasha, N.M., & Frangopol, D.M. (2010). Novel approach for multi-criteria optimization of life-cycle preventive and essential maintenance of deteriorating structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 136(8), 1009–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okasha, N.M., Frangopol, D.M., & Deco, A. (2010). Integration of structural health monitoring in life-cycle performance assessment of ship structures under uncertainty. Marine Structures, 23(3), 303–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
   Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2002). Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 17(3), 211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2003). Fuzzy multicriteria model for post-earthquake land-use planning. Natural Hazards Review, 4(2), 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orcesi, A.D., & Frangopol, D.M. (2011a). Probability-based multiple-criteria optimization of bridge maintenance using monitoring and expected error in the decision process. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 44(1), 137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orcesi, A.D., & Frangopol, D.M. (2011b). Optimization of bridge maintenance strategies based on structural health monitoring information. Structural Safety, 33(1), 26–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orcesi, A.D., Frangopol, D.M., & Kim, S. (2010). Optimization of bridge maintenance strategies based on multiple limit states and monitoring. Engineering Structures, 32(3), 627–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, M., Li, Q., McNeil, S., & Trimbath, S. (2011). Measuring infrastructure performance: Development of a national infrastructure index. Public Works Managament and Policy, 16(4), 373–394.
   Google Scholar
• Ozbek, M.E., de la Garza, J.M., & Konstantinos Triantis, K. (2010). Data and modeling issues faced during the efficiency measurement of road maintenance using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 16(1), 21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozelkan, E.C., & Duckstein, L. (1996). Analysing water resources alternatives and handling criteria by multi criterion decision techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 48(1), 69–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, H., Zhang, Z., & Yang, L. (2011). A Study on risk of durability failure for construction projects of tunnels and underground projects. Advanced Materials Research, 163-167, 3280–3284.
   Google Scholar
• Patidar, V., Labi, S., Sinha, K.C., & Thompson, P. (2007). Multi-objective optimization for bridge management systems. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 590, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Petcherdchoo, A., Neves, L.A.C., & Frangopol, D.M. (2008). Optimizing lifetime condition and reliability of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(4), 544–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires, A., Chang, N.B., & Martinho, G. (2011). An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setubal Peninsula, Portuga. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 56(1), 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohekar, S.D., & Ramachandran, M. (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8(4), 365–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourzeynali, S., Lavasani, H.H., & Modarayi, A.H. (2007). Active control of high rise building structures using fuzzy logic and genetic Algorithms. Engineering Structures, 29(3), 346–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudenz, S., Bruggemann, R., Voigt, K., & Welzl, G. (2002). Multi-criteria evaluation and decision-support instruments for the long-term development of management strategies. Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung, 14(1), 52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, S.M. (2005). Sustainability appraisal of urban transportation: Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Conference proceedings of Environmentally Sustainable Development. Abbottabad, Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Raju, K.S., Duckstein, L., & Arondel, C. (2000). Multicriterion analysis for sustainable water resources planning: A case study in Spain. Water Resources Management, 14(6), 435–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju, K.S., & Kumar, D.N. (1998). MCDMGSS: A group decision support system for multicriterion analysis. Proceedings of international conference on system dynamics (pp. 67–73). Kharagpur, India.
   Google Scholar
• Raju, K.S., & Kumar, D.N. (2006). Ranking irrigation planning alternatives using data envelopment analysis. Water Resources Management, 20(4), 553–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju, K.S., & Pillai, C.R.S. (1999). Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development. European Journal of Operational Research, 112(2), 249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters, T. (2010)., Web of science. Accessed January 1, 2011. Available online http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/web_of_science/.
   Google Scholar
• Revadigar, S., & Mau, S.T. (1999). Automated multicriterion building damage assessment from seismic data. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(2), 211–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. (2000). Using Electre III to aid the choice of housing construction process within structural engineering. Construction Management and Economics, 18(3), 333–342.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M., & Bruen, M. (2000). Using ELECTRE III to choose route for Dublin port motorway. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126(4), 313–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, P.D., & Grigg, N.S. (2009). Failure assessment modeling to prioritize water pipe renewal: Two case studies. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 15(3), 162–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, C., & Rehman, T. (1987). Natural resource management and the use of multiple criteria decision making techniques: A review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 14(1), 61–89.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B. (1978). ELECTRE III: un algorithme de classements fonde sur une representation floue des preferences en presence de criteres multiples. Cahiers du CERO, 20(1), 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B., & Bertier, P. (1971). La methode ELECTRE II. Paris, France: Note de travail 142, SEMA-METRA, Metra International.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B., & Skalka, J. (1984). ELECTRE IS: Aspects methodologiques et guide dutilisation, Document du LAMSADE 30, University Paris-Dauphine.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2008). Developing environmental indices using fuzzy numbers ordered weighted averaging (FN-OWA) operators. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 22(5), 495–505.
   Google Scholar
• Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2009). Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP). Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23(1), 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, M. (1987). Application of the analytic hierarchy method to setting priorities on bridge replacement projects. Transportation Research Record, 1124, 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh, A.E., Yavari, A., Maleki, M., & Alamouti, S.M. (2012). Ranking of efficient approaches to urban infrastructures management by using TOPSIS method: Case study of Iran. Recent Researches in Engineering Mechanics, Urban & Naval Transportation and Tourism (pp. 252–257). Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Salem, O.M., Miller, R.A., Deshpande, A.S., & Arurkar, T.P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision-making system for selecting an effective plan for bridge rehabilitation. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(8), 806–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salokangas, L. (2009). Bridge life cycle optimisation-ETSI project (Stage 2) (pp. 1–140): Helsinki University of Technology Publications in Bridge Engineering, TKK-R-BE3.
   Google Scholar
• Saparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2006). Evaluation of construction sustainability by multiple criteria methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 12(4), 321–326.
   Google Scholar
• Sarma, K.C., & Adeli, H. (2000). Fuzzy discrete multicriteria cost optimization of steel structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(11), 1339–1347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasmal, S., Ramanjaneyulu, K., & Lakshmanan, N. (2007). Priority ranking towards condition assessment of existing reinforced concrete bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3(1), 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawicki, P., Zak, J., & Redmer, A. (1999). The comparison of ELECTRE, ORESTE and MAPPAC methods applied to the quality evaluation of transportation systems. Papers of the International Conference on Modelling and Management in Transportation, Poznan, Krakow, 223-229.
   Google Scholar
• Selih, J., Kne, A., Srdic, A., & Zura, M. (2008). Multiple-criteria decision support system in highway infrastructure management. Transport, 23(4), 299–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semaan, N., & Zayed, T. (2009). Subway station diagnosis index condition assessment model. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 15(3), 222–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semaan, N., & Zayed, T. (2010). A stochastic diagnostic model for subway stations. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 25(1), 32–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafike, N.G., Duckstein, L., & Maddock, T. (1992). Multicriterion analysis of groundwater contamination management. Water Resources Bulletin, 28(1), 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Shahriar, A., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2012). Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 25(3), 505–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, J.S., Tjader, Y., & Ding, Y. (2004). A unified framework for multicriteria evaluation of transportation projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(3), 300–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira, A., & Goldenberg, M. (2005). AHP-based equipment selection model for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(12), 1263–1273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi, M.A., & Rodriguez, E. (2002). Design and development of a planning support system for policy formulation in water resources rehabilitation; the case of Alcazar De San Juan District in Aquifer 23, La Mancha, Spain. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 4(3), 157–175.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, V., Al-Hussein, M., Safouhi, H., & Bouferguene, A. (2008). Municipal infrastructure asset levels of service assessment for investment decisions using analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 14(3), 193–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, J., & Medina, M. (2010). Integrated multiple-criteria decision-making method to prioritize transportation projects. Transportation Research Record, 2174, 51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiau, J.T., & Lee, H.C. (2005). Derivation of optimal hedging rules for a water-supply reservoir through compromise programming. Water Resources Management, 19(2), 111–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shook, D.A., Roschke, P.N., Lin, P.Y., & Loh, C.H. (2008). GA-optimized fuzzy logic control of a large-scale building for seismic loads. Engineering Structures, 30(2), 436–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu-Kuang, N., & Chang, N.B. (2005). Screening the relocation strategies of water quality monitoring stations by compromise programming. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41(5), 1039–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidek, L.M., Basri, H., & Zalaluddin, Z. (2008). Development of decision support tools for urban storm drainage. Proceedings of international conference on construction and building technology (pp. 349–362). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, V.B.S., Morais, D.C., & Almeida, A.T. (2010). A multicriteria group decision model to support watershed committees in Brazil. Water Resources Management, 24(14), 4075–4091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, U., Bruggemann, R., Behrendt, H., Shulenberger, E., & Pudenz, S. (2006). METEOR: A step-by-step procedure to explore effects of indicator aggregation in multi criteria decision aiding-application to water management in Berlin, Germany. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol, 34(1–2), 126–136.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, U., Bruggemann, R., Mey, S., & Pudenz, S. (2005). METEOR – Application of a decision support tool based on discrete mathematics. Match-Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, 54(3), 623–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, U., Bruggemann, R., & Pudenz, S. (2004). Aspects of decision support in water management-example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) I – Spatially differentiated evaluation. Water Research, 38(7), 1809–1816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovic, S.P., & Nirupama, A. (2005). spatial multi-objective decision-making under uncertainty for water resources management. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 7(2), 117–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skibniewski, M., & Chao, L. (1992). Evaluation of advanced construction technology with AHP method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(3), 577–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srdjevic, B. (2007). Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management. Decision Support Systems, 42(4), 2261–2273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srdjevic, Z., Bajcetic, R., & Srdjevic, B. (2012). Identifying the criteria set for multicriteria decision making based on SWOT/PESTLE analysis: A case study of reconstructing a water intake structure. Water Resources Management, 26(12), 3379–3393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srdjevic, B., Medeiros, Y.D.P., & Faria, A.S. (2004). An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios. Water Resources Management, 18(1), 35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuer, R.E., & Na, P. (2003). Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: A categorized bibliographic study. European Journal of Operational Research, 150(3), 496–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, C.W., Cheng, M.Y., & Lin, K.S. (2002). Data preprocessing for ranking of projects-a case study of rail transportation investment. Proceedings of the 17th conference of transportation association (pp. 1015–1026). Chiayi, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Su, C.W., Cheng, M.Y., & Lin, F.B. (2006). Simulation-enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 12(4), 285–291.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L., & Gu, W. (2011). Pavement condition assessment using fuzzy logic theory and analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137(9), 648–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabucanon, M.T., & Lee, H. (1995). Multiple criteria evaluation of transportation system improvement projects: The case of Korea. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 29(1), 127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, C.M., Tong, T.K.L., & Chiu, G.W.C. (2006). Comparing non-structural fuzzy decision support system and analytical hierarchy process in decision making for construction problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(2), 1317–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tecle, A. (1992). Selecting a multicriterion decision making technique for watershed resources management. Water Resources Bulletin, 28(1), 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Tecle, A., Fogel, M., & Duckstein, L. (1988). Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 114(4), 383–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam, S., & Sadiq, R. (2006). Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP). Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 21(1), 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam, S., Sadiq, R., & Najjaran, H. (2010). Decision-making under uncertainty – An example for seismic risk management. Risk Analysis, 30(1), 78–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam, S., & Sanchez-Silva, M. (2011). Fuzzy model of the life-cycle analysis of building in seismic regions. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 28(3), 261–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel, T. (2006). A proposal of defining participant preferences in a decision aiding process with the participant representing a collective body. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 12(3), 257–262.
   Google Scholar
• Thomaidis, F., & Mavrakis, D. (2006). Optimum route of the south transcontinental gas pipeline in SE Europe using AHP. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 14(1–3), 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Tille, M., & Dumont, A.G. (2003). The multicriteria decision making methods: A practical tool for design a sustainability road infrastructure. Proceedings of the XXIInd PIARC World Road Congress, Durban, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Tkach, R.J., & Simonovic, S.P. (1997). A new approach to multi-criteria decision making in water resources. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 1(1), 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Tracz, M., & Wawrzynkiewicz, B. (1993). Knowledge acquisition from multiple experts: A case of transport planning in Poland. Expert system in environmental planning (pp. 261–274). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Triantaphyllou, E. (2001). Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study. Brussels: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Trojan, F., & Morais, D.C. (2012). Prioritising alternatives for maintenance of water distribution networks: A group decision approach. Water Research Commission, 38(4), 555–564.
   Google Scholar
• Tsamboulas, D., Yiotis, G.S., & Panou, K.D. (1999). Use of multicriteria methods for assessment of transport projects. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 125(5), 407–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugwu, O.O., Kumaraswamy, M.M., Wong, A., & Ng, S.T. (2006). Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP). Part 1: Development of indicators and computational methods. Automation in Construction, 15(2), 239–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulengin, F., Ilker Topcu, Y., & Sahin, S.O. (2001). An integrated decision aid system for Bosphorus water-crossing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 134(1), 179–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, N. (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making model for whole life costing design. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7(6), 441–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., Kang, S., Du, T., Li, F., & Qiu, R. (2011b). Determination of comprehensive quality index for tomato and its response to different irrigation treatments. Agricultural Water Management, 98(8), 1228–1238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei-zhuo, S., Bing-sheng, L., & Li, L. (2010). Bid evaluation model design for construction project based on fuzzy-TOPSIS. Proceedings of International Conference on E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment (ICEEE) (pp. 1–4). Guangzhou, China.
   Google Scholar
• Won, J. (1990). Multicriteria evaluation approaches to urban transportation projects. Urban Studies, 27(1), 119–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J., Li, H., & Lai, J. (2008). Evaluating the system intelligence of the intelligent building systems. Part 1: Development of key intelligent indicators and conceptual analytical framework. Automation in Construction, 17(3), 284–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, P. (2008). Development ranking in real estate strategy management in China based on TOPSIS method. ISECS International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management Guangzhou, China (Vol. 3) (pp. 254–258)
   Google Scholar
• Yadollahi, M., & Zin, R.M. (2012). Multi-strategy budget allocation decision support system for seismic rehabilitation of road infrastructure. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.737810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, J.M., & Vairavamoorthy, K. (2003). Fuzzy approach for pipe condition assessment. Proceedings of International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction , Baltimore, MD, USA (pp. 466–476)
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.I., Frangopol, D.M., Kawakami, Y., & Neves, L.C. (2006a). The use of lifetime functions in the optimization of interventions on existing bridges considering maintenance and failure costs. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(6), 698–705.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.I., Frangopol, D.M., & Neves, L.C. (2006b). Optimum maintenance strategy for deteriorating bridge structures based on lifetime functions. Engineering Structures, 28(2), 196–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani, M., Alidoosti, A., & Basiri, M.H. (2012). Risk analysis for critical infrastructures using fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Management Research, 4(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Yedla, S., & Shrestha, P.M. (2003). Multi-criteria approach for the selection of alternative options for environmentally sustainable transport system in Delphi. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37(8), 717–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, B., & Harmancioglu, N.B. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making for water resource management: A case study of the Gediz River Basin, Turkey. Water SA, 36(5), 563–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K.P., & Hwang, C.L. (1995). Multiple attribute decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Young, K.D., Younos, T., & Randel, L. (2010). Application of the analytic hierarchy process for selecting and modeling stormwater best management practices. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 146(1), 50–63.
   Google Scholar
• Youssef, M.A., Anumba, C.J., & Thorpe, T. (2005). Intelligent selection of concrete bridge construction methods in Egypt. International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, Cancun, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W. (1992). ELECTRE TRI: Aspects methodologiques et manuel dutilisation, Document du LAMSADE 74, University Paris-Dauphine.
   Google Scholar
• Zak, J. (2011). The methodology of multiple criteria decision making/aiding in public transportation. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 45(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zak, J., Bozek, M., & Cieslik, R. (1997). Multiple criteria method for the selection of the means of transport for the mass transit system. Proceedings of the scientific conference: Transportation problems in metropolitan areas under congestion (pp. 84–90). Poznan.
   Google Scholar
• Zandi, F., & Tavana, M. (2011). An optimal investment scheduling framework for intelligent transportation systems architecture. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(3), 115–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zardari, N.H., Cordery, I., & Sharma, A. (2010). An objective multiattribute analysis approach for allocation of scarce irrigation water resources. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 46(2), 412–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarghami, M. (2010). Urban water management using fuzzy-probabilistic multi-objective programming with dynamic efficiency. Water Resources Management, 24(15), 4491–4504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarghami, M., Abrishamchi, A., & Ardakanian, R. (2008). Multi-criteria decision making for integrated urban water management. Water Resources Management, 22(8), 1017–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarghaami, M., Ardakanian, R., & Memariani, A. (2007). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making on water resources projects case study: Ranking water transfers to Zayanderud basin in Iran. Water International, 32(2), 280–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarghami, M., & Szidarovszky, F. (2009). Stochastic-fuzzy multi criteria decision making for robust water resources management. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23(3), 329–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarghami, M., & Szidarovszky, F. (2010). On the relation between compromise programming and ordered weighted averaging operator. Information Sciences, 180(11), 2239–2248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E.K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2004). Evaluation of buildings' redevelopment alternatives with an emphasis on the multipartite sustainability. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 8(2), 121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E.K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2006). Development of an indicator model and ranking of sustainable revitalization alternatives of derelict property: A Lithuanian case study. Sustainable Development, 14(5), 287–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, G., Jiang, R., Huang, G., Xu, M., & Li, J. (2006). Optimization of wastewater treatment alternatives by hierarchy grey relational analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 82(2), 250–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., & Wang, S. (2011). Comprehensive evaluation based on AHP-Fuzzy about the conception of underground container transportation lines in Shanghai. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 71-78, 175–181.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., Wu, H., Duan, T., & Li, J. (2012). Application-oriented implementation effect evaluation system of pedestrian reconstructing plans and case analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 43, 512–520.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Vairavamoorthy, K., & Grimshaw, F. (2009). Development of a Fuzzy based pipe condition assessment model using PROMETHEE. World environmental and water resources congress (pp. 4809–4818). Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ziara, M., Nigim, K., Enshassi, A., & Ayyub, B.M. (2002). Strategic implementation of infrastructure priority projects: Case study in Palestine. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 8(1), 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, H. (1996). Fuzzy sets, decision making and expert systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar