Direct displacement-based assessment with nonlinear soil–structure interaction for multi-span reinforced concrete bridges

REFERENCES

• Botero, J.C.A. (2004). Displacement-based design of continuous concrete bridges under transverse seismic excitation (Master's dissertation). European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk (ROSE School), Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., Perrone, G., & Sofia, S. (2011). A performance-based adaptive methodology for the seismic evaluation of multi-span simply supported deck bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9(5), 1463–1498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A.J. (2007). SIMQKE: A program for artificial motion generation. Christchurch: Civil Engineering Department, University of Canterbury.
   Google Scholar
• CEN (2003). Eurocode 8, Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, prEN 1998-1, draft no. 6. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, A.A. (2011). A pile-head macro-element approach to seismic design of monoshaft-supported bridges, (Doctoral dissertation). European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk (ROSE School), Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, L., Kutter, B.L., & Kunnath, S. (2012). Centrifuge modeling of bridge systems designed for rocking foundations. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 138(3), 335–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drosos, V., Georgarakos, T., Loli, M., Anastasopoulos, I., Zarzouras, O., & Gazetas, G. (2012). Soil–foundation–structure interaction with mobilization of bearing capacity: An experimental study on sand. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 138(11), 1369–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwairi, H., & Kowalsky, M.J. (2006). Implementation of inelastic displacement patterns in direct displacement based design of continuous bridge structures. Earthquake Spectra, 22(3), 631–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazetas, G. (1991). Foundation vibration, Chapter 15. In H.-Y.Fang (Ed.), Foundation engineering handbook (2nd ed., pp. 553–593). New York: Van Nostrand, Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Ghalibafian, H., Foschi, R.O., & Ventura, C.E. (2008). Performance-based assessment of the effects of soil–structure interaction on the seismic demands of bridge piers: A proposed methodology. 14th world conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, D.N., Blandon, C.A., & Priestley, M.J.N. (2005). Modelling inelastic response in direct displacement-based design (ROSE Research Report 2005/03)Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kappos, A.J., Gidaris, I.G., & Gkatzogias, K.I. (2012). Problems associated with direct displacement-based design of concrete bridges with single-column piers, and some suggested improvements. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 10(4), 1237–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kausel, E. (2010). Early history of soil–structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30, 822–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalsky, M.J. (2002). A displacement-based approach for the seismic design of continuous concrete bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 719–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, O.S., & Elnashai, A.S. (2010). Fragility analysis of a highway over-crossing bridge with consideration of soil-structure interaction. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 6(1–2), 159–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Hutchinson, T.C., Kutter, B.L., Hakhamaneshi, M., Aschheim, M., & Kunnath, S. (2012). Demonstration of compatible yielding between soil–foundation and superstructure components. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8), 1804–1826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegotto, M., & Pinto, P.E. (1973). Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending. Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeats Loads, Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Montejo, L.A., & Kowalsky, M.J. (2007). CUMBIA: Set of codes for the analysis of reinforced concrete members. (Technical Report No. IS-07-01). Raleigh, NC: Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Mylonakis, G., & Gazetas, G. (2000). Seismic soil structure interaction: Beneficial or detrimental?Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 4(3), 277–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylonakis, G., Syngros, C., Gazetas, G., & Tazoh, T. (2006). The role of soil in the collapse of 18 piers of Hanshin Expressway in the Kobe earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(5), 547–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, P. (2012). Non-linear dynamic soil–structure interaction for displacement-based seismic assessment of bridges, (Master's dissertation). European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk (ROSE School), Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Paolucci, R., di Prisco, C., Figini, R., Petrini, L., & Vecchiotti, M. (2009). Interazione dinamica non lineare terreno-struttura nell'ambito della progettazione sismica agli spostamenti. Progettazione Sismica, 2, 83–103, (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Paolucci, R., Figini, R., & Petrini, L. (2013). Introducing dynamic non-linear soil–foundation–structure interaction effects in displacement-based seismic design. Earthquake Spectra, 29(2), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Pecker, A., Paolucci, R., Chatzigogos, C., Correia, A., & Figini, R. (2012). The role of non-linear dynamic soil–foundation interaction on the seismic response of structures. Keynote lecture. 2nd international conference on Performance-based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Taormina, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Petrini, L., Şadan, O.B., & Calvi, G.M. (2009). Direct displacement-based seismic assessment procedure for multi-span reinforced concrete bridges. 13th Italian conference on Earthquake Engineering, Bologna, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Pettinga, J.D., & Priestley, M.J.N. (2007). Accounting for P–Δ effects in structures when using direct displacement-based design (ROSE Research Report 2007/02).Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M.J.N. (1997). Displacement-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1(1), 157–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M., & Kowalsky, M.J. (2007). Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., & Calvi, G.M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Restrepo, J.C.O. (2006). Displacement-based design of continuous concrete bridges under transverse seismic excitation, (Master's dissertation). European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk (ROSE School), Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Şadan, O.B. (2009). Direct displacement-based seismic assessment procedure for multi-span reinforced concrete bridges, (Doctoral dissertation). Politecnico di Milano, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Şadan, O.B., Petrini, L., & Calvi, G.M. (2012). Direct displacement-based seismic assessment procedure for multi-span reinforced concrete bridges with single-column piers. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 10.1002/eqe.2257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SeismoSoft (2010). SeismoStruct: A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures, [online]. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• SeismoSoft (2011). SeismoSignal: A computer program for signal processing of strong motion data, [online]. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• Sextos, A., Kappos, A.J., & Pitilakis, D. (2003). Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil–structure interaction phenomena. Part 2: Parametric study. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(4), 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sextos, A., Pitilakis, D., & Kappos, A.J. (2003). Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil–structure interaction phenomena. Part 1: Methodology and analytical tools. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(4), 607–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smerzini, C., Paolucci, R., Galasso, C., & Iervolino, I. (2012). Engineering ground motion selection based on displacement-spectrum compatibility. 15th world conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez, V.A., & Kowalsky, M.J. (2011). A stability-based target displacement for direct displacement-based design of bridge piers. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 15(5), 754–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C.A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, J.P. (1985). Dynamic soil–structure interaction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar