Life cycle cost optimisation in highway concrete bridges management

References

• Adams, T.M. , & Barut, J.F. (2007). Establishing MR&R costs for a network-level bridge management system. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record, 1642, 11–20. doi: 10.3141/1642-02.
   Google Scholar
• Adey, B. , Hajdin, R. , & Brühwiler, E. (2003). Risk-based approach to the determination of optimal interventions for bridges affected by multiple hazards. Engineering Structures, 25, 903–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, J.O. , Delgado, R.M. , & Teixeira, P.F. (2012). Network bridge management with life-cycle cost optimization. In F.  Biondini & D.M.  Frangopol (Eds.), IABMAS 2012: Bridge maintenance, safety, management, resilience and sustainability (pp. 2674–2681). The Netherlands: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, W.S. (2005). Management of highway structures – a code of practice. London: The Stationery Office. ISBN 0 11 552642 0.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, Q. , Labi, S. , Sinha, K.C. , & Thompson, P.D. (2011). Bridge user cost estimation - a synthesis of existing methods and addressing the issues of multiple counting, workzones and traffic capacity limitation. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9, 849–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaraj, D. (2009). Application of non-homogeneous Markov chains in bridge management systems, (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA).
   Google Scholar
• Ekberg, A. , & Paulsson, B. (2010). InnoTrack – concluding technical report. Paris: UIC. Retrieved from http://www.innotrack.net/Reports .
   Google Scholar
• Elbehairy, H. (2007). Bridge management system with integrated life cycle cost optimization, (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Elbehairy, H. , Hegazy, T. , & Soudki, K. (2009). Integrated multiple-element bridge management system. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, 14, 179–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrera, F.A.A. (2006). Optimización conjunta de las políticas de mantenimiento y rehabilitaciónenPuentes mediante Algoritmos Genéticos. Aplicación al Sistema de Gestión de Puentesdel Estado de Chiapas (México), (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya, Spain) (in Spanish).
   Google Scholar
• FHWA (1995). Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nations bridges. Washington, DC: FHWA.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M. , & Neves, L.C. (2004). Probabilistic maintenance and optimization strategies for deteriorating civil infrastructures. In Progress in computational structures technology (pp. 353–377). Stirlingshire: Saxe-Coburg Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D.M. , Strauss, A. , & Bergmeister, K. (2009). Lifetime cost optimization of structures by a combined condition reliability approach. Engineering Structures, 31, 1572–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, S.K. , & Peterson, S.R. (1996). Life-cycle costing manual for federal energy management program. National Institute of Standards and Technology Handbook (Vol. Handbook 135). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Furuta, H. , & Kameda, T. (2006). Application of multi-objective genetic algorithm to bridge maintenance. In F.  Ceragioli, A.  Dontchev, H.  Futura, K.  Marti & L.  Pandolfi (Eds.), System Modeling and Optimization (Vol. 199, pp. 139–148). USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gervásio, H. , & Silva, L.S. (2013). Life-cycle social analysis of motorway bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9, 1019–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guignier, F. , & Madanat, S.M. (1999). Optimization of infrastructure systems maintenance and improvement policies. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 5, 124–134.
   Google Scholar
• Hajdin, R. (2008). KUBA 4.0 – The Swiss road structure management system. TRB – Transportation Research Circular E-C128: Tenth International Conference on Bridge and Structure Management. IBSMC08-027, 47-62. ISSN: 0097-8515.
   Google Scholar
• Haupt, R.L. , & Haupt, S.E. (2004). Practical genetic algorithms (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hawk, H. (2003). Bridge life-cycle cost analysis – Guidance manual. NCHRP Report 483, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, R.Y. , & Chen, P.F. (2012). Analysis of influential factors and association rules for bridge deck deterioration with utilization of national bridge inventory. Journal of Marine Science and Technology-Taiwan, 20, 336–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InnoTrack (2007). Report D 6.2.1 – LCC methodology – unique boundary conditions. ADIF.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, R. , & Znidaric, A. (2004). COST345 project final report - Procedures required for assessment of highway structures. European Commission – Directorate General Transport and Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Jutila, A. , & Sundquist, H. (2007). Bridge life cycle optimisation – ETSI project (Stage 1). Helsinki: Laboratory of Bridge Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-L. (2007). Permutation-based elitist genetic algorithm using serial scheme for large-sized resource-constrained project scheduling. 39th Conference on Winter Simulation, Washington, DC (pp. 2112–2118)
   Google Scholar
• Kiviluoma, R. , & Korhonen, P. (2012). Guidelines for calculating the life cycle costs. In F.  Biondini & D.M.  Frangopol (Eds.), IABMAS 2012 – Bridge maintenance, safety, management, resilience and sustainability (pp. 2057–2063). The Netherlands: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M. , & Frangopol, D.M. (2005). Multiobjective maintenance planning optimization for deteriorating bridges considering condition, safety, and life-cycle cost. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 131, 833–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounis, Z. (2006). Risk-based maintenance optimization of aging highway bridge decks. In Advances in engineering structures, mechanics & construction (pp. 723–734). Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Markow, M.J. , & Hyman, W.A. (2009). Bridge management systems for transportation agency decision making – A synthesis of highway practice. NCHRP Synthesis 397 (p. 126). Washington, DC: Transportation research board.
   Google Scholar
• Neves, L.A.C. , Frangopol, D.M. , & Cruz, P.J. S. (2006). Probabilistic life-time oriented multiobjective optimization of bridge maintenance: Single maintenance type. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 132, 991–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noortwijk, J.M.V. , & Klatter, H.E. (2004). The use of lifetime distributions in bridge maintenance and replacement modeling. Computers and Structures, 82, 1091–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okasha, N.M. , & Frangopol, D.M. (2010). Advanced modeling for efficient computation of life-cycle performance prediction and service-life estimation of bridges. ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 24, 548–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okasha, N.M. , & Frangopol, D.M. (2011). Computational platform for the integrated life-cycle management of highway bridges. Engineering Structures, 33, 2145–2153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orcesi, A.D. , & Cremona, C.F. (2009). Optimization of management strategies applied to the national reinforced concrete bridge stock in France. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 5, 355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orcesi, A.D. , & Cremona, C.F. (2011a). Optimal maintenance strategies for bridge networks using the supply and demand approach. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7, 765–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orcesi, A.D. , & Cremona, C.F. (2011b). Optimization of maintenance strategies for the management of the national bridge stock in France. ASCE Journal of bridge engineering, 6, 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Poli, R. , Langdon, W.B. , & McPhee, N.F. (2008). A field guide to genetic programming, (with contributions by J.R. Koza). Retrieved from http://lulu.com .
   Google Scholar
• Portuguese regulation (1983). Regulamento de Segurança e Acções para Estruturas de Edifícios e Pontes [Loads and safety code for buildings and bridges structures]. Decreto-Lei no. 235/83, de 31 de Maio (in Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• Roelfstra, G. (2001). Modeled' evolution de l'etat des ponts-routes en beton. These n°2310 – Grade de Docteurès Sciences Techniques, Doctoral Dissertation, École Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne, Swiss (in French).
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B.B. , Picado-Santos, L. , & Cavaleiro, V.P. (2011). Simplified model of road-user costs for Portuguese highways. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2225, 3–10. doi: 10.3141/2225-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarja, A. (2004). Life cycle management system – LIFECON LMS – Technical summary, VTT Building and Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Thoft-Christensen, P. (2009). Life-cycle cost-benefit (LCCB) analysis of bridges from a user and social point of view. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 5, 49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoft-Christensen, P. (2012). Infrastructures and life-cycle cost-benefit analysis. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8, 507–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P.D. , Small, E.P. , Johnson, M. , & Marshall, A.R. (1998). The Pontis bridge management system. Structural Engineering International, 8, 303–308.
   Google Scholar
• Tolliver, D. , & Lu, P. (2012). Modeling bridge condition levels in the United States. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 6, 415–432.
   Google Scholar
• Vesikari, E. (2003). Lifecon deliverable D 2.2 – Statistical condition management and financial optimisation in lifetime management of structures. In LIFECON project - Life cycle management of concrete infrastructures for improved sustainability (Ed.), Project deliverable. Finland: Technical Research Centre of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Virtala, P. , Thompson, P.D. , & Ellis, R.M. (2012). Multi-objective optimization of engineering structures. In F.  Biondini & D.M.  Frangopol (Eds.), IABMAS 2012 – Bridge maintenance, safety, management, resilience and sustainability (pp. 2087–2094). The Netherlands: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R.J. , Cullington, D.W. , Daly, A.F. , Vassie, P.R. , Haardt, P. , Kashner, R. , Astudillo, A. , Velando, C. , Godart, B. , Cremona, C. , Mahut, B. , Raharinaivo, A. , Lau, M.Y. , Markey, I. , Bevc, L. , & Peruš, I. (2001). BRIME – final report. Deliverable D14.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.I. , Frangopol, D.M. , & Neves, L.C. (2004). Service life prediction of structural systems using lifetime functions with emphasis on bridges. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 86, 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar