Seismic risk assessment of high-voltage transformers using Bayesian belief networks

References

• AnagnosT. (1999). Development of an electrical substation equipment performance database for evaluation of equipment fragilities (PEER 2001/06)Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• AshrafiA. (2003). Issues of seismic response and retrofit for critical substation equipment (M.Sc. thesis). New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• BC Hydro (2013). BC hydro substations. Retrieved from http://www.bchydro.com/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• BayraktarliY.Y., & FaberM.H. (2011). Bayesian probabilistic network approach for managing earthquake risks of cities. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 5, 2–24.
   Google Scholar
• BensiM.T., Der KiureghianA., & StraubD. (2011). A Bayesian network methodology for infrastructure seismic risk assessment and decision support (PEER 2011/02)Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• BlumeS.W. (2007). Electrical power system basics for the nonelectrical professional. In E.H.Mohamed (Ed.), IEEE press series on power engineering. NJ: Wiley, pp. 61–99.
   Google Scholar
• BooreD.M., JoynerW.B., & FumalT.E. (1997). Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work. Seismological Research Letters, 68, 128–153.
   Google Scholar
• ChatzisM.N., & SmythA.W. (2012). Robust modeling of the rocking problem. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 138, 147–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CockburnG., & TesfamariamS. (2012). Earthquake disaster risk index for Canadian cities using Bayesian belief networks. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 6, 128–140.
   Google Scholar
• DastousJ.B., FiliatraultA., & PierreJ.R. (2004). Estimation of displacement at interconnection points of substation equipment subjected to earthquakes. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 19, 618–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Der KiureghianA., SackmanJ.L., & HongK.J. (1999). Interaction in interconnected electrical substation equipment subjected to earthquake ground motions (PEER 1999/01)Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• EidingerJ.M., & OstromD. (1994). Earthquake loss estimation methodsTechnical manual, Electric power utilities, Olympic Valley, CA: G&E Engineering Systems Inc.
   Google Scholar
• EidingerJ., & TangA.K. (2012). Christchurch, New Zealand earthquake sequence of Mw 7.1 September 04, 2010, Mw 6.3 February 22, 2011, Mw 6.0 June 13, 2011: Lifeline performance. Technical council on lifeline earthquake engineeringMonograph No. 40, Reston, VA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• ErsoyS. (2002). Seismic response of transformer bushing systems and their rehabilitation using frictional pendulum system (PhD dissertation) New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• ErsoyS., & SaadeghvaziriM.A. (2004). Seismic response of transformer-bushing systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 19, 131–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FiliatraultA., & MattH. (2006). Seismic response of high voltage electrical transformer-bushing systems. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132, 287–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FujisakiE. (2012). Seismic considerations. In J.D.McDonald (Ed.), Electric power substations engineering (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: CRC Press, Chapter 13.
   Google Scholar
• HongK.J., Der KiureghianA., & SackmanJ.L. (2001). Seismic interaction in cable-connected equipment items. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 127, 1096–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuoJ.R., & HwangH.H.M. (1995). Seismic fragility analysis of equipment and structures in a Memphis electric substation (Technical Report NCEER-95-0014)Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
   Google Scholar
• IEEE-1527 (2006). IEEE recommended practice for the design of flexible buswork located in seismically active areas (Report IEEE 1527)New York, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• IEEE-693 (2005). IEEE recommended practice for seismic design of substations (Report IEEE 693)New York, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• JayaramN., & BakerJ.W. (2010). Efficient sampling and data reduction techniques for probabilistic seismic lifeline risk assessment. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 39, 1109–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JensenF.V. (1996). An introduction to Bayesian networks. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• LiuK.F.R., LuC.F., ChenC.W., & ShenY.S. (2011). Applying Bayesian belief networks to health risk assessment. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 26, 451–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MakrisN., & BlackC.J. (2001). Rocking response of equipment anchored to a base foundation (PEER 2001/14)Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• MakrisN., & BlackC.J. (2002). Uplifting and overturning of equipment anchored to a base foundation. Earthquake Spectra, 18, 631–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MakrisN., & RoussosY. (1998). Rocking response and overturning of equipment under horizontal pulse-type motions (PEER 1998/05)Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• MakrisN., & ZhangJ. (1999). Rocking response and overturning of anchored equipment under seismic excitations (PEER 1999/06)Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• McCannR.K., MarcotB.G., & EllisR. (2006). Bayesian belief networks: Applications in ecology and natural resource. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 3053–3062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoteffJ., & ParfomakP. (2004). Critical infrastructure and key assets: Definition and identification (CRS Report RL32631)Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• NRCan (2013). National resources of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca/.
   Google Scholar
• Norsys Software Corp. (2006). Netica TM user's guide. Retrieved from https://norsys.com/downloads/old_versions/NeticaMan_Win_105.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NutiC., RasuloA., & VanziI. (2007). Seismic safety evaluation of electric power supply at urban level. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36, 245–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PearlJ. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: network of plausible inference. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• SchiffA.J., Electric Power and Communications Committee, Technical Council of Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, & American Society of Civil Engineers. (1999). Guide to improved earthquake performance of electric power systems. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 65–226.
   Google Scholar
• SchiffA.J. (1997). Northridge earthquake: Lifeline performance and post-earthquake response. In A.J.Schiff (Ed.), Technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering, Monograph No. 8. New York, NY: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• ShentonW. (1996). Criteria for initiation of slide, rock, and slide-rock rigid-body modes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 122, 690–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShinozukaM., DongX., ChenT.C., & JinX. (2007). Seimic performance of electric transmission network under component failures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36, 227–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmetsP. (2000). Data fusion in the transferable belief model. In Proccedings of 3rd international conference on information fusion, Paris, France. NewYork, USA: IEEE, (pp. PS21–PS33)
   Google Scholar
• SongJ., Der KiureghianA., & SackmanJ.L. (2007). Seismic interaction in electrical substation equipment connected by non-linear rigid bus conductors. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36, 167–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StraubD., & Der KiureghianA. (2008). Improved seismic fragility modeling from empirical data. Structural Safety, 30, 320–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StraubD., & Der KiureghianA. (2010). Bayesian network enhanced with structural reliability methods: Methodology. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 136, 1248–1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TesfamariamS., & LiuZ. (2013). Seismic risk analysis using Bayesian belief networks. In S.Tesfamariam & K.Goda (Eds.), Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited, pp. 175–208.
   Google Scholar
• VoyagakiE., MylonakisG., & PsycharisI.N. (2012). Rigid block sliding to idealized acceleration pulses. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 138, 1071–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhittakerA.S., FenvesG.L., & GilaniA.S. (2004). Earthquake performance of porcelain transformer bushings. Earthquake Spectra, 20, 205–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangJ., & MakrisN. (2001). Rocking response of free-standing blocks under cycloidal pulses. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 127, 473–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar