Structural damage detection and localisation using multivariate regression models and two-sample control statistics

References

• Alvandi, A., & Cremona, C. (2006). Assessment of vibration-based damage identification techniques. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 292, 179–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri, A., & Allahyari, S. (2011). Change point estimation methods for control chart post signal diagnostics: A literature review. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 28, 637–685.
   Google Scholar
• Bodeux, J., & Golinval, J. (2003). Modal identification and damage detection using the data-driven stochastic subspace and ARMAV methods. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 17, 83–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, P.J.S., & Salgado, R. (2009). Performance of vibration-based damage detection methods in bridges. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24, 62–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lautour, O.R., & Omenzetter, P. (2010). Nearest neighbor and learning vector quantization classification for damage detection using time series analysis. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 17, 614–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deraemaeker, A., & Preumont, A. (2006). Vibration based damage detection using large array sensors and spatial filters. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20, 1615–1630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., & Prime, M.B. (1998). A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock and Vibration Digest, 30, 91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Dorvash, S., Pakzad, S.N., Labuz, E., Chang, M., Li, X., & Cheng, L. (2010). Validation of a wireless sensor network using local damage detection algorithm for beam–column connections. In Proceedings of SPIE: Proceedings of the SPIE Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies, San Diego, CA (Vol. 7647, pp. 764719-1–764719-11). 10.1117/12.847581.
   Google Scholar
• Dorvash, S., Pakzad, S.N., & Labuz, E.L. (2014). Statistics based localized damage detection using vibration response. Smart Structures and Systems, 14. doi:10.12989/sss.2014.14.2.000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorvash, S., Pakzad, S.N., Labuz, E.L., Ricles, J.M., & Hodgson, I.C. (in press). Localized damage detection algorithm and implementation on a large-scale steel beam-to-column moment connection. Earthquake Spectra. doi:10.1193/031613EQS069M.
   Google Scholar
• El-Ouafi Bahlous, S., Abdelghani, M., Smaoui, H., & El-Borgi, S. (2007). A modal filtering and statistical approach for damage detection and diagnosis in structures using ambient vibrations measurements. Journal of Vibration and Control, 13, 281–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar, C.R., Baker, W.E., Bell, T.M., Cone, K.M., Darling, T.W., Duffey, T.A., Eklund, A., & Migliori, A. (1994). Dynamic characterization and damage detection in the I-40 bridge over the Rio Grande  (Report LA-12767-MS). Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, E., Figueiras, J., Park, G., Farrar, C.R., & Worden, K. (2011). Influence of the autoregressive model order on damage detection. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26, 225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlander, B., & Porat, B. (1984). The modified Yule-Walker method of ARMA spectral estimation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-20, 158–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugate, M.L., Sohn, H., & Farrar, C.R. (2001). Vibration-based damage detection using statistical process control. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 15, 707–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, M., Datta, G.S., Kim, D., & Sweeting, T.J. (2006). Likelihood-based inference for the ratios of regression coefficients in linear models. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 58, 457–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, M., & Catbas, F. (2011). Damage assessment with ambient vibration data using a novel time series analysis methodology. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 137, 1518–1526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D.M., & Zamba, K.D. (2005). Statistical process control for shifts in mean or variance using a change point formulation. Technometrics, 47, 164–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., & De Roeck, G. (1997). System identification of mechanical structures by a high-order multivariate autoregressive model. Computers and Structures, 64, 341–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Wang, B., & Ji, H. (2013). A wireless sensor network-based structural health monitoring system for highway bridges. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 28, 193–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.S. (2001). Structural identification from ambient vibration measurement using the multivariate AR model. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 241, 337–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, C.F., Ko, W.J., & Peng, Y.T. (2004). Identification of modal parameters from measured input and output data using a vector backward auto-regressive with exogeneous model. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 276, 1043–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaishi, B., & Ren, W.X. (2006). Damage detection by finite element model updating using modal flexibility residual. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 290, 369–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S., Spencer, B.F., Rice, J.A., & Wang, J. (2011). Full-scale experimental validation of high fidelity wireless measurement using a historic truss bridge. Advances in Structural Engineering, 14, 93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C.W., & Kawatani, M. (2008). Pseudo-static approach for damage identification of bridges based on coupling vibration with a moving vehicle. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 4, 371–379. doi:10.1080/15732470701270082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiremidjian, A.S., Kiremidjian, G., & Sarabandi, P. (2011). A wireless structural monitoring system with embedded damage algorithms and decision support system. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7, 881–894. doi:10.1080/15732470903208773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R.P., Oshima, T., Mikami, S., Miyamori, Y., & Yamazaki, T. (2012). Damage identification in a lightly reinforced concrete beam based on changes in the power spectral density. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8, 715–727. doi:10.1080/15732471003730674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labuz, E.L., Pakzad, S.N., & Wurst, D. (2011). Localized damage detection in a large-scale moment connection using a strain gauge sensor network. In Proceedings of the SPIE Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies, San Diego, CA (Vol. 7981, pp. 79813Q-1–79813Q-11). 10.1117/12.880752.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., & Gao, F. (2005). A novel time-domain auto-regressive model for structural damage diagnosis. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 283, 1031–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, J.P., Wang, Y., Loh, K.J., Yi, J.H., & Yun, C.B. (2006). Performance monitoring of the Geumdang bridge using a dense network of high-resolution wireless sensors. Smart Materials and Structures, 15, 1561–1575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moaveni, B., Stavridis, A., Lombaert, G., Conte, J.P., & Shing, P.B. (2013). Finite element model updating for assessment of progressive damage in a three-story infilled RC frame. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 139, 1665–1674. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, R.H., & Loftis, J.C. (1987). Applicability of the t-test for detecting trends in water quality variables. American Water Resources Association, 23, 653–662.
   Google Scholar
• Mosavi, A.A., Dickey, D., Seracino, R., & Rizkalla, S. (2012). Identifying damage locations under ambient vibrations utilizing vector autoregressive models and mahalanobis distances. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 26, 254–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, K.K., Kiremidjian, A.S., & Law, K.H. (2006). Time series-based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 291, 349–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigro, M.B., Pakzad, S.N., & Dorvash, S. (2014). Localized structural damage detection: A change point analysis. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29, 416–432. doi:10.1111/mice.12059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh, H.Y., Nair, K.K., Kiremidjian, A.S., & Loh, C.H. (2009). Application of time series based damage detection algorithms to the benchmark experiment at the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) in Taipei, Taiwan. Smart Structures and Systems, 5, 95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakzad, S.N. (2010). Development and deployment of large scale wireless sensor network on a long-span bridge. Smart Structures and Systems, 6, 525–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, A.K., & Biswas, M. (1995). Damage diagnosis of truss structures by estimation of flexibility change. The International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, 10, 104–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, M.S., & Worsley, K.J. (1986). Likelihood ratio tests for a change in the multivariate normal mean. Jounral of the American Statistical Association, 81, 199–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, H., Farrar, C.R., Hunter, N.F., & Worden, K. (2001). Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control: Special Issue on Identification of Mechanical Systems, 123, 706–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J.H., & Woodall, W.H. (1996). A control chart for preliminary analysis of individual observations. Journal of Quality Technology, 28, 265–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, B., & Paultre, P. (2010). Damage identification in a truss tower by regularized model updating. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 136, 307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, B.L. (1947). The generalization of ‘Student's’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34, 28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, W.M. (1984). Illustration of the use of modal assurance criterion to detect structural changes in an orbiter test specimen. In Proceedings of Air Force Conference on Aircraft Structural Integrity (pp. 1–6)
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, M. (2003). The philosophy of shewhart's theory of prediction. In Proceedings of the 9th Research Seminar: Deming Scholar's Program, New York, USA. Retrieved from http://www.flowmap.com/documents/shewhart.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, R., & Pakzad, S.N. (2012). Autoregressive statistical pattern recognition algorithms for damage detection in civil structures. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 31, 355–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, R., & Pakzad, S.N. (2013). Performance comparison of different autoregressive damage features using acceleration measurements from a truss bridge. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA (Vol. 1, pp. 220–227)
   Google Scholar
• Zamba, K.D., & Hawkins, D.M. (2006). A multivariate change-point model for statistical process control. Technometrics, 48, 539–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Zou, C., & Wang, Z. (2010). A control chart based on likelihood ratio test for monitoring process mean and variability. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 26, 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, H., & Mita, A. (2007). Two-stage damage diagnosis based on the distance between ARMA models and pre-whitening filters. Smart Materials and Structures, 16, 1829–1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, H., & Mita, A. (2009). Localized damage detection of structures subject to multiple ambient excitations using two distance measures for autoregressive models. Structural Health Monitoring, 8, 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., Luo, Y., & Wang, Z. (2010). A control chart based on likelihood ratio test for detecting patterned mean and variance shifts. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 54, 1634–1645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, C., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2006). A control chart based on a change-point model monitoring linear profiles. IIE Transactions, 38, 1093–1103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar