Publication Cover
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance
Volume 11, 2015 - Issue 10
785
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Condition-based maintenance decision support system for oil and gas pipelines

, , , &
Pages 1323-1337 | Received 09 Feb 2014, Accepted 03 Jun 2014, Published online: 29 Sep 2014

References

  • Ahammed, M. (1998). Probabilistic estimation of remaining life of a pipeline in the presence of active corrosion defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 75, 321–329.
  • Ammar, M., Zayed, T., & Moselhi, O. (2013). Fuzzy-based life-cycle cost model for decision making under subjectivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139, 556–563.
  • Baker, M., Fessler, R.R., & BIZTEK Consulting (2008). Pipeline corrosion. US Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (Office of Pipeline Safety). Retrieved from https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/gasimp/techreports.htm.
  • Bertolini, M., & Bevilacqua, M. (2006). Oil pipeline spill cause analysis: A classification tree approach. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 12, 186–198.
  • BP (2006). Guidance on practice for pipeline intervention and repair. BP Group Engineering technical practices.
  • Caleyo, F., Velázquez, J., Valor, A., & Hallen, J. (2009). Probability distribution of pitting corrosion depth and rate in underground pipeline. Corrosion Science, 51, 1925–1934.
  • Davis, P.M., Dubois, J., Gambardella, F., & Uhlig, F. (2010, June). Performance of European cross-country oil pipelines: Statistical summary of reported spillages in 2008 and since 1971. CONCAWE, Brussels. Retrieved from https://www.concawe.eu/content/default.asp?PageID = 569.
  • Dey, P. (2003). Analytic hierarchy process analyses risk of operating cross-country petroleum pipelines in India. Natural Hazards Review, 4, 213–221.
  • Dey, P., Ogunlana, S.O., & Naksuksakul, S. (2004). Risk-based maintenance model for offshore oil and gas pipelines: A case study. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 10, 169–183. doi:10.1108/13552510410553226.
  • El-Abbasy, M.S., Senouci, A., Zayed, T., Mirahadi, F., & Parvizsedghy, L. (2014a). Artificial neural network models for predicting condition of offshore oil and gas pipelines. Automation in Construction, 45, 50–65. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.003.
  • El-Abbasy, M.S., Senouci, A., Zayed, T., Mirahadi, F., & Parvizsedghy, L. (2014b). Condition prediction models for oil and gas pipelines using regression analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 140, 04014013. https://doi.org/doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000838.
  • El-Abbasy, M.S., Senouci, A., Zayed, T., & Mosleh, F. (2014). A condition assessment model for oil and gas pipelines using integrated simulation and analytic network process. Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. doi:10.1080/15732479.2013.873471.
  • EPA (2006). Composite wrap for non-leaking pipeline defects. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from www.epa.gov/gasstar/documents/ll_compwrap.pdf.
  • Frangopol, D.M., Kong, J., & Gharaibeh, E.S. (2001). Reliability-based life cycle management of highway bridges. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15, 27–34, Special Issue: Information technology for life-cycle infrastructure management, 27–34.
  • Gomes, W.J.S., Beck, A.T., & Haukaas, T. (2013). Optimal inspection planning for onshore pipelines subject to external corrosion. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 118, 18–27.
  • Healy, J., Jones, D.G., Clyne, A.J., Cazenave, P.B., & Alkazraji, D. (2004). Using benchmarking to optimize the cost of pipeline integrity management. In Pigging Products and Servicing Association London Seminar. London, UK. Retrieved from http://ppsa-online.com/papers.php PPSA.
  • Hegazy, T., Elbeltagi, E., & El-Behairy, H. (2004). Bridge deck management system with integrated life-cycle cost optimization. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1866, 44–50. doi:10.3141/1866-06.
  • Jaske, C., Hart, B.O., & Bruce, W.A. (2006). Pipeline repair manual. Arlington, TX: Pipeline Research Council International.
  • Kennedy, J.L. (1993). Oil and gas pipeline fundamentals (2nd ed.). Oklahoma: PennWell Publishing.
  • Liao, K., Yao, Q., Wu, X., & Jia, W. (2012). A numerical corrosion rate prediction method for direct assessment of wet gas gathering pipelines internal corrosion. Energies, 5, 3892–3907.
  • Maes, M., Faber, M., & Dann, M. (2009). Hierarchical modelling of pipeline defect growth subject to ILI uncertainty. In Proceedings of the ASME 2009 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2009-79470, Hawaii, USA.
  • Math Works (2010). MATLAB R2010b. Retrieved from http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/.
  • Menon, E.S. (2005). Gas pipeline hydraulics. In Pipeline economics (pp. 327–354). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Microsoft Group (2010). Microsoft Excel 2010. Retrieved from http://office.microsoft.com/en-ca/excel.
  • Noor, N.M., Ozman, N.A.N., & Yahaya, N. (2011). Deterministic prediction of corroding pipeline remaining strength in marine environment using DNV RP - F101 (Part A). Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 6, 69–78.
  • PALISADE Corporation (2013). @RISK version: 6. Retrieved from http://www.palisade.com/risk/.
  • Palmer-Jones, R., Hopkins, P., & Eyre, D. (2005). Pipeline rehabilitation planning. Newcastle: Penspen Integrity Virtual Library. Retrieved from http://www.penspenintegrity.com/virtual-library.
  • Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Retrieved from US Department of Transportation: http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/reports/safety/sida.html?nocache = 4372 (2013)
  • Ren, C.Y., Qiao, W., & Tian, X. (2012). Natural gas pipeline corrosion rate prediction model based on BP neural network. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, 147, 449–455.
  • Senouci, A., El-Abbasy, M.S., Elwakil, E., Abdrabou, B., & Zayed, T. (2014). A model for predicting failure of oil pipelines. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10, 375–387. doi:10.1080/15732479.2012.756918.
  • Senouci, A., El-Abbasy, M.S., & Zayed, T. (2014). A fuzzy-based model for predicting failure of oil pipelines. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, https://doi.org/doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000181, 04014018.
  • Shahata, K., & Zayed, T. (2008). Simulation as a tool for life cycle cost analysis. In Proceedings of the 40th conference on winter simulation (pp. 2497–2503). Miami, FL: WSC.
  • Shahata, K., & Zayed, T. (2012). Data acquisition and analysis for water main rehabilitation techniques. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8, 1054–1066. doi:10.1080/15732479.2010.502179.
  • Shahata, K., & Zayed, T. (2013). Simulation-based life cycle cost modelling and maintenance plan for water mains. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9, 403–415. doi:10.1080/15732479.2011.552509.
  • Singh, M., & Markeset, T. (2014). Simultaneous handling of variability and uncertainty in probabilistic and possibilistic failure analysis of corroded pipes. International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management, 5, 43–54.
  • Sinha, S., & Pandey, M. (2002). Probabilistic neural network for reliability assessment of oil and gas pipelines. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 17, 320–329. doi:10.1111/1467-8667.00279.
  • Teixeira, A.P., Guedes Soares, C., Netto, T.A., & Estefen, S.F. (2008). Reliability of pipelines with corrosion defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 85, 228–237.
  • World-Bank (2013). Inflation, consumer prices (annual %). Retrieved from World Bank website: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP. CPI. TOTL. ZG?display = graph.
  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.
  • Zhang, S., & Zhou, W. (2014). An efficient methodology for the reliability analysis of corroding pipelines. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 136, 041701.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.