Uplift of elastomeric bearings in isolated bridges subjected to longitudinal seismic excitations

References

• Akiyama, M., Frangopol, D.M., & Mizuno, K. (2014). Performance analysis of Tohoku-Shinkansen viaducts affected by the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10, 1228–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials [AASHTO] (2010). Guide specifications for seismic isolation design (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials [AASHTO] (2013). LRFD bridge design specifications. Customary U.S. units, 6th ed., with 2013 interim revisions. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Aria, M., & Akbari, R. (2013). Inspection, condition evaluation and replacement of elastomeric bearings in road bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9, 918–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artieda, C.C.M., & Whittaker, A.S. (2010). Theoretical studies of the XY-FP seismic isolation bearing for bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 15, 631–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckle, I., Yen, W.-H.(.P.), Marsh, L., & Monzon, E. (2012). Implications of bridge performance during Great East Japan Earthquake for U.S. seismic design practice. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, March 1–4, 2012, Tokyo (pp. 1363–1374). Tokyo: Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering. Retrieved from http://nisee.berkeley.edu/elibrary/getpkg?id = 201203281.
   Google Scholar
• BS EN 15129 (2009). Anti-seismic devices. British Standards International. Retrieved from http://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030129844.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Transportation [CalTrans] (1999). Bridge memo to designers (20-1) – Seismic design methodology. Sacramento, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, K.-C., Chang, D.-W., Tsai, M.-H., & Sung, Y.-C. (2000). Seismic performance of highway bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, 2, 55–77.
   Google Scholar
• Chu-Chieh, L., Hung, J.H.-H., Liu, K.-Y., & Chai, J.-F. (2010). Reconnaissance observation on bridge damage caused by the 2008 Wenchuan (China) earthquake Chu-Chieh. Earthquake Spectra, 26, 1057–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, A.K. (1995). Dynamics of structures – Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International Series in Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics.
   Google Scholar
• Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI) (2010). SAP 2000 – Nonlinear version 14.2.0, user's reference manual. Berkeley, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, M.C., Kalpakidis, I., Filiatrault, A., & Ecker Lay, R.A. (2011). LRFD-based analysis and design procedures for bridge bearings and seismic isolators (MCEER-11-0004). Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. Retrieved from http://mceer.buffalo.edu/pdf/report/11-0004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dicleli, M. (2006). Performance of seismic-isolated bridges in relation to near-fault ground-motion and isolator characteristics. Earthquake Spectra, 22, 887–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfmann, A., & Burtscher, S.L. (2000). Aspects of cavitation damage in seismic bearings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126, 573–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earthquake Engineering Research Institute [EERI] (1995a). Northridge earthquake reconnaissance report. Oakland, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Earthquake Engineering Research Institute [EERI] (1995b). The Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake reconnaissance report. Oakland, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Earthquake Engineering Research Institute [EERI] (2001). 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake reconnaissance report. Oakland, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Earthquake Engineering Research Institute [EERI] (2011). Learning from earthquakes bridge performance in the Mw 9.0 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake of March 11, 2011. Oakland, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1337-3 (2005). Structural bearings – Part 3: Elastomeric bearings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1992-1-1 (2004). Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures, Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1998-1 (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1998-2 (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 2: Bridges. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Hamzeh, O., Tassoulas, J., & Becker, E. (1998). Behavior of elastomeric bridge bearings: Computational results. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 3, 140–146.
   Google Scholar
• Hindi, R., & Dicleli, M. (2006). Effect of modifying bearing fixities on the seismic response of short- to medium-length bridges with heavy substructures. Earthquake Spectra, 22, 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbsen, R.A. (2007). Proposed AASHTO guide specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design-Subcommittee for seismic effects on bridges, T-3. Imbsen Consulting. Retrieved from http://bridges.transportation.org/Documents/2007Ballot-SeismicGuidelines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Iwabe, N., Takayama, M., Kani, N., & Wada, A. (2000). Experimental study on the effect of tension for rubber bearings. In Proceedings of the 12th WCEE-World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, paper 1290. International Association for Earthquake Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/1290.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Japan Road Association [JRA] (1997). Manual for seismic design of highway bridges. Tokyo: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Japan Road Association [JRA] (2002). Chapter 1: Seismic design specifications for highway bridges. Tokyo: International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Japan Road Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kappos, A.J. (2002). RCCOLA-90: A microcomputer program for the analysis of the inelastic response of reinforced concrete sections (Report). Thessaloniki: Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
   Google Scholar
• Kappos, A.J., Saiidi, M.S., Aydinoglu, M.N., & Isaković, T. (2012). Seismic design and assessment of bridges, inelastic methods of analysis and case studies. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 21. The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Katsaras, C.P., Panagiotakos, T.B., & Kolias, B. (2009). Effect of torsional stiffness of prestressed concrete box girders and uplift of abutment bearings on seismic performance of bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 7, 363–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima, K. (2012). Damage of bridges due to the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, March 1–4, 2012, Tokyo, Japan (pp. 82–101). Tokyo: Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering (JAEE). Retrieved from http://www.jaee.gr.jp/event/seminar2012/eqsympo/pdf/papers/140.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J.M. (2003). Tension buckling in multilayer elastomeric bearings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 129, 1363–1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J.M., & Takhirov, S.M. (2007). Tension buckling in multilayer elastomeric isolation bearings. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 2, 1591–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitahara, T., Kajita, Y., & Kitane, Y. (2012). Investigation on the damage cause of the bridge rubber bearings in the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake. In Proceedings of the 15th WCEE – World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, paper No. 2815. International Association for Earthquake Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/WCEE2012_2815.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kunde, M.C., & Jangid, R.S. (2003). Seismic behavior of isolated bridges: A state-of-the-art review. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 3, 140–170.
   Google Scholar
• Manos, G.C., Mitoulis, S.A., & Sextos, A. (2012). A knowledge-based software for the preliminary design of seismically isolated bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 10, 1029–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J., Heymsfield, E., & Avent, R.R. (2000). Slippage of neoprene bridge bearings. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 5, 216–223.
   Google Scholar
• Mitoulis, S.A. (2012). Seismic design of bridges with the participation of seat-type abutments. Engineering Structures, 44, 222–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitoulis, S.A., Muhr, A., & Ahmadi, H. (2014). Uplift of elastomeric bearings in isolated bridges – A possible mechanism: Effects and remediation. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (2ECEES), Istanbul, Turkey, paper 686.
   Google Scholar
• Mwafy, A., Elnashai, A., & Yen, W.-H. (2007). Implications of design assumptions on capacity estimates and demand predictions of multispan curved bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 12, 710–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeim, F., & Kelly, J.M. (1999). Design of seismic isolated structures, from theory to practice. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Standards and Technology [NIST] (1996). The January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake: Performance of structures lifelines, and fire protection systems, NIST Special Publication 901 Author.
   Google Scholar
• Poulos, H.G., & Davis, E.H. (1980). Pile foundation analysis and design. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., & Calvi, G.M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Public Works Research Institute [PWRI] (2011). Technical note of PWRI no. 4217. In Proceedings of the 43rd Joint Meeting of U.S.-Japan panel on wind and seismic effects (UJNR), Tsukuba, August 29–30 (pp. 154–163). Tsukuba: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nehrp.gov/pdf/UJNR-4217.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sextos, A., Kappos, A., & Pitilakis, K. (2003). Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil-structure interaction phenomena. Part 2: Parametric analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32, 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, J.F., Roeder, C.W., Mackenzie-Helnwein, P., White, C., Kuester, C., & Craig, B. (2008). Rotation limits for elastomeric bearing (NCHRP Report 596). Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q.R., Liu, W.G., He, W.F., & Feng, D.M. (2010). Tensile stiffness and deformation model of rubber isolators in tension and tension-shear states. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 136, 429–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar