Seismic performance of irregular bridges – comparison of different nonlinear static procedures

References

• Ambraseys, N., Smith, P., Sigbjornsson, R., Suhadolc, P., & Margaris, B. (2002). Internet-site for European strong-motion data. In Environment and Climate Programme. European Commission, Research-Directorate General. Retrieved from www.isesd.cv.ic.ac.uk/ESD.
   Google Scholar
• American Concrete Institute Committee 318 (2005). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (ACI 318R-02). Farmington Hills, MI: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers (2007). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings ASCE standard ASCE/SEI 41-06. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Antoniou, S., & Pinho, R. (2004). Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8, 643–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council (2005). Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures  (FEMA Report No. 440). Redwood City, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Aydınoğlu, M.N. (2004). An improved pushover procedure for engineering practice: Incremental response spectrum analysis (IRSA). In Proceedings of the international workshop on performance-based seismic design: Concepts and implementation  (PEER Report No. 2004/05), Bled, Slovenia (pp. 345–356)
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, B., & Bento, R. (2012). Comparison of nonlinear static methods for the seismic assessment of plan irregular frame buildings with non seismic details. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 16, 15–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommer, J.J., & Martínez-Pereira, A. (1999). The effective duration of earthquake strong motion. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 3, 127–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvi, G.M., Pavese, A., & Pinto, P.E. (1993). Progettazione Antisismica di Ponti Non Regolari [Seismic design of irregular bridges]. Pisa: Giornate AICAP-93.
   Google Scholar
• Casarotti, C., Monteiro, R., & Pinho, R. (2009). Verification of spectral reduction factors for seismic assessment of bridges. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 42, 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Casarotti, C., & Pinho, R. (2007). An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 5, 377–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, A.K., & Goel, R.K. (2002). A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, 561–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC8-1 (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1. General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1:2004 Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• EC8-2 (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 2. Bridges. prEN 1998-2:200X Draft 5 (pr Stage 51), Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• EC8-3 (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3. Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. EN 1998-3, Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P. (2000). A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthquake Spectra, 16, 573–592.
   Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P., Marusic, D., & Perus, I. (2005). Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 831–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency 273 (1997). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency 356 (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Finley, A., & Charney, P.E. (2008). Unintended consequences of modeling damping in structures. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 134, 581–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischinger, M., Beg, D., Isakovic, T., Tomazevic, M., & Zarnic, R. (2004). Performance based assessment - From general methodologies to specific implementations. In Proceedings of the international workshop on performance-based seismic design: Concepts and implementation  (PEER Report No. 2004/05), Bled, Slovenia (pp. 293–308)
   Google Scholar
• Goel, R.K., & Chopra, A.K. (2005). Extension of modal pushover analysis to compute member forces. Earthquake Spectra, 21, 125–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulkan, P., & Sozen, M.A. (1974). Inelastic responses of reinforced concrete structure to earthquake motions. ACI Journal Proceedings, 71, 604–610.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J., Watson-Lamprey, J., Abrahamson, N.A., Bommer, J.J., Markatis, A., McCoy, E., & Mendis, R. (2006). An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10, 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., Galasso, C., & Cosenza, E. (2010). REXEL: Computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8, 339–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isakovic, T., & Fischinger, M. (2006). Higher modes in simplified inelastic seismic analysis of single-column bent viaducts. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, 95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isakovic, T., & Fischinger, M. (2011). Applicability of pushover methods to the seismic analyses of an RC bridge, experimentally tested on three shake tables. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 15, 303–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isakovic, T., Fischinger, M., & Kante, P. (2003). Bridges: When is single mode seismic analysis adequate? Structures and Buildings, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 156, 165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isakovic, T., Pompeyo, M., Lazaro, N., & Fischinger, M. (2008). Applicability of pushover methods for the seismic analysis of single-column bent viaducts. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 1185–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappos, A.J., Saidi, M.S., Aydınoğlu, M.N., & Isakovic, T. (Eds.). (2012). Seismic design and assessment of bridges Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, (Vol. 21, XII, 224 p.), Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-3943-7.
   Google Scholar
• Kohrangi, M., Bento, R., & Lopes, M. (2012). Evaluation of nonlinear static procedures for seismic assessment of irregular bridges. In Proceedings of 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalsky, M.J., & Priestley, M.J.N. (2000). An improved analytical model for shear strength of circular RC columns in seismic regions. ACI Journal, 97, 388–396.
   Google Scholar
• Kreslin, M., & Fajfar, P. (2011). The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 40, 1571–1589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.Y., & Chang, K.C. (2003). Study on damping reduction factor for buildings under earthquake ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129, 206–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114, 1804–1826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegotto, M., & Pinto, P.E. (1973). Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending. In Symposium on the resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well defined repeated loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland (pp. 15–22)
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, E. (2000). Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126, 1150–1159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, E., & Ruiz-García, J. (2002). Evaluation of approximate methods to estimate maximum inelastic displacement demands. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, 539–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moaveni, B., Barbosa, A.R., Panagiotou, M., Conte, J.P., & Restrepo, J.I. (2009). Uncertainty analysis of identified damping ratios in nonlinear dynamic systems. In Proceedings of the IMAC-XXVII, Orlando, Florida, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, R. (2011). Probabilistic seismic assessment of bridges  (PhD thesis). Engineering Faculty of the University of Oporto, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Paraskeva, Th., Kappos, A.J., & Sextos, A.G. (2006). Extension of modal pushover analysis to seismic assessment of bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, 1269–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho, R., Casarotti, C., & Antoniou, S. (2007). A comparison of single-run pushover analysis techniques for seismic assessment of bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36, 1347–1362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho, R., Monteiro, R., Casarotti, C., & Delgado, R. (2009). Assessment of continuous span bridges through nonlinear static procedures. Earthquake Spectra, 25, 143–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., & Calvi, G.M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Seismosoft (2010). SeismoMatch: An application capable of adjusting earthquake accelerograms to match a specific target response. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• SeismoSoft (2011). SeismoStruct V5.2.5: A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• Shakeria, K., Tarbalib, K., & Mohebbia, M. (2013). Modified adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of bridges. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 17, 918–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar