References
- Ang, A.H., & Tang, W.H. (2007). Probability concepts in engineering (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
- Benjamin, J.R., & Cornell, C.A. (1970). Probability, statistics and decision for civil engineers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Bergmeister, K., Novák, D., Pukl, R., & Červenka, V. (2009). Structural assessment and reliability analysis for existing engineering structures, theoretical background. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 5, 267–275.
- Bernardo, J.M. (2009). Bayesian methodology in statistics. In SBrown, RTauler, & RWalczak (Eds.), Comprehensive chenometrics (1, pp. 213–245). Oxford: Elsevier.
- BRIME (2001). D5: Development of models (loads and strength). In IV frame-work program. Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.trl.co.uk/brime/.
- CAN/CSA-S6-00 (2000). Commentary on canadian highway bridge design code. Toronto: Canadian Standards Association.
- Casas, J.R., & Wisniewski, D. (2013). Safety requirements and probabilistic models of resistance in the assessment of existing railway bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9, 529–545.
- Ditlevsen, O., & Madsen, H.O. (1996). Structural reliability methods. Chichester: Wiley.
- EN1990 (2002). Eurocode: Bases of structural design. Brussels: CEN.
- Engelund, S., & Rackwitz, R. (1992). On predictive distribution functions for the three asymptotic extreme value distributions. Structural Safety, 11, 255–258.
- Enright, M., & Frangopol, D. (1999). Condition prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges using bayesian updating. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125, 1118–1125.
- Geyskens, P., Kiureghian, A., & Monteiro, P. (1998). Bayesian prediction of elastic modulus of concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124, 89–95.
- Jacinto, L. (2011). Avaliação da Segurança de Pontes Existentes—Abordagem Probabilí-stica Bayesiana (PhD thesis), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Costa da Caparica, Lisboa, Portugal. Retrieved from http://run.unl.pt/handle/10362/7601. (In Portuguese).
- JCSS (2001). Probabilistic model code. Joint Committee on Structural Safety. Retrieved 10 September 2013, from http://www.jcss.byg.dtu.dk/Publications/.
- Kiureghian, A.D., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? does it matter?Structural Safety, 31, 105–112.
- Lauridsen, J., Jensen, J.S., & Enevoldsen, I.B. (2007). Bridge owner's benefits from probabilistic approaches. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3, 281–302.
- Melchers, R. (1999). Structural reliability analysis and prediction (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
- RSA (1983). Regulamento de Segurança e Acções para Estruturas de Edifícios e Pontes. Casa da Moeda: Imprensa Nacional. (In Portuguese).
- Rubinstein, R. (1981). Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. New York, NY: Wiley.
- Shao, Q.-M., & Ibrahim, J.G. (2000). Monte Carlo methods in Bayesian computation. Springer series in statistics. New York, NY: Springer.
- Steenbergen, R., & Vrouwenvelder, A. (2010). Safety philosophy for existing structures and partial factors for traffic loads on bridges. Heron, 55, 123–139.
- Strauss, A., Frangopol, D.M., & Kim, S. (2008). Use of monitoring extreme data for the performance prediction of structures: Bayesian updating. Engineering Structures, 30, 3654–3666.
- Strauss, A., Hoffmann, S., Wendner, R., & Bergmeister, K. (2009). Structural assessment and reliability analysis for existing engineering structures, applications for real structures. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 5, 277–286.
- Vejdirektoratet (2004). Reliability-based classification of the load carrying capacity of existing bridges. Denmark: Road Directorate, Ministry of Transport.
- Wisniewski, D. (2007). Safety formats for the assessment of concrete bridges (PhD thesis), Universidade do Minho, Civil Engineering Department, Azurém, Guimarães, Portugal.