Cost analysis for maintenance and seismic retrofit of existing bridges

References

• A.N.A.S. S.p.A. (2014). Compartimento della Viabilità per il Veneto – Unit Price List (in Italian) – Direzione Centrale Ricerca e Nuove Tecnologie, Norme Tecniche e Osservatorio Prezzi [Roadway department of Veneto region - unit price list. Central direction for research and new technologies, technical standards and prices monitoring]. Retrieved from http://www.stradeanas.it (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Biondini, F., Camnasio, E., & Palermo, A. (2014). Lifetime seismic performance of concrete bridges exposed to corrosion. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10, 880–900.10.1080/15732479.2012.761248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carturan, F., Zanini, M. A., Pellegrino, C., & Modena, C. (2013). A unified framework for earthquake risk assessment of transportation networks and gross regional product. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12, 795–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COST345. (2004). Procedures required for the assessment of highway infrastructures. European Research Project under the framework of European Cooperation in the field of Scientific and Technical Research. EU Commission-Directorate General Transport and Energy, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Franchetti, P., Grendene, M., Pellegrino, C., & Modena, C. (2004). A methodological approach to bridge maintenance and criteria for seismic risk evaluation. 18th Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials, 1–3 December, 2004, Perth, Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Franchin, P., & Pinto, P. E. (2006). On the role of road networks in reducing human losses after earthquakes. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13, 585–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruguglietti, E., & Pasqualato, G. (2014). Bridge management system implementation for Italian highways: From Pontis toward SIOS (Sistema Ispettivo Opere Sineceo) and new generation systems. Proceedings of 7th International IABMAS Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability, Shanghai, 7–11 July 2014, ISBN 978-1-138-00103-9.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, M., Kühn, B., Frieβem, H., & Winkler, B. (2012). Pre-assessment of existing road bridges – New procedure for a rough but quick estimation of the capacity of existing road bridges. Proceedings of 6th International IABMAS Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability, Stresa, 8–12 July 2012, ISBN 978-0-415-62124-3.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, S. W., Carmichael, R. F., Moser, L. O., Hudson, W. R., & Wilkes, W. J. (1987). Bridge management systems. NCHRP Rep. 300, Project 12-28 (2), Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Italian Ministry of Infrastructures. (2008). Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni [Technical standards for constructions], DM 14/01/2008 (in Italian). Rome: DEI Editor.
   Google Scholar
• Kamya, B. M. (2012). Bridge Management Systems: Challenge of adopting a bridge management system appropriate to the needs of a local authority: Examples from the United Kingdom. Proceedings of 6th International IABMAS Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability, Stresa, 8–12 July 2012, BRIME PL97-2220, TRL Ltd, Wokingham, UK. ISBN 978-0-415-62124-3.
   Google Scholar
• Kitada, T., Maekawa, Y., Nakamura, I., & Horie, Y. (2000). Bridge management system for elevated steel highways. Computer-Aided and Civil Infrastructure Engineering, 15, 147–157.10.1111/mice.2000.15.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M., & Kjell, J. (2013). Applied predictive modeling. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3
   Google Scholar
• Kuprenas, J. A., Madjidi, F., Vidaurrazaga, A., & Lim, C. L. (1998). Seismic retrofit program for Los Angeles bridges. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 4, 185–191.10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1998)4:4(185)
   Google Scholar
• Markow, M. J. (1995). Highway management systems: State of the art. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 1, 186–191.10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:3(186)
   Google Scholar
• Mendonça, T., & Brito, V. (2014). Bridge management in Portugal: The past, the present and the future. Proceedings of 7th International IABMAS Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability, Shanghai, 7–11 July 2014, ISBN 978-1-138-00103-9.
   Google Scholar
• Modena, C., Tecchio, G., Pellegrino, C., da Porto, F., Donà, M., Zampieri, P., & Zanini, M. A. (2015). Typical deficiencies and strategies for retrofitting RC and masonry arch bridges in seismic areas. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11, 415–442.10.1080/15732479.2014.951859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morbin, R., Zanini, M. A., Pellegrino, C., Zhang, H., & Modena, C. (2015). A probabilistic strategy for seismic assessment and FRP retrofitting of existing bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. Available on-line. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9725-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OPCM 3362, 04. (2004). Modalità di attivazione Fondo per investimenti straordinari della Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri istituito ai sensi dell’art. 32-bis del decreto legge 30 settembre 2003, no 269, convertito, con modificazioni, dalla legge 24 novembre 2003, no 326 [Order of the President of the Ministry Council: Guidelines for the activation of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers extraordinary investment fund established under the Legislative Decree 30 September 2003 no 269, subsequently updated in Law 24 November 2004 No 326. Rome (in Italian)]. Rome: Order of the President of the Ministry Council (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Patidar, V., Labi, S., Sinha, K. C., Thompson, P. D., Hyman, W. A., & Shirole, A. (2007). Performance measures for enhanced bridge management. Transportation Research Record, 1991. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, C., Franchetti, P., Soffiato, A., Modena, C., & Bruno, D. (2004). Evaluation criteria for bridge maintenance. 2nd International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, IABMAS ‘04, Kyoto, Japan, 19–22 October 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, C., Pipinato, A., & Modena, C. (2011). A simplified management procedure for bridge network maintenance. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7, 341–351.10.1080/15732470802659084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, C., Zanini, M. A., Zampieri, P., & Modena, C. (2015). Contribution of in situ and laboratory investigations for assessing seismic vulnerability of existing bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11, 1147–1162.10.1080/15732479.2014.938661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, N., & Hinkeesing, S. (2014). Deterioration modelling using condition inspection data and engineering judgment. Proceedings of 7th International IABMAS Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability, Shanghai, 7–11 July 2014, ISBN 978-1-138-00103-9.
   Google Scholar
• Rota, M., Pecker, A., Bolognini, D., & Pinho, R. (2005). A methodology for seismic vulnerability of masonry arch bridge walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 331–353.10.1142/S1363246905002432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryall, M. J. (2001). Bridge management. Oxford: Butterworth, Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• SA.MA.R.I.S. (2005). Sustainable and advanced materials for road infrastructure. Final report, VI Framework Programme, Brussels: SA.MA.R.I.S. Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Shirole, A., & Malik, A. (1995). Seismic vulnerability evaluation of New York state bridges. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Structures Congress XIII, Boston, MA, 2–5 April, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Söderqvist, M. K., & Veijola, M. (2012). The new management system of engineering structures in Finland. Proceedings of 6th International IABMAS Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability, Stresa, 8–12 July 2012, ISBN 978-0-415-62124-3.
   Google Scholar
• Strand 7 v2.4. (2010). Strand7 finite element system Release 2.4. Sydney: Strand 7 Pty.
   Google Scholar
• Sustainable Bridges. (2006). Guidelines for load and resistance assessment of existing European railway bridges – Advice on the use of advanced methods. European research project under the EU 6th framework programme. Retrieved from http://www.sustainablebridges.net/
   Google Scholar
• Thoft-Christensen, P. (1995). Advanced bridge management systems. Structural Engineering Review, 7, 151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torkkeli, M., & Lämsä, J. (2012). Guidelines and policy for maintaining and managing all engineering structures of the traffic agency. Proceedings of 6th International IABMAS Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability, Stresa, 8–12 July 2012, ISBN 978-0-415-62124-3.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. J., Cullington, D. W., Daly, A. F., Vassie, P. R., Haardt, P., Kashner, R., ... Peruš, J. (2001). Bridge Management in Europe – Final Report (BRIME PL97-2220). Wokingham: BRIME PL97-2220, TRL.
   Google Scholar
• Veneto Strade S.p.A. (2014). Unit price list. Retrieved from http://www.venetostrade.it/public/pages/pdf/autocpdf/ (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Yue, Y. C., Pozzi, M., Zonta, D., & Zandonini, R. (2012). Bayesian networks for post-earthquake assessment of bridges. Proceedings of 6th International IABMAS Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability, Stresa, 8–12 July 2012, ISBN 978-0-415-62124-3.
   Google Scholar
• Zampieri, P., Zanini, M. A., & Modena, C. (2015). Simplified seismic assessment of multi-span masonry arch bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13, 2629–2646.10.1007/s10518-015-9733-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanini, M. A., Pellegrino, C., Morbin, R., & Modena, C. (2013). Seismic vulnerability of bridges in transport networks subjected to environmental deterioration. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11, 561–579.10.1007/s10518-012-9400-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonta, D., Zandonini, R., & Bortot, F. (2007). A reliability-based bridge management concept. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3, 215–235.10.1080/15732470500315740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar