The suitability of risk reduction indicators to inform dam safety management

References

• Albalate, D., Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2012). Beyond the efficiency-equity dilemma: Centralization as a determinant of government investment in infrastructure. Journal of Regional Science, 91, 599–615.
   Google Scholar
• Altarejos-García, L., Serrano-Lombillo, A., Escuder-Bueno, I., & Morales-Torres, A. (2012). Factor of safety and probability of failure in concrete dams. In Phoon, Kok-Kwang and Ching, Jianye (Eds.), Risk Analysis, Dam Safety, Dam Security and Critical Infrastructure Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• ANCOLD. (2003). Guidelines on risk assessment. Hobart: Australian National Committee on Large Dams.
   Google Scholar
• Ardiles, L., Sanz, D., Moreno, P., Jenaro, E., Fleitz, J., & Escuder-Bueno, I. Risk assessment and management for 26 dams operated by the Duero River Authority (Spain). In 6th international conference on dam engineering. Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Ayyub, B.M., McGill, W.L., & Kaminskiy, M. (2007). Critical asset and portfolio risk analysis: An all-hazards framework. Risk Analysis, 27, 798–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baecher, G.B., Paté, M.E., & De Neufville, R. (1980). Risk of dam failure in benefit-cost analysis. Water Resources Research, 16, 449–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnenblust, H. (1998). Risk-based decision making in the transportation sector. In R. E.Jorissen P. J. M.Stallen (Eds.), Quantified societal risk and policy making (pp. 132–153). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bottelberghs, P.H. (2000). Risk analysis and safety policy developments in the Netherlands. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 71, 59–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, D.S. (2001). Advances in the practice and use of portfolio risk assessment. In Bulletin 117. Australian national committee on large dams (ANCOLD) (pp. 21–32). Melbourne : Australian National Committee on Large Dams (ANCOLD)
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, D.S. (2004). ALARP evaluation: Using cost effectiveness and disproportionality to justify risk reduction. In Bulletin 127, Australian National Committee on Large Dams (ANCOLD) (pp. 89–106). Melbourne: Australian National Committee on Large Dams (ANCOLD).
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, D.S., Parsons, A.M., Anderson, L.R., & Glover, T.F. (1999). Portfolio risk assessment of SA Water’s large dams. In Bulletin 112, Australian National Committee on Large Dams (ANCOLD) (pp. 27–39). Melbourne: Australian National Committee on Large Dams (ANCOLD).
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, W.J. (1996). Executive order 13010: Critical infrastructure protection. Washington, DC: The American Presidency Project.
   Google Scholar
• De Blaeij, A., Florax, R.J.G.M., Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. (2003). The value of statistical life in road safety: A meta-analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 973–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingwood, B.R. (2005). Risk-informed condition assessment of civil infrastructure: State of practice and research issues. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance, 1, 7–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. International series in operations research & management science. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• HSE (Health and Safety Executive) (2001). Reducing risks, protecting people -- HSE’s decision-making process. Sudbury: Health and safety executive. ISBN 0-7176-2151-0.
   Google Scholar
• ICOLD (2005). Risk assessment in dam safety management. A reconnaissance of benefits, methods and current applications. In International Commission on Large Dams. Committee on dam safety. Bulletin 130. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• iPresas (2014). iPresas calc. User guide. iPresas risk analysis. Retrieved from http://www.ipresas.com
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (1985). Nomenclature for hazard and risk assessment in the process industries. Institute of Chemical Engineering (ICHEM): Rugby.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkman, S.N., Jongejan, R., & Maaskant, B. (2011). The use of individual and societal risk criteria within the dutch flood safety policy-nationwide estimates of societal risk and policy applications. Risk Analysis, 31, 282–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkman, S.N., van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M., & Vrijling, J.K. (2003). An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 99, 1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, N.N., & Lambert, J.H. (2007). Equity metrics with risk, performance, and cost objectives for the prioritization of transportation projects. Transactions on Engineering Management, 54, 539–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, G., Sadiqa, R., & Tesfamariama, S. (2014). A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-cycle Design and Performance, 10, 1176–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (1997). The words of risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 17, 407–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney, R.L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Applied probability and statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khadam, I.M., & Kaluarachchi, J.J. (2003). Multi-criteria decision analysis with probabilistic risk assessment for the management of contaminated ground water. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 683–721.
   Google Scholar
• Le Guen, J. (2010). Paper for exploration of tolerable risk guidelines for levee system workshop. In United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), (ed.), Proceedings of the workshop 15 exploration of tolerable risk guidelines for the USACE levee safety program. Alexandria, Washington, DC: United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Institute for Water Resources (IWR).
   Google Scholar
• Lutter, R., Morrall, J.F., & Viscusi, W.K. (1999). The cost-per-life-saved cutoff for safety-enhancing regulations. Economic Inquiry, 37, 599–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MMARM (2001). Plan Hidrológico Nacional [National Hydrological Plan]. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Rural y Marino. Madrid: Gobierno de Espa{\~n}a.
   Google Scholar
• Moteff, J. (2005). Risk management and critical infrastructure protection: Assessing, integrating, and managing threats, vulnerabilities and consequences. Technical report, Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (2014). Reducing coastal risk on the East and gulf coasts. National research council of the national academies. In Committee on United States Army Corps of Engineers water resources science, engineering, and planning. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• NSWDSC (2006). Risk management policy framework for dam safety. New South Wales Government: New South Walles Dams Safety Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D.J., Green, C.H., & Thompson, P.M. (1987). Urban flood protection benefits: A project appraisal guide. Aldershot: Gower Technical Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsberg, J.A.L., & Sjöberg, L. (1997). The cost-effectiveness of lifesaving interventions in Sweden. Risk Analysis, 17, 467–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L. (1988). What is the analytic hierarchy process? In Mathematical models for decision support. NATO ASI series (Vol. 48, pp. 109–121). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano-Lombillo, A., Fluix\’{a}-Sanmartin, A., & Espert-Canet, V.J. (2012). Flood routing studies in risk analysis. Risk analysis, dam safety, dam security and critical infrastructure management. Leiden: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano-Lombillo, A., Morales-Torres, A., & García-Kabbabe, L.A. (2012). Consequence estimation in risk analysis. In I.Escuder-Bueno, E.Matheu, I.Altarejos-García, & J. T.Castillo-Rodríguez (Eds.),Risk analysis, dam safety, dam security and critical infrastructure management. Leiden: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• SPANCOLD (2012). Risk analysis as applied to dam safety. In Technical guide on operation of dams and reservoirs. Technical guides on dam safety, Nr.8. Vol. 1. Madrid: Spanish National Committee on Large Dams.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M.G., & Mueller, J. (2008). A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures. Transport Security, 1, 143–159.
   Google Scholar
• USACE (2014). Safety of dams -- Policy and procedures. Engineering and design. Washington, DC: United States Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• USBR (2011a). Dam safety public protection guidelines. In A risk framework to support dam safety decision-making. United States Bureau of Reclamation. Dam Safety Office. Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• USBR (2011b). Dam safety risk analysis. best practices training manual. In United States Bureau of Reclamation in cooperation with United States Army Corps of Engineers. Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Viscusi, W.K., & Aldy, J.E. (2003). The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27, 5–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrijling, J.K., van Hengel, W., & Houben, R. J. (1995). A framework for risk evaluation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 43, 245–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrijling, J.K., & van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M. (1997). Societal risk and the concept of risk aversion. In C. Guedes Soares (Eds.), Advances in safety and reliability (Vol. 1, pp. 45–52). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Yamano, N., & Ohkawara, T. (2000). The regional allocation of public investment: Efficiency or equity? Journal of Regional Science, 40, 205–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamano, N., & Ohkawara, T. (2000). The regional allocation of public investment: Efficiency or equity? Journal of Regional Science, 40, 205–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar