Cost-benefit evaluation of self-centring concentrically braced frames considering uncertainties

References

• AISC (2010a). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.
   Google Scholar
• AISC. (2010b). Steel construction manual. 14th ed, Second Printing. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Algermissen, S. T., Rinehart, W. A., Dewey, J., Steinbrugge, K. V., Degenkolb, H. J., Cluff, L. S., McClure, F. E., & Gordon, R. F. (1972). A study of earthquake losses in the San Francisco bay area: data and analysis. Rockville, MD: Environmental Research Laboratories of National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnos, T., & Kiremidjian, A. S. (1984). Stochastic time-predictable model for earthquake occurrences. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 74, 2593–2611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE. (2007). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings (41-06). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE. (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (7-10). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• ATC. (1985). Earthquake damage evaluation data for california (ATC-13 Report). Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, J.W., Hueste, M. B. D., & Gardoni, P. (2009). Probabilistic assessment of structural damage due to earthquakes for buildings in Mid-America. Journal of Structural Engineering, 135, 1155–1163.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:10(1155)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. (2007). Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector-valued intensity measures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36, 1861–1883.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W., & Cornell, C. A. (2008). Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation. Structural Safety, 30, 236–252.10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blebo, F. C., & Roke, D. A. (2015). Seismic-resistant friction-damped braced frame system with buckling restrained columns. Structures Congress, 2015, 2241–2250.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Database of inflation and prices for all urban consumers (current series). United States department of labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/data/
   Google Scholar
• Cha, E. J., & Ellingwood, B. R. (2014). Attitudes towards acceptance of risk to buildings from extreme winds. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10, 697–707.10.1080/15732479.2012.758642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58, 1583–1606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBock, D. J., Kim, K. Y., & Liel, A. B. (2013). A scenario case study to evaluate methods of seismic loss assessment for communities of buildings. In G. Deodatis, B. R. Ellingwood, & D. M. Frangopol (Eds.), Safety, reliability, risk and life-cycle performance of structures and infrastructures (pp. 789–796). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dyanati, M., Huang, Q., & Roke, D. (2013). Seismic performance evaluation of self-centering concentrically braced frame system. In G. Deodatis, B. R. Ellingwood, & D. M. Frangopol (Eds.), Safety, reliability, risk and life-cycle performance of structures and infrastructures (pp. 4145–4152). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dyanati, M., Huang, Q., & Roke, D. (2014). Structural and nonstructural performance evaluation of self-centering, concentrically braced frames under seismic loading. Structures Congress, 2014, 2393–2404.
   Google Scholar
• Dyanati, M., Huang, Q., & Roke, D. (2015). Seismic demand models and performance evaluation of self-centering and conventional concentrically braced frames. Engineering Structures, 84, 368–381.10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingwood, B. R. & Wen, Y. K. (2005). Risk-benefit-based design decisions for low-probability/high consequence earthquake events in Mid-America. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 7, 56–70.10.1002/(ISSN)1528-2716
   Google Scholar
• Erberik, M. A., & Elnashai, A. S. (2006). Loss estimation analysis of flat-slab structures. Natural Hazards Review, 7, 26–37.10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:1(26)
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (1992). A benefit-cost model for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings: Vol. 1 & 2, FEMA-227 & 228. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2012). FEMA-P58: Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Volume I (Methodology). Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2014). HAZUS-MH 2.1 Technical manual: Earthquake model. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Goda, K., Lee, C. S., & Hong, H. P. (2010). Lifecycle cost-benefit analysis of isolated buildings. Structural Safety, 32, 52–63.10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunturi, S., & Shah, H. (1993). Building-specific earthquake damage estimation. PhD Thesis. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Q., Gardoni, P., & Hurlebaus, S. (2010). Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete highway bridges with one single-column bent. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 136, 1340–1353.10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafaeikivi, M., Roke, D., & Huang, Q. (2016, February). Seismic performance assessment of self-centering dual systems with different configurations. Structures, 5, 88–100.10.1016/j.istruc.2015.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Y. J., & Wen, Y. K. (2000). Minimum life-cycle cost structural design against natural hazards (Structural research series No.629). Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Lamprou, A., Jia, G., & Taflanidis, A. A. (2013). Life-cycle seismic loss estimation and global sensitivity analysis based on stochastic ground motion modeling. Engineering Structures, 54, 192–206.10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q. & Ellingwood, B. R. (2007). Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under main shock-aftershock earthquake sequences. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36, 405–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, K. C., Lin, C. C. J., Chen, J. Y., & Chang, H. Y. (2010). Seismic reliability of steel framed buildings. Structural Safety, 32, 174–182.10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., & Warn, G. P. (2012). Seismic performance and sensitivity of floor isolation systems in steel plate shear wall structures. Engineering Structures, 42, 115–126.10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2006). OpenSees command language manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, J. E., Dennemann, K., & Ghosh, J. (2010). Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost-benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment. Structural Safety, 32, 165–173.10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. J., & Ang, A. H. S. (1985). Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 111, 722–739.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvini Sani, H., & Banazadeh, M. (2012). Decision analysis for seismic retrofit based on loss estimation. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, K. A., & Kiremidjian, A. S. (2001). Assembly-based vulnerability of buildings and its uses in seismic performance evaluation and risk management decision-making (Report No. 309). Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, K. A., Beck, J. L., Shaikhutdinov, R. V., Au, S. K., Mizukoshi, K., Miyamura, M., Ishida, H., Moroi, T., Tsukada, Y., & Masuda, M. (2004). Effect of seismic risk on lifetime property values. Earthquake Spectra, 20, 1211–1237.10.1193/1.1810536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, C. M., & Miranda, E. (2009). Building-specific loss estimation methods and tools for simplified performance-based earthquake engineering (Report No. 171). Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Roke, D., Sause, R., Ricles, J. M., Seo, C. Y., & Lee, K. S. (2006). Self-centering seismic-resistant steel concentrically-braced frames. Proceedings of 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Roke, D., Sause, R., Ricles, J. M., & Gonner, N. (2009). Damage-free seismic-resistant self-centering steel concentrically-braced frames. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Roke, D., Sause, R., Ricles, J. M., & Chancellor, N. B. (2010). Damage-free seismic-resistant self-centering concentrically-braced frames (ATLSS Report 10-09). Bethlehem, PA: ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University.
   Google Scholar
• RS Means. (2013a). RS means square foot costs. Kingston, MA: RS Means Company.
   Google Scholar
• RS Means. (2013b). RS means facilities maintenance & repair cost data online. Author. Retrieved from http://rsmeans.com/66030.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Sabelli, R., Mahin, S., & Chang, C. (2003). Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures, 25, 655–666.10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00175-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, R. E., Kustu, O., Perry, C. L., & Zanetti, J. M. (1982). Seismic damage assessment for high-rise building. San Francisco, CA: URS/John A. Blume & Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Singhal, A., & Kiremidjian, A. (1997). A method for earthquake motion-damage relationships with application to reinforced concrete frames (Report No. 119). Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, P., Smith, S., Punyamurthula, S., & Sun, J. (1997). Development of ground motion time histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project (Report No SAC/BD-97/04). Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
   Google Scholar
• Song, J., & Ellingwood, B. R. (1999). Seismic reliability of special moment steel frames with welded connections: II. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125, 372–384.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(372)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, Y., Kiureghian, A. D., & Ang, A. H. S. (2004). Life-cycle cost analysis based on a renewal model of earthquake occurrences. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33, 859–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uriz, P., & Mahin, S. (2008). Toward earthquake-resistant design of concentrically braced steel-frame structures. (PEER Report 2008/08). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2014). Database of U.S. Geological Survey for ground motion hazards. Author. Retrieved from http://www.usgs.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Wanitkorkul, A., & Filiatrault, A. (2008). Influence of passive supplemental damping systems on structural and nonstructural seismic fragilities of a steel building. Engineering Structures, 30, 675–682.10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Y. K., & Ang, A. H. (1991). Reliability and cost-effectiveness of structures with active control. Intelligent Structures-2: Monitoring and Control. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intelligent Systems, Perugia.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Y. K., & Shinozuka, M. (1998). Cost-effectiveness in active structural control. Engineering Structures, 20, 216–221.10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00080-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. J., Gardoni, P., & Bracci, J. M. (2009). Decision analysis for seismic retrofit of structures. Structural Safety, 31, 188–196.10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareian, F., & Krawinkler, H. K. (2006). Simplified performance-based earthquake engineering. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar