Gaussian process model for maximum and residual drifts of timber-steel hybrid building

References

• Ancheta, T., Darragh, R., Stewart, J., Seyhan, E., Silva, W., Chiou, B., ..... Donahue, J. (2013). PEER 2013/03 PEER NGA-West2 Database. Pacific earthquake engineering research center (PEER). http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/
   Google Scholar
• ASCE 41. (2006). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. Technical report. Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council. (2006). Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: Program plan for new and existing buildings, FEMA 445. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bezabeh, M., Tesfamariam, S., & Stiemer, S. (2015). Equivalent viscous damping for steel moment-resisting frames with cross-laminated timber infill walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 04015080. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezabeh, M. A., Tesfamariam, S., Stiemer, S., Popovski, M., & Karacabeyli, E. (2015). Direct displacement based design of a novel hybrid structure: Steel moment-resisting frames with cross laminated timber infill walls. Earthquake Spectra, Online first.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christidis, A. A., Dimitroudi, E. G., Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., & Beskos, D. E. (2013). Maximum seismic displacements evaluation of steel frames from their post-earthquake residual deformation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11, 2233–2248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopoulos, C., Pampanin, S., & Priestley, M. J. N. (2003). Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part I: Single-degree of freedom systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7, 97–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clouston, P., Bathon, L. A., & Schreyer, A. (2005). Shear and bending performance of a novel wood--concrete composite system. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131, 1404–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clouston, P., & Schreyer, A. (2008). Design and use of wood-concrete composites. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 13, 167–174.
   Google Scholar
• CSA (2004). CSA G40.21-04 {\it structural quality steel}. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Standards Association.
   Google Scholar
• CSA. (2009). CSA S16–09 design of steel structures. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Standards Association.
   Google Scholar
• Currin, C., Mitchell, T., Morris, M., & Ylvisaker, D. (1991). Bayesian prediction of deterministic functions, with applications to the design and analysis of computer experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 953–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deierlein, G. G., & Noguchi, H. (2004). Overview of US--Japan research on the seismic design of composite reinforced concrete and steel moment frame structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 361–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickof, C., Stiemer, S. F., Bezabeh, M. A., & Tesfamariam, S. (2014). CLT-steel hybrid system: Ductility and overstrength values based on static pushover analysis. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, A4014012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erochko, J., Christopoulos, C., Tremblay, R., & Choi, H. (2011). Residual drift response of SMRFs and BRB frames in steel buildings designed according to ASCE 7-05. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137, 589–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangi, A., Knobloch, M., & Fontana, M. (2009). Fire design of timber--concrete composite slabs with screwed connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 136, 219–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goda, K., & Tesfamariam, S. (2015). Multi-variate seismic demand modelling using copulas: Application to non-ductile reinforced concrete frame in Victoria, Canada. Structural Safety, 56, 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutkowski, R. M., Brown, K., Shigidi, A., & Natterer, J. (2004). Investigation of notched composite wood--concrete connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 1553–1561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., & Beskos, D. E. (2009). Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to repeated earthquakes. Engineering Structures, 31, 2744–2755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., Papagiannopoulos, G. A., & Beskos, D. E. (2011). Evaluation of maximum seismic displacements of SDOF systems from their residual deformation. Engineering Structures, 33, 3422–3431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima, K., MacRae, G., Hoshikuma, J., & Nagaya, K. (1998). Residual displacement response spectrum. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124, 523–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lignos, D. G., & Krawinkler, H. (2011). Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137, 1291–1302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeppky, J. L., Sacks, J., & Welch, W. J. (2009). Choosing the sample size of a computer experiment: A practical guide. Technometrics, 51, 366–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., Fenves, G. L., & Jeremic, B. (2006). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/manuals/usermanual/index.html
   Google Scholar
• McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (1979). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of ouput from a computer code. Technometrics, 21, 239–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (2000). Scotia place -- 12 story apartment building: A case study of high rise construction using wood and steel. New Zealand Timber Design Journal, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. D., & Mitchell, T. J. (1995). Exploratory designs for computational experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 43, 381–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishiyama, I., Kuramoto, H., & Noguchi, H. (2004). Guidelines: Seismic design of composite reinforced concrete and steel buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 336–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. (2010). National building code of Canada 2010. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Pampanin, S., Christopoulos, C., & Priestley, M. J. N. (2003). Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part II: Multi-degree of freedom systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7, 119–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-García, J., & Miranda, E. (2006a). Evaluation of residual drift demands in regular multi-storey frames for performance-based seismic assessment. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35, 1609–1629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-García, J., & Miranda, E. (2006b). Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35, 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J., & Wynn, H. P. (1989). Designs and analysis of computer experiments (with discussion). Statistical Science, 4, 409–435.
   Google Scholar
• Santner, T. J., Williams, B. J., & Notz, W. I. (2003). The design and analysis of computer experiments. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., Karacabeyli, E., Popovski, M., Stiemer, S. F., & Tesfamariam, S. (2014). Damage assessment of connections used in cross laminated timber subject to cyclic loads. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, A4014008. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonlau, M., & Welch, W.J. (2006). A.M. Dean, & S. Lewis (Eds.) Screening the input variables to a computer model via analysis of variance and visualization. (pp. 308–327). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Seismosoft. (2013). SeismoMatch: A computer program for adjusting earthquake records. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.com
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Y. L., Schneider, J., Tesfamariam, S., Stiemer, S. F., & Mu, Z. G. (2013). Hysteresis behavior of bracket connection in cross-laminated-timber shear walls. Construction and Building Materials, 48, 980–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiemer, S., Tesfamariam, S., Karacabeyli, E., & Popovski, M. (2012). Development of steel-wood hybrid systems for buildings under dynamic loads. (Vol. 911). In Proceedings of the 7th International Speciality Conference on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (STESSA), Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Taranath, B. S. (2005). Wind and earthquake resistant buildings: structural analysis and design. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam, S., & Goda, K. (2015). Loss estimation for non-ductile reinforced concrete building in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: effects of mega-thrust Mw9-class subduction earthquakes and aftershocks. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44, 2303–2320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam, S., & Stiemer, S. F. (2014). Special issue on performance of timber and hybrid structures. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 28, Special Issue: Performance of Timber and Hybrid Structures(6), A2014001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam, S., Stiemer, S. F., Dickof, C., & Bezabeh, M. A. (2014). Seismic vulnerability assessment of hybrid steel--timber structure: Steel moment resisting frames with CLT infill. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 18, 929–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam, S., Stiemer, S., Bezabeh, M., Goertz, C., Popovski, M., & Goda, K. (2015,December). Force based design guideline for timber-steel hybrid structures: steel moment resisting frames with CLT infill walls. 145. Retrieved from https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/52383/items/1.0223405
   Google Scholar
• Trifunac, M., & Brady, A. (1975). A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65, 581–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uma, S., Pampanin, S., & Christopoulos, C. (2010). Development of probabilistic framework for performance-based seismic assessment of structures considering residual deformations. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14, 1092–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, W. J., Buck, R. J., Sacks, J., Wynn, H. P., Mitchell, T. J., & Morris, M. D. (1992). Screening, predicting, and computer experiments. Technometrics, 34, 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazgan, U., & Dazio, A. (2012). Post-earthquake damage assessment using residual displacements. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41, 1257–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar