Visual inspection and bridge management

References

• Ang, A. H.-S., & Tang, W. H. (1975). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE. (2013). Report card for America’s infrastructure. Retrieved from https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/
   Google Scholar
• Attoh-Okine, N. O., & Bowers, S. (2006). A Bayesian belief network model of bridge deterioration. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Journal of Bridge Engineering, 159, 69–76.10.1680/bren.2006.159.2.69
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. L., & Au, S. K. (2002). Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128, 380–391.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J., & Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bensi, M., Der Kiureghian, A., & Straub, D. (2013). Efficient Bayesian network modeling of systems. Journal of Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 112, 200–213.10.1016/j.ress.2012.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensi, M., Der Kiureghian, A., & Straub, D. (2015). Framework for post-earthquake risk assessment and decision making for infrastructure systems. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 1(1), 04014003-1-17.
   Google Scholar
• Bensi, M. T. (2010). A Bayesian Network methodology for infrastructure seismic risk assessment and decision support (PhD thesis). University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Biondini, F., & Frangopol, D. M. (2016). Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structural systems under uncertainty: Review. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(9), F4016001-1-17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, T. M., Collins, T. J., Garlich, M. J., O’Leary, J. E., Stromberg, D. G., & Heringhaus, K. C. (2010). Underwater bridge inspection (Report No. FHWA-NHI-10-027 C). Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, S. B., Adu-Gyamfi, Y., Aktan, A. E., & Minaie, E. (2016). Synthesis of national and international methodologies used for bridge health indices (Report No. FHWA-HRT-15-081). McLean VA: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• De Leon, D., Lopez, A., & Esteva, L. (2015). Value of Information on the risk/benefit of infrastructure under strong winds in Mexico. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP12), Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• DeGroot, M. H. (1984). Changes in utility as information. Theory and Decision, 17, 287–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2007). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Paper presented at the Special Workshop on Risk Acceptance and Risk Communication, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Deshmukh, P., & Bernhardt, S. K. L. (2000). Quantifying uncertainty in bridge condition assessment data. Paper presented at the Mid-continent Transportation Symposium 2000 Proceedings, Ames, IA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• DTTAS. (2016). Department of transport tourism and sport: Regional and local roads. Retrieved from https://www.dttas.ie/roads/english/regional-and-local-roads
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, L. (2004). Development of Eirspan: Ireland’s bridge management system. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Journal of Bridge Engineering, 157, 139–146.10.1680/bren.2004.157.3.139
   Google Scholar
• Estes, A. C., Frangopol, D. M., & Foltz, S. D. (2004). Using visual inspection results to update reliability analyses of highway bridges and river lock structures. Journal of Structural Safety and Reliability, 26, 319–333.
   Google Scholar
• Gattulli, V., & Chiaramonte, L. (2005). Condition assessment by visual inspection for a bridge management system. Journal of Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20, 95–107.10.1111/mice.2005.20.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulet, J.-A., & Smith, I. F. C. (2013). Categories of SHM deployments: Technologies and capabilities. Journal of Structural Engineering, 20(11), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Goulet, J. A., Der Kiureghian, A., & Lia, B. (2015). Pre-posterior optimization of sequence of measurement and intervention actions under structural reliability constraint. Journal of Structural Safety, 52(A), 1–9.10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graybeal, B. A., Phares, B. M., Rolander, D. D., Moore, M., & Washer, G. (2002). Visual inspection of highway bridges. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 21, 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, C., & Pakrashi, V. (2015). Reliability analysis of a bridge network in Ireland. Proceedings of the ICE, Bridge Engineering, 168, 442–456.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, F. V., & Nielsen, T. D. (2007). Bayesian networks and decision graphs (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2
   Google Scholar
• Koller, D., & Friedman, N. (2009). Probabilistic graphical models: Principles and techniques. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Konakli, K., Sudret, B., & Faber, M. H. (2015). Numerical investigations into the value of information in lifecycle analysis of structural systems. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 2(3), B40150071-3.
   Google Scholar
• Kosgodagan, A., Morales-Nápoles, O., Maljaars, J., Yeung, T., & Castanier, B. (2015). Bayesian networks to quantify transition rates in degradation modeling: Application to a set of steel bridges in The Netherlands. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, A. (2008). Optimizing sensing theory and applications ( PhD Thesis). Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Sun, L., & Ning, G. (2014). Deterioration prediction of urban bridges on network level using Markov-Chain model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article ID 728107, 10 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, D. V. (1956). On the measure of the information provided by an experiment. Annuals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, 986–1005.10.1214/aoms/1177728069
   Google Scholar
• Luque, J., & Straub, D. (2015). Probabilistic modeling of system deterioration with inspection and monitoring data using Bayesian Networks. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Madanat, S. (1993). Optimal infrastructure management decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies., 1, 77–88.10.1016/0968-090X(93)90021-7
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, H. O., Sørensen, J. D., & Olesen, R. (1989). Optimal inspection planning for fatigue damage of offshore structures. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, San Francisco, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Malings, C., & Pozzi, M. (2016). Value of information for spatially distributed systems: Application to sensor placement. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 154, 219–233.10.1016/j.ress.2016.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malings, C., & Pozzi, M. (2015). Sensor network optimization using Bayesian networks, decision graphs, and value of information. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, Vamcover, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Memarzadeh, M., & Pozzi, M. (2016). Value of information in sequential decision making: Component inspection, permanent monitoring and system-level scheduling. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 154, 137–151.10.1016/j.ress.2016.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzaei, Z., Adey, B. T., Klatter, L., & Thompson, P. D. (2014). Overview of existing bridge management systems. Shanghai: International Association for Bridge Maintenance And Safety (IABMAS).
   Google Scholar
• Morbin, R., Zanini, M. A., Pellegrino, C., Zhang, H., & Modena, C. (2015). A probabilistic strategy for seismic assessment and FRP retrofitting of existing bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13, 2411–2428.10.1007/s10518-015-9725-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. E., Phares, B. M., Graybeal, B. A., Rolander, D. D., & Washer, G. A. (2001). Reliability of visual inspection for highway bridges (Report No. FHWA-RD-01-020). McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. (2001). The Bayes net toolbox for matlab. Berkley: Department of Computer Science, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• National Roads Authority (NRA). (2008). Eirspan: System manual no. 3 principal inspection. Ireland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, T. (2015). Funding for local and regional roads cut by nearly €40 m. The Irish Times. Retrieved from https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/funding-for-local-and-regional-roads-cut-by-nearly-40 m-1.2090023
   Google Scholar
• Pakrashi, V., Kelly, J., & Ghosh, B. (2011). 2011. Sustainable prioritisation of bridge rehabilitation comparing road user cost, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington DC, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Pakrashi, V., Kelly, J., & O’Connor, A. (2012). Direct and probabilistic interrelationships between half-cell potential and resisitivity test results for durability ranking, IABMAS 2012, Stresa, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzi, M., & Der Kiureghian, A. (2011). Assessing the value of information for long-term structural health monitoring. Journal of Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems, 7984, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzi, M., & Der Kiureghian, A. (2012). Assessing the value of alternative bridge health monitoring systems. Paper presented at the 6th International IABMAS Conference, Stresa, Lake Maggiore, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzi, M., Zonta, D., Wang, W., & Chen, G. (2010). A framework for evaluating the impact of structural health monitoring on bridge management. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (IABMAS 2010), Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Rafiq, M. I., Chryssanthopoulos, M. K., & Sathananthan, S. (2015). Bridge condition modelling and prediction using dynamic Bayesian belief networks. Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11, 38–50.10.1080/15732479.2013.879319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H., & Schlaifer, R. (1961). Applied statistical decision theory. Boston, MA: Division of Research Graduate School of Business Administration Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Reale, T., & O’Connor, A. (2011). Cross-entropy as an optimization method for bridge condition transition probability determination. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138, 741–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saydam, D., Frangopol, D., & Dong, Y. (2013). Assessment of risk using bridge element condition ratings. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 19, 252–265.10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, R. P., & Kumar, A. (2013). Value of condition monitoring in infrastructure maintenance. Journal of Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66, 233–241.10.1016/j.cie.2013.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. G. (1992). Modelling human error rates for human reliability analysis of a structural design task. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 36, 171–180.10.1016/0951-8320(92)90097-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, D. (2009). Stochastic modeling of deterioration processes through dynamic Bayesian networks. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 135, 1089–1099.10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, D. (2014). Value of information analysis with structural reliability methods. Journal of Structural Safety, 49, 75–85.10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, D., & Faber, M. H. (2005). Risk based inspection planning for structural systems. Journal of Structural Safety, 27, 335–355.10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Silva, M., Frangopol, D. M., Padgett, J., & Soliman, M. (2016). Maintenance and operation of infrastructure systems: Review. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(9), F4016004-1-16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, J. D., & Thoft-Christensen, P. (1986). Optimal strategy for inspection and repair of structural systems. Civil Engineering Systems, 4, 94–100.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, W. (1973). Probabilistic updating of flaw information. Journal of Testing and EvaluationJournal of Testing and Evaluation, 1, 459–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaghef, K., de Melo e Silva, H. A., Harris, D. K., & M. Ahlborn, T. (2011). Application of thermal IR imagery for concrete bridge inspection. PCI Convention and National Bridge Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of games and economic behaviour. (3rd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, N. (2010). Reliability-based condition assessment of existing highway bridges (PhD thesis). Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Washer, G. A., & Fuchs, P. A. (2015). Developments in the use of infrared thermography for the condition assessment of concrete. Paper presented at the International Symposium Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering. Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Wellalage, N. K. W., Zhang, T., & Dwight, R. (2014). Calibrating Markov chain-based deterioration models for predicting future conditions of railway bridge elements. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, 20(2), 04014060-1-13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weninger-Vycudil, A., Hanley, C., Deix, S., O’Connor, A., & Pakrashi, V. (2015). Cross-asset management for road infrastructure networks. Proceedings of the Institution of Engineers – Transport, 168, 442–456.10.1680/jtran.13.00087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanini, M. A., Faleschini, F., & Pellegrino, C. (2017). Bridge residual service-life prediction through Bayesian visual inspection and data updating. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13, 906–917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zink, J., & Lovelace, B. (2015). Unmanned aerial vehicle bridge inspection demonstration project (Report No. MN/RC 2015-40). St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Znidaric, A., Pakrashi, V., O’Connor, A., & O’Brien, E. (2011). A review of road structure data in six European countries. Proceedings of the ICE, Journal of Urban Design and Planning, 164, 225–232.10.1680/udap.900054
   Google Scholar
• Zonta, D., Glisic, B., & Adriaenssens, S. (2014). Value of information: Impact of monitoring on decision-making. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2014, 1034–1056.
   Google Scholar