System loss assessment of bridge networks accounting for multi-hazard interactions

References

• Adey, B. T., Hackl, J., Lam, J. C., van Gelder, P., van Erp, N., Prak, P., Heitzler, M., Iosifescu, I., & Hurni, L. (2016). Ensuring acceptable levels of infrastructure related risks due to natural hazards with emphasis on stress tests. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Infrastructure Asset Management (SIAM), Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Akkar, S., & Bommer, J. J. (2010). Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region, and the Middle East. Seismological Research Letters, 81, 195–206. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.2.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alipour, A., Shafei, B., & Shinozuka, M. (2012). Reliability-based calibration of load and resistance factors for design of RC bridges under multiple extreme events: Scour and earthquake. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18, 362–371. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyroudis, S., & Kaynia, A. M. (2014). Fragility functions of highway and railway infrastructure. In K. Pitilakis, H. Crowley, & A.M. Kaynia (Eds.), SYNER-G: Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of complex urban, utility, lifeline systems and critical facilities – Typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk (pp. 299–326). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. (2015). Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 31, 579–599. doi:10.1193/021113EQS025M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensi, M., Der Kiureghian, A., & Straub, D. (2011). A Bayesian Network methodology for infrastructure seismic risk assessment and decision support (Report No. 2011/02). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bensi, M., Der Kiureghian, A., & Straub, D. (2013). Efficient Bayesian Network modeling of systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 112, 200–213. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake spectra, 19, 733–752. doi:10.1193/1.1623497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardone, D. (2014). Displacement limits and performance displacement profiles in support of direct displacement-based seismic assessment of bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 43, 1239–1263. doi:10.1002/eqe.2396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalieri, F., Franchin, P., Gehl, P., & Khazai, B. (2012). Quantitative assessment of social losses based on physical damage and interaction with infrastructural systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41, 1569–1589. doi:10.1002/eqe.2220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalieri, F., Franchin, P., Gehl, P., & D’Ayala, D. (2017). Bayesian Networks and infrastructure systems: Computational and methodological challenges. In P. Gardoni (Ed.), Risk and Reliability Analysis: Theory and Applications (pp. 385–415). London: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Corbane, C., Hancilar, U., Ehrlich, D., & De Groeve, T. (2017). Pan-European seismic risk assessment: A proof of concept using the Earthquake Loss Estimation Routine (ELER). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15, 1057–1083. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9993-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A., & Krawinkler, H. (2000). Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News, 3(2), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ayala, D., Gehl, P., Martinovic, K., Gavin, K., Clarke, J., Corbally, R., Tucker, M., Avdeeva, Y. V., van Gelder, P., Salceda Page, M. T., & Segarra Martinez, M. J. (2015). Fragility functions matrix (Report No. D3.2). Retrieved from INFRARISK Project Website http://www.infrarisk-fp7.eu
   Google Scholar
• Deng, L., Wang, W., & Yu, Y. (2015). State-of-the-art review on the causes and mechanisms of bridge collapse. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30, 04015005. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Frangopol, D. M., & Saydam, D. (2013). Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42, 1451–1467. doi:10.1002/eqe.2281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunnett, C. W., & Sobel, M. (1955). Approximations to the probability integral and certain percentage points of a multivariate analogue of student’s t-distribution. Biometrica, 42, 258–260. doi:10.2307/2333441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2003). HAZUS MR4 technical manual: Earthquake model. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, F. J. (1993). Recomendaciones para el calculo hidrometeorologico de avenidas (Report No. 2A-WSD). Madrid: Ministerio de Fomento.
   Google Scholar
• Gallina, V., Torresan, S., Critto, A., Sperotto, A., Glade, T., & Marcomini, A. (2016). A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment. Journal of environmental management, 168, 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., & Rosowsky, D. (2011). Seismic fragility increment functions for deteriorating reinforced concrete bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7, 869–879. doi:10.1080/15732470903071338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl, P. (2017). Bayesian Networks for the multi-risk assessment of road infrastructure (PhD thesis). London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, P., & D’Ayala, D. (2016). Development of Bayesian Networks for the multi-hazard fragility assessment of bridge systems. Structural Safety, 60, 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackl, J., Adey, B. T., Heitzler, M., & Iosifescu-Enescu, I. (2015). An overarching risk assessment process to evaluate the risks associated with infrastructure networks due to natural hazards. International Journal of Performability Engineering, 11, 153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Harary, F. (1994). Graph theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannou, I., Rossetto, T., & Grant, D. N. (2012). Use of regression analysis for the construction of empirical fragility curves. Proceedings of the Fifteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Kafali, C. (2008). System performance under multi-hazard environment (PhD thesis). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Kameshwar, S., & Padgett, J. E. (2014). Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards. Engineering Structures, 78, 154–166. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, W. H., Song, J., & Gardoni, P. (2008). Matrix-based system reliability method and applications to bridge networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 1584–1593. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamlou, A., & Bocchini, P. (2017). Functionality-fragility surfaces. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 46, 1687–1709. doi:10.1002/eqe.2878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., & Gardoni, P. (2014). Effect of seismic degradation on the fragility of reinforced concrete bridges. Engineering Structures, 79, 267–275. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, J. C., & Adey, B. T. (2016). Integrating functional loss assessment and restoration analysis in the quantification of indirect consequences of natural hazards. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 2, 04016008. doi:10.1061/AJRUA6.0000877
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. H., & Rosowsky, D. V. (2006). Fragility analysis of woodframe buildings considering combined snow and earthquake loading. Structural Safety, 28, 289–303. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, D., Moehle, J., Mahin, S., Calderone, A., & Henry, L. (2004). Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge columns. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 869–879. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(869)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, K. R., & Stojadinovic, B. (2006). Post-earthquake functionality of highway overpass bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, 77–93. doi:10.1002/eqe.534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzocchi, W., Garcia-Aristizabal, A., Gasparini, P., Mastellone, M. L., & Di Ruocco, A. (2012). Basic principles of multi-risk assessment: A case study in Italy. Natural Hazards, 62, 551–573. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0092-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, F., Fenves, G. L., & Scott, M. H. (2000). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://opensees.berkeley.edu
   Google Scholar
• Mignan, A., Wiemer, S., & Giardini, D. (2014). The quantification of low-probability – High-consequences events: Part I. A generic multi-risk approach. Natural Hazards, 73, 1999–2022. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1178-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modaressi, H., Desramaut, N., & Gehl, P. (2014). Specification of the vulnerability of physical systems. In K. Pitilakis, P. Franchin, B. Khazai, & H. Wenzel (Eds.), SYNER-G: Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of complex urban, utility, lifeline systems and critical facilities – Methodology and Applications (pp. 131–184). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. (2007). Bayes Net Toolbox [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://github.com/bayesnet/bnt
   Google Scholar
• Nassirpour, A., & D’Ayala, D. (2017). Fragility assessment of masonry infilled steel structures through simplified and dynamic methods. Earthquake Spectra. (under review).
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, B. G. (2005). Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones (PhD thesis). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E., & the INFRARISK Consortium (2013–2016). Novel indicators for identifying critical INFRA structure at RISK from natural hazards [Research Project]. Retrieved from http://www.infrarisk-fp7.eu
   Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell, E. (2012). On “Black Swans” and “Perfect Storms”: Risk analysis and management when statistics are not enough. Risk Analysis, 32, 1823–1833. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01787.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poljansek, K., Bono, F., & Gutierrez, E. (2012). Seismic risk assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure systems: The case of European gas and electricity networks. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41, 61–79. doi:10.1002/eqe.1118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pousse, G., Bonilla, L. F., Cotton, F., & Margerin, L. (2006). Non-stationary stochastic simulation of strong ground motion time-histories including natural variability: Application to the K-net Japanese database. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96, 2103–2117. doi:10.1785/0120050134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, G., & Banerjee, S. (2013). The impact of flood-induced scour on seismic fragility characteristics of bridges. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 17, 803–828. doi:10.1080/13632469.2013.771593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, E. V., & Davis, S. R. (1995). Evaluating scour at bridges (Report No. FHWA-IP-90-017). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T., Gehl, P., Minas, S., Galasso, C., Duffour, P., Douglas, J., & Cook, O. (2016). FRACAS: A capacity spectrum approach for seismic fragility assessment including record-to-record variability. Engineering Structures, 125, 337–348. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selva, J. (2013). Long-term multi-risk assessment: Statistical treatment of interaction among risks. Natural Hazards, 67, 701–722. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0599-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temez, J. R. (1991). Extended and improved rational method. Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth IAHR World Congress, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Tsionis, G., & Fardis, M. N. (2014). Fragility functions of road and railway bridges. In K. Pitilakis, H. Crowley, & A. M. Kaynia (Eds.), SYNER-G: Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of complex urban, utility, lifeline systems and critical facilities – Typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk (pp. 259–298). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherill, G., Esposito, S., Iervolino, I., Franchin, P., & Cavalieri, F. (2014). Framework for seismic hazard analysis of spatially distributed systems. In K. Pitilakis, P. Franchin, B. Khazai, & H. Wenzel (Eds.), SYNER-G: Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of complex urban, utility, lifeline systems and critical facilities – Methodology and applications (pp. 57–88). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, S. D., Taylor, C. E., Cho, S., Lavoie, J. P., Huyck, C., Eitzel, C., Chung, H., & Eguchi, R.T. (2006). REDARS 2: Methodology and software for seismic risk analysis of highway systems (Report No. MCEER-06-SP08). Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., & Konagai, K. (2001). A simplified method for expression of the dynamic stiffness of large-scaled grouped piles in sway and rocking motions. JSCE Journal of Applied Mechanics, 4, 415–422. doi:10.2208/journalam.4.415
   Google Scholar
• Zanini, M. A., Faleschini, F., & Pellegrino, C. (2016). Cost analysis for maintenance and seismic retrofit of existing bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12, 1411–1427. doi:10.1080/15732479.2015.1133661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanini, M. A., Faleschini, F., & Pellegrino, C. (2017). Probabilistic seismic risk forecasting of aging bridge networks. Engineering Structures, 136, 219–232. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanini, M. A., Pellegrino, C., Morbin, R., & Modena, C. (2013). Seismic vulnerability of bridges in transport networks subjected to environmental deterioration. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11, 561–579. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9400-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccaro, G., Cacace, F., Spence, R. J. S., & Baxter, P. J. (2008). Impact of explosive eruption scenarios at Vesuvius. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 178, 416–453. doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar