Publication Cover
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance
Volume 14, 2018 - Issue 7
4,979
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Developments in the management of flood defences and hydraulic infrastructure in the Netherlands

, , &
Pages 895-910 | Received 02 Mar 2017, Accepted 27 Oct 2017, Published online: 04 Mar 2018

References

  • CEN. (2002). EN 1990:2002 Eurocode – Basis of structural design. Brussels, Belgium: European Committer for Standardization.
  • Delta Program. (2014). Working on the delta – Decisions to keep the Netherlands safe and liveable. The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment.
  • Deltares. (2014) Technisch-inhoudelijke uitwerking DPV 2.1 (Working paper Deelprogramma Veiligheid. Concept of 26-02-2014). Delft: Deltares.
  • Eijgenraam, C.J.J. (2006). Optimal safety standards for dikering areas. Paper presented at CPB discussion, paper 62.
  • Frangopol, S.M., Kong, J.S., & Gharaibeh, E.S. (2001). Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway Bridges. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15(1), 27–34. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2001)15:1(27)
  • Jongejan, R.B., & Maaskant, B. (2015). Quantifying flood risks in the Netherlands. Risk Analysis, 35(2), 252–264. doi:10.1111/risa.12285
  • Jonkman, S.N., & Schweckendiek, T. (2015). Developments in levee reliability and flood risk analysis in the Netherlands. In T. Schweckendiek, et al. (Eds.), Geotechnical safety and risk V, proceedings of the ISGSR conference in Rotterdam (pp. 50–60). Amsterdam: IOS Press. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-580-7-50
  • Jonkman, S.N., Bočkarjova, M., Kok, M., & Bernardini, P. (2008). Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modelling of flood damage in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 66, 77–90.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.022
  • Jonkman, S.N., Jongejan, R.B., & Maaskant, B. (2011). The use of individual and societal risk criteria within the dutch flood safety policy-nationwide estimates of societal risk and policy applications. Risk Analysis, 31(2), 282–300. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01502.x
  • Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B.J. (1991). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1, 11–27.
  • Kind, J.M. (2014). Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 7(2), 103–117. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12026
  • Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020
  • Klerk, W.J., Kanning, W., vander Meer, M.T. & Nieuwenhuis, J.W. (2017). Structural health monitoring for life-cycle management of dikes: A case study in the north of the Netherlands. In J. Bakker, D.M. Frangopol, & K. van Breugel (Eds.), Life-Cycle of engineering systems: Emphasis on sustainable civil infrastructure (IALCCE 2016) (p. 438). Leiden: CRC Press/Balkema.
  • Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu. (2016a). Achtergronden bij de normering van de primaire waterkeringen in Nederland. Report, 2016.
  • Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat. (2016b). Beleidslijn Grote Rivieren. Publicatie van het Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat (Directoraat-Generaal Water) en het Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu (Directoraat-Generaal Ruimte).
  • Miranda, C., Teixeira, A., Huber, M., & Schweckendiek, T. (2014). Probabilistic design of relief wells systems as piping mitigation measure. In Proceedings of the 12th International Probabilistic Workshop (IPW2014). Weimar, Germany. Retrieved from http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:2e2e6048-1578-460a-961a-ae6d0bfadbb7
  • Nieuwenhuis, J.W., van der Meer, M.T., Bakkenist, S., Pluijmers, Y., Clemens, R., & Zomer, W. (2016). LivedijkXL Noorderzijlvest: State of the Art 2015. Groningen: Stichting FloodControl IJkdijk.
  • Peck, R.B. (1969). Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics. Géotechnique, 19(2), 171–187. doi:10.1680/geot.1969.19.2.17110.1680/geot.1969.19.2.171
  • Rijkswaterstaat. (2009). Hydrologsche trends Ijsselmeer. Rijkswaterstaat report 16 December 2009, edited by D. Vlag. Lelystad, the Netherlands.
  • Rijkswaterstaat. (2015). The national flood risk analysis for the Netherlands. Utrecht: Rijkswaterstaat.
  • Rijkswaterstaat Water, Verkeer en Leefomgeving. (2017). Rivierkundig Beoordelingskader voor ingrepen in de Grote Rivieren. Versie 4.0, Lelystad, the Netherlands, Rijkswaterstaat.
  • Roscoe, K.L. (2017). Bayesian Networks for levee system reliability: Reliability updating and model verification ( Doctoral Dissertation). Delft: University of Technology.
  • Schweckendiek, T., Vrouwenvelder, A.C.W.M., Calle, E.O.F., Jongejan, R.B., & Kanning, W. (2013). Partial Factors for Flood Defences in the Netherlands. In G.A. Fenton, et al. (Eds.), Modern Geotechnical Codes of Practice – Development and Calibration. Special Geotechnical Publication, Taylor & Francis.
  • Schweckendiek, T., Vrouwenvelder, A.C.W.M., & Calle, E.O.F. (2014). Updating piping reliability with field performance observations. Structural Safety, 47, 13–23. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.10.002
  • van Slobbe, E., de Vriend, H.J., Aarninkhof, S., Lulofs, K., de Vries, M., & Dircke, P. (2013). Building with nature: In search of resilient storm surge protection strategies. Natural Hazards, 66(3), 1461–1480. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0342-y
  • Slomp, R., Knoeff, H., Bizzarri, A., Bottema, M., & de Vries, W. (2016). Probabilistic flood defence assessment tools. In Proceedings of Flood Risk 2016 (Vol. 7, p. 03015). doi:10.1051/e3sconf/2016070315
  • Stevin, H. (1667). Wiscontisch Filosfisch Bedrijf (in Dutch). Leiden: Philips de Cro-Y.
  • Stive, M.J., & Waterman, R.E. (2002). The Netherlands: The Zuyder Zee project. In J. Chen, et al. (Eds.), Engineered Coasts (pp. 279–290). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Thijsse, J.T. (1972). Een halve Eeuw Zuiderzeewerken (in Dutch). Groningen: H.D. Tjeenk Willink.
  • VNK – Veiligheid Nederland in Kaart. (2014). Eindrapportage Veiligheid Nederland in Kaart (Rapport HB 2540621). Nieuwegein: Rijkswaterstaat Projectbureau VNK.
  • Voortman, H.G., & van der Kolk, H. (2013). Adaptive design as an answer to climate uncertainty. In R.D.J.M. Steenbergen, P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder, S. Miraglia, & A.C.W.M. Vrouwenvelder (Eds.), Proceedings of ESREL 2013: Safety, reliability and risk analysis: Beyond the Horizon (pp. 3303–3309). London: Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.1201/b15938-50210.1201/b15938
  • Voortman, H., Tuin, H., Seinen, W., & Jonkman, S.N. (2017). Lifecycle optimization of portfolios of hydraulic structures. In J. Bakker, D.M. Frangopol, & K. van Breugel (Eds.), Life-cycle of engineering systems: Emphasis on sustainable civil infrastructure (IALCCE 2016) (p. 110). Leiden: CRC Press/Balkema.
  • Vrijling, J.K. (2001). Probabilistic design of flood defence systems in the Netherlands. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 74(3), 337–344.10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00082-5
  • Vrijling, J.K., van Hengel, W., & Houben, R.J. (1998). Acceptable risk as a basis for design. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59(1), 141–150. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00135-X
  • Vuik, V., Jonkman, S.N., Borsje, B.W., & Suzuki, T. (2016). Nature-based flood protection: The efficiency of vegetated foreshores for reducing wave loads on coastal dikes. Coastal Engineering, 116, 42–56.10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.06.001
  • Willems, A., & Webbers, P. (2003). Modelling a probabilistic safety management system for the Eastern-Scheldt storm surge barrier, the basin and the surrounding dikes. In T. Bedford & P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder (Eds.), Safety & reliability: Proceedings of ESREL 2003, Vol. 2 (pp. 1713–1719). Lisse: A.A. Balkema.