The use of nested sampling for prediction of infrastructure degradation under uncertainty

References

• BRIME. (2001). Project funded by the European Commission under the Transport, RTD Programme of the 4th Framework Programme – Bridge Management and Condition Monitoring, BRIME PL97-2220, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fwa, T.F., & Farhan, J. (2012). Optimal multi-asset maintenance budget allocation in highway asset management. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138(10), 1179–1187.10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000414
   Google Scholar
• Gamerman, D., & Lopes, H.F. (2006). Markov chain monte carlo, stochastic simulation for bayesian inference. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Gervásio, H., Simões da Silva, L., Perdigão, V., Orcesi, A., & Andersen, R. (2015). Influence of maintenance strategies on the life cycle performance of composite highway bridges. Structural Engineering International, 25(2), 184–196.10.2749/101686614X14043795569978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K., Kaito, K., & Lethanh, N. (2012a). A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46(4), 544–561.10.1016/j.trb.2011.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K., Kaito, K., & Lethanh, N. (2012b). A bayesian estimation method to improve deterioration prediction for infrastructure system with markov chain model. International Journal of Architecture, Engineering and Construction, 1(1), 1–13.10.7492/IJAEC.2012.001
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, B.W. (1993). Statistical theory. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mašović, S., Stošić, S., & Hajdin, R. (2015). Application of semi-Markov decision process in bridge management. IABSE Symposium Report, IABSE Conference Geneva 2015: Structural Engineering: Providing Solutions to Global Challenges.
   Google Scholar
• Memarzadeh, M., & Pozzi, M. (2016). Integrated inspection scheduling and maintenance planning for infrastructure systems. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 31(6), 403–415.10.1111/mice.2016.31.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishalani, R., & Madanat, S. (2002). Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 8(4), 139–148.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP. (2007). Multi-objective optimization for bridge management systems, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis Report No. 590. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Orcesi, A.D., & Cremona, C.F. (2010). A bridge network maintenance framework for Pareto optimization of stakeholders/users costs. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95(11), 1230–1243.10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakonstantinou, K.G., & Shinozuka, M. (2014a). Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and Markov processes. Part I: Theory. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 130, 202–213.10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakonstantinou, K.G., & Shinozuka, M. (2014b). Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and Markov processes. Part II: POMDP implementation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 130, 214–224.10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PIARC. (2003). Indicators for bridge performance and prioritization of bridge actions, PIARC Technical Committee 11 on Bridges and Other Structures, ISBN : 2-84060-161-3.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Silva, M., & Klutke, G.A. (2016). Reliability and lifecycle analysis of deteriorating systems (p. 355). Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-20946-3
   Google Scholar
• Schöbi, R., & Chatzi, E.N. (2016). Maintenance planning using continuous-state partially observable Markov decision processes and non-linear action models. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(8), 977–994.10.1080/15732479.2015.1076485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R.W., & Johnson, M.B. (2001, July-August). California bridge health index: A diagnostic tool to maximize bridge longevity, investment. TR News, No. 215, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Skilling, J. (2004). Nested sampling. In G. Erickson, J.T. Rychert, & C.R. Smith (Eds.), Maximum entropy and Bayesian methods in science and engineering (pp. 395–405). AIP Conference Proceedings, 735.
   Google Scholar
• Skilling, J. (2006). Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation. Bayesian Anal., 1(4), 833–859. doi:10.1214/06-BA127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilling, J. (2012). Bayesian computation in big spaces-nested sampling and Galilean Monte Carlo. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1443, 145. doi:10.1063/1.3703630
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P.D. (2000). Commonly-recognized bridge elements successful applications and lessons learned. Prepared for the National Workshop on Commonly Recognized Measures for Maintenance, AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• Van Erp, H.R.N., & Van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M. (2009). Introducing nested sampling. Proceedings of the 7th International Probabilistic Workshop. Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Van Erp, H.R.N., Linger, R.O., & Van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M. (2017). Introducing inner nested sampling, arXiv:1704.02207v1 [stat.ME].
   Google Scholar
• Zellner, A. (1971). An introduction to Bayesian inference in econometrics. New York, NY: J. Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar