An improved damage diagnostic technique based on Singular Spectrum Analysis and time series models

References

• Abdi, H., & Williams, L.J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Computational statistics, 2(4), 433–459.
   Google Scholar
• Alampalli, S., Fu, G., & Dillon, E.W. (1997). Signal versus noise in damage detection by experimental modal analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(2), 237–245.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:2(237)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayissa, W.L., Haritos, N., & Thelandersson, S. (2008). Vibration-based structural damage identification using wavelet transform. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 22(5), 1194–1215.10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., & Reinsel, G.C. (1994). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Broomhead, D.S., Jones, R., King, G.P., & Pike, E.R. (1987). Singular system analysis with application to dynamical systems. In E.R. Pike & L.A. Lugiato (Eds.), Chaos, noise and fractals (pp. 15–27). Bristol: Adam Hilger.
   Google Scholar
• Carden, E.P., & Brownjohn, J.M. (2008). ARMA modelled time-series classification for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 22(2), 295–314.10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, S.H., & Loh, C.H. (2014). Application of singular spectrum analysis to structural monitoring and damage diagnosis of bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(6), 708–727.10.1080/15732479.2012.758643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva, S., Junior, M.D., Junior, V.L., & Brennan, M.J. (2008). Structural damage detection by fuzzy clustering. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 22(7), 1636–1649.10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., & Prime, M.B. (1998). A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. The Shock and Vibration Digest, 30(2), 91–105.10.1177/058310249803000201
   Google Scholar
• Elsner, J.B., & Tsonis, A.A. (2013). Singular spectrum analysis: A new tool in time series analysis. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Gharibnezhad, F., Mujica, L.E., Rodellar, J., & Fritzen, C.P. (2013). Damage detection using principal component analysis based on wavelet ridges. Key Engineering Materials, 569–570, 916–923.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.569-570
   Google Scholar
• Golinval, J.C. (2014). On the use of Principal Component Analysis for parameter identification and damage detection in structures. 4ème Colloque. Analyse Vibratoire Expérimentale. Blois, France: INSA Centre Val de Loire.
   Google Scholar
• Golyandina, N., Nekrutkin, V., & Zhigljavsky, A. (2001). Analysis of time series structure – SSA and related techniques (pp. 13–78). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.10.1201/CHMONSTAAPP
   Google Scholar
• Golyandina, N., & Zhigljavsky, A. (2013). Singular Spectrum Analysis for time series. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-642-34913-3
   Google Scholar
• Gul, M., & Catbas, F.N. (2009). Statistical pattern recognition for Structural Health Monitoring using time series modeling: Theory and experimental verifications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 23(7), 2192–2204.10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassani, H. (2007). Singular Spectrum Analysis: Methodology and comparison. Journal of Data Science, 5(2), 239–257.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, H., Wu, C., & Lu, W.J. (2011). Damage detection of circular hollow cylinder using modal strain energy and scanning damage index methods. Computers & Structures, 89(1-2), 149–160.10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, N.E. (2005). Introduction to the Hilbert Huang transform and its related mathematical problems. Chapter 1. In: N.E. Huang & S.S.P. Shen (Eds.), Hilbert–Huang transform and its applications (pp. 1–26). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.10.1142/IMS
   Google Scholar
• Huynh, D., He, J., & Tran, D. (2005). Damage location vector: A non-destructive structural damage detection technique. Computers & Structures, 83(28), 2353–2367.10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayawardhana, M., Zhu, X.Q., & Liyanapathirana, R. (2013). An experimental study on damage detection of concrete structures using decentralized algorithms. Advances in Structural Engineering, 16(1), 33–50.10.1260/1369-4332.16.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, S.S., Cho, S., & Jung, H.J. (2015). Adaptive reference updating for vibration-based structural health monitoring under varying environmental conditions. Computers & Structures, 158, 211–224.10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juneja, V., Haftka, R.T., & Cudney, H.H. (1997). Damage detection and damage detectability – Analysis and experiments. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 10(4), 135–142.10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1997)10:4(135)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopsaftopoulos, F.P., & Fassois, S.D. (2015). A vibration model residual-based sequential probability ratio test framework for structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring: An International Journal, 14(4), 359–381.10.1177/1475921715580499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawczuk, M., Żak, A., & Ostachowicz, W. (2000). Elastic beam finite element with a transverse elasto-plastic crack. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 34(1), 61–73.10.1016/S0168-874X(99)00027-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullaa, J. (2014, July). Benchmark data for structural health monitoring. EWSHM-7th European workshop on structural health monitoring, Nantes, France.
   Google Scholar
• Lakshmi, K., & Rama Mohan Rao, A. (2014). A robust damage-detection technique with environmental variability combining time-series models with principal components. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 29(4), 357–376.10.1080/10589759.2014.949709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (1997). A note on the residual empirical process in autoregressive models. Statistics & Probability Letters, 32(4), 405–411.10.1016/S0167-7152(96)00100-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljung, L. (1987). System identification: Theory for the user. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mosavi, A.A., Dickey, D., Seracino, R., & Rizkalla, S. (2012). Identifying damage locations under ambient vibrations utilizing vector autoregressive models and Mahalanobis distances. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 26, 254–267. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omenzetter, P., & de Lautour, O.R. (2008). Application of time series analysis and statistical pattern recognition for seismic damage detection. The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Oropeza, V. (2010). The singular spectrum analysis method and its application to seismic data denoising and reconstruction (M.Sc Thesis). University of Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Pai, P.F., & Sundaresan, M.J. (2012). Space–wavenumber and time–frequency analysis for damage inspection of thin-walled structures. Structural Health Monitoring: An International Journal, 11(4), 452–471.10.1177/1475921711434860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit, S.M., & Wu, S.M. (1983). Time series and system analysis with applications. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rama Mohan Rao, A., & Lakshmi, K. (2015). Damage diagnostic technique combining POD with time-frequency analysis and dynamic quantum PSO. Meccanica, 50(6), 1551–1578. doi:10.1007/s11012-015-0106-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rama Mohan Rao, A., Lakshmi, K., & Venkatachalam, D. (2012). Damage diagnostic technique for structural health monitoring using POD and self adaptive differential evolution algorithm. Computers & Structures, 106, 228–244. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, M.H., & Fassois, S.D. (1998). Reduced-dimensionality geometric approach to fault identification in stochastic structural systems. AIAA Journal, 36(12), 2250–2256.10.2514/2.334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, H., & Farrar, C.R. (2001). Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals. Smart Materials and Structures, 10(3), 446. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, H., Allen, D.W., Worden, K., & Farrar, C.R. (2003). Statistical damage classification using sequential probability ratio tests. Structural Health Monitoring: An International Journal, 2(1), 57–74.10.1177/147592103031113
   Google Scholar
• Tomaszewska, A. (2010). Influence of statistical errors on damage detection based on structural flexibility and mode shape curvature. Computers & Structures, 88(3–4), 154–164.10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Chen, X., Tian, S., & He, Z. (2012). Multiple damages detection in beam based approximate waveform capacity dimension. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 41(5), 663.10.12989/sem.2012.41.5.663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, R., & Pakzad, S.N. (2012). Autoregressive statistical pattern recognition algorithms for damage detection in civil structures. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 31, 355–368.10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, H., & Mita, A. (2008). Damage indicator defined as the distance between ARMA models for structural health monitoring. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 15(7), 992–1005.10.1002/stc.v15:7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Li, L., & He, X.Q. (2011). Damage detection method for shear buildings using the changes in the first mode shape slopes. Computers & Structures, 89(9), 733–743.10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar