Performance-based seismic design of bridges: a global perspective and critical review of past, present and future directions

References

• ACI-374. (2014). Acceptance criteria for moment frames based on structural testing and commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO. (2013). AASHTO guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO. (2014a). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO. (2014b). Guide specifications for seismic isolation design. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO. (1983). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Alam, M., Youssef, M., & Nehdi, M. (2007). Utilizing shape memory alloys to enhance the performance and safety of civil infrastructure: A review. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 34 (9), 1075–1086. doi: 10.1139/l07-038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACI-341. (2014). Analysis and design of seismic-resistant concrete bridge systems. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ACI-550.3. (2013). Design specification for unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete special moment frames satisfying ACI 374.1. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Akiyama, M., Frangopol, D., Deodatis, G., Ellingwood, B., & Frangopol, D. (2013). Safety, Reliability, Risk and Life-Cycle Performance of Structures and Infrastructures: Life-cycle design of bridges under multiplehazards: Earthquake, tsunami, and continuous deterioration. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• ATC-13. (1985). Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• ATC-40. (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing concrete buildings. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Basoz, N., & Kiremidjian, A. S. (1998). Evaluation of bridge damage data from the Loma Prieta and Northridge, California earthquakes (Report No. MCEER-98–0004). Redwood City, CA: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
   Google Scholar
• BCMOT. (2016). British Columbia Supplement to CHBDC S6-14. Victoria: British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, M., & Eberhard, M. (2003). Performance models for flexural damage in reinforced concrete columns (Report No. 2003/18). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Billah, A. M., & Alam, M. S. (2014). Seismic fragility assessment of concrete bridge pier reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloy. Earthquake Spectra, 31(3), 1515–1541. doi: 10.1193/112512EQS337M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billah, A. M., & Alam, M. S. (2015). Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: A state-of-the-art review. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(6), 804–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billah, A. M., & Alam, M. S. (2016a). Performance-based seismic design of shape memory alloy–reinforced concrete bridge piers. I: Development of performance-based damage states. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(12), 04016140. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billah, A. M., & Alam, M. S. (2016b). Performance-based seismic design of shape memory alloy–reinforced concrete bridge piers. II: Methodology and design example. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(12), 04016141. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billah, A. M., Alam, M. S., & Bhuiyan, M. R. (2013). Fragility analysis of retrofitted multicolumn bridge bent subjected to near-fault and far-field ground motion. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18(10), 992–1004. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billington, S. L., & Yoon, J. (2004). Cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned precast columns with ductile fiber-reinforced concrete. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 9(4), 353–363. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(353)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckle, I. G., Constantinou, M. C., Diceli, M., & Ghasemi, H. (2006). Seismic isolation of highway bridges (Report No. MCEER-06-SP07). New York, NY: University of Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Buckle, I. G., & Mayes, R. L. (1990). Seismic isolation: History, application, and performance—A world view. Earthquake Spectra, 6(2), 161–201. doi: 10.1193/1.1585564
   Google Scholar
• Caltrans. (2013). Caltrans seismic design criteria. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Caltrans. (2016). Caltrans seismic design specifications for steel bridges. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Caltrans. (2010). Memo to designers 20-1 seismic design methodology. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. (2005). Eurocode 8–design of Structures for earthquake resistance. Brussels: European Committee for Normalization.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S. E., & Shinozuka, M. (1996). Life-cycle cost analysis with natural hazard risk. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2(3), 118–126. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:3(118)
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W.-F., & Duan, L. (2014). Bridge engineering handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• China-MOT. (2008). Chinese guidelines for seismic design of highway bridges. Beijing: Ministry of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, E., DesRoches, R., & Nielson, B. (2004). Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structures, 26(2), 187–199. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, C. C., & Hsu, C. P. (2008). Hysteretic model development and seismic response of unbonded post‐tensioned precast cft segmental bridge columns. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 37(6), 919–934. doi: 10.1002/eqe.796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopoulos, C., Tremblay, R., Kim, H.-J., & Lacerte, M. (2008). Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: Development and validation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(1), 96–107. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(96)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, W.-J., Yun, C.-B., Kim, N.-S., & Seo, J.-W. (1999). Shaking table and pseudodynamic tests for the evaluation of the seismic performance of base-isolated structures. Engineering Structures, 21(4), 365–379. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00211-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohagen, L. S., Pang, J. B., Stanton, J. F., & Eberhard, M. O. (2008). A precast concrete bridge bent designed to re-center after an earthquake Seattle, WA: TransNow.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, M., Symans, M., Tsopelas, P., & Taylor, D. (1993). Fluid viscous dampers in applications of seismic energy dissipation and seismic isolation. Proceedings ATC, 17(1), 581–592.
   Google Scholar
• CSA. (2014). Canadian highway bridge design code. Mississauga: Canadian Standards Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dawood, H., Elgawady, M., & Hewes, J. (2012). Behavior of segmental precast posttensioned bridge piers under lateral loads. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 17(5), 735–746. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devereux, C., Holden, T., Buchanan, A., & Pampanin, S. (2011). NMIT arts & media building-damage mitigation using post-tensioned timber walls. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 9th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Di Sarno, L., & Manfredi, G. (2012). Experimental tests on full‐scale rc unretrofitted frame and retrofitted with buckling‐restrained braces. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(2), 315–333. doi: 10.1002/eqe.1131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Bahey, S., & Bruneau, M. (2011). Buckling restrained braces as structural fuses for the seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete bridge bents. Engineering Structures, 33(3), 1052–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, K. J., & Moehle, J. P. (2005). Axial capacity model for shear-damaged columns. ACI Structural Journal, 102(4), 578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P. (2000). A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthquake Spectra, 16(3), 573–592. doi: 10.1193/1.1586128
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (1997). HAZUS technical manual. Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2000). Commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA. (2006). Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 – Bridges. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA-NHI. (2014). LRFD seismic analysis and design of bridges reference manual (Publication No. FHWA-NHI-15-004). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., Kowalsky, M. J., & Nau, J. M. (2015). Effect of seismic load history on deformation limit states for longitudinal bar buckling in RC circular columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(8), 04014187. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., Der Kiureghian, A., & Mosalam, K. M. (2002). Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128(10), 1024–1038. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1024)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovinazzi, S., Wilson, T., Davis, C., Bristow, D., Gallagher, M., Schofield, A., Villemure, M., Eidinger, J., & Tang, A. (2011). Lifelines performance and management following the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, New Zealand: Highlights of resilience. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44(4), 402–417.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobarah, A. (2001). Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: State of development. Engineering Structures, 23(8), 878–884. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00036-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1982). Working with the performance approach in building. Rotterdam: CIB Report Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Gidaris, I., Padgett, J. E., Barbosa, A. R., Chen, S., Cox, D., Webb, B., & Cerato, A. (2017). Multiple-hazard fragility and restoration models of highway bridges for regional risk and resilience assessment in the United States: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Structural Engineering, 143(3), 04016188. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günay, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2013). PEER performance-based earthquake engineering methodology, revisited. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 17(6), 829–858. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2013.787377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habel, K., Denarié, E., & Brühwiler, E. (2006). Structural response of elements combining ultrahigh-performance fiber-reinforced concretes and reinforced concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132 (11), 1793–1800. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1793)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Hable” FEMA. (1996). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Hedayati Dezfuli, F., & Alam, M. S. (2015). Seismic vulnerability assessment of a multi-span continuous steel-girder bridge isolated by SMA wire-based natural rubber bearings (sma-nrb). Paper presented at the Structures Congress, Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Hedayati Dezfuli, F., & Alam, M. S. (2016). Effect of different steel‐reinforced elastomeric isolators on the seismic fragility of a highway bridge. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 24(2), e1866. doi: 10.1002/stc.1866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamburger, R., Rojahn, C., Moehle, J., Bachman, R., Comartin, C., & Whittaker, A. (2004). The ATC-58 project: development of next-generation performance-based earthquake engineering design criteria for buildings. Paper presented at the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Q., Du, X., Liu, J., Li, Z., Li, L., & Zhao, J. (2009). Seismic damage of highway bridges during the 2008 wenchuan earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 8(2), 263–273. doi: 10.1007/s11803-009-8162-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, A. R., & Alam, M. S. (2017). Hysteretic behaviour of a piston based self-centering (PBSC) bracing system made of superelastic SMA bars–A feasibility study. Structures, 12, 102–114. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2017.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Liu, J. B., & Chiu, Y.-H. (2001). Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges. Mid-America Earthquake Center report: project MAEC RR-4. Urbana: MACE
   Google Scholar
• Hewes, J. T., & Priestley, M. N. (2002). Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns (Report No. SSRP 2001/25). La Jolla, CA: University of California San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Hieber, D. G., Wacker, J. M., Eberhard, M. O., & Stanton, J. F. (2005). Precast concrete pier systems for rapid construction of bridges in seismic regions (Report No. WA-RD 611.1). Seattle, WA: Washington State Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Hijikata, K., Takahashi, M., Aoyagi, T., & Mashimo, M. (2012). Behavior of a base-isolated building at Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant during the Great East Japan Earthquake. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, T., Restrepo, J., & Mander, J. B. (2003). Seismic performance of precast reinforced and prestressed concrete walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(3), 286–296. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:3(286)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITG-5.1. (2008). Acceptance criteria for special unbonded post-tensioned precast structural walls based on validation testing. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ITG-5.2. (2009). Requirements for design of a special unbonded post-tensioned precast shear wall satisfying ACI ITG-5.1 and commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• JRC-Ispra. (2012). Seminar bridge design with Eurocodes. JRC Ispra Seminar, Ispra, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Kameshwar, S., & Padgett, J. (2014). Towards risk-based, multi-hazard-resistant design of bridges. Boston, MA: Structures Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-H., & Feng, M. Q. (2003). Fragility analysis of bridges under ground motion with spatial variation. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 38(5), 705–721. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00128-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasai, K., Mita, A., Kitamura, H., Matsuda, K., Morgan, T. A., & Taylor, A. W. (2013). Performance of seismic protection technologies during the 2011 tohoku-oki earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 29(s1), S265–S293. doi: 10.1193/1.4000131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima, K. (2000). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33(3), 265–285.
   Google Scholar
• Kawashima, K., Takahashi, Y., Ge, H., Wu, Z., & Zhang, J. (2009). Reconnaissance report on damage of bridges in 2008 Wenchuan, China, earthquake. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13(7), 965–996. doi: 10.1080/13632460902859169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima, K., Unjoh, S., Hoshikuma, J.-I., & Kosa, K. (2011). Damage of bridges due to the 2010 maule, chile, earthquake. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 15(7), 1036–1068. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2011.575531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Choi, H. (2004). Behavior and design of structures with buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures, 26(6), 693–706. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchsteiger, C. (1999). On the use of probabilistic and deterministic methods in risk analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 12(5), 399–419. doi: 10.1016/S0950-4230(99)00012-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohno, M., & Collins, K. R. (2000). Merging life cycle cost analysis and performance-based design. Paper presented at the 8th ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, Notre Dame, Indiana.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalsky, M. J. (2000). Deformation limit states for circular reinforced concrete bridge columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(8), 869–878. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(869)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurama, Y., Sause, R., Pessiki, S., & Lu, L.-W. (1999). Lateral load behavior and seismic design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. ACI Structural Journal, 96(4), 622–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurama, Y. C., & Shen, Q. (2004). Posttensioned hybrid coupled walls under lateral loads. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(2), 297–309. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(297)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurama, Y. C., Sritharan, S., Fleischman, R. B., Restrepo, J. I., Henry, R. S., Cleland, N. M., Ghosh, S., & Bonelli, P. (2018). Seismic-resistant precast concrete structures: State of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering, 144(4), 03118001. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwabara, T., Tamakoshi, T., Murakoshi, J., Kimura, Y., Nanazawa, T., & Hoshikuma, J-I. (2013). Outline of Japanese design specifications for highway bridges in 2012. Papre presented at the 44th Meeting, Joint Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects (UJNR), UJNR Gaithersburg.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. K. (2007). Simulation and performance-based earthquake engineering assessment of self-centering post-tensioned concrete bridge systems (PhD Thesis). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, D., Moehle, J., Mahin, S., Calderone, A., & Henry, L. (2004). Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(6), 869–879. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(869)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Mander, J. B., & Dhakal, R. P. (2008). Bidirectional cyclic loading experiment on a 3D beam–column joint designed for damage avoidance. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(11), 1733–1742. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:11(1733)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X., Han, B., Hori, M., Xiong, C., & Xu, Z. (2014). A coarse-grained parallel approach for seismic damage simulations of urban areas based on refined models and GPU/CPU cooperative computing. Advances in Engineering Software, 70, 90–103. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Mackie, K. R., & Elgamal, A. (2011). BridgePBEE: OpenSees 3D pushover and earthquake analysis of single-column 2-span bridges (Beta 1.0) [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, K. R., & Stojadinovic, B. (2004). Residual displacement and post-earthquake capacity of highway bridges. Paper presented at the Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, K. R., & Stojadinović, B. (2005). Fragility basis for California highway overpass bridge seismic decision making (Report No. 2005/02). Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, K. R., Wong, J. M., & Stojadinović, B. (2008). Integrated probabilistic performance-based evaluation of benchmark reinforced concrete bridges (Report No. 2007/09). Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Maeda, M., Nakano, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2004). Post-earthquake damage evaluation for R/C buildings based on residual seismic capacity. Paper presented at the Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, J. B., & Cheng, C.-T. (1997). Seismic resistance of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design (Report No. NCEER-97-0014). New York, NY: The State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, T. J., Rodgers, G. W., Chase, J. G., Mander, J. B., Macrae, G. A., & Dhakal, R. P. (2009). Damage avoidance design steel beam-column moment connection using high-force-to-volume dissipators. Journal of Structural Engineering, 135(11), 1390–1397. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marriott, D., Pampanin, S., Bull, D., & Palermo, A. (2008). Dynamic testing of precast, post-tensioned rocking wall systems with alternative dissipating solutions. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 41(2), 90–103.
   Google Scholar
• Marriott, D., Pampanin, S., & Palermo, A. (2009). Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post‐tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 38(3), 331–354. doi: 10.1002/eqe.857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, M. L., & Stringer, S. J. (2013). Performance-based seismic bridge design (Vol. 440). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Masroor, A., & Mosqueda, G. (2012). Experimental simulation of base-isolated buildings pounding against moat wall and effects on superstructure response. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(14), 2093–2109. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, R. K. (2001). Deterministic vs. probabilistic earthquake hazards and risks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21(5), 377–384. doi: 10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00019-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megget, L. M. (2006). From brittle to ductile: 75 years of seismic design in New Zealand. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 39(3), 158–169.
   Google Scholar
• Metelli, G., Beschi, C., & Riva, P. (2011). Cyclic behaviour of a column to foundation joint for concrete precast structures. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 15(9), 1297–1318. doi: 10.3166/ejece.15.1297-1318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., Bruneau, M., Saatcioglu, M., Williams, M., Anderson, D., & Sexsmith, R. (1995). Performance of bridges in the 1994 northridge earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(2), 415–427. doi: 10.1139/l95-050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moehle, J., & Deierlein, G. G. (2004). A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering. Paper presented at the Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mokha, A., Constantinou, M., & Reinhorn, A. (1990). Teflon bearings in base isolation. I: Testing. Journal of Structural Engineering, 116(2), 438–454. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:2(438)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J., Kiremidjian, A., & Chiu, S. (2002). Seismic risk model for a designated highway system: Oakland/San Francisco Bay area (PEER Report No. 2002/02). Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Motaref, S., Saiidi, M. S., & Sanders, D. H. (2011). Seismic response of precast bridge columns with energy dissipating joints (Report No. CA12-1999). Reno, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP. (2002). Comprehensive specification for the seismic design of bridges. Redwood City, CA: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NYSDOT. (2015). New York State Department of Transportation LRFD bridge design specifications. New York, NY: State Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• NZT. (2016). New Zealand bridge manual. Wellington: Transit New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• ODOT. (2016). Bridge design and drafting manual. Salem, OR: Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, J. E., & DesRoches, R. (2009). Retrofitted bridge fragility analysis for typical classes of multispan bridges. Earthquake Spectra, 25(1), 117–141. doi: 10.1193/1.3049405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrini, L., Maggi, C., Priestley, M. N., & Calvi, G. M. (2008). Experimental verification of viscous damping modeling for inelastic time history analyzes. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(sup1), 125–145. doi: 10.1080/13632460801925822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo, A., Pampanin, S., & Calvi, G. M. (2005). Concept and development of hybrid solutions for seismic resistant bridge systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9(6), 899–921. doi: 10.1080/13632460509350571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo, A., Wotherspoon, L., Wood, J., Chapman, H., Scott, A., Hogan, L., Kivell, A., Camnasio, E., Yashinsky, M., & Bruneau, M. (2011). Lessons learnt from 2011 Christchurch earthquakes: Analysis and assessment of bridges. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44(4), 319–333.
   Google Scholar
• Pekcan, G., Mander, J. B., & Chen, S. S. (1995). The seismic response of a 1:3 scale model RC structure with elastomeric spring dampers. Earthquake Spectra, 11(2), 249–267. doi: 10.1193/1.1585814
   Google Scholar
• Perez, F. J., Sause, R., & Pessiki, S. (2007). Analytical and experimental lateral load behavior of unbonded posttensioned precast concrete walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(11), 1531–1540. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1531)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. H. (2008). Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Earthquake Spectra, 24(2), 555–557. doi: 10.1193/1.2932170
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. N. (2000). Performance based seismic design. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33(3), 325–346.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. N., Calvi, M., Petrini, L., & Maggi, C. (2007). Effects of damping modelling on results of time-history analysis of RC bridges. Paper presented at the 1st US-Italy Seismic Bridge Workshop, Pavia, Italia.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. N., Seible, F., & Calvi, G. M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmzadeh, A., Alam, M. S., & Tremblay, R. (2018). Analytical prediction and finite element simulation of the lateral response of rocking steel bridge piers with energy dissipating steel bars. Journal of Structural Engineering, 144(11), 04018210. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reza, S. M., Alam, M. S., & Tesfamariam, S. (2014). Lateral load resistance of bridge piers under flexure and shear using factorial analysis. Engineering Structures, 59, 821–835. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. H. (1982). Lead-rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 10(4), 593–604. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290100408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojahn, C., King, S. A., Scholl, R. E., Kiremidjian, A. S., Reaveley, L. D., & Wilson, R. R. (1997). Earthquake damage and loss estimation methodology and data for Salt Lake County, Utah (ATC-36). Earthquake Spectra, 13(4), 623–642. doi: 10.1193/1.1585972
   Google Scholar
• Sadrossadat-Zadeh, M., O'Brien, M., & Saiidi, M. S. (2007). A study of concrete bridge columns using innovative materials subjected to cyclic loading (Report No. TRB-NCHRP-116). Reno, NV: University of Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Saini, A., & Saiidi, S. (2013). Post-earthquake bridge damage mitigation–post-earthquake damage repair of various reinforced concrete bridge components. Paper presented at the European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Sideris, P., Aref, A. J., & Filiatrault, A. (2014). Quasi-static cyclic testing of a large-scale hybrid sliding-rocking segmental column with slip-dominant joints. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 19(10), 04014036. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanack, F., Valdebenito, G., & Alvial, J. (2012). Seismic damage to bridges during the 27 February 2010 magnitude 8.8 chile earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 28(1), 301–315. doi: 10.1193/1.3672424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai, J., & Mahin, S. A. (2004). Mitigation of residual displacements of circular reinforced concrete bridge columnsed. Paper presented at the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• SCDOT. (2008). The South Carolina Department of Transportation seismic design specifications for highway bridges (Specifications). Columbia, SC: Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• SEAOC. (1995). Vision 2000: Performance based seismic engineering of buildings (Vols. I and II), Conceptual framework. Sacramento, CA: Structural Engineers Association of California.
   Google Scholar
• SeismoSoft. (2017). SeismoStruct (version 2017) [Computer software]. Italy: SeismoSoft, Pavia.
   Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Kim, H.-K., & Kim, S.-H. (2000). Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126(12), 1287–1295. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1287)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., & Naganuma, T. (2000). Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126(12), 1224–1231. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., Zhou, Y., Banerjee, S., & Murachi, Y. (2006). Cost-effectiveness of seismic bridge retrofit. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, Porto, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, R., Bycroft, G., & Mcverry, G. (1976). A practical system for isolating nuclear power plants from earthquake attack. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 36(2), 287–297. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(76)90013-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, R., & Mcverry, G. (1975). Base isolation for increased earthquake resistance of buildings. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 8(2), 93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Terzic, V., & Stojadinovic, B. (2010). Post-earthquake traffic capacity of modern bridges in California (Report No. CA/PEER/2010-103). Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Terzic, V., & Stojadinovic, B. (2015). Evaluation of post-earthquake axial load capacity of circular bridge columns. ACI Structural Journal, 112(1), 23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thonstad, T., Mantawy, I. M., Stanton, J. F., Eberhard, M. O., & Sanders, D. H. (2016). Shaking table performance of a new bridge system with pretensioned rocking columns. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21(4), 04015079. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, R., Bolduc, P., Neville, R., & Devall, R. (2006). Seismic testing and performance of buckling-restrained bracing systems. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(2), 183–198. doi: 10.1139/l05-103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, M.-H., Wu, S.-Y., Chang, K.-C., & Lee, G. C. (2007). Shaking table tests of a scaled bridge model with rolling-type seismic isolation bearings. Engineering Structures, 29(5), 694–702. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsopelas, P., Constantinou, M., Kim, Y., & Okamoto, S. (1996a). Experimental study of fps system in bridge seismic isolation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 25(1), 65–78. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<65::AID-EQE536>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsopelas, P., Constantinou, M., Okamoto, S., Fujii, S., & Ozaki, D. (1996). Experimental study of bridge seismic sliding isolation systems. Engineering Structures, 18(4), 301–310. doi: 10.1016/0141-0296(95)00147-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. (1978). Tapered steel energy dissipators for earthquake resistant structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 11(4), 282–294.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R., & Robinson, W. (1984). High-strain tests on lead-rubber bearings for earthquake loadings. Earthquake Engineering, 17(2), 90–105.
   Google Scholar
• Vassiliou, M. F., & Makris, N. (2015). Dynamics of the vertically restrained rocking column. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 141(12), 04015049. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warn, G., & Unal, M. (2014). Estimating the residual axial load capacity of flexure-dominated reinforced concrete bridge columns (PSU-2013-03). State College, PA: Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J., Chapman, H., & Prabhaharan, P. (2012). Performance of highway structures during the darfield and christchurch earthquakes of 4 September 2010 and 22 February 2011. New Zealand: NZ Transport Agency, Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Y. (2001). Minimum lifecycle cost design under multiple hazards. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 73(3), 223–231. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00047-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WSDOT. (2016). Bridge Design Manual LRFD. Washington: Washington State Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Yamashita, R., & Sanders, D. H. (2009). Seismic performance of precast unbonded prestressed concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal, 106(06), 821–830.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Alam, M. S. (2016). Evaluating the seismic behavior of segmental unbounded posttensioned concrete bridge piers using factorial analysis. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21(4), 04015073. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Alam, M. S., Khan, S., & Jiang, J. (2016). Seismic performance comparison between force-based and performance-based design as per Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC) 2014. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 43(8), 741–748. doi: 10.1139/cjce-2015-0419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Huo, Y. (2009). Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method. Engineering Structures, 31(8), 1648–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar