Seismic risk analysis for reinforced concrete structures with both random and parallelepiped convex variables

References

• Amir, O., & Elishakoff, I. (2015). Intricate interrelation between robustness and probability in the context of structural optimization. ASME Jounral of Risk and Uncertainties in Engineering System, Part B: Mechanical. Engineering., 1(3), 031003. doi: 10.1115/1.4030456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzurro, P. (1998). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis (PhD thesis), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bazzurro, P., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Vector-valued probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (VPSHA). Proceedings of the 7th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W., & Cornell, A. C. (2005). A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34(10), 1193–1217. doi: 10.1002/eqe.474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. (2011). Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground-motion selection. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(3), 322–331. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A. (1994). Risk-based structural design. In A.S. Nowak (Ed.), Proceedings of Symposium on Risk Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A. (1996). Calculating building seismic performance reliability: A basis for multi-level design norms. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Acapulco, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A., & Krawinkler, H. (2000). Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News, 3(2), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., & Foutch, D. A. (2002). Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4), 526–533. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China earthquake administration (CEA). (2001). Zoning map of earthquake ground motion parameters in China (GB18306-2001) (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• CEA (2005). Evaluation of seismic safety of engineering sites (GB17741-2005) (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., Bruneau, M., & Rutenberg, A. (2006). Multi-dimensional fragility of structures: Formulation and evaluation. Report MCEER-06-0002. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P., Roh, H., & De Stefano, A. (2009). Spectral and fragility evaluations of retrofitted structures through strength reduction and enhanced damping. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 8(1), 115–125. doi: 10.1007/s11803-009-8144-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P., & Reinhorn, A. (2011). Multidimensional performance limit state for hazard fragility functions. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 137(1), 47–60. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubourg, V., Sudret, B., & Bourinet, J. M. (2011). Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 44(5), 673–690. doi: 10.1007/s00158-011-0653-8
   Google Scholar
• Eads, L., Miranda, E., Krawinkler, H., & Lignos, D. G. (2013). An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(1), 25–41. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echard, B., Gayton, N., & Lemaire, M. (2011). AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation. Structural Safety, 33(2), 145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002
   Google Scholar
• FEMA (1997). FEMA 273. NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC:Author.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA (2000). FEMA 356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA (2006). FEMA 445. Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: program plan for new and existing buildings. Washington, DC: ATC for the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• GB50011 (2010). GB50011-2010. Code for seismic design of buildings. Beijing: China Architecture Industry Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J., & Du, X. (2007). Sensitivity analysis with mixture of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. AIAA Journal 45(9), 2337–2349. doi: 10.2514/1.28707
   Google Scholar
• Huo, J. R., Hu, Y. X., & Feng, Q. M. (1991). Study on envelop function of acceleration time history. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1, 1–12. in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Jalayer, F., & Cornell, C. A. (2003). A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor (DCFD) seismic formats. PEER Report 2003/08. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• JGJ3 (2010). JGJ3-2010. Technical specification for concrete structures of tall building. Beijing: China Architecture Industry Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, C., Zhang, Q. F., Han, X., & Qian, Y. H. (2014). A non-probabilistic structural reliability analysis method based on a multidimensional parallelepiped convex model. Acta Mechanica, 225(2), 383–395. doi: 10.1007/s00707-013-0975-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, C., Zhang, Q. F., Han, X., Liu, J., & Hu, D. A. (2015). Multidimensional parallelepiped model—a new type of non-probabilistic convex model for structural uncertainty analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 103(1), 31–59. doi: 10.1002/nme.4877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luco, N. (2002). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis, SMRF connection fractures, and near-source effects (PhD thesis). Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, D., Yu, X., Pan, F., & Wang, G. (2008). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis considering random system properties by an improved cloud method. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, D., Yu, X., Jia, M., & Wang, G. (2014). Seismic risk assessment for a reinforced concrete frame designed according to Chinese codes. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(10), 1295–1310. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2013.791326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, R. K. (1995). Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85(5), 1275–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2006). OpenSees command language manual. Berkeley, CA. Retrieved from http://opensees.berkeley.edu/ (Accessed 10 August 2009) Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, B. Y., Jiang, C., & Han, X. (2016). An improved multidimensional parallelepiped non-probabilistic model for structural uncertainty analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(7/8), 4727–4745. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.11.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, B. Y., Jiang, C., & Huang, Z. L. (2018). Discussions on non-probabilistic convex modelling for uncertain problems. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2017, 59, 54–85. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.01.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pnevmatikos, N., & Gantes, C. J. (2015). Actively and semi-actively controlled structures under seismic actions: Modeling and analysis. Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Shome, N. (1999). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures (Report No. RMS-35). Stanford: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, G., & Martin, J. (2009). MATLAB®: a language for parallel computing. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 37(1), 3–36. doi: 10.1007/s10766-008-0082-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H. B., Wu, Z. Y., & Liu, X. X. (2013). Multidimensional performance limit state for structural fragility estimation. Engineering Mechanics, 30(5), 147–152.
   Google Scholar
• Soroushian, S., Zaghi, A. E., Maragakis, M., Echevarria, A., Tian, Y., & Filiatrault, A. (2013). Seismic fragility study of fire sprinkler piping systems. Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2013, Pittsburgh, PA: ASCE,.
   Google Scholar
• Tothong P. (2007). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures, attenuation relationships, and near-fault effects. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Tothong, P., & Cornell, C. A. (2006). Application of nonlinear static analyses to probabilistic seismic demand analysis. Proceedings of the 8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Tothong, P., & Luco, N. (2007). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36(13), 1837–1860. doi: 10.1002/eqe.696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Y., Filiatrault, A., & Mosqueda, G. (2013). Experimental seismic study of pressurized fire sprinkler piping subsystems. Report MCEER-13-000. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo, the State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2004). Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 20(2), 523–553. doi: 10.1193/1.1737737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Q., Zhu, H., Fan, J., & Zeng, Z. (2012). Seismic performance assessment on some frame structure. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 31(15), 158–164.
   Google Scholar
• Wieser, J. (2011). Assessment of floor accelerations in yielding buildings (M.Sc. thesis) University of Nevada, Reno.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X., Liu, Y., Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., & Gao, Z. (2015). An active learning kriging model for hybrid reliability analysis with both random and interval variables. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 51(5), 1003–1016. doi: 10.1007/s00158-014-1189-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, X., & Yue, Z. (2014). A global nonprobabilistic reliability sensitivity analysis in the mixed aleatory–epistemic uncertain structures. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. doi: 10.1177/0954410014534201
   Google Scholar