Optimum design of a non-conventional multiple tuned mass damper for a complex power plant structure

References

• Abe, M., & Fujino, Y. (1994). Dynamic characteristics of multiple tuned mass dampers and some design formulas. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 23(8), 813–835. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290230802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almazan, J. L., Espinoza, G., & Aguiire, J. J. (2012). Torsional balance of asymmetric structures by means of tuned mass dampers. Engineering Structures, 42, 308–328. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelis, M. D., Perno, S., & Reggio, A. (2012). Dynamic response and optimal design of structures with large mass ratio TMD. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(1), 41–60. doi:10.1002/eqe.1117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, Virginia: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Bekdas, G., & Nigdeli, S. M. (2017). Metaheuristic based optimization of tuned mass dampers under earthquake excitation by considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92, 443–461. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekdas, G., Nigdeli, S. M., & Yang, X.-S. (2018). A novel bat algorithm based optimum tuning of mass dampers for improving the seismic safety of structures. Engineering Structures, 159, 89–98. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Wu, J. (2003). Experimental study on multiple tuned mass dampers to reduce seismic response of a three-storey building structure. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 32, 793–810. doi:10.1002/eqe.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Wu, J. (2001). Optimal placement of multiple tuned mass dampers for seismic structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(9), 1054–1062. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1054)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, K., Li, B., Wang, J., Li, A., Li, H., Li, J., & Tesfamariam, S. (2018). Optimal probability based partial mass isolation of elevated coal scuttle in thermal power plant building. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 27(11), e1477. doi:10.1002/tal.1477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, Y., & Lavan, O. (2015). Optimality criteria based seismic design of multiple tuned-mass-dampers for the control of 3D irregular buildings. Earthquakes and Structures, 8(1), 77–100. doi:10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S., Gur, S., Mishra, S. K., & Chakraborty, S. (2015). Optimal performance of base isolated building considering limitation on excessive isolator displacement. Structural and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(7), 904–917. doi:10.1080/15732479.2014.921716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghan-Niri, E., & Zahrai, S. M.. (2010). Effectiveness-robustness objectives in MTMD system design: An evolutionary optimal design methodology. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 17(2), 218–236. doi:10.1002/stc.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, T. S., & Johnson, E. A. (2011). Distributed mass damper system for integrating structural and environmental control in buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 137(3), 205–213. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, R., Lucchini, A., & Marano, G. C. (2015). Robust design of tuned mass dampers installed on multi-degree-of-freedom structures subjected to seismic action. Engineering Optimization, 47(8), 1009–1030. doi:10.1080/0305215X.2014.941288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, W., Nutini, J., & Tesfamariam, S. (2013). A survey of non-gradient optimization methods in structural engineering. Advanced in Engineering Software, 59, 19–28. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, N., & Warnitchai, P. (2005). Design of multiple tuned mass dampers by using a numerical optimizer. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34(2), 125–144. doi:10.1002/eqe.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., Kumar, P. C. A., & Sahoo, D. R. (2015). Response of staggered arrangement of concentric braces using perform-3D. In 8th International Conference on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, Shanghai.
   Google Scholar
• Lavan, O., & Daniel, Y. (2013). Full resources utilization seismic design of irregular structures using multiple tuned mass dampers. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48(3), 517–532. doi:10.1007/s00158-013-0913-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavan, O. (2017). Multi-objective optimal design of tuned mass dampers. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 24(11), e2008. doi:10.1002/stc.2008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, A. Y. T., Zhang, H., Cheng, C. C., & Lee, Y. Y. (2008). Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non-stationary based excitation during earthquake. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 37, 1223–1246. doi:10.1002/eqe.811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. (2000). Performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for attenuating undesirable oscillations of structures under the ground acceleration. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 29(9), 1405–1421. doi:10.1002/1096-9845(200009)29:9<1405::AID-EQE976>3.0.CO;2-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., & Qu, W. (2006). Optimum properties of multiple tuned mass dampers for reduction of translational and torsional response of structures subject to ground acceleration. Engineering Structures, 28(4), 472–494. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., & Ni, X. (2007). Optimization of non-uniformly distributed multiple tuned mass damper. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 308(1–2), 80–97. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J., Zhang, W., Sun, K., He, Q., Lark, J. R., & Williams, W. F. (1999). Precise and efficient computation of complex structures with TMD devices. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 223(5), 693–701. doi:10.1006/jsvi.1998.1891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J. L., Tsai K. C., & Yu, Y. J. (2010). Coupled tuned mass dampers for the seismic control of asymmetric-plan buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 26(3), 749–778. doi:10.1193/1.3435347
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. L., Tsai, K. C., & Yu, Y. J. (2011). Bi-directional coupled tuned mass dampers for the seismic response control of two-way asymmetric-plan buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40, 675–690. doi:10.1002/eqe.1054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marano, G. C., Greco, R., Trentadue, F., & Chiaia, B. (2007). Constrained reliability-based optimization of linear tuned mass dampers for seismic control. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 44(22–23), 7370–7388. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marano, G. C. (2008). Multiobjective optimization criteria for linear structures subject to random vibrations. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2(1), 75–87. doi:10.2174/1874149500802010075
   Google Scholar
• MathWorks (2011). Global optimization toolbox user's guide (R2011b). Natick, MA: MathWorks.
   Google Scholar
• Miguel, L. F. F., Lopez, R. H., Miguel, L. F. F., & Torii, A. J. (2016). A novel approach to the optimum design of MTMDs under seismic excitations. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 23(11), 1290–1313. doi:10.1002/stc.1845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoHURD, & AQSIQ (2010). Code for seismic design of buildings (Chinese Standard GB50011-2010). Beijing: China Building Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nigdeli, S. M., & Bekdas, G. (2014). Optimum tuned mass damper approaches for adjacent structures. Earthquakes and Structures, 7(6), 1071–1091. doi:10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.1071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigdeli, S. M., Bekdas, G., & Yang, X.-S. (2017). Optimum tuning of mass dampers by using a hybrid method using harmony search and flower pollination algorithm. In J. Del Ser (Ed.), Harmony Search Algorithm. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 514, pp. 222–231). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ogata, K. (2010). Modern control engineering (5th ed.). Toronto: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., & Reed, D. (2001). Analysis of uniformly and linearly distributed mass dampers under harmonic and earthquake excitation. Engineering Structures, 23(7), 802–814. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00095-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penzien, J., & Watabe, M. (1974). Characteristics of 3-Dimensional earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 3(4), 365–373. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290030407
   Google Scholar
• Rana, R., & Soong, T. T. (1998). Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers. Engineering Structures, 20(3), 193–204. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00078-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reggio, A., & Angelis, M. D. (2015). Optimal energy-based seismic design of non-conventional tuned mass damper (TMD) implemented via inter-story isolation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44(10), 1623–1642. doi:10.1002/eqe.2548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, Z., Li, S., Zhang, J., & He, M. (2017). Optimum seismic design of a power plant building with pendulum tuned mass damper system by its heavy suspended buckets. Engineering Structures, 136, 114–132. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, M. P., Singh, S., & Moreschi, L. M. (2002). Tuned mass dampers for response control of torsional buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31, 749–769. doi:10.1002/eqe.119.abs
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajimi, H. (1960). A statistical method of determining the maximum response of a building during earthquake. In: Proceedings of 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vol. II, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Dai, K., Yin, Y., & Tesfamariam, S. (2018). Seismic performance-based design and risk analysis of thermal power plant building with consideration of vertical and mass irregularities. Engineering Structures, 164(1), 141–154. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Warburton, G. B. (1982). Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 10, 381–401. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290100304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, K., & Igusa, T. (1992). Dynamic characteristics of multiple substructures with closely spaced frequencies. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 21(12), 1059–1070. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290211203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X. (2010). Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Frome: Luniver Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., & Cao, G. (1988). Random vibration theory and its application (In Chinese). Shanghai: Tongji University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zahrai, S. M., Dehghan-Niri, E., & Mohtat, A. (2007). Design methodology for MTMD performance optimization using a new criterion for robustness. In ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rethymno, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). Tuned mass damper system of high-rise intake towers optimized by improved harmony search algorithm. Engineering Structures, 138, 280–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar