Hybrid inspection-monitoring approach for optimal maintenance planning

References

• Alaswad, S., & Xiang, Y. (2017). A review on condition-based maintenance optimisation models for stochastically deteriorating system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 157, 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins. (2002). CSS bridge condition indicators, Volume 3: Evaluation of condition indicators. Lincoln: County Surveyors Society.
   Google Scholar
• Attoh-Okine, N. O., & Bowers, S. (2006). A Bayesian belief network model of bridge deterioration. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering, 159(2), 69–76. doi:10.1680/bren.2006.159.2.69
   Google Scholar
• Barroso, L. R., & Rodriguez, R. (2004). Damage detection utilizing the damage index method to a benchmark structure. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130 (2), 142–151. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:2(142)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastidas-Arteaga, E., & Schoefs, F. (2015). Sustainable maintenance and repair of RC coastal structures. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Maritime Engineering, 168(4), 162–173.
   Google Scholar
• Boscato, G., Dal Cin, A., Russo, S., & Sciarretta, F. (2014). SHM of historic damaged churches. Advanced Materials Research, 838, 2071–2078. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.838-841.2071
   Google Scholar
• Brincker, R., & Ventura, C. (2015). Introduction to operational modal analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, P. C., Flatau, A., & Liu, S. C. (2003). Review paper: health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Structural Health Monitoring: An International Journal, 2(3), 257–267. doi:10.1177/1475921703036169
   Google Scholar
• Corotis, R. B., Ellis, J. H., & Jiang, M. (2005). Modeling of risk-based inspection, maintenance and life-cycle cost with partially observable Markov decision process. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1(1), 75–84. doi:10.1080/15732470412331289305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A. J., & Haldar, A. (2010). Structural integrity assessment under uncertainty for three dimensional offshore structures. International Journal of Terraspace Science and Engineering, 2 (2), 101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Faddoul, R., Raphael, W., & Chateauneuf, A. (2011). A generalised partially observable Markov decision process updated by decision trees for maintenance optimisation. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7(10), 783–796. doi:10.1080/15732470902985827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faddoul, R., Raphael, W., Soubra, A. H., & Chateauneuf, A. (2013). Incorporating Bayesian networks in Markov decision processes. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 19(4), 415–424. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, W., & Qiao, P. (2011). Vibration-based damage identification methods: A review and comparative study. Structural Health Monitoring, 10 (1), 83–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, S. M., Niedzwecki, J. M., Ozbey, M. C., & Cummis, T. J. (2017). A brief review of structural health monitoring with special focus on damage detection and sensor optimisation. In Encyclopedia of maritime and offshore engineering (pp. 1–8). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (2015). Smart choices: A practical guide to making better decisions. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, S. S., & Achenbach, J. D. (2008). Structural health monitoring and damage prognosis in fatigue. Structural Health Monitoring: An International Journal, 7(1), 37–49. doi:10.1177/1475921707081973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Chen, C. J. (2017). Dynamic reliability assessment for non-repairable multistate systems by aggregating multilevel imperfect inspection data. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 66(2), 281–297. doi:10.1109/TR.2016.2645840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, G., Cudney, H. H., & Inman, D. J. (1999b). Impedance-based health monitoring technique for civil structures. Structural health monitoring. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 6(4), 8950518. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2000)6:4(153)
   Google Scholar
• Park, G., Cudney, H., & Inman, D. J. (1999a). Developing a model based health monitoring technique using structural impedance sensors. In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Identification in Engineering Systems (pp. 506–515). Swansea, UK: University of Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Rainieri, C., & Fabbrocino, G. (2014). Operational modal analysis of civil engineering structures. New York: Springer, pp. 142, 143.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Z. Y., Law, S. S., & Zhang, L. M. (2000). Structural damage detection from modal strain energy change. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126 (12), 1216–1223. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1216)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Z. Y., Law, S. S., & Zhang, L. M. (2002). Improved damage quantification from elemental modal strain energy change. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128 (5), 521–529. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(521)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratt, R. W. (2010). Bridge management a system approach for decision making. School of Doctoral Studies European Union Journal, 2, 67–108.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, N. (2011). A literature review of recent methods for structural health monitoring systems to evaluate structural capacity and remaining service life of bridges. Final Report, Iowa State University Bridge Engineering Center.
   Google Scholar
• Tinga, T., & Loendersloot, R. (2014). Aligning PHM, SHM and CBM by understanding the physical system failure behaviour. In 2nd European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, PHME 2014 - La Cité, the Nantes Events Center, Nantes, France, 8–10 July.
   Google Scholar
• Wegmann, D., Leuenberger, C., & Excoffier, L. (2009). Efficient approximate Bayesian computation coupled with Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihood. Genetics, 182(4), 1207–1218. doi:10.1534/genetics.109.102509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. D. (2013). Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) gives exact results under the assumption of model error. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 12(2), 129–141. doi:10.1515/sagmb-2013-0010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar