221
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Quantification of tail risk to evaluate infrastructure maintenance policies considering time-consistency

&
Pages 471-480 | Received 08 Feb 2020, Accepted 10 Aug 2020, Published online: 13 Nov 2020

References

  • Acciaio, B., & Penner, I. (2011). Dynamic risk measures. In Giulia Di Nunno and Bernt Øksendal (Eds.). Advanced mathematical methods for finance (pp. 1–34). Berlin: Springer.
  • Akiyama, M., Frangopol, D. M., & Suzuki, M. (2012). Integration of the effects of airborne chlorides into reliability-based durability design of reinforced concrete structures in a marine environment. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8(2), 125–134.
  • Akiyama, M., Frangopol, D. M., & Yoshida, I. (2010). Time-dependent reliability analysis of existing RC structures in a marine environment using hazard associated with airborne chlorides. Engineering Structures, 32(11), 3768–3779.
  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D., & Ku, H. (2007). Coherent multiperiod risk adjusted values and Bellman’s principle. Annals of Operations Research, 152(1), 5–22.
  • Au, S.-K., & Beck, J. L. (2001). Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 16(4), 263–277.
  • Bucklew, J. (2013). Introduction to rare event simulation. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Corotis, R. B., Hugh Ellis, J., & Jiang, M. (2005). Modeling of risk-based inspection, maintenance and life-cycle cost with partially observable Markov decision processes. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1(1), 75–84.
  • De Boer, P.-T., Kroese, D. P., Mannor, S., & Rubinstein, R. Y. (2005). A tutorial on the cross-entropy method. Annals of Operations Research, 134(1), 19–67.
  • Decò, A., & Frangopol, D. M. (2013). Life-cycle risk assessment of spatially distributed aging bridges under seismic and traffic hazards. Earthquake Spectra, 29(1), 127–153. doi:10.1193/1.4000094
  • Durango, P. L., & Madanat, S. M. (2002). Optimal maintenance and repair policies in infrastructure management under uncertain facility deterioration rates: An adaptive control approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 36(9), 763–778.
  • Durango-Cohen, P. L., & Madanat, S. M. (2008). Optimization of inspection and maintenance decisions for infrastructure facilities under performance model uncertainty: A quasi-Bayes approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(8), 1074–1085.
  • Fernando, D., Adey, B. T., & Lethanh, N. (2015). A model for the evaluation of intervention strategies for bridges affected by manifest and latent deterioration processes. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(11), 1466–1483.
  • Frangopol, D. M., & Liu, M. (2007). Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3(1), 29–41.
  • Frangopol, D. M., & Soliman, M. (2016). Life-cycle of structural systems: Recent achievements and future directions. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(1), 1–20. doi:10.1080/15732479.2014.999794
  • Furuta, H., Frangopol, D. M., & Nakatsu, K. (2011). Life-cycle cost of civil infrastructure with emphasis on balancing structural performance and seismic risk of road network. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7(1-2), 65–74.
  • Golabi, K., Kulkarni, R. B., & Way, G. B. (1982). A statewide pavement management system. Interfaces, 12(6), 5–21.
  • Hardy, M. R., & Wirch, J. L. (2004). The iterated CTE: A dynamic risk measure. North American Actuarial Journal, 8(4), 62–75.
  • Jiang, D. R., & Powell, W. B. (2018). Risk-averse approximate dynamic programming with quantile-based risk measures. Mathematics of Operations Research, 43(2), 554–579.
  • Kobayashi, K., Kaito, K., & Lethanh, N. (2012). A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46(4), 544–561.
  • Kuhn, K. D. (2010). Network-level infrastructure management using approximate dynamic programming. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 16(2), 103–111.
  • Kuhn, K. D., & Madanat, S. M. (2005). Model uncertainty and the management of a system of infrastructure facilities. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 13(5-6), 391–404.
  • Lethanh, N., Adey, B. T., & Fernando, D. N. (2015). Optimal intervention strategies for multiple objects affected by manifest and latent deterioration processes. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(3), 389–401.
  • Lin, K., & Marcus, S. I. (2013). Dynamic programming with non-convex risk-sensitive measures. In American control conference (ACC), 2013 (pp. 6778–6783). Washington, DC: IEEE.doi:10.1109/ACC.2013.6580904
  • Liu, M., & Frangopol, D. M. (2006). Optimizing bridge network maintenance management under uncertainty with conflicting criteria: Life-cycle maintenance, failure, and user costs. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132(11), 1835–1845. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1835)
  • Madanat, S. (1993). Optimal infrastructure management decisions under uncertainty. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 1(1), 77–88.
  • Madanat, S., & Ben-Akiva, M. (1994). Optimal inspection and repair policies for infrastructure facilities. Transportation Science, 28(1), 55–62.
  • Madanat, S., Mishalani, R., & Ibrahim, W. H. W. (1995). Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 1(2), 120–125.
  • Madanat, S., Park, S., & Kuhn, K. (2006). Adaptive optimization and systematic probing of infrastructure system maintenance policies under model uncertainty. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12(3), 192–198.
  • Osogami, T. (2012). Iterated risk measures for risk-sensitive Markov decision processes with discounted cost. arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.3755.
  • Phares, B. M., Washer, G. A., Rolander, D. D., Graybeal, B. A., & Moore, M. (2004). Routine highway bridge inspection condition documentation accuracy and reliability. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 9(4), 403–413.
  • Ristic, B., Arulampalam, S., & Gordon, N. (2003). Beyond the Kalman filter: Particle filters for tracking applications. London: Artech House.
  • Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. The Journal of Risk, 2(3), 21–42. doi:10.21314/JOR.2000.038
  • Ruszczyński, A. (2010). Risk-averse dynamic programming for Markov decision processes. Mathematical Programming, 125(2), 235–261.
  • Saydam, D., Bocchini, P., & Frangopol, D. M. (2013). Time-dependent risk associated with deterioration of highway bridge networks. Engineering Structures, 54, 221–233. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.04.009
  • Seyedshohadaie, S. R., Damnjanovic, I., & Butenko, S. (2010). Risk-based maintenance and rehabilitation decisions for transportation infrastructure networks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(4), 236–248.
  • Smilowitz, K., & Madanat, S. (2000). Optimal inspection and maintenance policies for infrastructure networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 15(1), 5–13.
  • Wu, J. (2012). Advances in K-means clustering: A data mining thinking. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Zhu, B., & Frangopol, D. M. (2013). Risk-based approach for optimum maintenance of bridges under traffic and earthquake loads. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(3), 422–434.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.