The resilience of ‘peripheral’ lifeline systems—damage analysis and implications for seismic design based on the anti-catastrophe concept

References

• Akiyama, M., & Frangopol, D. M. (2018). Life-cycle reliability of bridges under independent and interacting hazards. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, IABMAS 2018. In D. M. Frangopol, R. Al-Mahaidi, C. Caprani, & N. Powers (Eds.), Maintenance, safety, risk, management and life-cycle performance of bridges (pp. 16–35). Balkema: CRC Press. ISBN 9781138730458:
   Google Scholar
• American Lifelines Alliance (ALA). (2001). Seismic fragility formulations for water systems. https://www.americanlifelinesalliance.com.
   Google Scholar
• Bocchini, P., Frangopol, D.M., Ummenhofer, T., & Zinke, T. (2013). Resilience and sustainability of civil infrastructure: Toward a unified approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, 20(2), 0414004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boin, A., & McConnell, A. (2007). Preparing for critical infrastructure breakdowns: The limits of crisis management and the need for resilience. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 15(1), 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O'Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., … von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneau, M., Filiatrault, A., Lee, G.C., O’Rourke, T.D., Reinhorn, A.M., Shinozuka, M., & Tierney, K. (2007). White Paper on the SDR grand challenges for disaster reduction. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University at New York: MCEER-05-SP09.
   Google Scholar
• Çağnan, Z., Davidson, R. A., & Guikema, S. D. (2006). Post-earthquake restoration planning Los Angeles electric power. Earthquake Spectra, 22(3), 589–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Disaster Prevention Council. (2005). Report of special investigation committee. Central Disaster Prevention Council. http://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/chubou/shutochokka/houkoku.pdf (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S.E., Shinozuka, M., & Svekla, W. (1999). Modeling post-disaster urban lifeline restoration. Proceedings of the fifth U.S. Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. Seattle, WA, USA. In W. E. Elliott & P. McDonough (Eds.), Optimizing post-earthquake lifeline system reliability. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA. ASCE Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Monograph 16: 602–611.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Homeland Security. (2003). The national strategy for the physical protection of critical infrastructures and key assets. https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/Physical_Strategy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Disaster Prevention Conference of Tokyo Metropolitan Government. (2006). Publication of Tokyo regional disaster prevention measures. http://www.bousai.metro.tokyo.jp/japanese/knowledge/materialh.html. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Disaster Prevention Conference of Tokyo Metropolitan Government. (2007). Local plans for disaster prevention of Tokyo metropolitan (in Japanese). Tokyo: Disaster Prevention Conference of Tokyo Metropolitan Government.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E., Leveson, N., & Woods, D.D. (2007). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Burlington, VT, USA: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E., Paries, J., David, D.W., & Wreathall, J. (2010). Resilience engineering in practice: A guidebook. Burlington, VT, USA: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Honda, R., Akiyama, M., Nozu, A., Takahashi, Y., Kataoka, S., & Murono, Y. (2017). Seismic design for “anti-catastrophe”- A study on the implementation as design codes. Journal of JSCE, 5(1), 346–356.
   Google Scholar
• Hoshiya, M. (1981). Seismic damage restoration of underground water pipeline. In Seismic Risk Analysis and its Application to Reliability-Based Design of Lifeline Systems.(pp. 229–244). Review Meeting of U.S.-Japan Cooperative Research. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA; Tokyo, Japan:Gakujutsu Bunken Fukyu-Kai.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H. M. H., Lin, H., & Shinozuka, M. (1998). Seismic performance assessment of water delivery systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, 4(3), 118–125.
   Google Scholar
• International Risk Governance Council (IRGC). (2012). An Introduction to the IRGC Risk Governance Framework.
   Google Scholar
• Investigation Committee on the Accident at Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company. (2012). Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 2394. (2015). General Principles on Reliability for Structures.
   Google Scholar
• Isoyama, R., Ishida, E., Yune, K., & Shirouzu, N. (1998). Study about estimation of seismic damage on water pipeline (in Japanese). Journal of Water Works Association, 67(2), 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Japan Meteorological Agency. JMA seismic intensity data. https://www.data.jma.go.jp/svd/eqev/data/bulletin/data/shindo/readme_e.html.
   Google Scholar
• Japan Road Association. (2017). Design specifications for highway bridges V; Seismic design (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Japan Society of Civil Engineers Special Task Committee of Earthquake Resistance of Civil Engineering Structures. (1996). Proposal on earthquake resistance for civil engineering structures. http://www.jsce.or.jp/committee/earth/index-e.html.
   Google Scholar
• Javanbarg, M. B., & Takada, S. (2009). Seismic reliability assessment of water supply systems. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR2009. In Safety, reliability and risk of structures, infrastructures and engineering systems, Osaka, Japan: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kozin, F., & Zhou, H. (1990). System study of urban response and reconstruction due to earthquake. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 116(9), 1959–1972. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:9(1959)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunugi, T. (2000). Relationship between Japan Meteorological Agency instrumental intensity and instrumental Modified Mercalli intensity obtained from K-NET strong-motion data. Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan. 2nd Series), 53(1), 89–93. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, G.-Y., & Hung, H.-Y. (2009). Seismic performance simulation of water systems considering uncertainties in ground motions and pipeline damages. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR2009. In Safety, reliability and risk of structures, infrastructures and engineering systems (pp. 2316–2321). Osaka, Japan: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Maruyama, Y., & Yamazaki, F. (2010). Damage estimation of water distribution pipes following recent earthquakes in Japan. In Joint Conference Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering (7CUEE) & 5th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering (5ICEE) (pp. 1487–1491), Center for Urban Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Naba, S., Tsukiji, T., Shoji, G., & Nagata, S. (2012). Damage assessment on water supply system and sewerage system at the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake – Case study for the data at Ibaraki and Chiba Prefectures. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on engineering lessons learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake (pp. 1487–1495), Tokyo, Japan, March 1–4: https://jaee.gr.jp/event/seminar2012/eqsympo/proceedings.html.
   Google Scholar
• Nojima, N., & Kameda, H. (1992). Optimal strategy by use of tree structure for post-earthquake restoration of lifeline network systems. In Proceedings of the Tenth World Conference on earthquake engineering (pp. 5541–5546), Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Nojima, N., & Kameda, H. (1995). Seismic risk assessment of urban lifelines under system interactions. Journal of Structural Mechanics and Earthquake Engineering, JSCE, 507(507), 231–241. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Nozu, A., Murono, Y., Takahashi, Y., Akiyama, M., Kataoka, S., & Honda, R. (2016). Anti-catastrophe” concept in Japanese seismic design codes. In Proceedings of Sixteenth World Conference of Earthquake Engineering (pp. 1948). Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• O'Rourke, T.D., Grigoriu, M. D., & Khater, M. M. (1985). Seismic response of buried pipes. In C. Sundrarajan (Ed.), Pressure vessel and piping technology - A decade of progress (pp. 281–323). New York: ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Railway Technical Research Institute. (2012). Design standards for railway structures and commentary (seismic design). Maruzen: Railway Technical Research Institute. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Renschler, C.S., Frazier, A., Arendt, L., Cimellaro, G.P., Reinhorn, A.M., & Brunearu, M. (2010). A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: The PEOPLES resilience framework. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York: MCEER-10.0006.
   Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., & Tan, R. Y. (1981). Estimation and optimization of the serviceability of underground water transmission network system under seismic risk. In Seismic Risk Analysis and its Application to Reliability -Based Design of Lifeline Systems (pp. 207–228). Review Meeting of U.S.-Japan Cooperative Research. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA; Tokyo, Japan: Gakujutsu Bunken Fukyu-Kai.
   Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., Feng, M.Q., Lee, J., & Naganuma, T. (2000). Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126(12), 1224–1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoji, G., & Kurozumi, N. (2009). Development of evaluation method of systems consequences due to functional impairment of critical infrastructure in views of seismic disaster risks. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on structural safety and reliability, ICOSSAR2009. In Safety, reliability and risk of structures, infrastructures and engineering systems (pp. 2820–2827). Osaka, Japan: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Shoji, G., & Toyota, A. (2009). Modeling of restoration process associated with critical infrastructure and its interdependency due to a seismic disaster. In Lifeline earthquake engineering in a multihazard environment, TCLEE2009 (Vol. 357, pp. 1–658). Oakland, CA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Shoji, G., Naba, S., & Nagata, S. (2011). Evaluation of seismic vulnerability of sewerage pipelines based on assessment of the damage data in the 1995 Kobe earthquake. In M. H. Faber, J. Kőhler, & K. Nishijima (Eds.), Applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering (pp. 1415–1423). London: Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-0-415-66986-3.
   Google Scholar
• Shoji, G., Takahashi, D., Tsukiji, T., & Naba, S. (2012). Damage assessment on electric power failures during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake. Journal of Disaster Research, 7, 491–499.
   Google Scholar
• Takada, S., Fujiwara, M., Miyajima, M., Suzuki, Y., Yoda, M., & Toshima, T. (2001). Study about method for estimating damage of pipelines based on character of local earthquake disasters. Journal of Water Works Association, 70(3), 21–37. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Tsukiji, T., & Shoji, G. (2013). Development of damage functions on water supply systems subjected to an extreme ground motion. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on structural safety and reliability, ICOSSAR2013, New York, USA. In G. Deodatis, B. R. Ellingwood, & D. M. Frangopol (Eds.), Safety, reliability, risk and life-cycle performance of structures & infrastructures (pp. 691–698). London: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-1-138-00086-5.
   Google Scholar
• Ünen, H.C., Elnashai, A.S., & Sahin, M. (2009). Seismic performance assessment of interdependent utility network systems. In Lifeline earthquake engineering in a multihazard environment, TCLEE2009 (Vol. 357, pp. 659–669). Oakland, CA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar