Value of information of combinations of proof loading and pore pressure monitoring for flood defences

References

• Deltares. (2014). KOSten voor versterking WATerkeringen. KOSWAT, systeemdocumentatie. https://www.helpdeskwater.nl/publish/pages/130414/koswat_v2_3_-_systeemdocumentatie.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantidis, D., Sykora, M., & Sousa, H. (2019). Quantifying the value of structural health information for decision support: Guide for practising engineers. In COST Action TU1402.
   Google Scholar
• Eijgenraam, C., Brekelmans, R., Hertog, D., Den., & Roos, K. (2017). Optimal strategies for flood prevention. Management Science, 63(5), 1644–1656. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D. M., Strauss, A., & Kim, S. (2008). Use of monitoring extreme data for the performance prediction of structures: General approach. Engineering Structures, 30(12), 3644–3653. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.06.010. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongejan, R. B., & Maaskant, B. (2015). Quantifying flood risks in the Netherlands. Risk Analysis : An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 35(2), 252–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkman, S. N., van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M., & Vrijling, J. K. (2003). An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 99(1), 1–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00283-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanning, W., & van der Krogt, M. (2016). Memo: Pore water pressure uncertainties for slope stability. http://publications.deltares.nl/1230090_034.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Klerk, W.J., Kanning, W., & Kok, M. (2018). Time-dependent reliability in flood protection decision making in the Netherlands. Safety and Reliability – Safe Societies in a Changing World: Proceedings of ESREL 2018, 3167–3174.
   Google Scholar
• Klerk, W.J., Kanning, W., van der Meer, M. T., & Nieuwenhuis, J. W. (2016). Structural health monitoring in life-cycle management of dikes: a case study in the north of the Netherlands. Life-Cycle of Engineering Systems: Emphasis on Sustainable Civil Infrastructure: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering (IALCCE 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Klerk, W. J., Schweckendiek, T., den Heijer, F., & Kok, M. (2019). Value of information of structural health monitoring in asset management of flood defences. Infrastructures, 4(3), 56. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4030056
   Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, A. R., De Vries, G., van Lottum, H., Förster, U., van Beek, V. M., & Bezuijen, A. (2014). Full-scale testing of piping prevention measures: Three tests at the IJkdijk. Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 891–897. doi:https://doi.org/10.1201/b16200-124
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, C. C., & Foott, R. (1974). New design procedure for stability of soft clay. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 100(7), 763–786.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D.-Q., Zhang, F.-P., Cao, Z.-J., Tang, X.-S., & Au, S.-K. (2018). Reliability sensitivity analysis of geotechnical monitoring variables using Bayesian updating. Engineering Geology, 245, 130–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque, J., & Straub, D. (2019). Risk-based optimal inspection strategies for structural systems using dynamic Bayesian networks. Structural Safety, 76, 68–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phoon, K. K., & Retief, J. V. (2016). Reliability of geotechnical structures in ISO2394. In CRC Press (Issue September). https://doi.org/10.3208/jgssp.KL-1.
   Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H., & Schlaifer, R. (1961). Applied statistical decision theory. Boston: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rijkswaterstaat. (2019). Schematiseringshandleiding Macrostabiliteit WBI-2017 version 3.0, in Dutch.
   Google Scholar
• Roubos, A. A., Steenbergen, R. D. J. M., Schweckendiek, T., & Jonkman, S. N. (2018). Risk-based target reliability indices for quay walls. Structural Safety, 75(January), 89–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, A., & Wroth, P. (1968). Critical state soil mechanics. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schweckendiek, T. (2014). On reducing piping uncertainties: A Bayesian decision approach. doi:https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:f9be2f7e-7009-4c73-afe5-8b4bb16e956f
   Google Scholar
• Schweckendiek, T., van der Krogt, M. G., Teixeira, A., Kanning, W., Brinkman, R., & Rippi, K. (2017). Reliability updating with survival information for dike slope stability using fragility curves. Geo-Risk, 2017, 494–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480700.047
   Google Scholar
• Schweckendiek, T., & Vrouwenvelder, A. C. W. M. (2013). Reliability updating and decision analysis for head monitoring of levees. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 7(2), 110–121.
   Google Scholar
• Schweckendiek, T., Vrouwenvelder, A. C. W. M., & Calle, E. O. F. (2014). Updating piping reliability with field performance observations. Structural Safety, 47, 13–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, H., Wenzel, H., & Thöns, S. (2019). Quantifying the value of structural health information for decision support: Guide for operators. In COST Action TU1402.
   Google Scholar
• Spross, J., & Johansson, F. (2017). When is the observational method in geotechnical engineering favourable? Structural Safety, 66, 17–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavenas, F., Mieussens, C., & Bourges, F. (1979). Lateral displacements in clay foundations under embankments. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 16(3), 532–550. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/t79-059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thöns, S. (2018). On the Value of monitoring information for the structural integrity and risk management. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 33(1), 79–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thöns, S. (2019). Quantifying the value of structural health information for decision support: Guide for scientists. In COST Action TU1402.
   Google Scholar
• van Hoven, A., & Noordam, A. (2018). POVM Infiltratieproef II -Analyse Infiltratieproef IJsseldijk (in Dutch). https://www.povmacrostabiliteit.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/POVM-Analyse-Infiltratieproef-IJsseldijkII_v03-definitief.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Voortman, H. G. (2003). Risk-based design of large-scale flood defence systems. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:31d3672a-0062-465d-b30a-bacc2ed4b79d?collection=research.
   Google Scholar
• Vrijling, J. K. (2001). Probabilistic design of water defense systems in The Netherlands. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 74(3), 337–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00082-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Zhang, L. M., & Tang, W. H. (2011). Slope reliability analysis considering site-specific performance information. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(3), 227–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2004). Reliability verification using proof pile load tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(11), 1203–1213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:11(1203)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar