Quantifying the benefit of structural health monitoring: can the value of information be negative?

References

• Arrow, K. J. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk bearing. Helsinki: Yrjo Jahnssonin Saatio.
   Google Scholar
• Baiman, S. (1975). The evaluation and choice of internal information systems within a multiperson world. Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2490646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal, D., Zonta, D., & Pozzi, M. (2009). An examination of the ARX as a residual generator for damage detection. In Proceedings of SPIE: Health monitoring of structural and biological systems, San Diego, CA. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/12.816211[]
   Google Scholar
• Bolognani, D., Verzobio, A., Tonelli, D., Cappello, C., Glisic, B., Zonta, D., & Quigley, J. (2018). Quantifying the benefit of strutural health monitoring: What if the manager is not the owner? Structural Health Monitoring, 17(6), 1393–1409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718794506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognani, D., Verzobio, A., Tonelli, D., Cappello, C., Zonta, D., & Glisic, B. (2017). An application of prospect theory to a SHM-based decision problem. Proceedings of SPIE, Portland, OR. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2261212[]
   Google Scholar
• Bolstad, W. M. (2010). Understanding computational Bayesian statistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cappello, C., Zonta, D., & Glisic, B. (2016). Expected utility theory for monitoring-based decision-making. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104, 1647–1661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2012). Elements of information theory. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• DeGroot, M. H. (1994). Changes in utility as information. Theory and Decision, 17(3), 287–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132613
   Google Scholar
• Diamantidis, D., Sykora, M., & Sousa, H. (2019). Quantifying the value of structural health information (SHI) for decision support – Guide for practising engineers (COST Action TU1402).
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, E., & Todd, M. (2010a). A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24(4), 891–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, E., & Todd, M. (2010b). Optimal placement of piezoelectric actuators and sensors for detecting damage in plate sensors. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 21(3), 265–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X09338080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, E., Todd, M. D., Croxford, A. J., Drinkwater, B. W., & Wilcox, P. D. (2012). Enhanced detection through low-order stochastic modeling for guided-wave structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring: An International Journal, 11(2), 149–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921711414232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, P. F., Prendergast, L. J., & Limongelli, M. P. (2020). A framework for assessing the value of information for health monitoring of scoured bridges. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 10(3), 485–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00398-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glisic, B., & Adriaenssens, S. (2010). Streicker Bridge: Initial evaluation of life-cycle cost benefits of various structural health monitoring approaches. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Glisic, B., Chen, J., & Hubbell, D. (2011). Streicker Bridge: A comparison between Bragg-gratings long-gauge strain and temperature sensors and Brillouin scattering-based distributed strain and temperature sensors. In: Proceedings of SPIE: Health monitoring of structural and biological systems, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Glisic, B., & Yao, Y. (2012). Development of method for in-service crack detection based on distributed fiber optic sensors. Structural Health Monitoring: An International Journal, 11(6), 696–711. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921712455683
   Google Scholar
• Goulet, J. A., Der Kiureghian, A., & Li, B. (2015). Pre-posterior optimization of sequence of measurement and intervention actions under structural reliability constraints. Structural Safety, 52, 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, D. H., Park, S. O., Hong, C. S., & Kim, C. G. (2007). Mechanical strength characteristics of fiber Bragg gratings considering fabrication process and reflectivity. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 18(4), 303–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X06066030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketzenberg, M. E., Rosenzweig, E. D., Marucheck, A. E., & Metters, R. D. (2007). A framework for the value of information in inventory replenishment. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(3), 1230–1250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limongelli, M. P., Omenzetter, P., Yazgan, U., & Soyoz, S. (2017). Quantifying the value of monitoring for post-earthquake emergency management of bridges. Proc. IABSE. Vancouver. doi:https://doi.org/10.2749/222137817822208852[]
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, D. V. (1956). On a measure of the information provided by an experiment. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27(4), 986–1005. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728069
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, D. V. (2006). Understanding uncertainty. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, C. R. (1966). Economics: Principles, problems, and policies (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, J. V., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nikles, M., Thevenaz, L., & Robert, P. (1996). Simple distributed fiber sensor based on Brillouin gain spectrum analysis. Optics Letters, 21(10), 758–760. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.21.000758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmigiani, G., & Inoue, L. (2009). Decision theory: Principles and approaches. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, C., Schredelseker, K., & Seeber, G. U. H. (2009). On the negative value of information in informationally inefficient markets: Calculations for large number of traders. European Journal of Operational Research, 195(1), 117–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzi, M., & Der Kiureghian, A. (2011). Assessing the value of information for long-term structural health monitoring. In: Proceeding of SPIE: Health monitoring of structural and biological systems, San Diego, CA. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/12.881918
   Google Scholar
• Pozzi, M., Malings, C., & Minca, A. C. (2017). Negative value of information in systems' maintenance. 12th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzi, M., Milangs, C., & Minca, A. (2020). Information avoidance and overvaluation under epistemic constraints: Principles and implications for regulatory policies. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Volume 197, May 2020, 106814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzi, M., Zonta, D., Wang, W., & Chen, G. (2010). A framework for evaluating the impact of structural health monitoring on bridge management. In: Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (IABMAS 2010), Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, J. W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32(1/2), 122–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1913738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, J., Walls, L., Demirel, G., MacCarthy, B. L., & Parsa, M. (2018). Supplier quality improvement: The value of information under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(3), 932–947. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H., & Schlaifer, R. (1961). Applied statistical decision theory. Boston, MA: Clinton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin, F., & Robinson, E. P. (2002). Flow coordination and information sharing in supply chains: Review, implications, and directions for future research. Decision Sciences, 334(4), 505–536.
   Google Scholar
• Schredelseker, K. (2001). Is the usefulness approach useful? Some reflections on the utility of public information. In S. McLeay & A. Riccaboni, eds. Contemporary issues in accounting regulation (pp. 135–153). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sivia, D., & Skilling, J. (2006). Data analysis: A Bayesian tutorial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, H., Wenzel, H., & Thons, S. (2019). Quantifying the value of structural health information (SHI) for decision support – Guide for operators (COST Action TU1402).
   Google Scholar
• Straub, D., Chatzi, E., Bismut, E., Courage, W. M. Q., Dohler, M., Nielsel, M. H., Kohler, J., Lombaert, G., Omenzetter, P., Pozzi, M., Thons, S., Val, D. V., Wenzel, H., & Zonta, D. (2017). Value of information: A roadmap to quantifying the benefit of structural health monitoring. 12th International Conference on Structural Safety & Reliability (ICOSSAR 2017), Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, D., & Faber, M. (2005). Risk based inspection planning for structural systems. Structural Safety, 27(4), 335–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoft-Christensen, P., & Sorensen, J. D. (1987). Optimal strategy for inspection and repair of structural systems. Civil Engineering Systems, 4(2), 94–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02630258708970464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thons, S. (2017). On the value of monitoring information for the structural integrity and risk management. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 33, 79–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thons, S. (2019). Quantifying the value of structural health information (SHI) for decision support – Guide for scientists (COST Action TU1402).
   Google Scholar
• Thons, S., & Faber, M. H. (2013). Assessing the value of structural health monitoring. In 11th International Conference on Structural Safety & Reliability (ICOSSAR 2013), New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Thons, S., Limongelli, M. P., Ivankovic, A. M., Faber, M. H., Val, D., Chryssanthopulous, M., … Chang, F. K. (2017). Progress of the COST action TU1402 on the quantification of the value of structural health monitoring. 11th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tonelli, D., Verzobio, A., Bolognani, D., Cappello, C., Glisic, B., Zonta, D., & Quigley, J. (2018). The conditional value of information of SHM: What if the manager is not the owner? Proceedings of SPIE, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Tonelli, D., Verzobio, A., Cappello, C., Bolognani, D., Zonta, D., Bursi, S. O., & Costa, C. (2017). Expected utility theory for monitoring-based decision support system. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Verzobio, A., Bolognani, D., Quigley, J., & Zonta, D. (2018). The consequences of Heuristic distortions on SHM-based decision problems. Proceedings of the 9th European Workshop of Structural Health Monitoring, Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Verzobio, A., Bolognani, D., Zonta, D., & Quigley, J. (2019). Quantifying the benefit of structural health monitoring: Can the value of information be negative? Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Verzobio, A., El-Awady, A., Ponnambalam, K., Quigley, J., & Zonta, D. (2020). An elicitation process to quantify Bayesian networks for dam failure analysis. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2020-0089 (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, H. M. (1969). Principles of operations research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., & Quigley, J. (2016). Allocation of tasks for reliability growth using multi-attribute utility. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(1), 259–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonta, D., Glisic, B., & Adriaenssens, S. (2014). Value of information: Impact of monitoring on decision-making. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 21(7), 1043–1056. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar