On the frontiers of Europe, not all musket balls were round; accuracy and penetration of various types of military small arms munitions from the mid seventeenth century to the early eighteenth century

Bibliography

• N. F. Barka, Archaeology of the Yorktown Battlefield, Yorktown, Virginia. Yorktown Research Series No. 1 (Williamsburg, VA: Southside Historical Sites, Inc., 1976).
   Google Scholar
• D. P. Barr, Unconquered: The Iroquois League at War in Colonial America (Westport: Praeger, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• M. Bennett, ‘The Moot Site,’ Chenango Chapter New York Society of American Anthropologists, 14: 1 (1973), 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• J.-F. Blanchette, ‘Firearms,’ in Burr’s Hill: A 17th Century Wampanoag Burial Ground in Warren, ed. by S. G. Gibson (Rhode Island: Haffenreffer Museum of Anthropology, 1980), 67–71.
   Google Scholar
• J. W. Bradley, ‘The Onondaga Iroquois: 1500–1655. A Study in Acculturative Change and its Consequences’ ( Syracuse University PhD dissertation, 1979).
   Google Scholar
• J. W. Bradley, Evolution of the Onondaga Iroquois, Accommodating Change, 1500–1655 (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1987).
   Google Scholar
• J. P. Brain, Fort St. George: Archaeological Investigations of the 1607–1608 Popham Colony (Augusta, GA: Occasional Publications in Maine Archaeology, 12 2007), 144–147.
   Google Scholar
• A. Dolleczek, Monographie der k.u.k. Österr.-Ung. Blanken und Handfeuer-Waffen [Monograph on the Imperial and Royal Arms of Austria and Hungary, Polished Steel and Firearms] (Vienna, reprinted Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck und Verlagsantalt, 1896/1970).
   Google Scholar
• J. Durdik, M. Mudra and M. Sada, Alte Handfeuerwaffen [Old Firearms] (Prague: Artia, 1977).
   Google Scholar
• M. L. Fackler and J. A. Malinowski, ‘The Wound Profile: A Visual Method for Quantifying Gunshot Wound Components,’ Journal of Trauma, 25 (1985), 522–529.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. Faulkner and G. Fearon Faulkner, The French at Pentagoet, 1635–1674 (Augusta, ME: Occasional Publications in Maine Archaeology, 5, 1987)
   Google Scholar
• C. L. Fisher, ed., The Most Advantageous Situation in the Highlands: An Archaeological Study of Ft. Montgomery State Historic Site (New York, NY: New York State Museum, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• G. Foard and R. Morris, The Archaeology of English Battlefields: Conflict in the Pre-industrial Landscape (York: Council for British Archaeology, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• C. Geisler, Neue Curieuse und vollkommene Artillerie [New, Curious and Perfect Artillery] (Dresden: Johann Christoph Zimmermann, 1718).
   Google Scholar
• B. S. Hall, Weapons and Warfare in Renaissance Europe; Gunpowder, Technology, and Tactics (Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1997).
   Google Scholar
• T. M. Hamilton, Colonial Frontier Guns (Union City, CA: Pioneer Press, 1987).
   Google Scholar
• L. Hanson and D. Ping Hsu, Casemates and Cannonballs: Archeological Investigations at Fort Stanwix, Rome, New York (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1975).
   Google Scholar
• D. F. Harding, Lead Shot of the English Civil War: A Radical Study (London: Foresight Books, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• J. C. Harrington, New Light on Washington’s Fort Necessity (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1957).
   Google Scholar
• M. Hrushevsky, History of Ukraine Rus’, Volume Seven: The Cossack Age to 1625 (Toronto: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• G. T. Hunt, Wars of the Iroquois: A Study in Intertribal Trade Relations (Madison, WI: Reprinted University of Wisconsin Press, 1940/1960).
   Google Scholar
• P. R. Kalaus, ‘Schiessversuche mit Historischen Feuerwaffen des Landeszeughause Graz an der Prüf- und Versuchsstelle für Waffen and Munition des Amtes für Wehrtechnik [Experimental Trails with Historical Firearms Belonging to the Regional Arsenal at Graz and the Results of Testing and Experiements with Weapons and Munitions].’ Von Alten Handfeuerwaffen; Entwicklung, Technik, Leistung (Graz: Landesmuseum Joanneum Graz, 1989).
   Google Scholar
• W. A. Kenyon, The History of James Bay: A Study in Historical Archaeology. Archaeology Monograph 10 (Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum, 1986).
   Google Scholar
• W. S. McBride, K. Arbogast McBride and G. Adamson, Frontier Forts in Western Virginia (Charlestown, WV: West Virginia Division of Culture and History, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• A. Mandzy, ‘Doslidzhennia Oblohy Zbarazha 1649 R [Researching the 1649 Siege of Zbarazh].’ Dezhava ta Armiia, 571 Visnyk Natsional’noho Universytetu L’vivs’ka Politekhnika, 571 (2006), 124–130, L’viv.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mandzy, ‘Tatars, Cossacks, and the Polish Army: The Battle of Zboriv,’ in Fields of Conflict: Battlefield Archaeology from the Roman Empire to the Korean War, ed. by D. D. Scott, L. E. Babits and C. M. Haecker (University of Virginia, Praeger Security International, 2007), 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mandzy, ‘Munitions and Unit Frontage: New Evidence about the Russian Main Battle Line,’ Fasciculi Archaeologiae Historicae, 25 (2012), 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mandzy and M. Bevz, Kompleksne Doslidzhennia Istorychnoho Polia Bytvy: Metodyka i Dosvid Mizhnarodnoi Arkhekturho-Arkheolohichnoi Ekspedytsii [A Multi-disciplinary Study of a Historical Battlefield: Methodology and Results of an International Architectural-archaeological Expedition], Fortress, 1 (2009), 550–558.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mandzy, E. Hale and J. Marin, ‘Is a Battlefield Ever Truly Lost? Blue Licks and the Question of Impact,’ Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology, 26 (2010), 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• J. R. Mayer, Flintlocks of the Iroquois, 1620–1687 (Rochester, MN: Research Records of the Rochester Museum of Arts and Sciences, 6, 1943).
   Google Scholar
• N. C. Nicholas and J. R. Welsch, Institute for Non-lethal Technologies Report: Ballistic Gelatin (State College, PA: Applied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• E. B., O’Callaghan, ‘Documents Relative to the Colonial History of the State of New York,’ vol. IV, p. 57, quoted in C. P., Russell Guns on the Early Frontiers (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1854/1957), p. 14.
   Google Scholar
• U. W. Patrick, III, Handgun Wounding Factors and Effectiveness (Quantico, VA: FBI Academy Firearms Training Unit, 1989).
   Google Scholar
• U. W. Patrick, III, FBI Test Protocol (Quantico, VA: FBI Academy Firearms Training Unit, 1991).
   Google Scholar
• A. B. Pernal and D. F. Essar, A Description of Ukraine (Harvard, MA: Guillaume Le Vasseur, Sieur de Beauplan, 1993).
   Google Scholar
• H. L. Peterson, Arms and Armor in Colonial America, 1526–1783 (Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books, 1956).
   Google Scholar
• H. L. Peterson, The Book of the Gun (London: Paul Hamlyn, 1964).
   Google Scholar
• O. Pohorilets, ‘Do Problemy Poshuku Mistsia Bytvy Pyliavtsiamy (11–13 Verecnia 1648) [Toward the Problem of Finding the Battle of Pyliavtsi],’ Novi Doslidxhennia Pam’iatok Kozats’koi Doby v Ukraini, 16 (2007), 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• J.-P. Puype, ‘Part I, Dutch and other Flintlocks from Seventeenth Century Iroquois Sites,’ in Proceedings of the 1984 Trade Gun Conference, ed. by C. F. Hayes, III (Rochester, MN: Research Records of the Rochester Museum of Arts and Sciences, 18, 1985), 1–120.
   Google Scholar
• N. A. Roberts, J. W. Brown, B. Hammett and P. D. F. Kingston, ‘A Detailed Study of the Effectiveness and Capabilities of 18th Century Musketry on the Battlefield,’ Journal of Conflict Archaeology, 4 (2008), 1–21.10.1163/157407808X382737
   Google Scholar
• E. Sanow, ‘Ballistic Gelatin Media (paper presented at the Ballistic Test Protocol Symposium, Immigration & Naturalization Service, National Firearms Unit, Altoona, PA, April, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• O. Schmidt, Prussian Regular Infantryman 1808–15 (Oxford: Osprey Publishing, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• E. Schütz, An Armeno-Kipchak Chronicle on the Polish-Turkish Wars of 1620–1621 (Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1968).
   Google Scholar
• D. M. Sivilich, ‘What the Musket Ball Can Tell: Monmouth Battlefield State Park,’ in Fields of Conflict: Battlefield Archaeology from the Roman Empire to the Korean War, ed. by D. D. Scott, L. E. Babits and C. M. Haecker (Praeger Security International: University of Virginia, 2007), 84–101.
   Google Scholar
• D. M. Sivilich and G. Wheeler Stone, The Battle of Monmouth: The Archaeology of Molly Pitcher, the Royal Highlanders, and Colonel Cilley’s Light Infantry (Freehold, NJ: Monmouth Battlefield State Park, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• P. Surirey de Saint-Remy, Memoires d’artillerie [Memories of Artillery] (Amsterdam: Pierre Mortier, 1702).
   Google Scholar
• P. Surirey de Saint-Remy, Memoires d’artillerie [Memories of Artillery] (A la Haye [The Hague]: Chez Jean Neaulme, 1741).
   Google Scholar
• I. K. Sveshnikov, Bytva pid Berestechkom [Battle of Berestechko] (Slovo: L’viv, 1993).
   Google Scholar