A weak-constraint 4DEnsembleVar. Part I: formulation and simple model experiments

References

• Bannister, R. N. 2008. A review of forecast error covariance statistics in atmospheric variational data assimilation. II: Modelling the forecast error covariance statistics. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 134, 1971–1996. DOI:10.1002/qj.v134:637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, C., Etherton, B. and Majumdar, S. 2001. Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Mon. Weather Rev. 129, 420–436. DOI:10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0420:ASWTET>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, S., Takacs, L., DaSilva, A. and Ledvina, D. 1996. Data assimilation using incremental analysis updates. Mon. Wea. Rev. 124(6), 1256–1271. DOI:10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<1256:DAUIAU>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonavita, M., Isaksen, L. and Holm, E. 2012. On the use of EDA background error variances in the ECMWF 4D-Var. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 138, 1540–1559. DOI:10.1002/qj.1899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehner, M. 2005. Ensemble-derived stationary and flow- dependent background error covariances: Evaluation in a quasi-operational NWP setting. Q. J. R. MeteoR. Soc. 131, 1013–1043. DOI:10.1256/qj.04.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, A. M., Lorenc, A. C. and Barker, D. M. 2013. Operational Implementation of a Hybrid Ensemble/4D-Var Global Data Assimilation System at the Met Office. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. DOI:10.1002/qj.2054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evensen, G. and Van Leeuwen, P. J. 2000. An ensemble Kalman smoother for nonlinear dynamics. Mon. Wea. Rev. 128, 1852–1867. DOI:10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<1852:AEKSFN>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbarn, D., Pring, S., Lorenc, A. and Roulsone, I. 2014. A comparison of 4DVAR with ensemble data assimilation methods. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 140, 281–294. DOI:10.1002/qj.2135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspari, G. and Cohn, S. E. 1999. Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125, 723–757. DOI:10.1002/qj.49712555417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodliff, M., Amezcua, J. and Van Leeuwen, P. J. 2015. Comparing hybrid data assimilation methods on the Lorenz 1963 model with increasing non-linearity. Tellus A 67, 26928. DOI:10.3402/tellusa.v67.26928.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, B. R., Kostelich, E. J. and Szunyogh, I. 2007. Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: a local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Phys. D 230, 112–126. DOI:10.1016/j.physd.2006.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalnay, E. and Yang, S.-C. 2010. Accelerating the spin-up of Ensemble Kalman Filtering. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 136, 1644–1651. DOI:10.1002/qj.652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, W. G. and Hansen, J. A. 2005. Alignment Error Models and Ensemble-Based Data Assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev. 133, 1687–1709. DOI:10.1175/MWR2945.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Dimet, F.-X. and Talagrand, O. 1986. Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations: theoretical aspects. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 38A, 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Xiao, Q. and Wang, B. 2008. An ensemble-based four-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme. Part I: Technical formulation and preliminary test. Mon. Wea. Rev. 136(9), 3363–3373. DOI:10.1175/2008MWR2312.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenc, A. 2003. The potential of the ensemble Kalman filter for NWP – a comparison with 4D-Var. Q. J Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 129(595B), 3183–3203. DOI:10.1256/qj.02.132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenc, A. C., Bowler, N. E., Clayton, A. M., Pring, S. R., and Fairbairn, D. 2015. Comparison of hybrid-4DEnVar and hybrid-4DVar data assimilation methods for global NWP. Q J. Roy. Met. Soc. 143. DOI:10.1175/MWR-D-14-00195.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E. 1963. Deterministic Non-periodic Flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E. N. 1996. Predictability: A problem partly solved. In: Proc. ECMWF Seminar on Predictability, 4–8 September 1995, Reading, UK, pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E. N. 2005. Designing chaotic models. J. Atmos. Sci. 62, 1574–1587. DOI:10.1175/JAS3430.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyoshi, T. 2011. The Gaussian approach to adaptive covariance inflation and its implementation with the local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Mon. Weather Rev. 139, 1519–1535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish, D. F. and Derber, J. C. 1981. The National Meteorological Center’s spectral statistical interpolation analysis system. Mon. Weather Rev. 120, 1747–1763. DOI:10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<1747:TNMCSS>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, -J.-J. 1987. The proper analytical solution of the Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers equation. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 20(2), 49–56. DOI:10.1088/0305-4470/20/2/002.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, D. 2006. Optimal State Estimation. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 552 p.
   Google Scholar
• Talagrand, O. and Courtier, P. 1987. Variational Assimilation of Meteorological Observations With the Adjoint Vorticity Equation. I: Theory. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 113, 1311–1328. DOI:10.1002/qj.49711347812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremolet, Y. 2006. Accounting for an imperfect model in 4D-Var. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 132, 2483–2504. DOI:10.1256/qj.05.224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, P. J. 2003. A Variance-Minimizing Filter for Large-Scale Applications. Mon. Wea. Rev. 131, 2071–2084. DOI:10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<2071:AVFFLA>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, P. J. and Evensen, G. 1996. Data assimilation and inverse methods in terms of a probabilistic formulation. Mon. Wea. Rev. 124, 2898–2914. DOI:10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2898:DAAIMI>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Bishop, C. and Julier, S. 2004. Which is better, an ensemble of positive-negative pairs or a centered spherical simplex ensemble?. Mon. Wea. Rev. 132, 1590–1605. DOI:10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1590:WIBAEO>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Snyder, C. and Hamill, T. M. 2007. On the Theoretical Equivalence of Differently Proposed Ensemble 3DVAR Hybrid Analysis Schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev. 135, 222–227. DOI:10.1175/MWR3282.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, J. S. and Hamill, T. M. 2002. Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations. Mon. Weather Rev. 130, 1913–1927. DOI:10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1913:EDAWPO>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wursch, M. and Craig, G. C. 2014. A simple dynamical model of cumulus convection for data assimilation research. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 23(5), 483–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-C., Baker, D., Li, H., Cordes, K., Huff, M.et al. 2006. Data assimilation as synchronization of truth and model: experiments with the three-variable Lorenz system. J. Atmos. Sci. 63(9), 2340–2354. DOI:10.1175/JAS3739.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakharov, V. E. and Faddeev, L. D. 1971. Korteweg-de Vries equation: A completely integrable Hamiltonian system. Funct. Anal. Appl. 5(4), 280–287. DOI:10.1007/BF01086739.
   Google Scholar
• Zupanski, M. 2005. Maximum likelihood ensemble filter: theoretical aspects. Mon. Wea. Rev. 133(6), 171–1726. DOI:10.1175/MWR2946.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar