The particle dry deposition component of total deposition from air quality models: right, wrong or uncertain?

References

• Ahlm, L., Krejci, R., Nilsson, E. D., Martensson, E. M., Vogt, M. and co-authors. 2010. Emission and dry deposition of accumulation mode particles in the Amazon Basin. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 10237–10253. doi:10.5194/acp-10-10237-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, A. G., Harrison, R. M. and Nicholson, K. W. 1991. Dry deposition of fine aerosol to a short grass surface. Atmos. Environ. 25A, 2671–2676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgardner, R. E. Jr, Lavery, T. F., Rogers, C. M. and Isil, S. S. 2002. Estimates of the atmospheric deposition of sulfur and nitrogen species: Clean Air Status and Trends Network, 1990-2000. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 2614–2629. doi:10.1021/es011146g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beswick, K. M., Hargreaves, K. J., Gallagher, M. W., Choularton, T. W. and Fowler, D. 1991. Size-resolved measurements of cloud droplet deposition velocity to a forest canopy using an eddy correlation technique. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 117, 623–645. doi:10.1002/qj.49711749910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. E., Schwede, D. B., Lear, G. G., Warren-Hicks, W. J. and Finkelstein, P. L. 2011. Quality assurance decisions with air models: A case study of imputation of missing input data using EPA’s Multi-Layer Model. Water Air Soil Pollut. 223, 391–402.
   Google Scholar
• Brook, J. R., Di-Giovanni, F., Cakmak, S. and Meyers, T. P. 1997. Estimation of dry deposition velocity using inferential models and site-specific meteorology – uncertainty due to siting of meteorological towers. Atmos. Environ. 31, 3911–3919. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00247-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzorius, G., Rannik, U., Makela, J. M., Keronen, P., Vesala, T. and co-authors. 2000. Vertical aerosol fluxes measured by the eddy covariance method and deposition of nucleation mode particles above a Scots pine forest in southern Finland. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 19905–19916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, D. and Schere, K. 2006. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl. Mech. Rev. 59, 51–77. doi:10.1115/1.2128636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffrey, P. F., Ondov, J. M., Zufall, M. J. and Davidson, C. I. 1998. Determination of size-dependent dry particle deposition velocities with multiple intrinsic elemental tracers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 1615–1622. doi:10.1021/es970644f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, A. C. 1967. Transport of Lycopodium spores and other small particles to rough surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 296A, 45–70.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, W. S. 1975. The deposition of particles on moss and grass surfaces. Atmos. Environ. 9, 1113–1119. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(75)90187-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contini, D., Donateo, A., Belosi, F., Grasso, F. M., Santachiara, G. and co-authors. 2010. Deposition velocity of ultrafine particles measured with the eddy correlation method over the Nansen Ice Sheet (Antarctica). J. Geophys. Res. 115, D16202. doi:10.1029/2009JD013600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deardorff, J. W. 1970. Convective velocity and temperature scales for the unstable planetary boundary layer and for Rayleigh convection. J. Atmos. Sci. 27, 1211–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, C. T., Lawrence, G. B., Bulger, A. J., Butler, T. J., Cronan, C. S. and co-authors. 2001. Acidic deposition in the northeastern United States: sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies. Biogeoscience 51, 180–198.
   Google Scholar
• Duan, B., Fairall, C. W. and Thomson, D. W. 1988. Eddy correlation measurements of the dry deposition of particles in wintertime. J. Appl. Meteor. 27, 642–652.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A., Jacob, D. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Zhang, L., Holmes, C. D. and co-authors. 2013. Present and future nitrogen deposition to national parks in the United States: critical load exceedances. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 9083–9095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environ International Corporation. 2012. CAMx: User’s Guide Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions, Version 6.0, Novato, California. (http:/www.environcorp.com).
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. W., Choularton, T. W., Morse, A. P. and Fowler, D. 1988. Measurements of the size dependence of cloud droplet deposition at a hill site. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 114, 1291–1303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. W., Beswick, K. M., Duyzer, J., Westrate, H., Choularton, T. W. and co-authors. 1997. Measurements of aerosol fluxes to Speulder Forest using a micrometeorological technique. Atmos. Environ. 31, 359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, J. N., Aber, J. D., Erisman, J. W., Seitzinger, S. P., Howarth, R. W. and co-authors. 2003. The nitrogen cascade. Bioscience 53, 341–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaman, A., Rannik, U., Aalto, P., Pohja, T., Siivola, E. and co-authors. 2004. Relaxed eddy accumulation system for size resolved aerosol particle flux measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 21, 933–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, W., Makar, P. A., Zhang, J., Milbrandt, J., Gravel, S. and co-authors. 2015. Modelling aerosol-cloud-meteorology interaction: A case study with a fully coupled air quality model (GEM-MACH). Atmos. Environ. 115, 695–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, M., Staebler, R. M., Liggio, J., Vlasenko, A., Li, S.-M. and co-authors. 2011. Aerosol flux measurements above a mixed forest at Borden, Ontario. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 6773–6786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grell, G. and Baklanov, A. 2011. Integrated modeling for forecasting weather and air quality: A call for fully coupled approaches. Atmos. Environ. 45, 6845–6851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronholm, T., Aalto, P. P., Hiltunen, V., Rannik, U., Rinne, J. and co-authors. 2007. Measurements of aerosol particle dry deposition velocity using the relaxed eddy accumulation technique. Tellus 59B, 381–386.
   Google Scholar
• Gronholm, T., Launiainen, S., Ahlm, L., Martensson, E. M., Kulmala, M. and co-authors. 2009. Aerosol particle dry deposition to canopy and forest floor measured by two-layer eddy covariance system. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D04202. doi:10.1029/2008JD010663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosch, S. and Schmitt, G. 1988. Experimental Investigations on the Deposition of Trace Elements in Forest Area. In: Environmental Meteorology (eds. K. Grefen and L. Lobel). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Held, A., Orsini, D. A., Vaattovaara, P., Tjernstrom, M. and Leck, C. 2011a. Near-surface profiles of aerosol number and concentration and temperature over the Arctic Ocean. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 4, 1603–1616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, A., Brooks, I. M., Leck, C. and Tjernstrom, M. 2011b. On the potential contribution of open lead particle emissions to the central Arctic aerosol concentration. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 3093–3105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettelingh, J.-P., Posch, M., De Smet, P. and Downing, R. J. 1995. The use of critical loads in emission reduction agreements in Europe. Water Air Soil Pollut. 85, 2381–2388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, B. B., Saylor, R. D. and Baker, B. D. 2016. Dry deposition of particles to canopies – A look back and the road forward. J. Geophys. Res. – Atmos. 121, 14691–14707. doi:10.1002/2015JD024742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, B. B., Wesely, M. L., Durham, J. L. and Brown, M. A. 1982. Some direct measurements of atmospheric sulfur fluxes over a pine plantation. Atmos. Environ. 16, 2899–2903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, B. B., Matt, D. R., McMillen, R. T., Womack, J. D., Wesely, M. L. and co-authors. 1989. A field investigation of sulfate fluxes to a deciduous forest. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 13003–13011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, B. B. 1986. Measuring dry deposition: a re-assessment of the state of the art. Water Air Soil Pollut. 30, 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, B. B. 1995. On the determination of total deposition to remote areas. Stud. Environ. Sci. 64, 163–173.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, B. B. 2008. On estimating dry deposition rates in complex terrain. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. 47, 1651–1658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofken, K. D. and Gravenhorst, G. 1982. Deposition of atmospheric aerosol particles to beech- and spruce forest. In: Deposition of Atmospheric Pollutants (eds. H. W. Georggi and J. Pankrath). D. Reidel Publishing Company, Oberursel/Taunus, Germany, pp. 191–194.
   Google Scholar
• Houyoux, M. R. and Vukovich, J. M. 1999. Updates to the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) Modeling System and Integration with Models-3. In: Proceedings of the Emission Inventory: Regional Strategies for the Future. Raleigh, NC, Air and Waste Management Association Annual Meeting, pp. 430–440.
   Google Scholar
• Hummelshoj, P. 1994. Dry Deposition of Particles and Gases. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, M., Barrie, L. A. and Fanaki, F. 1983. An experimental and theoretical investigation of the dry deposition of particles to snow, pine trees and artificial collectors. Atmos. Environ. 17, 781–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, U., Bianconi, R., Solazzo, E., Kioutsioukis, I., Badia, A., and co-authors. 2015. Evaluation of operational online-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part II: Particular matter. Atmos. Environ. 115, 421–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Core Writing Team, eds., R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer), IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Katul, G. G., Gronholm, T., Launiainen, S. and Vesala, T. 2011. The effects of the canopy medium on dry deposition velocities of aerosol particles in the canopy sub-layer above forested ecosystems. Atmos. Environ. 45, 1203–1212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, B., Ansari, A. S. and Pandis, S. N. 2003. Integrated approaches to modeling the organic and inorganic atmospheric aerosol components. Atmos. Environ. 37, 4757–4768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, N. K., O'Neill, S. M., Solomon, R., Raffuse, S., Strand, T., and co-authors. 2009. The BlueSky smoke modeling framework. Int. J. Wildland Fire 18, 906–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavi, A., Farmer, D. K., Segre, E., Moise, T., Rotenberg, E. and co-authors. 2013. Fluxes of fine particles over a semi-arid pine forest: Possible effects of a complex terrain. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 47, 906–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P., McQueen, J., Stajner, I., Huang, J., Pan, L., and co-authors. 2017. NAQFC developmental forecast guidance for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Weather Forecast. 32, 343–360. doi:10.1175/WAF-D-15-0163.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Lu, L., Mao, D. and Jia, L. 2007. Evaluating parameterizations of aerodynamic resistance to heat transfer using field measurements. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 11, 769–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, R. and Murphy, C. E. Jr.1989. Dry deposition of particles to a pine plantation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 46, 355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammarella, I., Rannik, U., Aalto, P., Keronen, P., Vesala, T. and co-authors. 2011. Long-term aerosol particle flux observations. Part II: Particle size statistics and deposition velocities. Atmos. Environ. 45, 3794–3805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda, K., Fujimura, Y., Hayashi, K., Takahashi, A. and Nakaya, K. 2010. Deposition velocity of PM2.5 sulfate in the summer above a deciduous forest in central Japan. Atmos. Environ. 44, 4582–4587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda, K., Watanabe, I., Mizukami, K., Ban, S. and Takahashi, A. 2015. Dry deposition of PM2.5 sulfate above a hilly forest using relaxed eddy accumulation. Atmos. Environ. 107, 255–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, T. P., Finkelstein, P., Clarke, J., Ellestad, T. G. and Sims, P. F. 1998. A multilayer model for inferring dry deposition using standard meteorological measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 22,645–22,661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller, U. and Schumann, G. 1970. Mechanisms of transport from the atmosphere to the Earth’s surface. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 3013–3019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, R., Koo, B. and Yarwood, G. 2005. Evaluation of multisectional and two-section particulate matter photochemical grid models in the western United States. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 55, 1683–1693.
   Google Scholar
• National Atmospheric Deposition Program 2016. Total Deposition 2015 Annual Map Summary. NADP Data Report 2016-02. Illinois State Water Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Nemitz, E., Gallagher, M. W., Duyzer, J. H. and Fowler, D. 2002. Micrometeorological measurements of particle deposition velocities to moorland vegetation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 128, 2281–2300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nenes, A., Pilinis, C. and Pandis, S. N. 1998. ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols. Aquatic Geochem. 4, 123–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nenes, A., Pilinis, C. and Pandis, S. N. 1999. Continued development and testing of a new thermodynamic aerosol module for urban and regional air quality models. Atmos. Environ. 33, 1553–1560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, H. H. and den Hartog, G. 1985. Eddy correlation measurements of atmospheric fluxes of ozone, sulphur, and particulates during the Champaign Intercomparison Study. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 2097–2110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, E. D. and Rannik, U. 2001. Turbulent aerosol fluxes over the Arctic Ocean, 1. Dry deposition over sea and pack ice. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 32,125–32,137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S. M., N. K., Larkin, J., Hoadley, G., Mills, J. K., Vaughan, R. and co-authors. 2009.,. Regional real-time smoke prediction systems. In: Wildland Fires and Air Pollution: Developments in Environmental Science, Vol. 8, (eds by A. Bytnerowicz. et al. ), Elsevier B.V., Oxford, U.K. pp 499–534.
   Google Scholar
• Ould-Dada, Z. 2002. Dry deposition profile of small particles within a model spruce canopy. Sci. Total Environ. 286, 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, L., Tong, D., Lee, P., Kim, H. and Chai, T. 2014. Assessment of NOx and O3 forecasting performances in the U.S. National Air Quality Forecasting Capability before and after the 2012 major emissions updates. Atmos. Environ. 95, 610–619. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, L. H., Fenn, M. E., Goodale, C. L., Geiser, L. H., Driscoll, C. T. and co-authors. 2011. Effects of nitrogen deposition and empirical nitrogen critical loads for ecoregions of the United States. Ecol. Appl. 21, 3049–3082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroff, A., Mailliat, A., Amielh, M. and Anselmet, F. 2008a. Aerosol dry deposition on vegetative canopies. Part I: Review of present knowledge. Atmos. Environ. 42, 3625–3653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroff, A., Mailliat, A., Amielh, M. and Anselmet, F. 2008b. Aerosol dry deposition on vegetative canopies. Part II: A new modelling approach and applications. Atmos. Environ. 42, 3654–3683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroff, A., Zhang, L., Pryor, S. C. and Belot, Y. 2009. An extended dry deposition model for aerosols onto broadleaf canopies. Aerosol Sci. 40, 218–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroff, A. and Zhang, L. 2010. Development and validation of a size-resolved particle dry deposition scheme for application in aerosol transport models. Geosci. Model Dev. 3, 753–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilinis, C., Capaldo, K. P., Nenes, A. and Pandis, S. N. 2000. MADM – A new multicomponent aerosol dynamics model. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 32, 482–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleim, J. 2007. A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: Model description and testing. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 46, 1383–1395. doi:10.1175/JAM2539.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleim, J. and Ran, L. 2011. Surface flux modeling for air quality applications. Atmosphere 2, 271–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, S. C., Gallagher, M., Sievering, H., Larsen, S. E. and Barthelmie, R. and co-authors. 2008a. A review of measurement and modeling results of particle atmosphere-surface exchange. Tellus 60B, 42–75.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, S. C., Barthelmie, R. J., Sorensen, L. L., Larsen, E., Sempreviva, A. M. and co-authors. 2008b. Upward fluxes of particles over forests: when, where, why? Tellus 60B, 372–380.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, S. C. 2006. Size-resolved particle deposition velocities of sub-100 nm diameter particles over a forest. Atmos. Environ. 40, 6192–6200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, S. C., Larsen, S. E., Sorensen, L. L., Barthelmie, R. J., Gronholm, T. and co-authors. 2007. Particle fluxes over forests: Analyses of flux methods and functional dependencies. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D07205. doi:10.1029/2006JD008066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, S. C., Barthelmie, R. J., Spaulding, A. M., Larsen, S. E. and Petroff, A. 2009. Size-resolved fluxes of sub-100-nm particles over forests. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D18212. doi:10.1029/2009JD012248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye, H. O. T., Liao, H., Wu, S., Mickley, L. J., Jacob, D. J. and co-authors. 2009. Effect of changes in climate and emissions on future sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosol levels in the United States. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D01205. doi: 10.1029/2008JD010701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruminski, M., Kondragunta, S., Draxler, R. and Zeng, J. 2006. Recent Change to the Hazard Mapping System. Preprint: 15th International Emission Inventory Conf.: Reinventing Inventories – New Ideas in New Orleans. New Orleans, LA, May 15-18, 2006. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/conference/ei15/session10/ruminski.pdf (last accessed Nov 20, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Saide, P. E., Spak, S. N., Pierce, R. B., Pierce, Otkin, J. A., Schaack, T. K. and co-authors. 2015. Central American biomass burning smoke can increase tornado severity in the U. S. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 956–965. doi:10.1002/2014GL062826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saide, P. E., Thompson, G., Eidhammer, T., da Silva, A. M., Pierce, R. B. and co-authors. 2016. Assessment of biomass burning smoke influence on environmental conditions for multiyear tornado outbreaks by combining aerosol-aware microphysics and fire emission constraints. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 10,294–10,311. doi:10.1002/2016JD025056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarwar, G., Luecken, D., Yarwood, G., Whitten, G. and Carter, W. 2008. Impact of an updated carbon bond mechanism on predictions from the CMAQ modeling system: Preliminary assessment. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. 47, 3–14. doi:10.1175/2007JAMC1393.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saylor, R. D. and Hicks, B. B. 2016. New directions: Time for a new approach to modeling surface-atmosphere exchanges in air quality models? Atmos. Environ. 129, 229–233.
   Google Scholar
• Schwede, D. B. and Lear, G. G. 2014. A novel hybrid approach for estimating total deposition in the United States. Atmos. Environ. 92, 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sievering, H. 1981. Profile measurements of particle mass transfer at the air-water interface. Atmos. Environ. 15, 123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sievering, H. 1982. Profile measurements of particle dry deposition velocity at an air-land interface. Atmos. Environ. 16, 301–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sievering, H. 1988. Small-particle dry deposition measurements: A comparison of gradient and eddy flux techniques over agricultural fields, In: Annual Meeting of Air Pollution Control Association, Dallas, Texas, June 19–24, 6, pp. 88–101.
   Google Scholar
• Slinn, W. G. N. 1982. Predictions for particle deposition to vegetative canopies. Atmos. Environ. 16, 1785–1794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slinn, W. G. N. 1977. Some approximations for the wet and dry removal of particles and gases from the atmosphere. Water Air Soil Pollut. 7, 513–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slinn, S. A. and Slinn, W. G. N. 1980. Predictions for particle deposition on natural waters. Atmos. Environ. 14, 1013–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solazzo, E., Bianconi, R., Pirovano, G., Matthias, V., Vautard, R., and co-authors. 2012. Operational model evaluation for particulate matter in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII. Atmos. Environ. 53, 75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, F., Yin, Z., Lun, X., Zhao, Y., Li, R. and co-authors. 2014. Deposition velocity of PM2.5 in the winter and spring above deciduous and coniferous forests in Beijing, China. PLoS One 9, e97723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, D. Q., Lamsal, L., Pan, L., Ding, C., Kim, H. and co-authors. 2015. Long-term NOx trends over large cities in the United States during the great recession: Comparison of satellite retrievals, ground observations, and emission inventories. Atmos. Environ. 107, 70–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. S. Forest Service, National Park Service, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Federal Land Managers’ Interagency Guidance for Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition Analyses: November 2011 (Natural Resource Report, National Park Service, Denver, Colorado).
   Google Scholar
• Vong, R. J., Vong, I. J., Vickers, D. and Covert, D. S. 2010. Size-dependent aerosol deposition velocities during BEARPEX’07. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 5749–5758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vong, R. J., Vickers, D. and Covert, D. S. 2004. Eddy correlation measurements of aerosol deposition to grass. Tellus 56B, 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Waraghai, A. and Gravenhorst, G. 1989. Dry deposition of atmospheric particles to an old spruce stand, in: Mechanisms and Effects of Pollutant Transfer into Forests. (ed. H. W. Georgii), Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp. 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Wesely, M. L., Hicks, B. B., Dannevik, W. P., Frisella, S. and Husar, R. B. 1977. An eddy-correlation measurement of particulate deposition from the atmosphere. Atmos. Environ. 11, 561–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesely, M. L., Cook, D. R., Hart, R. L. and Speer, R. E. 1985. Measurements and parameterization of particulate sulfur dry deposition over grass. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 2131–2143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyers, G. P. and Duyzer, J. H. 1997. Micrometeorological measurement of the dry deposition flux of sulphate and nitrate aerosols to coniferous forest. Atmos. Environ. 31, 333–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Gong, S., Padro, J. and Barrie, L. 2001. A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module. Atmos. Environ. 35, 549–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. and Vet, R. 2006. A review of current knowledge concerning size-dependent aerosol removal. China Particuol. 4, 272–282.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Shao, Y. and Huang, N. 2014. Measurements of dust deposition velocity in a wind-tunnel experiment. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 8869–8882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zufall, M. J., Davidson, C. I., Caffrey, P. F. and Ondov, J. M. 1998. Airborne concentrations and dry deposition fluxes of particulate species to surrogate surfaces deployed in southern Lake Michigan. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 1623–1628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar