‘I don't know whether I need a further level of disaster’: shifting media of sociology in the sandbox

References

• Becker, H. 2007. Telling about society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, M. 2013. The rime of the globalised mariner: In six parts (with bonus tracks from a chorus of Greek shippers). Sociology 47, no. 1: 30–50. doi: 10.1177/0038038512448568
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. 2008. National risk register. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/resource-library/national-risk-register.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the Fisherman of St. Brieuc Bay. In Power, action and belief. A new sociology of knowledge? ed. J. Law, 196–233. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., A. Clement, and V. Pipek. 2012. Participatory design for, with, and by communities. In International handbook of participatory design, ed. J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 182–209. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fals Borda, O. 2001. Participatory (action) research in social theory: Origins and challenges. In Handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice, ed. P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 27–37. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, G., and J. Law. 1988. On the invisibility of the visual: Editors’ introduction. In Picturing power. Visual depiction and social relations, ed. G. Fyfe and J. Law, 1–14. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. In Studies in ethnomethodology, ed. H. Garfinkel, 35–75. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim, M. 2011. The proof is in the pudding. On ‘Truth to materials’ in STS, followed by an attempt to improve it. Science Technology and Industry Studies 7, no. 1: 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim, M. Forthcoming. The media of sociology: Tight or loose translations? British Journal of Sociology.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking I. 1983 Representing and intervening. Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, D. 2012. Visual sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. 1959. Thing and medium. In ‘On perception, event structure, and psychological environment’. Selected Papers, ed. F. Heider. Psychological Issues 1, no. 3: 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, C., and P. Sweetman, eds. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: Visual methods in the sociological imagination. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kraeftner, B., and J. Kroell. 2009. Washing and assessing: Multiple diagnoses and hidden talents. In Un/knowing bodies, ed. J. Latimer and M. Schillmeier, 158–80. Oxford: Malden MA Blackwell Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Lagadec, P. 2007. Crisis management in the twenty-first century: ‘Unthinkable’ events in ‘inconceivable’ contexts. In Handbook of disaster research, ed. H. Rodríguez, E.L. Quarantelli, and R.C. Dynes, 489–507. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1986. Visualisation and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present 6: 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1995. The ‘pedofil’ of Boa Vista: A photo-philosophical montage. Common Knowledge 4, no. 1: 144–87.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2004. After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R.M. 2004. Recording technologies and the interview in sociology, 1920–2000. Sociology 38: 869–89. doi: 10.1177/0038038504047177
   Google Scholar
• Lessing, G.E. 1825. Fables and epigrams: With essays on fable and epigram; from the German. London: J. and H.L. Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Lionni, L. 2003. Frederick. Reissued ed. New York: Knof.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., and S. Woolgar, eds. 1990. Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. 2011. What is visualisation? Visual Studies 26: 36–49. doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2011.548488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, E., and L. Pauwels, eds. 2011. The Sage handbook of visual research methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., and N. de Lange. 2011. Community-based participatory video and social action in rural South Africa. In The Sage handbook of visual research methods, ed. E. Margolis and L. Pauwels, 171–85. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.R., and H.S. Friedman. 1994. Sandplay: Past, present, and future. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raunig, G. 2007. Art and revolution: Transversal activism in the long twentieth century. New York: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Research Center for Shared Incompetence, B. Kraeftner, and J. Kroell. 2010. A pillow squirrel and its habitat: Patients, a syndrome, and their dwelling(s). In New technologies and emerging spaces of care, ed. M.W.J. Schillmeier and M. Domenech, 169–95. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, M. 2007. The parasite. Updated ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szasz, C. 1979. The early history of visual sociology. In Images of information: Still photography in the social sciences, ed. J. Wagner. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, A. 1940. More sand table exercises, 6th ed. Aldershot: Gale & Polden.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. 2002. Contrasting images, complementary trajectories: Sociology, visual sociology and visual research. Visual Studies 17, no. 2: 160–71. doi: 10.1080/1472586022000032233
   Google Scholar
• Zerling, C. 2003. Lexikon der Tiersymbolik: Mythologie, Religion, Psychologie, ed. W. Bauer. München: Kösel.
   Google Scholar