Rethinking personal and political friendship with Durkheim

References

• Alexander, J. 1982. The antinomies of classical thought: Marx and Durkheim. Vol. 2 of Theoretical logic in sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. 2003. The meanings of social life: A cultural sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. 2008. The civil sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, G. 1989. Friendship: Developing a sociological perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D. 2004. Talking to strangers: Anxieties of citizenship since Brown V. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1968. On humanity in dark times: Thoughts about Lessing. In Men in dark times, 3–31. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1985. Nicomachean ethics. Trans. T. Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2003. Liquid love. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, R. 1976. Civil religion in America. In Beyond belief: Essays on religion in a post-traditional world, 168–93. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Blatterer, H. 2013. Friendship's freedom and gendered limits. European Journal of Social Theory 16, no. 4: 435–56. doi: 10.1177/1368431013484000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J.M. 1980. Aristotle on friendship. In Essays on Aristotle’s ethics, ed. A. Rorty, 301–40. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1997. Politics of friendship. Trans. G. Collins. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Devere, H., and G. Smith. 2010. Friendship and politics. Political Studies Review 8: 341–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. [1887] 1975. Notice biographique sur Victor Hommay. In Textes, ed. V. Karady, 1:418–24. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. [1893] 1984. The division of labor in society. Trans. W.D. Halls. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. [1897] 1979. Suicide. Trans. J. Spaulding and G. Simpson. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. [1898] 1973. Individualism and the intellectuals. In Emile Durkheim: On morality and society, ed. R. Bellah, 43–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. [1899] 1975. Concerning the definition of religious phenomena. In Durkheim on religion, ed. W.S.F. Pickering, 74–99. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. [1912] 1995. The elementary forms of religious life. Trans. K. Fields. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. [1925] 1961. Moral education. Trans. E. Wilson and H. Schnurer. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. [1950] 1996. Professional ethics and civic morals. Trans. C. Brookfield. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eve, M. 2002. Is friendship a sociological topic?. European Journal of Sociology 43: 386–409. doi: 10.1017/S0003975602001157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1997. Friendship as a way of life. In Ethics: Subjectivity and truth, ed. P. Rabinow, 135–40. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, M. 2013. Emile Durkheim: A biography. Trans. D. Macey. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J.J. 2012. Gaga feminism: Sex, gender, and the end of normal. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heaney, S. 2010. Human chain: Poems. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Heyking, J., and R. Avramenko. 2008. Friendship and politics: Essays in political thought. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, M. Forthcoming. A cultural sociological lens on zoning conflict in Atlantic Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology.
   Google Scholar
• Kahane, D. 1999. Diversity, solidarity and civic friendship. Journal of Political Philosophy 7: 267–86. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, I. [1775–1780] 1991. Lecture on friendship. In Other selves: Philosophers on friendship, ed. M. Pakaluk, 208–17. Indianapolis: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. 2007. What can the concept of friendship contribute to the study of national identity? Nations and Nationalism 13: 225–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2007.00270.x
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, P. 2010. Without foundations: Plato's lysis and postmodern friendship. American Political Science Review 104: 134–50. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 1973. Emile Durkheim: His life and work. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. [1938] 1985. A category of the human mind: The notion of person; the notion of self. In The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history, ed. M. Carrithers, S. Collins, and S. Lukes, 1–25. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montaigne, M. [1580] 1958. On friendship. In Essays, 91–105. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, R. 1998. Friendship: The social glue of contemporary society? In The politics of risk society, ed. J. Franklin, 99–119. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, R. 2000. On friendship. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, R., and L. Spencer. 2010. Family, friends, and personal communities: Changing models-in-the-mind. Journal of Family Theory & Review 2, no. 3: 197–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00053.x
   Google Scholar
• Paine, R. 1969. In search of friendship: An exploratory analysis in ‘middle-class’ culture. Man 4: 505–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pakaluk, M. 1994. Political friendship. In The changing face of friendship, ed. L.S. Rouner, 197–214. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, W.S.F. 1984. Durkheim’s sociology of religion: Themes and theories. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt-Rivers, J. 1961. The people of the Sierra. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, A.W. 2004. Epistemology and practice: Durkheim’s The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, A. 2002. The sacred calling of intellectual labor in mystic and ascetic Durkheimianism. European Journal of Sociology 43: 354–85. doi: 10.1017/S0003975602001145
   Google Scholar
• Rosati, M. 2005. The evil that men suffer: Evil and suffering from a Durkheimian perspective. Durkheimian Studies 11: 67–85. doi: 10.3167/175223005783472301
   Google Scholar
• Roseneil, S. 2006. Foregrounding friendship: Feminist pasts, feminist futures. In The Sage handbook of gender and women’s studies, ed. K. Davis, M. Evans, and J. Lorber, 323–41. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roseneil, S., and S. Budgeon. 2004. Cultures of intimacy and care beyond ‘the family’: Personal life and social change in the early 21st century. Current Sociology 52: 135–59. doi: 10.1177/0011392104041798
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. [1782/1789] 1953. The confessions. Trans. J.M. Cohen. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Schiermer, B. 2009. Fashion objects: Breaking up the Durkheimian cult. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 10, no. 2: 81–104. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2009.9672749
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. [1932] 1996. The concept of the political. Trans. G. Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzenbach, S. 2005. Democracy and friendship. Journal of Social Philosophy 36: 233–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00269.x
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzenbach, S. 2009. On civic friendship: Including women in the state. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scorza, J. 2004. Liberal citizenship and civic friendship. Political Theory 32: 85–108. doi: 10.1177/0090591703252378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1976. The fall of public man. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, A. 1997. ‘Two different sorts of commerce’ – Friendship and strangership in civil society. In Public and private in thought and practice: Perspectives on a grand dichotomy, ed. J. Weintraub and K. Kumar, 43–74. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, B. 2013. Montesquieu and the discovery of the social. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C., K. Davies, B. Heaphy, and J. Mason. 2012. Difficult friendships and ontological insecurity. The Sociological Review 60: 91–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02048.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. [1759] 1982. The theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2011. Friendship and the world of states. International Politics 48, no 1: 10–27. doi: 10.1057/ip.2010.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., and J. Alexander. 2005. Introduction: The new Durkheim. In The Cambridge companion to Durkheim, ed. J. Alexander and P. Smith, 1–37. New York: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L., and R. Pahl. 2006. Rethinking friendship: Hidden solidarities today. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern-Gillet, S. 1995. Aristotle’s philosophy of friendship. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R., and S. Hartley. 1988. Religious elements in friendship: Durkheimian theory in an empirical context. In Durkheimian sociology: Cultural studies, ed. J.C. Alexander, 93–106. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts Miller, W. 2002. Secularism and the sacred: Is there really something called ‘secular religion’? In Reappraising Durkheim for the study and teaching of religion today, ed. T.A. Idinopulos and B.C. Wilson, 27–44. Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, J., B. Heaphy, and C. Donovan. 2001. Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, C.H. 2001. Friends, compatriots, and special political obligations. Political Theory 29: 217–36. doi: 10.1177/0090591701029002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollstonecraft, M. [1792] 2010. A vindication of the rights of woman. Brooklyn: Verso.
   Google Scholar