Biological citizenship across the borders: politics of DNA profiling for family reunification

References

• Aas, K. 2006. ‘The body does not lie’: Identity, risk and trust in technoculture. Crime Media Culture 2, no. 2: 143–58. doi: 10.1177/1741659006065401
   Google Scholar
• Aas, K. 2011. ‘Crimmigrant’ bodies and bona fide travelers: Surveillance, citizenship and global governance. Theoretical Criminology 15, no. 3: 331–46. doi: 10.1177/1362480610396643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agamben, G. 1998. Homo sacer. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. 2006. Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the War on Terror. Political Geography 25, no. 3: 336–51. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreas, P., and T. Snyder, eds. 2000. The wall around the West: State borders and immigration controls in North America and Europe. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1949. ‘The rights of man’: What are they? Modern Review 3, no. 1: 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D. 2000. When two become one: Internal and external securizations in Europe. In International relations theory and politics of European integration, ed. M. Kelstrup and M. Williams, 171–204. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 1992. Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., and V. Rabeharisoa. 2008. The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life: Lessons from the French Association of Neuromuscular Disease Patients. Science, Technology & Human Values 33, no. 2: 230–61. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, S., and A. Davidson. 2000. Citizenship and migration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. 2009. Semi-citizenship in democratic politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooter, R. 2008. Biocitizenship. Lancet 372, 1725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2003. Council Directive No. 2003/86/EC, EUR-Lex. Official Journal of the European Union L: 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dal Lago, A. 2009. Non-persons. The exclusion of migrants in a global society. Vimodrone: IPOC.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. 1996. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. 2007. Inclusion: The politics of difference in medical research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Migration Network (EMN). 2008. Family reunification: Synthesis report. http://emn.intrasoft-intl.com/Downloads/prepareShowFiles.do?directoryID=105 (Retrieved 12 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Migration Network (EMN). 2009. Ad-hoc query on conducting other investigations (using a DNA test) in family reunification. http://emn.intrasoft-intl.com/Downloads/download.do;jsessionid=84F0FC77DA26F42A10151C744E6BE1D8?fileID=826 (Retrieved 12 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Migration Network (EMN). 2011. Key EU migratory statistics. http://emn.intrasoft-intl.com/Downloads/download.do;jsessionid=CF86D21BC6C852ED97A95E46FAAEAB77?fileID=2119 (Retrieved 12 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. 2005. Compassion and repression: The moral economy of immigration policies in France. Cultural Anthropology 20, no. 3: 362–87. doi: 10.1525/can.2005.20.3.362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassin, D., and E. d'Halluin. 2005. The truth from the body: Medical certificates as ultimate evidence for asylum seekers. American Anthropologist 107, no. 4: 597–608. doi: 10.1525/aa.2005.107.4.597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, R. 2008. Biological citizenship at the periphery: Parenting children with genetic disorders. New Genetics and Society 27, no. 3: 251–66. doi: 10.1080/14636770802326927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giardini, F. 2012. New families in the legal world: A comparative perspective. Interdisclipinary Journal of Family Studies 17, no. 2: 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon, S. 2007. Breast cancer genes and the gendering of knowledge. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon, S., and C. Novas, eds. 2008. Biosocialities, genetics and the social sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hautaniemi, P. 2007. Diasporic authenticity: Connecting genes and building families through DNA testing in Somali family reunification in Finland. In From Mogadishu to Dixon: The Somali diaspora in a global context, ed. A. Kusow and S. Björk, 119–234. Trenton, NJ: Red Sea Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heater, D. 1999. What is citizenship? Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, D., R. Rapp, and K.-S. Taussig. 2004. Genetic citizenship. In Companion to the anthropology of politics, ed. D. Hugent and J. Vincent, 152–67. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T., and T. Lemke. 2013a. Suspect families: DNA kinship testing in German immigration policies. Sociology 47, no. 4: 810–26. doi: 10.1177/0038038512454352
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T., and T. Lemke. 2013b. Biological citizenship reconsidered: The use of DNA analysis by immigration authorities in Germany. Science, Technology and Human Values AOP DOI:10.1177/0162243913509414.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T., U. Naue, and A.-M. Tapaninen. 2013. Verifying the family? A Comparison of DNA analysis for family reunification in three European countries (Austria, Finland, Germany). European Journal of Migration and Law 15, no. 2: 183–202. doi: 10.1163/15718166-12342030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helén, I. 1997. Äidin elämän politiikka [The politics of motherly life]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Helén, I., and M. Jauho. 2003. Terveyskansalaisuus ja elämän politiikka [Health citizenship and biopolitics]. In Kansalaisuus ja kansanterveys, ed. I. Helén and M. Jauho, 13–32. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Helén, I., and A.-M. Tapaninen. 2013. Closer to the truth: DNA profiling for family reunification and the rationales of immigration policy in Finland. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 3, no. 3: 153–61. doi: 10.2478/njmr-2013-0006
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. 2009. Disability activisms: social model stalwarts and biological citizens. Disability & Society 24, no. 6: 677–88. doi: 10.1080/09687590903160118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyusmans, J. 2000. The European Union and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies 38, no. 5: 751–77. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isin, E. 2002. Being political. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E., and B. Turner, eds. 2002. Handbook of citizenship studies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jauho, M. 2007. Kansanterveysongelman synty [The birth of a public health problem]. Helsinki: Tutkijaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. 2010. Citizenship and immigration. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kofman, E. 2006. Citizenship, migration and the reassertion of national identity. Citizenship Studies 9, no. 5: 453–67. doi: 10.1080/13621020500301221
   Google Scholar
• Lakhani, S., and S. Timmermans. 2014. Biopolitical citizenship in the immigration adjudication process. Social Problems (forthcoming).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert, R., and M. Pyykkönen. 2012. Contesting family in Finnish and Canadian immigration and refugee policy. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 2, no. 1: 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., S. Cole, R. McNally, and K. Jordan. 2008. Truth machine: The contentious history of DNA fingerprinting. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T.H. 1950. Citizenship and social class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, B. 2004. (Dis)qualified bodies: Securitization, citizenship and ‘identity management’. Citizenship Studies 8, no. 3: 279–94. doi: 10.1080/1362102042000257005
   Google Scholar
• Nayar, P. 2012. ‘I sing the body biometric’: Surveillance and biological citizenship. Economic and Political Weekly 47, no. 32: 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Novas, C. 2006. The political economy of hope: Patients’ organizations, science and biovalue. BioSocieties 1, no. 3: 289–305. doi: 10.1017/S1745855206003024
   Google Scholar
• Novas, C. 2008. Patients, profits values: Myozyme as an exemplar of biosociality. In Biosocialities, genetics and the social sciences , ed. S. Gibbon and C. Novas, 136–56. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, U. 1999. Drömmen om den hälsosamma medborgaren. Folkuppfostran och hälsoupplysning i folkhemment [A dream of healthy citizens: Popular hygiene education at the people's home]. Stockholm: Carlssons.
   Google Scholar
• Pascouau, Y. 2011. Conditions for family reunification under strain. A comparative study in nine EU member states. Bruxelles: European Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Petryna, A. 2002. Life exposed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B. 2010. Key issues in DNA profiling and databasing: Implications for governance. In Genetic suspects: Global governance of forensic DNA profiling and databasing, ed. R. Hindmarsh and B. Prainsack, 15–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B., and V. Toom. 2010. The Prüm regime: Situated dis/empowerment in transnational DNA profile exchange. British Journal of Criminology 50, no. 6: 1117–35. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azq055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. 1996. Artificiality and enlightenment: From sociobiology to biosociality. In Essays on the anthropology of reason, 91–111. Princeton: Princeton University Press,
   Google Scholar
• Radin, P. 2006. ‘To me, it's my life’: Medical communication, trust, and activism in cyberspace. Social Science & Medicine 62, no. 3: 591–601. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman, S., and R. Tutton. 2010. Life, science and biopower. Science, Technology and Human Values 35, no. 5: 711–34. doi: 10.1177/0162243909345838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 2007. The politics of life itself. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., and C. Novas. 2005. Biological citizenship. In Global assemblages, ed. A. Ong and S. Collier, 439–63. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, R. 2007. ‘Disease incarnate’: Biopolitical discourse and genocidal dehumanisation in the age of modernity. Journal of Historical Sociology 20, no. 3: 404–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6443.2007.00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, R., K. Kuczynski, and D. Skinner. 2008. Producing genetic knowledge and citizenship through Internet: Mothers, pediatric genetics and cybermedicine. Sociology of Health & Illness 30, no. 1: 145–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01042.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, L., and J. Solomos. 2002. Rights and wrongs across European borders: Migrants, minorities and citizenship. Citizenship Studies 6, no. 1: 37–54. doi: 10.1080/13621020220118740
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y. 1994. Limits of citizenship. Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Säädöskokoelma (SDK) 301/2004. Ulkomaalaislaki [The Aliens' Act].
   Google Scholar
• Taitz, J., J. Weekers, and D. Mosca. 2002. The last resort: Exploring the use of DNA testing for family reunification. Health and Human Rights 6, no. 1: 20–32. doi: 10.2307/4065312
   Google Scholar
• Ticktin, M. 2011. How biology travels: A humanitarian trip. Body & Society 17, nos. 2–3: 139–58. doi: 10.1177/1357034X11400764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. 2001. The erosion of citizenship. The British Journal of Sociology 52, no. 2: 189–209. doi: 10.1080/00071310120044944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2003. International declaration on human genetic data. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=17720&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (Retrieved 2 September 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Vallgårda, S. 2003. Folkesundhed som politik. Danmark og Sverige fra 1930 til i dag [Public health as politics: Denmark and Sweden from 1930 until today]. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, I, and I. Sprenkels. 2011. Migration and the machine-readable body: Identification and biometrics. In Migration and the new technological borders of Europe, ed. H. Dijstelbloem and A. Meijer, 68–104. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Villiers, J. 2010. Brave new world: The use and potential misuse of DNA technology in immigration law. Boston College Third World Law Journal 30, no. 2: 239–71.
   Google Scholar
• Wehling, P. 2011. Biology, citizenship and government of biomedicine: Exploring the concept of biological citizenship. In Governmentality: Current issues and future challenges, ed. U. Bröckling, S. Krassmann, and T. Lemke, 225–46. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. 2011. Strange DNA: The rise of DNA analysis for family reunification and its ethical implications. Genomics, Society and Policy 7, no. 1: 1–19. doi: 10.1186/1746-5354-7-1-1
   Google Scholar