Laclau and Mouffe and the ontology of radical negativity

References

• Andersen, N.Å. 2003. Discursive analytical strategies. Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biglieri, P., and G. Perelló. 2012. The names of the real in Laclau's theory: Antagonism, dislocation, and heterogeneity. Filozofski Vestnik XXXII, no. 2: 47–64
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1994. Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrberg, T.B. 2004. The political and politics in discourse analysis. In Laclau: A critical reader, ed. S. Critchley and O. Marchart, 241–55. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1974. The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. What is enlightenment. In The Foucault reader, ed. P. Rabinow, 32–50. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., and D.R. Howarth. 2007. Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A.D., and A. Sonnichsen. 2014a. Discourse, the political and the ontological dimension. An interview with Ernesto Laclau. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, Vol 15, No 3 DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.941889
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A.D., and A. Sonnichsen. 2014b. Radical democracy, agonism and the limits of pluralism: An interview with Chantal Mouffe. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, Vol 15, No 3 DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.941888
   Google Scholar
• Kneer, G., and A. Nassehi. 1997. Niklas Luhmann: Introduktion til teorien om sociale systemer [Niklas Luhmann: Introduction to the Theory of Social Systems]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1990. New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1993. Discourse. In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, 431–7. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1996. Deconstruction, pragmatism, hegemony. In Deconstruction and pragmatism, ed. C. Mouffe, 47–67. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2004. Glimpsing the future. In Laclau: A critical reader, ed. S. Critchley and O. Marchart, 279–328. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005a. On populist reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005b. Populism: What's in a name? In Populism and the mirror of democracy, 79–106. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2014a. Antagonism, subjectivity and politics. In The rhetorical foundations of society, 101–26. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2014b. The rhetorical foundations of society. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 2001. Preface to the second edition. In Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics, 2nd. ed., vii–xix. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1990. The cognitive program of constructivism and a reality that remains unknown. In Selforganization: Portrait of a scientific revolution, ed W. Krohn, G. Küppers and H. Novotny, 64–85. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1995. Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 2013. Theory of society, volume 2. Trans. R Barrett. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marchart, O. 2007. Post-foundational political thought: Political difference in Nancy, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2000. The democratic paradox. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. The limits of John Rawls's pluralism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 4, no. 2: 221–31. doi: 10.1177/1470594X05052539
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, D.C. 1989. Public choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norval, A.J. 2000. Trajectories of future research in discourse theory. In Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change, ed. D. Howarth, A. Norval, and Y. Stavrakakis, 219–36. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oksala, J. 2010. Foucault's politicization of ontology. Continental Philosophy Review 43, no. 4: 445–66. doi: 10.1007/s11007-010-9153-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch, W. 2013. Luhmann's ontology. In Luhmann observed radical theoretical encounters, ed A. La Cour and A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, 38–59. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1996. Political liberalism, volume 2. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, R.A. 1999. Realism and social science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stäheli, U. 2004. Competing figures of the limit: Dispersion transgression, antagonism, and indifference. In Laclau: A critical reader, ed. S. Critchley and O. Marchart, 226–40. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Staten, H. 1984. Wittgenstein and Derrida. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y. 1998. Laclau mit Lacan. In Das Undarstellbare der Politik. Aus Hegemonietheorie Ernesto Laclaus, 177–89. Wien: Turia + Kant.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. 1989. The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. 1990. Beyond discourse-analysis. In E. Laclau, New reflections on the revolution of our time, 249–60. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar