Spatial culture, processional culture and the materialities of social memory in nineteenth-century Sheffield

References

• Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, G. 1992. Ritual implicates ‘others’: Rereading Durkheim in a plural society. In Understanding rituals, ed. D. de Coppet, 97–117. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, T. 2010. Reassembling the city: Networks and urban imaginaries. In Urban assemblages: How actor network theory changes urban studies, ed. I. Farias and T. Bender. London: Routledge. 303–323.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, M. 2006. Past and “presence”: Revisiting historical ontology. History and Theory 45, no. 3: 349–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2006.00370.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki, R., and J. Jordan. 2002. The place of space in the study of the social. In The social in question: New bearings in history and the social sciences, ed. P. Joyce, 113–50. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borch, C. 2008. Foam architecture: Managing co-isolated associations. Economy and Society 37, no. 4: 548–71. doi: 10.1080/03085140802357943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannadine, D. 1982. Residential differentiation in nineteenth century towns: From shapes on the ground to shapes in society. In The structure of nineteenth century cities, ed. J.H. Johnson and C. Pooley, 235–81. London: Croon Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. 2004. Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connerton, P. 1989. How societies remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Landa, M. 2000. A thousand years of nonlinear history. Brooklyn: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• De Landa, M. 2006. A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1982. Margins of philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fassler, M. 2007. Adventus at Chartres: Ritual models for major processions. In Ceremonial culture in pre-modern Europe, ed. N. Howe, 13–62. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Favro, D., and C. Johanson. 2010. Death in motion: Funeral processions in the Roman Forum. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 69, no. 1: 12–37. doi: 10.1525/jsah.2010.69.1.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, D. 2016. Weaving patterns in the suburban fabric: Carnival procession routes, mapping place and experiencing space on London’s changing periphery, 1890–1914. In Spatial cultures: Towards a new social morphology of cities past and present, ed. S. Griffiths and A. von Lünen, 95–113. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. 2000. A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 463–96. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goheen, P.G. 1993. The ritual of the streets in mid-19th century Toronto. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11: 127–45. doi: 10.1068/d110127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S. 2009. Persistence and change in the spatio-temporal description of Sheffield Parish 1770–1910. In Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, ed. D. Koch, L. Marcus, and J. Steen, 37: 1–15. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S. 2011. Temporality in Hillier and Hanson's theory of spatial description: Some implications of historical research for space syntax. Journal of Space Syntax 2, no. 1: 73–96.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S. 2012. The use of space syntax in historical research: Current practice and future possibilities. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium, ed. M. Greene, J. Reyes, and A. Castro, 8193: 1–26. Santiago: Chile: PUC.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S. 2016. From lines on maps to symbolic order in cities? Translating processional routes as spatial practice, Sheffield c.1780–1910. In Spatial cultures: Towards a new social morphology of cities past and present, ed. S. Griffiths and A. von Lünen, 76–94. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S. Forthcoming. Manufacturing innovation as spatial culture: Sheffield’s cutlery industry c.1750–1900. In Unscrewing the creative city: The historical fabrication of cities as agents of economic innovation and creativity, ed. I. Van Damme, B. Blondé, and A. Miles. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S., and A. von Lünen, eds. 2016. Spatial cultures: Towards a new social morphology of cities past and present. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, S., and V.M. Netto. 2015. Open syntaxes: Towards new engagements with social sciences and humanities, guest editorial. Journal of Space Syntax 6, no. 1: i–v. http://joss.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/journal/index.php/joss/article/view/242 (accessed March 14, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, S. 2000. The public culture of the Victorian middle class: Ritual and authority and the English industrial city, 1840–1914. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, S., and R.J. Morris, eds. 2001. Identities in space: Contested terrains in the western city since 1850. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, M. 1988. Crowds and history: Mass phenomena in English towns 1790–1835. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1973. Social justice and the city. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1989. The architecture of the urban object. Ekistics 56, no. 334–5: 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1996 Space is the machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 2008. Space and spatiality: What the built environment needs from social theory. Construction Research and Information 36, no. 3: 216–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 2009. Spatial sustainability in cities: Organic patterns and sustainable forms. In 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, ed. D. Koch, L. Marcus, and J. Steen, 1–20. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology. K01: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and J. Hanson. 1984. The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., A. Leaman, P. Stansall, and M. Bedford. 1976. Space syntax. Environment and Planning B 3: 147–85. doi: 10.1068/b030147
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and V. Netto. 2002. Society seen through the prism of space. Urban Design International 7: 181–203. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000077
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E., and T. Ranger, eds. 1992. The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Canto.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, T. 2004. Building Jerusalem: The rise and fall of the Victorian city. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
   Google Scholar
• Jerram, L. 2013. Space: A useless category for historical analysis? History and Theory 52: 400–19. doi: 10.1111/hith.10676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingston, R. 2010 Mind over matter? History and the spatial turn. Cultural and Social History 7, no. 1: 111–21. doi: 10.2752/147800410X477368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space. Trans. D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2004. Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life. Trans. S. Elden and G. Moore. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Liebst, L.S. 2012. Intensifying the atmospheric: A postphenomenological reappraisal of the ambiance of urban space. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium, ed. M. Greene, J. Reyes, and A. Castro, 8105: 1–14. Santiago, Chile: PUC.
   Google Scholar
• Liebst, L.S. 2014. Staged, yet unstaged: Sociological inquiries into space and micro-interaction. PhD diss., University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Liebst, L.S. 2016. Reassembling Durkheimian sociology of space. In Spatial cultures: Towards a new social morphology of cities past and present, ed. S. Griffiths and A. von Lünen, 214–24. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Litten, J. 1998. The English funeral 1700–1850. In Grave concerns: Death and burial in England 1700–1850, ed. M. Cox, 3–16. York: CBA.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, J. 1997. The Cutlers’ feast. In Mesters to masters: A history of the company of cutlers in Sheffield, ed. C. Binfield and D. Hey, 225–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, A., and T. Murray, eds. 2001. The archaeology of urban landscapes: Explorations in slumland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, L. 1961. The city in history. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Nejad, R.M. 2013. The discursive manifestation of past and present through the spatial organization of the Ashura procession. Space and Culture (accessed April 7, 2015). DOI: 10.1177/1206331213475747.
   Google Scholar
• Netto, V. 2016. ‘What is space syntax not?’ Reflections on space syntax as sociospatial theory. Urban Design International 21, no. 1: 25–40. doi: 10.1057/udi.2015.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, D. 1992. Ritual as spatial direction and bodily division. In Understanding rituals, ed. D. de Coppet, 11–25. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, A. 2003. The shape of habitable space. In Proceedings 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, ed. J. Hanson, 62.1–62.16. London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Peponis, J. 1985. The spatial culture of factories. Human Relations 38, no. 4: 357–90. doi: 10.1177/001872678503800405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pooley, C. 2000. Patterns on the ground: Urban form, residential structure and the social construction of space. In The Cambridge urban history of Britain 1840–1950, Vol 3, ed. M.J. Daunton, 429–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pred, A. 1977. The Choreography of Existence: Comments on Hägerstrand's Time-Geography and its Usefulness. Economic Geography 53: 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 1982. Conflict and compromise: Class formation in English society 1830–1914: A comparative study of Birmingham and Sheffield. London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E.W. 2001. In different spaces: Interpreting the spatial organization of societies. In Proceedings of the Third International Space Syntax Symposium, ed. J. Peponis, J. Wineman, and S. Bafna, 1.1–1.7. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V.W. 1966. The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge, Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Vandeweghe, E. 2011. Staging urban history: Festivities and the creation of historical townscapes in Belgium (1860–1958). Environment, Space, Place 3, no. 2: 122–60. doi: 10.7761/ESP.3.2.122
   Google Scholar
• Vari, A. 2013. The nation in the city: Ceremonial (re)burials and patriotic mythmaking in turn-of-the-century Budapest. Urban History (accessed February 18, 2013). DOI: 10.1017/S0963926813000084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissenborn, F. 2015. After structure: Expression in built form. Journal of Space Syntax 6, no. 1: 34–48.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. 2014. The memory of the people: Custom and popular senses of the past in early modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar