Four normative languages of welfare: a pragmatic sociological investigation

References

• Andersen, J. 2005. The changing face of welfare: Consequences and outcomes from a citizenship perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. 2013. Medborgerskab under pres. In Socialt Arbejde - Teorier Og Perspektiver, ed. J. Guldager and M. Skytte, 86–127. Aalborg: Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J., and J. Pedersen. 2007. Continuity and change in Danish active labour market policy: 1990–2007: The battlefield between activation and workfare. Working Paper, Centre for Comparative Welfare State Studies (CCWS), Department of Economics, Politics and Public Administration, Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, A., and M.L. Meilvang. 2015. Picturing urban green attachments: Civic activists moving between familiar and public engagements in the city. Sociology 49, no. 1: 19–37. doi: 10.1177/0038038514532038
   Google Scholar
• Blokker, P. 2011. Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory 14, no. 3: 251–61. doi: 10.1177/1368431011412344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. 2012. Love and justice as competences. Chichester: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. 2011. On critique. A sociology of emancipation. 1st ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 2005a. The new spirit of capitalism. 1st ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 2005b. The new spirit of capitalism. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 18, no. 3: 161–88. doi: 10.1007/s10767-006-9006-9
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 2006. On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 2000. The reality of moral expectations: A sociology of situated judgement. Philosophical Explorations 3, no. 3: 208–31. doi: 10.1080/13869790008523332
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 1999. The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory 2, no. 3: 359–77. doi: 10.1177/136843199002003010
   Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, A., and E. Chiapello. 2005. The role of criticism in the dynamics of performance evaluation systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16, no. 6: 665–700. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, V. 2011. One-way Europe? Institutional guidelines, emerging regimes of justification, and paradoxical turns in European welfare capitalism. European Journal of Social Theory 14, no. 3: 321–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bredgaard, T., H. Jørgensen, P. Madsen, and S. Rasmussen. 2011. Dansk Arbejdsmarkedspolitik. Aarhus: Jurist-og Økonomforbundet.
   Google Scholar
• Centemeri, L. 2016. From conflicting justifications to place-based resistance. The struggles against the expansion of the Malpensa Airport (1970–2012).
   Google Scholar
• Chiapello, E., and N. Fairclough. 2002. Understanding the new management ideology: A transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism. Discourse & Society 13, no. 2: 185–208. doi: 10.1177/0957926502013002406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, H. 2006. Social policy short introductions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, H. 2007. The ethics of welfare-to-work. Policy & Politics 35, no. 4: 573–89. doi: 10.1332/030557307782453029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, H., and M. Melrose. 1998. Poverty, riches and social citizenship. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, H., and P. Taylor-Gooby. 2014. Dependency culture. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Vol. 6. Cambridge: Polity press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2000. New labour, new language? London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. 1997. The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., and L. Gordon. 1994. A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the US welfare state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 19, no. 2: 309–36. doi: 10.1086/494886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. 2015. Fællesskab, retfærdighed og effektivitet: Universalismens normative grundlag. In Den Universelle Velfærdsstat. Funktionsmåde, Folkelig Opbakning Og Forandring, ed. C. Larsen and J. Goul Andersen, 142–57. Frederiksberg: Frydenlund Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. 2017. Varieties of Scandinavian universalism: A comparative study of welfare justifications. Acta Sociologica 1–14. doi:10.1177/0001699317699258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. 2002. Transformation of the welfare state: The silent surrender of public responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. 2002. Structures of mutual obligation. Journal of Social Policy 31, no. 4: 579–96. doi: 10.1017/S004727940200675X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R., and J.S. Dryzek. 2006. Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics & Society 34, no. 2: 219–44. doi: 10.1177/0032329206288152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M.P. 2017. Trying the unemployed: Justification and critique, emancipation and coercion towards the ‘active society’. PhD diss., Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Jagd, S. 2011. Pragmatic sociology and competing orders of worth in organizations. European Journal of Social Theory 14, no. 3: 343–59. doi: 10.1177/1368431011412349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juul, S. 2010. Solidaritet – Anerkendelse, retfærdighed og god dømmekraft: En kritisk analyse af barrierer for sammenhængskraft i velfærdssamfundet. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Lafont, C. 2015. Deliberation, participation, and democratic legitimacy: Should deliberative mini-publics shape public policy? Journal of Political Philosophy 23, no. 1: 40–63. doi: 10.1111/jopp.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. 2008. The institutional logic of welfare a how welfare regimes influence public support. Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 2: 145–68. doi: 10.1177/0010414006295234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I., and A. Moreira, eds. 2014. Activation or workfare? Governance and the neo-liberal convergence. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I., and H. Trickey. 2001. ‘An offer you can't refuse': Workfare in international perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, Lawrence M. 1997. The new paternalism: Supervisory approaches to poverty. Washington: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Meilvang, M. 2012. Irakerne i kirken. Dansk Sociologi 22, no. 4: 31–49. doi: 10.22439/dansoc.v22i4.3920
   Google Scholar
• Morel, N., Palier, B., and Palme, J. 2012. Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M.H. 2014. Nytteaktiveringens retfærdiggørelse: Et pragmatisk sociologisk perspektiv på aktivering af arbejdsløse. Dansk Sociologi 25, no. 1: 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M.H. 2015a. Acting on welfare state retrenchment: In-between the private and the public. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 35, 11/12: 756–71. doi: 10.1108/IJSSP-11-2014-0105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M.H. 2015b. Det aktive menneskes triumf? Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv 17l, no. 1: 44–61.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, S. 2011. The emancipatory effect of deliberation: Empirical lessons from mini-publics. Politics & Society 39, no. 1: 103–40. doi: 10.1177/0032329210395000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenhof, L., J. Postma, and K. Putters. 2014. On justification work: How compromising enables public managers to deal with conflicting values. Public Administration Review 74, no. 1: 52–63. doi: 10.1111/puar.12153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patriotta, G., J.P. Gond, and F. Schultz. 2011. Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies 48, no. 8: 1804–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00990.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2001. Workfare states. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, O. 2011. Konkurrencestaten. København: Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 2000. Community, citizenship, and the third way. American Behavioral Scientist 43, no. 9: 1395–411. doi: 10.1177/00027640021955955
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 1998. Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stamer, N. 2016. The social dynamics of food consumption. PhD thesis, Copenhagen University.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2016. The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Taupin, B. 2013. The more things change … institutional maintenance as justification work in the credit rating industry. Management 15, no. 5: 529–62.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. 2001. Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. In The practice turn in contemporary theory, ed. K. Knorr-Cetina, T. Schatzki, and V. Savigny Eike, 56–73. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L., M. Moody, and C. Lafaye. 2000. Forms of valuing nature: Arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes. In Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States, ed. Michèle Lamont and Laurent Thévenot, 227–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2004. Det Stille Sporskifte i Velfærdsstaten. Aarhus: Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 1999. Towards a Schumpeterian workfare postnational regime: Reflections on path-shaping and path-dependency in Denmark. COS-Rapport; 1/1999. Copenhagen: Center for Offentlig Organisation og Styring.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. 2006. Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 16, no. 1: 23–42. doi: 10.1177/0958928706059829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. 2000. Who should get what and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy and Politics 28, no. 1: 33–48. doi: 10.1332/0305573002500811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, W., and F. Roosma. 2015. The social legitimacy of differently targeted benefits. No. 15/11. Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P. 1999. After justification repertoires of evaluation and the sociology of modernity. European Journal of Social Theory 2, no. 3: 341–57. doi: 10.1177/13684319922224572
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, Loïc. 2009. Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar