Recognition and precarity of life arrangement: towards an enlarged understanding of precarious working and living conditions

References

• Allan, G. 1980. A note on interviewing spouses together. Journal of Marriage and Family 42, no. 1: 205–10. doi: 10.2307/351948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amacker, M. 2014. Precare. Prekarität im Lebenszusammenhang: Die zwei Gesichter der Care-Prekarität. ethikundgesellschaft: Ökumenische Zeitschrift für Sozialethik 2.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2010. Migration, immigration control and the fashioning of precarious worker. Work, Economy and Society 24, no. 2: 300–17.
   Google Scholar
• Armano, E., A. Bove, and A. Murgia, eds. 2017. Mapping precariousness, labour insecurities and uncertain livelihoods. Subjectivities and resistance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P.L., and T. Luckmann. 1967. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. 1954. What is wrong with social theory. American Sociological Review 19, no. 3: 3–10. doi: 10.2307/2088165
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1999. Job insecurity is everywhere now. In acts of resistance: Against the tyranny of the market. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1997. The psychic life of power: theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2010. Frames of war. when is life grievable? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, I., and R. Price. 2016. Precarious work and precarious workers: towards an improved conceptualisation. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 27, no. 3: 314–32. doi: 10.1177/1035304616652074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castel, R. 2002. From manual workers to wage laborers: transformation of the social question. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, W., S. Mathieu, S. Prus, and E. Uckardesler. 2009. Precarious lives in the new economy. Comparative intersectional analysis. In Gender and the contours of precarious employment, eds. L.F. Vosko, M. Mcdonald and I. Campbell, 240–55. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dörre, K. 2006. Prekäre Arbeit und soziale Desintegration. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 40-41: 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dörre, K. 2015. Tests for the underclass: The social effects of activating labour market policy in Germany. In The new social division. Making and unmaking precariousness, eds. D.D. Porta, S. Hänninen, M. Siisiäinen and T. Silvasti, 83–100. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fantone, L. 2007. Precarious changes: gender and generational politics in contemporary Italy. Feminist Review 87: 5–20. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fineman, M.A. 2008. The vulnerable subject: Anchoring Equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 20: 8–40.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U., E.v. Kardorff, and I. Steinke. 2004. A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2003. Social justice in the age of identity politics: redistribution, recognition, and participation. In Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange, eds. N. Fraser and A. Honneth, 7–109. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhaus, J.H., and N.J. Beutell. 1985. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review 10 no. 1: 76–88. doi: 10.5465/amr.1985.4277352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Rodríguez, E. 2014. The precarity of feminisation. On domestic work, heteronormativity and the coloniality of labour. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 27: 191–202. doi: 10.1007/s10767-013-9154-7
   Google Scholar
• Hitzler, R., J. Reichertz, and N. Schröer, eds. 1999. Hermeneutische Wissenssoziologie. Standpunkte zur Theorie der Interpretation. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag Konstanz.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A.R. 1997. The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 1995. The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2003. Restribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser. In Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange, eds. N. Fraser and A. Honneth, 110–97. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2004. Recognition and justice: Outline of a plural theory of justice. Acta Sociologica 47 no. 4: 351–64. doi: 10.1177/0001699304048668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2012. The I in We: studies in the theory of recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2014. Freedom's Right: The social foundations of democratic life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jurczyk, K., and M.S. Rerrich, eds. 1993. Die Arbeit des Alltags. Beiträge zu einer Soziologie der alltäglichen Lebensführung. Freiburg: Lambertus.
   Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A.L. 2009. Precarious work, insecure workers: employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review 74: 1–22. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A.L. 2011. Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, B., and H. Seifert. 2013. Atypical employment in Germany forms, development, patterns. Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research 19, no. 4: 457–74. doi: 10.1177/1024258913501757
   Google Scholar
• Klenner, C., K. Menke, and S. Pfahl. 2012. Flexible Familienernährerinnen. Moderne Geschlechterarrangements oder prekäre Konstellationen? Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, M. 2016. Labor market reforms and labor market performance in Germany. International Labor Brief 14, no. 1: 18–35.
   Google Scholar
• König, S., and B. Cesinger. 2015. Gendered work–family conflict in Germany: Do self employment and flexibility matter? Work, Economy and Society 29, no. 4: 531–49.
   Google Scholar
• Koppetsch, C., and S. Speck. 2014. “Wenn der Mann kein Ernährer mehr ist … ” Coolness als Strategie männlichen Statuserhalts in individualisierten Paarbeziehungen. In Wissen - Methode - Geschlecht: Erfassen des fraglos Gegebenen, eds. C. Behnke, D. Lengersdorf and S. Scholz, 281–98. Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, L. 2008. Against recognition. Cambridge: polity.
   Google Scholar
• McQueen, P. 2015. Honneth, Butler and the ambivalent effects of recognition. Res Publica 21: 43–60. doi: 10.1007/s11158-014-9260-z
   Google Scholar
• Motakef, M. 2015. Prekarisierung. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, B., and N. Rossiter. 2008. Precarity as a political concept, or, fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society 25: 51–72. doi: 10.1177/0263276408097796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyman, C., L. Reinikainen, and K. Eriksson. 2018. The tension between gender equality and doing gender: Swedish couples’ talk about the division of housework. Women`s Studies International Forum 68: 36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2018.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paugam, S. 1996. The spiral of precariousness: A multidimensional approach to the process of social disqualification in France. In Beyond the threshold: The measurement and analysis of social exclusion, ed. G Room, 49–72. Bath: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitrou, A. 1978. La vie précaire, des familles face à leurs difficultés. Paris: Études.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1957. The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, M., and J. Hamilton. 2014. Picking on vulnerable migrants: precarity and the mushroom industry in northern Ireland. Work, Employment and Society 28, no. 3: 390–406. doi: 10.1177/0950017013510760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Precarias a la deriva. 2004. A la deriva: Por los circuitos de la precariedad femenina. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, A.J. 2015. The tumbleweed society: working and caring in an age of insecurity. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2011. The precariat. The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A.L. 2017. The mushroom at the end of the world. On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. 1999. Doing household research: Interviewing couples together and apart. Area 31, no. 1: 67–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.1999.tb00172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosko, L.F. 2010. Managing the margins: gender, citizenship, and the international regulation of precarious employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vosko, L.F., M. Mcdonald, and I. Campbell. 2009. Introduction. gender and the concept of precarious employment. In Gender and the contours of precarious employment, ed. LF Vosko, M Mcdonald, and I Campbell, 1–25. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Voswinkel, S. 2012. ‘Recognition’ and ‘interest’: A multidimensional concept in the sociology of work. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 13, no. 1: 21–41. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2012.640594
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2008. “Clawing back time”: Expansive working time and implications for work–life outcomes in Australian workers. Work, Economy and Society 22, no. 4: 737–48.
   Google Scholar
• Wimbauer, C. 2012. Wenn Arbeit Liebe ersetzt. Doppelkarriere-Paare zwischen Anerkennung und Ungleichheit. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Wimbauer, C., and M. Motakef. 2017. Das Paarinterview. Methodologie - Methode - Methodenpraxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Wimbauer, C., and M. Motakef. 2019. Prekäre Arbeit – prekäre Anerkennung? Eine Studie über unsichere Lebensverhältnisse. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar