Electricity engineers and the happening of behaviour: lessons from a real-scale experiment

References

• Abi Ghanem, D., and S. Mander. 2014. Designing consumer engagement with the smart grids of the future: Bringing active demand technology to everyday life. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26, no. 10: 1163–75. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2014.974531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G., and R. Shiller. 2009. Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breslau, Daniel. 2019. Assembling economic actors: Time-varying rates and the new electricity consumer. In Philosophy and interdisciplinary social science: A dialogue, ed. Michiru Nagatsu, and Attilia Ruzzene. London: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.D. 2012. Experiment: Abstract experimentalism. In Inventive methods: The happening of the social, ed. Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford, 61–75. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 2007. What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics, ed. Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 311–57. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chappells, H., and E. Shove. 2004. Infrastructures, crises and the orchestration of demand. In Sustainable consumption: The implications of changing infrastructures of provision, ed. Dale Southerton, Heather Chappells, and Bas van Vliet, 130–43. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H.M. 1990. Artificial experts: Social knowledge and Intelligent machines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, M., J. Torriti, and S.T. Smith. 2018. Demand side flexibility and responsiveness: Moving demand in time through technology. In Demanding energy: Space, time and change, ed. Allison Hui, Rosie Day, and Gordon Walker, 283–312. Cham (Switzerland): Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, William. 2014. The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, J.-P. 1982. Ordres et désordres. Enquête sur un nouveau paradigme. Paris: Le Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• EPRI. 2013. Quantifying the impacts of time-based rates, enabling technologies, and other treatments in consumer behavior study, guidelines and protocols, EPRI Report no. 3002000282.
   Google Scholar
• Escoffier, C., C. Grandclément, and P. Scolan. 2015. Transparence technique et coopération des utilisateurs dans deux projets de smart grid. In Énergie et transformations sociales. Enquêtes sur les interfaces énergétiques, ed. Jérôme Cihuelo, Arthur Jobert, and Catherine Grandclément, 17–31. Paris: Editions Lavoisier.
   Google Scholar
• Faruqui, A., and S. Sergici. 2010. Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: A survey of 15 experiments. Journal of Regulatory Economics 38, no. 2: 193–225. doi: 10.1007/s11149-010-9127-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandclément, C., and G. Gaglio. 2011. Convoking the consumer in person: The focus group effect. In Inside marketing: ideologies, practices, devices, ed. Detlev Zwick and Julien Cayla, 87–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grandclément, C., and Nadaï A. 2018. Devising the consumer of the competitive electricity market: The mundane meter, the unbundling doctrine, and the re-bundling of choice. Journal of Cultural Economy 11, no. 5: 440–457. doi:10.1080/17530350.2018.1488269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S., and S. Marvin. 1996. Transforming urban Infrastructure provision – The emerging logic of demand side management. Policy Studies 17, no. 2: 137. doi: 10.1080/01442879608423701
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. 1977. Toward a history of needs. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, no. 2: 263–91. doi: 10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijer, L., and M. Watson. 2017. ‘That’s when we started using the living room’: Lessons from a local history of domestic heating in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 28, no. June: 77–85. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.04.010.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J. 2007. A market of opinions: The political epistemology of focus groups. In Market devices, ed. Michel Callon, Yuval Millo, and Fabian Muniesa, 130–51. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J., F. Muniesa, and S. Vikkelsø. 2013. Provocative containment and the drift of social-scientific realism. Journal of Cultural Economy 6, no. 3: 278–93. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2012.739972
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C. 2009. Brand as assemblage. Assembling culture. Journal of Cultural Economy 2, no. 1–2: 67–82. doi: 10.1080/17530350903064022
   Google Scholar
• Moor, L., and C. Lury. 2018. Price and the person: Markets, discrimination, and personhood. Journal of Cultural Economy 11, no. 6: 501–513. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2018.1481878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 1989. More heat than light. Economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F. 2018. How to Spot the behavioural Shibboleth and what to do about it. In Inventing the social, ed. Noortje Marres, Michael Guggenheim, and Alex Wilkie, 195–211. London: Mattering Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, David E. 2010. When the lights went out: A history of blackouts in America. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pallesen, T., and R.P. Jenle. 2018. Organizing consumers for a decarbonized electricity system: Calculative agencies and user scripts in a Danish demonstration project. Energy Research & Social Science 38, no. April: 102–9. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Pykett, J., M. Whitehead, and R. Jones. 2014. Changing behaviours: On the rise of the psychological state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, G. 1996. Putting psychology in its place: An introduction from a critical historical perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1985. The psychological complex: Psychology, politics and society in England, 1869–1939. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas. 1989. Governing the Soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2010. Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42, no. 6: 1273–85. doi: 10.1068/a42282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2014. What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand. Theory, Culture & Society 31, no. 5: 41–58. doi: 10.1177/0263276414536746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten, E., and L. Vincent. 2010a. Interpreting transnational infrastructure vulnerability: European blackout and the historical dynamics of transnational electricity governance. Energy Policy 38, no. 4: 2053–62. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten, E., and V. Lagendijk. 2010b. ‘Transnational infrastructure vulnerability: The historical shaping of the 2006 European “blackout”’. Energy Policy 38, no. 4: 2042–52. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet, Bas, Heather Chappells, and Elizabeth Shove. 2005. Infrastructures of consumption: Environmental innovation in the utility industries. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhite, H., E. Shove, L. Lutzenhiser, and W. Kempton. 2000. The legacy of twenty years of energy demand management: We know more about individual behaviour but next to nothing about demand. In Society, behaviour, and climate change mitigation, ed. Eberhard Jochem, Jayant Sathaye, and Daniel Bouille, 109–26. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar