Responding as composing: towards a post-anthropocentric, feminist ethics for the Anthropocene

References

• Anderlini-D’Onofrio, S. 2004. The Gaia hypothesis and Ecofeminism. disClosure: A Journal for Social Theory 13, no. 6: 65–93.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Asafu-Adjaye, J., L. Blomqvist, S. Brand, B. Brook, R. Defries, E. Ellis, C. Foreman, et al. 2015. An Ecomodernist Manifesto. Online source: http://www.ecomodernism.org/, last access: 04.03.2019.
   Google Scholar
• Åsberg, C. 2013. The timely ethics of posthumanist gender studies. Feministische Studien 13, no. 1: 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2012. Nature’s queer performativity. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning/Women, Gender and Research 12, no. 1–2: 25–53.
   Google Scholar
• Bird Rose, D. 2017. Shimmer: When all you love is being trashed. In Arts of living on a damaged planet. Ghosts of the Anthropocene, ed. A. Tsing, H. Swanson, E. Gan, and N. Bubandt, G51–64. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneuil, C., and J.-B. Fressoz. 2016. The shock of the Anthropocene. The earth, history and us. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2006a. Affirmation versus vulnerability. On contemporary ethical Debates. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 10, no. 1: 235–54. doi: 10.5840/symposium200610117
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2006b. Transpositions. On nomadic ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2010. The politics of “life itself” and new ways of dying. In New materialisms. ontology, agency, and politics, ed. D. Coole and S. Frost, 201–20. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1995. Contingent foundations. In Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange, ed. S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, and N. Fraser, 35–58. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2004a. Precarious life. The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2004b. Undoing gender. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2005. Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2009. Frames of war. When is life grievable? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2011. “Confessing a passionate state” – Judith Butler Interviewed by Sabine Hark and Paula Villa. Feministische Studien 11, no. 2: 196–205.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2012. Precarious life, vulnerability, and the ethics of cohabitation. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26, no. 2: 134–51. doi: 10.5325/jspecphil.26.2.0134
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2014. Reflections on ethics, destructiveness, and life: Rosi Braidotti and the posthuman. In The subject of Rosi Braidotti. Politics and concepts, ed. B. Blaagaard and I. van der Tuin, 21–8. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2015. Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., and A. Athanasiou. 2015. Dispossession. The performative in the political. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2009. The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry 35, no. 2: 197–222. doi: 10.1086/596640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, N., and K. Yusoff. 2017. Geosocial formations and the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society 34, no. 2–3: 3–23. doi: 10.1177/0263276416688946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, W.E. 1999. Suffering, justice, and the politics of becoming. In Moral spaces. Rethinking ethics and world politics, ed. D. Campbell and M. Shapiro, 125–53. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crist, E. 2015. The reaches of freedom: A response to an ecomodernist manifesto. Environmental Humanities 7: 245–54. doi: 10.1215/22011919-3616452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P.J. 2002. Geology of mankind. Nature 415: 23. doi: 10.1038/415023a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P.J., and E.F. Stroemer. 2000. The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter 41: 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. 2008. Change of address: Butler’s ethics at sovereignty’s deadlock. In Judith Butler’s precarious politics. Critical encounters, ed. S. A. Chambers and T. Carver, 109–26. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and repetition. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 2002. The animal that therefore I am (more to follow). Critical Inquiry 28, no. 2: 369–418. doi: 10.1086/449046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, M. 2013. Ethics and politics After poststructuralism: Levinas, Derrida and Nancy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. 2015. The theodicy of the “good Anthropocene”. Environmental Humanities 7: 233–8. doi: 10.1215/22011919-3616434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1991. The biopolitics of postmodern bodies: Constitutions of self in Immune system discourse. In Simians, cyborgs, and women. The reinvention of nature, ed. D. Haraway, 203–30. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2003. The companion species manifesto. Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2015. Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making Kin. Environmental Humanities 6, no. 1: 159–65. doi: 10.1215/22011919-3615934
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D., and S. Franklin. 2017. Staying with the manifesto: An interview with Donna Haraway. Theory, Culture & Society 34, no. 4: 49–63. doi: 10.1177/0263276417693290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. 2008. Corporeal remains: Vulnerability, proximity, and living on after the end of the world. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40, no. 2: 423–45. doi: 10.1068/a391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, B. 2010. Antigone’s two laws: Greek tragedy and the politics of humanism. New Literary History 41, no. 1: 1–33. doi: 10.1353/nlh.0.0140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, B. 2013. Antigone, interrupted. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2015. Fifty shades of green. Environmental Humanities 7: 219–25. doi: 10.1215/22011919-3616416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2017. Facing Gaia. Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefort, C. 1986. The political forms of modern society. Bureaucracy, democracy, totalitarianism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lévinas, E. 1969. Totality and infinity. An essay on exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. 2015. The ethics and politics of vulnerable bodies. In Butler and ethics, ed. M. Lloyd, 168–92. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelock, J.E., and L. Margulis. 1974. Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: The Gaia hypothesis. TELLUS 26, no. 1–2: 2–10. doi: 10.3402/tellusa.v26i1-2.9731
   Google Scholar
• Marchart, O. 2007. Post-foundational political thought. Political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marchart, O. 2010. Die politische Differenz. Zum Denken des Politischen bei Nancy, Lefort, Badiou, Laclau und Agamben. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, J. 2008. Intimacy without proximity. Environmental Philosophy 5, no. 2: 99–128. doi: 10.5840/envirophil20085212
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. 2007. Normative violence, vulnerability, and responsibility. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 18, no. 2: 133–56. doi: 10.1215/10407391-2007-005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J.W. 2017. The Capitalocene, Part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44, no. 3: 594–630. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, A.V. 2011. Corporeal vulnerability and the new humanism. Hypatia 26, no. 3: 575–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01202.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2018. Against population, towards alterlife. In Making Kin Not population, ed. A. Clarke and D. Haraway, 101–24. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pyyhtinen, O., and S. Tamminen. 2011. We have never been only human: Foucault and Latour on the question of the Anthropos. Anthropological Theory 11, no. 2: 135–52. doi: 10.1177/1463499611407398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekret, P. 2016. A critique of new materialism: Ethics and ontology. Subjectivity 9, no. 3: 225–45. doi: 10.1057/s41286-016-0001-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saar, M. 2012. What is political ontology? Krisis. Journal of Contemporary Philosophy 32, no. 1: 79–83.
   Google Scholar
• Schrader, A. 2015. Abyssal intimacies and temporalities of care: How (not) to care about deformed leaf bugs in the aftermath of chernobyl. Social Studies of Science 45, no. 5: 665–90. doi: 10.1177/0306312715603249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotwell, A. 2016. Against purity. Living ethically in compromised times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, G. 2011. Acknowledgment and disavowal as an Idiom for theorizing politics. Theory & Event 14, no. 1. doi: 10.1353/tae.2011.0003
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2005. The cosmopolitical proposal. In Making things public, ed. B. Latour and P. Weibel, 994–1003. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2009. History through the middle: Between macro and mesopolitics. Inflexions. A Journal for Research Creation 3: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2013. Matters of cosmopolitics. On the provocations of Gaia. Isabelle Stengers in conversation with Heather Davis and Etienne Turpin. In Architecture in the Anthropocene. encounters among design, deep time, science and philosophy, ed. E. Turpin, 171–82. Open Humanities Press: Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2015a. Accepting the reality of Gaia. A fundamental shift? In The Anthropocene and the global Environmental crisis, ed. C. Hamilton, C. Bonneuil, and F. Gemenne, 134–44. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2015b. In catastrophic times. Resisting the coming barbarism. Open Humanities Press: Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 1991. Partial connections. Savage: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2015. The mushroom at the end of the world. On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A., H. Swanson, E. Gan, and N. Bubandt. (eds.). 2017. Arts of living on a damaged planet. Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dooren, T. 2016. Flight ways. Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D. 2015. Two regimes of the human: Butler and the politics of mattering. In Butler and ethics, ed. M. Lloyd, 141–66. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E.A. 2015. Gut feminism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K.P. 2018. Indigenous science (fiction) for the Anthropocene: Ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1, no. 1–2: 224–42.
   Google Scholar
• Zalasiewicz, J., A. Smith, T.L. Barry, A.L. Coe, P.R. Bown, P. Brenchley, D. Cantrill, et al. 2008. Are we now living in the Anthropocene GSA Today 18, no. 2: 4–8. doi: 10.1130/GSAT01802A.1
   Google Scholar