A Frommian perspective on the socio-psychological structure of post-fascism in liberal democracies

References

• Adorno, T.W. [1959] 2005. The meaning working through the past. In Critical models: Interventions and catchwords, ed. L. Goher, 89–103. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. [1951] 1973. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacciagaluppi, M. 1990. The relevance of Erich Fromm. Academy Forum 34, no. 4: 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bacciagaluppi, M. 1993. Fromm’s view on narcissism and the self. In Narcissism and the interpersonal self, eds. J. Fiscalini and A.L. Grey, 91–106. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacciagaluppi, M., and R. Biancoli. 1993. Frommian themes in a case of narcissistic personality disorder. Contemporary Psychoanalysis 29, no. 3: 441–52 doi: 10.1080/00107530.1993.10746819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, M. 2006. Fascism. In Encyclopedia of social theory, ed. A. Harrington, B.I. Marshall, and H.P. Muller, 192–3. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, C. 2018. Fascism old and new: American politics at the crossroads. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W.E. 2017. Aspirational fascism: The struggle for multifaceted democracy under Trumpism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Eramo, M. 2013. Populism and the new oligarchy. New Left Review 82: 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Deguchi, T. 2019. Post-truth politics as a pathology of normalcy: Beyond alienation and narcissism in the age of globalization. Fromm Forum (English edn.) 23: 161–8.
   Google Scholar
• Finchelstein, F. 2017. From fascism to populism in history. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fogarty, B.E. 2016. Fascism: Why not here. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. 1936a. Sozialpsychologischer Teil. In Studien über Autorität und Familie, ed. Institut für Sozialforschung, 77–135. Paris: Alcan.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E., et al. 1936b. Zweite Abteilung: Erhebungen. In Studien über Autorität und Familie, ed. Institut für Sozialforschung, 231–470. Paris: Alcan.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. 1941. Escape from freedom. New York: Rinehart & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. [1947] 1971. Man for himself: An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. 1955. The sane society. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. [1956] 1962. The art of loving. New York and Evanston: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. [1961] 2004. Marx’s concept of man. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. [1962] 1980. Beyond the chains of illusion: My encounter with Marx and Freud. London: Abacus.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. 1964. The heart of man: Its genius for good and evil. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. 1973. The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York, Chicago and San Francisco: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. 1979. Greatness and limitations of Freud’s thought. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. [1976] 2011. To have or to be? New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. 2018. Digital demagogue: Authoritarian capitalism in the age of Trump and Twitter. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, W.A. 2018. The populist challenge to liberal democracy. Journal of Democracy 29, no. 2: 5–19. doi: 10.1353/jod.2018.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, Henry A. 2018. American nightmare: Facing the challenge of fascism. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J.R., and S.A. Mitchell. 1983. Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. [1991] 1993. The nature of fascism. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. 2007. Modernism and fascism: The sense of a beginning under mussolini and hitler. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. 2012. Studying fascism in a postfascist age: From new consensus to new wave? Fascism: Journal of Comparative Fascist Studies 1: 1–17. doi: 10.1163/221162512X623601
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, D. 2016. American nightmare: Donald Trump, media spectacle, and authoritarian populism. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lesser, R. 2002. Erich Fromm and the psychoanalysis of the social unconscious. Fromm Forum (English edn.) 6: 23–4.
   Google Scholar
• Lio, E. 1989. Alienation as a central concept in Marxist and Frommian humanism. Presentation at a German-Italian Seminar on Die Marx-Rezeption Erich Fromms, 17–19 February 1989, Bologna. http://www.fromm-gesellschaft.eu/images/pdf-Dateien/Lio_E_1989b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. [1844] 2004. Economic and philosophical manuscripts, trans, T.B. Bottomore. In Fromm 2004 [1961].
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. [1867] 1992. Capital, vol. 1: A critique of political economy. Trans B. Fowkes. London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, N. 1998. How to become a forgotten intellectual: Intellectual movements and the rise and fall of Erich Fromm. Sociological Forum 13: 215–46. doi: 10.1023/A:1022189715949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morelock, J., ed. 2018. Critical theory and authoritarian populism. London: University of Westminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.W. 2016. What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Revelli, M. 2019. The new populism: Democracy stares into the abyss. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Roazen, P. 2001. The exclusion of Erich Fromm from the IPA. Contemporary Psychoanalysis 37, no. 1: 5–42. doi: 10.1080/00107530.2001.10747065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakurai, T. 2018a. Political theories of narcissism: Towards self-reflection on knowledge and politics from the psychoanalytic perspectives of Erich Fromm and Fujita Shōzō. Politik-wissenschaft series, vol. 212. Zurich: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sakurai, T. 2018b. The socio-psychological base of contemporary fascism in the world of liberal democracy: The theoretical scope of Erich Fromm’s socio-pathological theory of alienation. Fromm Forum (English edn.) 22: 143–55.
   Google Scholar
• Sakurai, T. 2019. The authoritarian orientation in liberal democracy: Integrating Erich Fromm’s conceptions of alienation and authoritarianism into his theory of narcissism (under review).
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. 2018. How fascism works: The politics of US and them. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Tamás, G.M. 2000. On post-fascism: The degradation of universal citizenship. Boston Review: A Political and Literary Forum, 1 June 2000. http://bostonreview.net/world/g-m-tamas-post-fascism.
   Google Scholar
• Tamás, G.M. 2001. What is post-fascism? openDemocracy, 13 September 2001. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/article_306jsp.
   Google Scholar
• Traverso, E. 2019. The new faces of fascism: Populism and the far right. Trans David Broder. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Whittam, J. 1995. Fascist Italy. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodley, D. 2010. Fascism and political theory: Critical perspectives on fascist ideology. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar