Does managerial coaching empower employees? – A psychoanalytical approach

References

• Althusser, L. [1970] 2008. Ideology and ideological state apparatus. In On ideology,1–60. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, V. 2013. A Trojan Horse? The implications of managerial coaching for leadership theory. Human Resource Development International 16, no. 3: 251–66.
   Google Scholar
• Arnaud, G., and B. Vidaillet. 2018.: Clinical and critical: The Lacanian contribution to management and organization studies. Organization 25, no. 1: 69–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 37, no. 2: 122–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, R., S. Kim, M. Hagen, et al. 2014. Managerial coaching: A review of the empirical literature and development of a model to guide future practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources 16, no. 2: 184–201.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, E., T. Bachkirova, and D. Clutterbuck. 2014. Theoretical traditions and coaching genres: Mapping the territory. Advances in Developing Human Resources 16, no. 2: 139–60.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 2005. The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cederström, C., and C. Hoedemaekers, eds. 2010. Lacan in organization. London: MayFly Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cederström, C., and A. Spicer. 2014. Discourse of the real kind: A post-foundational approach to organizational discourse analysis. Organization 21, no. 2: 178–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremin, C. 2010. Never employable enough: The impossibility of satisfying the boss’s desire. Organization 17, no. 2: 131–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, M. 2009a. From loss to lack: Stories of organizational change as encounters with failed fantasies of self. Work and Organization. Organization 16, no. 3: 353–69.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, M. 2009b. Struggling with lack: A Lacanian perspective on organizational identity. Organization Studies 30, no. 1: 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, M. 2014. The stressed subject: lack, empowerment and liberation. Organization 21, no. 1: 90–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellinger, A., and R.P. Bostrom. 1999. Managerial coaching behaviors in learning organizations. The Journal of Management Development 18, no. 9: 752–71.
   Google Scholar
• Ellinger, A., and S. Kim. 2014. Coaching and human resource development: Examining relevant theories, coaching genres, and scales to advance research and practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources 16, no. 2: 127–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ellinger, A.D., A.E. Ellinger, and S.B. Keller. 2003. Supervisory coaching behavior, employee satisfication, and warehouse employee performance: A dyadic perspective in the distribution industry. Human Resource Development Quarterly 14, no. 4: 435–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ellinger, A., T. Hamlin, and R. Beattie. 2008.: Behavioural indicators of ineffective managerial coaching: A cross-national study. Journal of European Industrial Training 32, no. 4: 240–57.
   Google Scholar
• Evered, R.D., and J.C. Selman. 1989. Coaching and art of management. Organizational Dynamics 18, no. 2: 16–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, B. 1995. The Lacanian subject. between language and jouissance. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, M. 2008. GROW – en centralt stuktur i coachingsamtalen. In: Coaching i perspektiv – grundbog, 74–87. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. 2010.: It takes time: A stages of change perspective on the adoption of workplace coaching skills. Journal of Change Management 10, no. 1: 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, M. 2012. Managerial coaching: A review of the literature. Performance Improvement Quarterly 24, no. 4: 17–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, R., A. Ellinger, and R. Beattie. 2006. Coaching at the heart of managerial effectiveness: A cross-cultural study of managerial behaviours. Human Resource Development International 9, no. 3: 305–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, R., A. Ellinger, and R. Beattie. 2008. The emergent ‘coaching industry’: a wake-up call for HRD professionals. Human Resource Development International 11, no. 3: 287–305.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, R., A. Ellinger, and R. Beattie. 2009. Toward a profession of coaching? A definitional examination of ‘coaching,’ ‘organization development,’ and ‘human resource development’. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring 7, no. 1: 13–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hede, T. 2010. Coaching – samtalekunst og ledelsesdisciplin. København: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Hoedemaekers, C. 2010. Lacan and organization: An Introduction. In Lacan in organization, 1–12. London: MayFly Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hoedemaekers, C., and A. Keegan. 2010. Performance pinned down: Studying subjectivity and the language of performance. Organization Studies 31, no. 8: 1021–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. 1985. The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I. In Écrits – A Selection,1–7. London: Tavistock Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. 1998. The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. (book XI). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. [1970] 2007. The seminar of Jacques Lacan: The other side of psychoanalysis (Book XVII). Trans. R. Grigg. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, G.P., and K. Wexley. 1994. Increasing productivity through performance appraisal, 2nd ed.. OH: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, G., B. Yang, M.-H. Christine Kuo, et al. 2005. Development and initial validation of an instrument measuring managerial coaching skill. Human Resource Development Quarterly 16, no. 2: 157–78.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, T. 1998. Theorizing subjectivity in organizations: The failure of foucauldian studies? Organization Studies 19: 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, C. 2010. Danger! Neurotics at work. In Lacan and organization, ed. C. Cederström, and C. Hoedmaekers, 187–209. London: MayFly.
   Google Scholar
• Pousa, C., and A. Mathieu. 2015. Is managerial coaching a source of competitive advantage? promoting employee self-regulation through coaching. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 8, no. 1: 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1998. The corrosion of Character – the personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y. 1999. Lacan and the political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y. 2008. Subjectivity and the organized other: between symbolic authority and fantasmatic enjoyment. Organization Studies 29, no. 7: 1037–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y. 2010. Symbolic authority, fantasmatic enjoyment and the spirits of capitalism: genealogies of mutual engagement. In Lacan and organization, ed. C. Cederström, and C. Hoedemaekers, 59–100. London: MayFly.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, F. 1914. The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmore, J. 2010. Coaching for performance: growing people, performance and purpose. London: Nicholas Brealey.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1989. The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1998. Four discourses, four subjects. In Cogito and the unconscious, ed. S Žižek, 74–113. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar