Bridging the gap between affect and reason: on thinking-feeling in politics

References

• Ahmed, S. 2009. Happy objects. In The Affect Theory reader, ed. Gregory J. Seigworth, and Melissa Gregg, 29–51. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Amoudi, I. 2017. Reflexivity in a just morphogenic society: a sociological contribution to political philosophy. In Morphogenesis and human flourishing, ed. Margaret Archer, 63–91. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2000. Being human: the problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2003. Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2007. Making Our Way through the world: human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2010. Routine, reflexivity, and realism. Sociological Theory 28, no. 3: 272–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2012. The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2014. Structural conditioning and personal reflexivity. In Distant markets, Distant harms: economic complicity and christian ethics, ed. Daniel Finn, 25–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2016. Structure, culture and agency: selected papers of margaret archer. Edited by Tom Brock, Mark Carrigan, and Graham Scambler. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., A. Giddens, and S. Lash. 1994. Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2009. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bickford, S. 2011. Emotion talk and political judgment. The Journal of Politics 73, no. 4: 1025–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, T., and M. Carrigan. 2015. Realism and contingency: a relational Realist analysis of the UK student protests. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45, no. 3: 377–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlie, J. 2014. Ordinary relationships: a sociological study of emotions, reflexivity and culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. 2012. Emotional reflexivity: feeling, emotion and imagination in reflexive dialogues. Sociology 46, no. 3: 458–72.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. 2016. Relational agency: relational sociology, agency and interaction. European Journal of Social Theory 19, no. 3: 322–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caetano, A. 2015. Defining Personal reflexivity: a critical reading of Archer’s approach. European Journal of Social Theory 18, no. 1: 60–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan, M. 2016. The fragile movements of late modernity. In Morphogenesis and the crisis of normativity, ed. Margaret Archer, 191–215. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chalari, A. 2013. The causal impact of Resistance: mediating between Resistance and internal conversation about Resistance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43, no. 1: 66–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, P. 2009. The affective turn. In The Affect Theory reader, ed. Melissa Gregg, and Gregory J. Seigworth, 206–25. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P., and J. Halley. 2007. The affective turn: theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colapietro, V. 1988. Peirce’s approach to the self: a semiotic perspective on human subjectivity. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colapietro, V. 2009. Cartesian privacy and peircean interiority. In Conversations about reflexivity, ed. Margaret Archer, 51–66. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. 2017. Facing the planetary: entangled humanism and the politics of swarming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cromby, J., and M. Willis. 2016. Affect—or feeling (after leys). Theory & Psychology 26, no. 4: 476–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. 2003. From reproduction to transformation: social movement fields and the radical habitus. Theory, Culture & Society 20, no. 6: 43–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D., and R. Stedman. 2018. Calling forth the change-makers: reflexivity theory and climate change attitudes and behaviors. Acta Sociologica 61, no. 1: 79–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699317693065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. 2001. Feeling and thinking: the role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M., and G. Seigworth. 2009. The Affect Theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. 2010. The emotionalization of reflexivity. Sociology 44, no. 1: 139–54.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. 2018. The emotions of protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, S. 2008. Civil passions: moral sentiment and democratic deliberation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leys, R. 2011. The turn to affect: a critique. Critical Inquiry 37, no. 3: 434–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leys, R. 2017. The ascent of affect: genealogy and critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, A. 2012. Avoiding deliberative democracy?: micropolitics, manipulation, and the public sphere. Philosophy and Rhetoric 45, no. 3: 269–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 1987. Notes on the translation and acknowledgements. In A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia, ed. Gilles Deleuze, and Félix Guattari, xvi–xx. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2015. Politics of affect. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2016. Such as it is: a short essay in extreme realism. Body & Society 22, no. 1: 115–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plato. 2015. Theaetetus. London: Aeterna Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. 2015. Reconstructing sociology: The critical Realist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Protevi, J. 2009. Political affect: connecting the social and the somatic. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2009. Reflexivity and the habitus. In Conversations about reflexivity, ed. Margaret Archer, 120–34. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N., and A. Amin. 2013. Arts of the political: new openings for the left. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, P. 2017. Hannah Arendt on thinking, personhood and meaning. In The Anthem companion to Hannah Arendt, ed. Peter Baehr, and Philip Walsh, 155–174. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, D. 2017. Affect: an introduction. Cultural Anthropology 32, no. 2: 175–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, N. 2006. Pragmatism and the dialogical self. International Journal for Dialogical Science 1, no. 1: 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, N. 2011. The American Self and the long march to Legal Equality: The American Self and Legal equality. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1234, no. 1: 127–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerilli, L. 2016. A democratic theory of judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar