Democratic self-defense: bringing the social model back in

References

• Andersson, Jenny. 2009. Nordic nostalgia and Nordic light: The Swedish model as utopia 1930–2007. Scandinavian Journal of History 34, no. 3: 229–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, Jenny. 2013. Between growth and security. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 2004. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 2017. Retrotopia. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Erik. 2019. The Swedish sonderweg in question: Democratization and inequality in comparative perspective, c. 1750–1920. Past and Present 244, no. 1: 123–61.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri. 1998. The social democratic moment: Ideas and politics in the making of interwar Europe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri. 2006. The primacy of politics: Social democracy and the making of Europe’s twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri. 2017. It wasn’t just hate. Fascism offered robust social welfare, Aeon 2017. March 27.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri. 2019. Democracy and dictatorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri, and Maria Snegovaya. 2019. Populism and the decline of social democracy. Journal of Democracy 30, no. 3: 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, Paula, and Joakim Palme. 2020. Universalism in welfare policy: The Swedish case beyond 1990. Social Inclusion 8, no. 1: 114–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, et al. 1999. The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Branting, Hjalmar. 1927. Tal och Skrifter. viii vols. Stockholm: Tidens förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 2015. Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, Giovanni. 2001. Defending democracy: Reactions to political extremism in inter-war Europe. European Journal of Political Research 39: 431–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capoccia, Giovanni. 2013. Militant democracy: The institutional bases of democratic self-preservation. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 9: 207–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyzenhaus, David. 1997. Legality and legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edberg, Rolf. ed. 1948. Demokratisk linje. Stockholm: Tidens förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Elmbrant, Björn. 2015. Innan mörkret faller: Ska 30-talet hinna ikapp oss? Stockholm: Atlas.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Anderson, Gösta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foa Dienstag, R. and Mounk, Y. 2017. Signs of deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy 28, 1: 5-16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, Sverker, Claes-Mikael Jonsson, and Ingemar Lindberg. 2018. Vad krävs för att rädda demokratin? Stockholm: Premiss.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, Per-Albin. 1935. Demokrati: Tal och uppsatser. Stockholm: Tidens förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friedrich. 1994 [1944]. The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, Hermann. 2019 [1925]. Sozialismus und nation. Dresden: Jungeuropa Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, Hermann. 2000 [1928]. Political democracy and social homogeneity. In Weimar: A jurisprudence of crisis, tr. D. Dyzenhaus, ed. A.J. Jacobsen, and B Schlink, 256–65. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, Axel. 2017. The idea of socialism: Towards a renewal. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Invernizzi Accetti, Carlo, and Ian Zuckerman. 2017. What’s wrong with militant democracy? Political Studies 65, no. 1S: 182–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, Andreas. 2019. Democracy and the poor: Prolegomena to a radical theory of democracy. Constellations 26, no. 4: 538–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karleby, Nils. 1926. Socialismen inför verkligheten. Stockholm: Tiden förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, John. 2020. The new despotism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Ellen. 1984. The politics of toleration in late Weimar: Hermann Heller’s analysis of fascism and political culture. History of Political Thought 5, no. 1: 109–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner, Alexander. 2014. A theory of militant democracy: The ethics of combating extremism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lafont, Cristina. 2020. Democracy without shortcuts: A participatory conception of deliberative democracy. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefort, Claude. 1988. Democracy and political theory. Tr. D. Macey. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, Leif. 1967. Planhushållningsdebatten. Uppsala: A& W.
   Google Scholar
• Llanque, Marcus. 2019. Herman Heller and the republicanism of the left in the Weimar republic. Jus Politicum, no. 23: 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Löwenstein, Karl. 1937a. Militant democracy and fundamental rights I. American Political Science Review 31, no. 3: 417–32.
   Google Scholar
• Löwenstein, Karl. 1937b. Militant democracy and fundamental rights II. American Political Science Review 31, no. 4: 638–58.
   Google Scholar
• Malkopoulou, Anthoula. Forthcoming. Hermann Heller on democratic self-defence: Militant democracy revisited. In Herman Heller’s democratic constitutionalism, ed. O. Lembcke, and V. Frick. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Malkopoulou, Anthoula, and Alexander Kirshner, eds. 2019. Militant democracy and its critics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malkopoulou, Anthoula, and Ludvig Norman. 2018. Three models of democratic self-defence: Militant democracy and its alternatives. Political Studies 66, no. 2: 442–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNay, Luis. 2014. The misguided search for the political. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The global rise of populism: Performance, political style and representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, Per. 2014. Ojämlikhetens anatomi. Stockholm: Weyler Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, Gustav. 1918a. Demokratins seger. Tiden 10: 337–42.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, Gustav. 1918b. Den sociala revolutionen. Tiden 10: 241–56.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, Gustav. 1927. Humanitet och arbetslöshet. Stockholm: Tidens förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, Gustav. 1928. Trygghet och säkerhet åt Sveriges Folk. Stockholm: Tidens förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, Gustav. 1946. De planerade socialreformerna. Tiden 38: 70–85.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, Gustav. 1947. Kan trygghet skapas? Tiden 39: 325–43.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, Gustav. 1948. Från fattighus-Sverige till social-Sverige. Stockholm: Tidens förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, Gustav. 1952. Svensk socialpolitik. Tiden 44: 391–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016a. Protecting popular self-government from the people? New normative perspectives on militant democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 19: 249–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016b. What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Jan-Werner. 2020. Democracy for losers. Boston: Boston Review.
   Google Scholar
• Näsström, Sofia. 2021. The spirit of democracy: Corruption, disintegration, renewal. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Näsström, Sofia, and Sara Kalm. 2015. A democratic critique of precarity. Global Discourse 5, no. 4: 556–73.
   Google Scholar
• Niesen, Peter. 2002. Anti-extremism, negative republicanism, civic society: Three paradigms for banning political parties - part I. German Law Journal 3, no. 7: 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Norocel, Cristian. 2016. Populist radical right protectors of the folkhem: Welfare chauvinism in Sweden. Critical Social Policy 36, no. 3: 371–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. 1966. The open society and its enemies. 1 vol. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam. 2010. Democracy and the limits of self-government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam. 2018. Why bother with elections? Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, Nancy. 2008. On the side of the angels: An appreciation of parties and partisanship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Bo. 1998. Just institutions matter. The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rummens, Stefan, and Koen Abts. 2010. Defending democracy: The concentric containment of political extremism. Political Studies 58, no. 4: 649–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajó, Andras, ed. 2004. Militant democracy. Utrecht: Eleven International.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, Guy. 2011. The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Tilton, Tim. 1990. The political theory of Swedish social democracy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tingsten, Herbert. 1967. Demokratiens problem. Stockholm: Aldus/Bonniers.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. 2019. Me, the people: How populism transforms democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westerberg, Rikard. 2020. Socialists at the gate: Swedish Business and the Defence of Free Enterprise, 1940–1985. Dissertation, Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Vinx, Lars. 2020. Democratic equality and militant democracy. Constellations 27, no. 4: 685–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigforss, Ernst. 1952. Socialism i vår tid. Stockholm: Tidens förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wigforss, Ernst. 2013. Kan dödläget brytas? Idépolitiska skrifter i urval 1908–1974. Stockholm: Karneval förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K. 2011. The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar