695
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Un-represent: theorizing the reason of political fanaticism

References

  • Abizadeh, A. 2007. On the philosophy/rhetoric binaries: Or, is Habermasian discourse motivationally impotent? Philosophy and Social Criticism 33, no. 4: 445–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453707077017.
  • Arendt, H. 1992. Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Badiou, A. 2007. “One divides into two.” The century, 58–67. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Batnitzky, L. 2009. Idolatry and representation: The philosophy of Franz Rosenzweig reconsidered. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bejan, T. 2017. Mere civility: Disagreement and the limits of toleration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Berchman, R. 2013. Religion, ritual, and war in the late Roman republic. In Just war in religion and politics, 63–98. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
  • Bickle, P. 1975. The revolution of 1525: The German peasants’ war from a new perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Brubaker, R., and F. Cooper. 2000. Beyond ‘identity’. Theory and Society 29, no. 1: 1–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007068714468.
  • Budgen, S., S. Kouvelakis, and S. Zizek, eds. 2007. Lenin reloaded: Toward a politics of truth, trans. D. Fernbach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Cavanaugh, W. 2011. The invention of fanaticism. Modern Theology 27, no. 2 April: 226–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2010.01673.x.
  • Chambers, S. 2009. Rhetoric and the public sphere: Has deliberative democracy abandoned Mass democracy? Political Theory 37, no. 3: 323–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591709332336.
  • Colas, D. 1997. Civil society and fanaticism: Conjoined histories, trans. Amy Jacobs. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia, trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Denton, R. 1980. The rhetorical functions of slogans: Classifications and characteristics. Communication Quarterly 28, no. 2: 10–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378009369362.
  • Disch, L., M. van de Sande, and N. Urbinati, eds. 2020. The constructivist turn in political representation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Frazer, M. 2010. The enlightenment of sympathy: Justice and the moral sentiments in the eighteenth century and today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Garsten, B. 2006. Saving persuasion: A defense of rhetoric and judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gray, J. 2008. Black mass: apocalyptic religion and the death of utopia. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Habermas, J. 1996. Popular sovereignty as procedure. In Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, trans. William Rehg, 463–490. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Holmes, S. 1996. The anatomy of anti-liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Honneth, A. 1996. The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Krylov, U. 2010. The two barrel carts. In The frogs who begged for a tsar, trans. Lydia Stone, 17–18. Moscow: Russian Information Service.
  • La Vopa, A. 1997. The philosopher and the Schwärmer: On the career of a German epithet from Luther to Kant. Huntington Library Quarterly 60, no. 1/2: 85–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3817833.
  • Lecercle, J. 2002. Deleuze on language. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lenin, V.I. 1963. On slogans. In Collected works, Vol. 25, 185–192. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
  • Lenin, V.I. 1902/1987. What is to be done? In From essential works of Lenin: “What is to be done?” and other writings, ed. H. Christman, 53–175. Garden City, NY: Dover.
  • Lih, L. 2006. Lenin rediscovered: What is to be done? In context. Leiden: Brill.
  • Markell, P. 2006. The rule of the people: Arendt, Archê, and democracy. The American Political Science Review 100, no. 1: 1–14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27644327.
  • Müller, J. 2007. Constitutional patriotism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Olson, J. 2009. Friends and enemies, slaves and masters: Fanaticism, Wendell Phillips, and the limits of democratic theory. The Journal of Politics 71: 82–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608090063.
  • Oz, A. 2010. How to cure a fanatic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Phillips, W. 1860. The philosophy of abolition movement. New York: American Anti-Slavery Society.
  • Pocock, J.G.A. 1997. Enthusiasm: The antiself of enlightenment. Huntington Library Quarterly 60, no. 1/2: 7–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3817830.
  • Rancière, J. 2014. Hatred of democracy. London: Verso.
  • Saward, M. 2010. The representative claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Shklar, J. 1998. Liberalism of fear. In Political thought and political thinkers, ed. S. Hoffman, Repr., 3–20. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Simpson, J.A., and E.S.C. Weiner, eds. 1989. The Oxford English dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Strong, T. 2012. Lenin and the calling of the party. In Politics without vision: Thinking without a banister in the twentieth century, 184–217. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Tønder, L. 2013. Tolerance: A sensorial orientation to politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Toscano, A. 2010. Fanaticism: On the uses of an idea. London: Verso.
  • Tucker, R. 1996. The cults of the Roman empire. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Urbinati, N. 2006. Representative democracy: Principles and genealogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Warrior, V.M. 2006. Roman religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.