Personalization: a new political arithmetic?

References

• Amoore, L. 2013. The Politics of possibility: risk and security beyond probability. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. 2020. Cloud ethics: algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2006 [1983]. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Beauvisage, T., and K. Mellet. 2020. Datassets: assetizing and marketizing personal data. In Turning things into assets, eds. K. Birch, and F. Muniesa, 75–95. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/12075.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K., and F. Muniesa. 2020. Assetization: Turning Things into assets in Technoscientific capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1987. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste, trans. nice R. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. 2020. The right-time web: theorizing the kairologic of algorithmic media. New Media & Society 22, no. 9: 1699–1714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, G. F., and E. K. Jermakowicz. 2015. International financial reporting standards: a framework-based perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callard, F., and E. Perego. 2021. How and why patients made long COVID. Social Science & Medicine 268: 113426. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardon, D. 2019. Society2Vec: From categorical prediction to behavioral traces, SASE Conference, New York, 27-29 June. https://medialab.sciencespo.fr/en/productions/2019-06-society2vec-from-categorical-prediction-to-behavioral-traces-dominique-cardon/.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E.S., and M. Lempert. 2016. Scale: discourse and dimensions of social life. California: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.15.
   Google Scholar
• Cassirer, E. 2003 [1910]. Substance and function and einstein’s Theory of relativity. trans. W.C. Swabey and M.C. Swabey. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, W. 2016. Updating to remain the same: habitual media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, W. 2021. Discriminating data: correlation, neighborhoods and the New politics of recognition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, K. 2016. Never alone, except for Now: Art, networks, populations. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coombes, R.C., K. Page, R. Salari, et al. 2019. Personalized detection of circulating Tumor DNA antedates breast cancer metastatic recurrence. Clinical Cancer Research 25, no. 14: 4255–4263. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmody, A., and D. Zwick. 2020. Manipulate to empower: hyper-relevance and the contradictions of marketing in the age of surveillance capitalism. Big Data & Society. doi:10.1177/2053951720904112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, S., and C. Lury. 2017. New technologies of the observer: #BringBack, visualization and disappearance. Theory, Culture and Society 34, no. 7-8: 51–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, S., W. Viney, J. Bruton, and H. Ward. 2021. Past-futures in experimental care: breast cancer and HIV medicine. New Genetics and Society, 449–472. doi:10.1080/14636778.2020.1861542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. 1998. The Politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Cambridge: Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson, D. 2013. Me medicine vs. We medicine: reclaiming biotechnology for the common good. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, G., A. D'Andrea, V. Marshall, et al. 2019. Conferring legal personality on the world’s rivers: A brief intellectual assessment, 44 Water International 1. At: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1321.
   Google Scholar
• Eshaghi, A., A.L. Young, P.A. Wijeratne, F. Prados, D.L. Arnold, S. Narayanan, et al. 2021. Identifying multiple sclerosis subtypes using unsupervised machine learning and MRI data. Nature Communications 12, no. 1: 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, E. 2011. The future of futures: The time of Money in financing and society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, L. 2019. U.S. group says ‘big’ residents don’t need safer water. Sustainability Times (14 March). https://www.sustainability-times.com/environmental-protection/u-s-group-says-its-big-residents-dont-need-safer-water/.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner-Gurstein, R., and D. Wyatt. 2021. Platform NHS: reconfiguring a public service in the age of digital capitalism. Science, Technology and Human Values. doi:10.1177/01622439211055697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA. 2018. Master Protocols: Efficient Clinical Trial Design Strategies To Expedite Development of Oncology Drugs and Biologics. Draft. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/master-protocols-efficient-clinical-trial-design-strategies-expedite-development-oncology-drugs-and.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2019. Adaptive Design Clinical Trials for Drugs and Biologics Guidance for Industry. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/adaptive-design-clinical-trials-drugs-and-biologics-guidance-industry.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, L., and R. Wigglesworth. 2021. Swedish Hedge Fund IPM Hit as Pandemic Upends Quant Models. Financial Times, April 20. https://www.ft.com/content/5313948a-9823-4777-b4ca-3813ece1f5fb.
   Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, B.D. 2021. Nine pails of ashes: social networks, genocide, and the structuralists’ database of language. History of Anthropology Review 45. https://histanthro.org/notes/nine-pails-of-ashes/.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, A., R. Loar, A.E. Kramer, and G.P. Garnett. 2019. Reaching and targeting more effectively: the application of market segmentation to improve HIV prevention programmes. Journal of The international Aids Society 22, no. Suppl 4: e25318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guardian Correspondent. 2021. Tui Plane in ‘Serious Incident’ After Every ‘Miss’ on Board Was Assigned Child’s Weight. The Guardian (9 April). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/09/tui-plane-serious-incident-every-miss-on-board-child-weight-birmingham-majorca.
   Google Scholar
• Guha, R. 1994. On some aspects of the historiography of colonial India. In Subaltern studies Vol. 1, ed. Ranajit Guha, 1–8. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, J.I. 2007. Prophecy and the near future: thoughts on macroeconomic, evangelical, and punctuated time. American Ethnologist 34, no. 3: 409–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyer, J.I. 2014a. Percentages and perchance: archaic forms in the twenty-first century. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 15, no. 2: 155–173.
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, J.I. 2014b. The gross domestic person. Anthropology Today 30, no. 2: 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, J.I. 2016. Legacies, logics, logistics: essays in the Anthropology of the platform economy. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1982. Biopower and the avalanche of printed numbers. Humanities in Society 5: 279–295.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1984. Representing and intervening. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35, no. 4: 381–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1986. Making up people. In Reconstructing individualism: autonomy, individuality, and the self in western thought, eds. T. C. Heller, M. Sosna, and D.E. Welbery, 222–236. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1991. How should we do the history of statistics? In The foucault effect, eds. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 181–195. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, K. 2005. The Hit Man's Dilemma: Or Business, Personal and Impersonal. Prickly Paradigm #18. https://www.prickly-paradigm.com/titles/the-hit-mans-dilemma/.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, K. 2010. Models of statistical distribution. Anthropological Theory 10, no. 1-2: 67–74. doi:10.1177/1463499610365371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, K. 2017. Money in a Human economy. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, C. 2013. Distinctively similar. U.C. Davis Law Review 47, no. 2: 601–632.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, C. 2022. The spectacular generic. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig, C., and T.F. Liao. 2013. How to find an appropriate clustering for mixed-type variables with application to socio-economic stratification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 62: 309–369. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2012.01066.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E.J. 1990. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: programme, myth, reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honeyford, K., G.S. Cooke, A. Kinderlerer, E. Williamson, M. Gilchrist, A. Holmes, et al. 2020. Evaluating a digital sepsis alert in a London multisite hospital network: a natural experiment using electronic health record data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 27, no. 2: 274–83. doi:10.1093/JAMIA/OCZ186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, L., and S.H. Friend. 2011. Predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory (P4) cancer medicine. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 8: 184–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopman, R., and A. M’charek. 2020. Facing the unknown suspect: forensic DNA phenotyping and the oscillation between the individual and the collective. BioSocieties 15: 438–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, T. 2020. Making it personal: algorithmic personalization, identity, and everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katsnelson, A. 2013. Momentum grows to make ‘personalized’ medicine more ‘precise’. Nature Medicine 19: 249. doi:10.1038/nm0313-249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelty, C.M. 2020. The participant: A Century of Participation in four stories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurgan, L., D. Brawley, B. House, J. Zhang, and W. Chun. 2019. Homophily: The Urban History of an Algorithm. https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/are-friends-electric/289193/homophily-the-urban-history-of-an-algorithm/.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, D.M., M.S. Esfahani, F. Scherer, et al. 2019. Dynamic risk profiling using serial Tumor biomarkers for personalized outcome prediction. Cell 178, no. 3: 699–713.e19. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lury, C. 2004. Brands: The logos of the Global economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C. 2021. Shifters. In Uncertain archives: Critical keywords for Big data, eds. N. Thylstrup, D. Agostinho, A. Ring, C. D’Ignazio, and K. Veel, 469–476. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C., and S. Day. 2019. Algorithmic personalisation as a mode of individuation. Theory, Culture and Society 36, no. 2: 17–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lury, C. 2022. One of a kind: MyUniversity as a personalized generic. In Academic brands: distinction in Global higher education, eds. M. Biagiolo, and M. Sunder, 27–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. 2010. More Parts than Elements. How Databases Multiply. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/staff/mackenza/papers/mackenzie_database-multiples-sept2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. 2016. Distributive numbers: a post-demographic perspective on probability. In Modes of knowing: resources from the baroque, eds. J. Law, and E. Ruppert, 115–135. Manchester: Mattering Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. 2017. Machine learners: archaeology of a data practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, T. 2007. Transmutation, inclusion, and exclusion: political arithmetic from charles II to William III. Journal of Historical Sociology 20, no. 3: 259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’charek, A. 2020. Tentacular faces: race and the return of the phenotype in forensic identification. American Anthropologist 122, no. 2: 369–380. doi:10.1111/aman.13385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moor, L., and C. Lury. 2018. Price and the person: markets, discrimination and the person. Journal of Cultural Economy 11, no. 6: 501–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2011. Distributed reproduction. In Corpus: An Interdisciplinary reader on bodies and knowledge, eds. M. J. Casper, and P. Currah, 21–38. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2017. The economization of life. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelms, T.C., B. Maurer, L. Swartz, and S. Mainwaring. 2018. Social payments: innovation, trust, bitcoin, and the sharing economy. Theory, Culture and Society 35, no. 3: 13–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newitz, A. 2016. Facebook’s ad Platform Now Guesses at Your Race Based on your Behavior. Arstechnica, 18 March. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/03/facebooks-ad-platform-now-guesses-at-your-race-based-on-your-behavior/.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Digital. 2021. Trusted Research Environment Service for England. NHS Digital. https://digital.nhs.uk/coronavirus/coronavirus-data-services-updates/trusted-research-environment-service-for-england (accessed 13 May).
   Google Scholar
• Perego, E., F. Callard, L. Stras, B. Melville-Jóhannesson, R. Pope, and N. Alwan. 2020. . Why We Need to Keep Using the Patient Made Term “Long Covid”. The BMJ. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/10/01/why-we-need-to-keep-using-the-patient-made-term-long-covid/ (accessed 29 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Petty, W. 1899 [1690]. Political Arithmetic. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Political_Arithmetick_(1899).
   Google Scholar
• Phan, T., and S. Wark. 2021. What Personalisation Can Do for You!; Or, How to do Racial Discrimination wIthout “Race”. Culture Machine 20 special issue on ‘Machine Intelligences’. https://culturemachine.net/vol-20-machine-intelligences/what-personalisation-can-do-for-you-or-how-to-do-racial-discrimination-without-race-thao-phan-scott-wark/.
   Google Scholar
• Poovey, M. 1993. Figures of arithmetic, figures of speech: the discourse of statistics in the 1830s. Critical Inquiry 19, no. 2: 256–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poovey, M. 1998. A history of the modern fact: problems of knowledge in the sciences of wealth and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poovey, M. 2008. Genres of the Credit Economy: mediating value in eighteenth- and nineteenth-Century britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T.M. 1986. The rise of statistical thinking: 1820–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T.M. 1995. Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in Science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B. 2017. Personalized medicine: empowered patients in the 21st century? New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. 2007. Marking time: On the Anthropology of the contemporary. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B. 2020. Engines of order: A mechanology of algorithmic techniques. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riles, A. 2004. Real time: unwinding technocratic and anthropological knowledge. American Ethnologist 31, no. 3: 392–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosamond, E. 2022. The reputation economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seaver, N. 2021. Everything lies in a space: cultural data and spatial reality. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 27: 43–61. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.13479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simondon, G. 1992. The genesis of the individual. In Incorporations, eds. J. Crary, and S. Kwinter, 297–319. Cambridge: Zone Books, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, B. 1999. Visual analogy: consciousness as the Art of connecting. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. 1972. Should trees have standing? toward legal rights for natural objects. Southern California Law Review 45: 45–501. https://iseethics.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/stone-christopher-d-should-trees-have-standing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Totaro, P., and D. Ninno. 2014. The concept of algorithm as an interpretive key of modern rationality. Theory, Culture and Society 31, no. 4: 29–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tupasela, A. 2017. Populations as brands in medical research – placing genes on the global genetic atlas. BioSocieties 12: 47–65. doi:10.1057/s41292-016-0029-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. 1981 [1975]. The invention of culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, H., B. Flower, P.J. Garcia, S.W.X. Ong, D. Altmann, B. Delaney, et al. 2021. Global surveillance, research, and collaboration needed to improve understanding and management of long COVID (comment). The Lancet 398: 2057–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02444-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, M., J. Elliott, M. Chadeau-Hyam, S. Riley, A. Darzi, G. Cooke, H. Ward, and P. Elliott. 2022. Persistent COVID-19 symptoms in a community study of 606,434 people in England. Nature Communications 13, no. 1: 1957. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29521-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. 2017. Big Data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. London and New York: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ziauddeen, N., D. Gurdasani, M.E. O’Hara, C. Hastie, P. Roderick, G. Yao, and N.A. Alwan. 2021. Characteristics of Long Covid: Findings from a Social Media Survey. MedRxiv 2021.03.21.21253968. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.21.21253968.
   Google Scholar