A science of stereotypes: paranoiac-critical forays within the medium of information

References

• Amadae, S.M. 2016. Prisoners of reason: Game theory and neoliberal political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107565258
   Google Scholar
• Arkenbout, C., J. Wilson and D. de Zeeuw, eds. 2021. Critical meme reader: Global mutations of the viral image. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Augoustinos, M., and I. Walker. 1998. The construction of stereotypes within social psychology: From social cognition to ideology. Theory & Psychology 8, no. 5: 629–52. doi:10.1177/0959354398085003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. 1994. L’Angélus de Millet: Conditions d’un discours mythique (1856-1993). Ethnologie Française 24, no. 2: 243–53.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K. and F. Muniesa, eds. 2020. Assetization: Turning things into assets in technoscientific capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/12075.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Birchall, C., and P. Knight. 2022. Do your own research: Conspiracy theories and the internet. Social Research: An International Quarterly 89, no. 3: 579–605. doi:10.1353/sor.2022.0049.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, S. 1999. The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blissett, L. 1995. Mind invaders. Come fottere i media: Manuale di guerriglia e sabotaggio culturale. Rome: Castelvecchi.
   Google Scholar
• Blissett, L. 1999. Q. Turin: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. 2003. Foreword: The opposite of property? Law and Contemporary Problems 66, no. 1/2: 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Butter, M. and P. Knight, eds. 2020. Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429452734.
   Google Scholar
• Carducci, V. 2006. Culture jamming: A sociological perspective. Journal of Consumer Culture 6, no. 1: 116–38. doi:10.1177/1469540506062722.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, A., A. Jorge and T. Karppi, eds. 2021. Reckoning with social media. London: Rowan & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Clemens, J., and D. Pettman. 2004. Avoiding the subject: Media, culture and the object. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.5117/9789053567166.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R. 2018. Theorizing the present: Digital media, pre-emergence and infra-structures of feeling. Cultural Studies 32, no. 4: 600–22. doi:10.1080/09502386.2017.1413121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, R. 2020. Refresh: On the temporalities of digital media ‘Re’s. Media Theory 4, no. 2: 55–84.
   Google Scholar
• Coley, R. 2018. ‘Destabilized perception’: Infrastructural aesthetics in the films of Adam Curtis. Cultural Politics 14, no. 3: 304–26. doi:10.1215/17432197-7093324.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. 2011. All watched over by machines of loving grace. London: BBC.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. 2016. HyperNormalisation. London: BBC.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. 2021. Can’t get you out of my head. London: BBC.
   Google Scholar
• Dalí, S. 1978. Le mythe tragique de l’Angélus de Millet. Paris: Pauvert.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. 2020. Who am I prepared to kill? London Review of Books 42, no. 15: 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Day, S., C. Lury, and H. Ward. 2023. Personalization: A new political arithmetic? Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2022.2098352
   Google Scholar
• Doganova, L., and F. Muniesa. 2015. Capitalization devices: Business models and the renewal of markets. In Making things valuable, eds. M. Kornberger, L. Justesen, A. Koed Madsen, and J. Mouritsen, 109–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712282.003.0006
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. 2017. Adam Curtis as remixologist: The case for metajournalism as radical practice. Studies in Documentary Film 11, no. 1: 45–63. doi:10.1080/17503280.2016.1266899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeley, R.A. 2001. Dalí’s fascism; Lacan’s paranoia. Art History 24, no. 4: 465–92. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.00278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. 1989. Cartographies schizoanalytiques. Paris: Galilée.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, O. 2015. Beautiful data: A history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822376323
   Google Scholar
• Hamerton-Kelly, R., ed. 2007. Politics and apocalypse. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F.A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35, no. 4: 519–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayles, N.K. 1999. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E., and E. Ruppert. 2015. Being digital citizens. London: Rowan & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Juárez, G. 2021. The ghostchain. (Or taking things for what they are). Paletten 325: 54–9.
   Google Scholar
• Juárez, G. 2022. This is financial advice. Paletten 327-328: 108–11.
   Google Scholar
• Karppi, T. 2018. Disconnect: Facebook’s affective bonds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. doi:10.5749/j.ctv65sz27
   Google Scholar
• Klossowski, P. 1970. Protase et apodose. L’Arc 43: 8–20.
   Google Scholar
• Klossowski, P., and P. Zucca. 1970. La monnaie vivante. Paris: Eric Losfeld.
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, C. 2019. How we became our data: A genealogy of the informational person. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/9780226626611/
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J., and J.B. Pontalis. 1967. Vocabulaire de la psychanalyse. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, P. 2019. The communal mind. London Review of Books 41, no. 4: 11–4.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, P. 2021. No one is talking about this. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• Löwy, M. 2000. L’étoile du matin: Surréalisme et marxisme. Paris: Syllepse.
   Google Scholar
• Machuco Rosa, A. 2018. Mimesis, network theory and digital social networks. Xiphias Gladius 1: 93–111.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N., M. Guggenheim and A. Wilkie, eds. 2018. Inventing the social. Manchester: Mattering Press. doi:10.28938/9780995527768.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 2002. Machine dreams: Economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511613364.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., and E. Nik-Khah. 2017. The knowledge we have lost in information: The history of information in modern economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190270056.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F. 2014. The provoked economy: Economic reality and the performative turn. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203798959.
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F. 2018. How to spot the behavioral shibboleth and what to do about it. In Inventing the social, eds. N. Marres, M. Guggenheim, and A. Wilkie, 195–211. Manchester: Mattering Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F. 2019. Société du comportement, information de la sociologie. Zilsel: Science, Technique, Société 5: 197–207. doi:10.3917/zil.005.0196.
   Google Scholar
• Nafus, D.2016. Quantified: Biosensing technologies in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/10293.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Naville, P. 1977. Le temps du surréel. Paris: Galilée.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, G., and D. Nafus. 2016. Self-tracking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/10421.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Negativland. 2003. Two relationships to a cultural public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems 66, no. 1/2: 239–62.
   Google Scholar
• Negativland. 2021. It’s normal for some things to come to your attention. Marshall, NC: Negativland.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, M. 2021. The storm is upon us: How QAnon became a movement, cult, and conspiracy theory of everything. London: Monoray.
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Martin, A. 2020. Note sur les “penseurs” de la Silicon Valley. Savoir/Agir 51: 79–86. doi:10.3917/sava.051.0079.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D.W. 2005a. Klossowski’s reading of Nietzsche: Impulses, phantasms, simulacra, stereotypes. Diacritics 35, no. 1: 8–21. doi:10.1353/dia.2007.0017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D.W. 2005b. The concept of the simulacrum: Deleuze and the overturning of platonism. Continental Philosophy Review 38, no. 1: 89–123. doi:10.1007/s11007-006-3305-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, A. 2002. Parody and post-modernism: The story of Negativland. Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 25: 171–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Ming 1. 2021. La Q di qomplotto. QAnon e dintorni: Come le fantasie di complotto difendono il sistema. Rome: Alegre.
   Google Scholar