- Ethan A. Nadelmann (1990). Global prohibition regimes: the evolution of norms in international society. International Organization, 44(4), 503.
- Ibid.
- David F. Musto (1987). The American Disease, p. 248. Oxford University Press, New York.
- H.W. Brands (1998). What America Owes the World: The Struggle for the Soul of Foreign Policy, p. vii. Cambridge University Press, New York.
- Robert O. Keohane (1995). The analysis of international regimes. In: Volker Rittberger (Ed.), Regime Theory and International Relations, p. 43. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
- Norman H. Clark (1976). Deliver us from Evil: An Interpretation of American Prohibition. Norton, New York.
- Arnold H. Taylor (1969). American Diplomacy and the Narcotics Traffic, 1900-1939, p. 29. Duke University Press, Durham, N.C.
- Alan A. Block (1989-1990). European drug traffic and traffickers between the wars: the policy of suppression and its consequences. Journal of Social History, 23, 331.
- S.K. Chatterjee (1981). Legal Aspects of International Drug Control, p. 201. Martinus Nijhoff, London.
- Robert W, Gregg (1993). About Face? The United States and The United Nations, p. 5. Lyne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, C.O.
- See Phyllis Bennis (2000). Calling the Shots: How Washington Dominates Today's UN, pp. 1-21. Olive Branch Press, an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc., Northampton, M.A.
- New York Times, 18 November 1975.
- Charies Siragusa (1966). The Trail of the Poppy, p. 212. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
- See David R. Bewley-Taylor (1999). The United Stales and International Drug Control, 1990-1997, pp. 54-101. Pinter, London and New York.
- See William B. McAllister (2000). Drug Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century: An International History, pp. 156-211. Routledge, New York.
- AM, p. 183 and David R. Bewley-Taylor (March 1999). The Cost of Containment: The Cold War and US International Drug Control at the UN, 1950-58. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 10(1), 147-171.
- Judith Goldstein (1986). The political economy of trade; institutions of protection. American Political Science Review, 80, 161-184.
- Rufus King (1964). The Drug Hang-Up America's Fifty-Year Folly, Charles C. Thomas, 1974, pp. 218-219 and WV Conference for the Adoption of a Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, Vol. 1, p. 6. UN Publications, New York.
- September 1997 saw the United Nations Drug Control Programme (UNDCP) and the UN Crime prevention and Criminal Justice Division brought together by the UN Secretary General into a single Office for 8Drug Control and Crime Prevention (ODCCP). Such a move indicates an Organizational trend to fuse drug and crime policy. It is consequently important to note that the 2000 UN Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime is, among other things, designed to compliment the 1988 Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. The 2000 Convention, like earlier protocols dealing specifically with drug control, has also received energetic support from Washington. See Michael Woodiwiss (2001). Organized Crime and American Power: A History, p. 385. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
- (January-March 1965). Coming into Force of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961. Bulletin on Narcotics, XVII(1), 1.
- (1964). UN Conference for the Adoption of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, Vol. II, p. 300, UN Publications, New York and Declaration of the International Conference on Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking and Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Outline on Future Activities in Drug Abuse Control, New York, United Nations, 1988, p. iii and p. 1. The UN has in recent years toned down rhetoric associated with drug control and dropped terms like "evil" and "scourge" from its vocabulary. This appears to be in line with a small deviation from the supply-side mindset so long associated with international control efforts. Nonetheless, even without such emotive phraseology the organization's image remains important for regime adherence.
- IRobert Keohane (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, p. 94. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- See David R, Bewley-Taylor, The United States and International Drug Control, op. cit., pp. 171-174. Also see Peter Andreas who notes that "Open defection from the drug prohibition regime would.. have severe consequences: it would place the defecting country in the category of a pariah 'narcostate', generate material repercussions in the form of economic sanctions and aid cut offs, and damage the country's moral standing in the international community". "When Policies Collide: Market Reform, Market Prohibition, and the Narcotization of the Mexican Economy", pp. 127-128, in (1999) H. Richard Friman and Peter Andreas (Eds.), The Illicit Global Economy and Slate Power, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham.
- (September/October 1987). Dutch Liberalism under Pressure. Druglink, 2(5), 5.
- (November-December 1991). Drug Abuse and Drug Abuse Education, p. 112.
- Mark Riley and David Humphries, "Injecting Rooms are a Crime," Sidney Morning Herald, 24 February 2000 and Sunday Telegraph, Australia, 27 February, 2000.
- Dan Gardener, "US Bullies World into Waging Futile Drug War", Chicago Sun Times, January 7, 2001.
- Robert J. MacCoun and Peter Reuter (2001). Drug War Heresies: Learning from Other Vices, Times and Places, p. 294. Cambridge University Press, New York.
- Friedrich Kratochwill (Autumn 1984). The Force Proscriptions. International Organization, 38(4), 706.
- KettiIe Bruun, Lynn Pan and Ingemar Rexed (1975). The Gentlemen's Club: International Control of Drugs and Alcohol, p. 142. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- WorId Drug Report 2000, p. 1. United Nations Office For Drug Control and Crime Prevention, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Peter Webster (1998). Rethinking Drug Prohibition: Don't Look for US Government Leadership. International Journal of Drug Policy, 9(5), 297-303.
- See for example Nicholas Dorn and Alison Jamieson, (March 2000), Room for Manoeuvre: Overview of Comparative Legal Research into National Drug Laws of France, Italy, Spain the Netherlands and Sweden and their Relation to Three International Drug Conventions. A study of DrugScope, London, for the Independent Inquiry on the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.
- Letter from Anslinger to Reginald Wright Kaufman, Editor of the Bangor Daily News, 19 March 1945, the Harry J. Anslinger Papers, Pattee Library, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA, Box 3; File 22.
Addiction Research & Theory
Volume 11, 2003 - Issue 2