References
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
- Broome, K. M., Knight, K., Hiller, M. L., & Simpson, D. D. (1996). Drug treatment process indicators for probationers and prediction of recidivism. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13, 487–491.
- Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Routledge.
- Chapman, T. & Hough, M. (1998). Evidence Based Practice: A Guide to Effective Practice. London: Home Office Publications.
- Chiovitti, R. F., & Piran, N. (2003). Rigour and grounded theory research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(4), 427–435.
- Fiorentine, R., Nakashima, J., & Anglin, M. D. (1999). Client engagement in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 17, 199–206.
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
- Gossop, M., Marsden, J., Stewart, D., & Rolfe, A. (2000a). Patterns of improvement after methadone treatment: 1 year follow-up results from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS). Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 60, 275–286.
- Gossop, M., Marsden, J., & Stewart, D. (2000b). Treatment outcomes of stimulant misusers: One year follow-up results from the National Treatment Outcome research Study (NTORS). Addictive Behaviors, 25, 509–522.
- Gossop, M., Marsden, J., & Stewart, D. (2001). NTORS After Five Years. The National Treatment Outcome Research Study. London: National Addiction Centre.
- Hennessy, J. J. (2001). Introduction: Drug courts in operation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 33(4), 1–10.
- HMSO (1998). Tackling Drugs to Build a Better Britain: The Government’s Ten-Year Strategy for Tackling Drugs Misuse. London: The Stationery Office.
- Hollin, C. R. (1995). The meaning and implications of ‘‘Programme Integrity’’. In: J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing Reoffending. Chichester: Wiley.
- Home Office (2001). National Standard for the Drug Treatment and Testing Order (DTTO). PC25/2001. London: National Probation Directorate Criminal Policy Group.
- Hough, M., Clancy, A., McSweeney, T., & Turnbull, P. J. (2003). The Impact of Drug Treatment and Testing Orders on Offending: Two-Year Reconviction Results. London: Home Office.
- Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
- Morse, J. M. (1991). Strategies for sampling. In: J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue (pp. 127–145). London: Sage.
- Myles, J., Midgely, S., Evans, V., & Green, G. (2001). Clinical outcomes for patients treated in the Bristol area, under Trident (Probation Orders with the condition of treatment), and Drug Treatment and Testing Orders over the past three years. Paper presented at the Society for the Study of Addiction Annual Symposium, Leeds.
- National Audit Office (2004). The Drug Treatment and Testing Order: Early Lessons. London: The Stationery Office.
- Peters, R. H., Haas, A. L., & Hunt, W. M. (2001). Treatment ‘‘dosage’’ effects in drug court programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 33(4), 63–72.
- Rempel, M., & Destefano, C. D. (2001). Predictors of engagement in court-mandated treatment: Findings at the Brooklyn Treatment Court, 1996–2000. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 33(4), 87–124.
- Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. London: Sage.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Turnbull, P. J., McSweeney, T., Webster, R., Edmunds, M., & Hough, M. (2000). Drug Treatment and Testing Orders: Final Evaluation Report. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.