A drug monitoring system: Keeping a finger on the pulse by triangulation of qualitative and quantitative methods

References

• Barendregt C, van der Poel A, van de Mheen H. Tracing selection effects in three non-probability samples. European Addiction Research 2005; 11: 124–131
   Google Scholar
• Barendregt B, van der Poel A, van de Mheen H. The rise of the mobile phone in the hard drug scene in Rotterdam. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 2006; 38: 77–87
   Google Scholar
• Blanken P, Barendregt C. Veranderingen in de aanbod – en vraagzijde van de illegale drugsmarkt in Rotterdam: Enkele resultaten van het Rotterdams Drug Monitoring Systeem 1995–1997. (Changes in supply and demand on the illegal drug market. Some results from the Rotterdam Drug Monitoring System 1995–1997). IVO bulletin 1998; 1(1)1–11, [in Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Blanken P, Barendregt C, Zuidmulder L. Community fieldwork: Bringing users into research action. Understanding and responding to drug use: The role of qualitative research. EMCDDA, Lisbon 2000
   Google Scholar
• Bourgois P. Anthropology and epidemiology on drugs: The challenges of cross-methodological and theoretical dialogue. International Journal of Drug Policy 2002; 13: 259–269
   Google Scholar
• Chenitz WC, Swanson JM. From practice to grounded theory. Qualitative research in nursing. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, California 1986
   Google Scholar
• Coumans AM, Spreen M. Drug use and the role of homelessness in the process of marginalization. Substance Use & Misuse 2003; 38: 311–338
   Google Scholar
• Coumans AM, Knibbe RK, van de Mheen H. Street level effects of local drug policy on marginalisation and hardening: An ethnographic study among chronic drug users. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Cruts AAN, Lempens ALF, Ketelaars APM, van Laar MW, van de Mheen H. Monitoring van alcohol en drugs onder de loep. Een onderzoek naar opbrengst en lacunes van informatiesystemen op het gebied van alcohol en drugs. (Monitoring of alcohol and drugs on the map: A study on outcome and lacunas of information systems in the field of alcohol and drugs). Trimbos Institute/IVO, Utrecht/Rotterdam 2004, 2004 [in Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Denzin NK. The research act. Aldine, Chicago 1978
   Google Scholar
• Geetz C. Thick description: Toward an interpretative theory of culture. The interpretation of cultures., C Geertz. Basic Books, Selected Essays. New York 1973; 3–30
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, New York 1967
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths P, Vingoe L, Hunt N, Mounteney J, Hartnoll R. Drug information systems, early warning, and new drug trends: Can drug monitoring systems become more sensitive to emerging trends in drug consumption?. Substance Use & Misuse 2000; 35: 811–844
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks VM, Meer CW, Blanken P. De Addiction Severity Index: ASI (R). Handleiding bij training en afname (The Addiction Severity Index (R). Manual for training and administration). IVO, Rotterdam 1991, [in Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks VM, Blanken P, Adriaans NFP, Vollemans LC. Continue gegevensverzameling over druggebruik: de opzet van een locaal drug monitoring system (DMS). (Continuous data collection about drug use: The design of a local drug monitoring system (DMS)). IVO, Rotterdam 1994, [in Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Jones R. Why do qualitative research?. British Medical Journal 1995; 311: 2
   Google Scholar
• Kelle U. Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2001; 2(1), [on line journal] http://qualitative-research.net/fgs/fgs-eng.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lambert EY. The collection and interpretation of data from hidden populations. NIDA Research Monograph 98. NIDA, Rockville 1990
   Google Scholar
• Lambert EY, Ashery RS, Needle RH. Qualitative methods in drug abuse and HIV research. NIDA Research Monograph 157. NIDA, Rockville 1995
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA 1985
   Google Scholar
• Mackenbach JP. Paradigma, succes en toekomst van de maatschappelijke gezondheidszorg (Paradigm, success and future of public health). TSG 2001; 79: 522–529, [in Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Maxell JA. Designing a qualitative study. In. Handbook of applied social research methods, Leonard Blickman, Debra J. Rog. Sage, Thousand Oaks 1998
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. A source back of new methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA 1984
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research 1991; 40: 120–123
   Google Scholar
• Morse J. Qualitative generalisibility. Qualitative Health Research 2000; 9: 5–6
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In. Handbook of mixed method, A Tashakkori, C Teddlie. Sage, Thousand Oaks 2003
   Google Scholar
• Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment 1998; 2: 1–273
   Google Scholar
• Murphy E, Dingwall R. Qualitative methods in health services research. In. Health services research methods, N Black, J Brazier, F Fitzpatrick, B Reeves. BMJ Publications, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Neale J, Allen D, Coombes L. Qualitative research methods within the addictions. Addiction 2005; 100: 1584–1593
   Google Scholar
• Nutbeam D. Evaluatie van oorzak en gevolg in gezondheidsbevorderingsprojecten: Aanpassing van onderzoeksmethoden aan interventiemethoden (Evaluating cause and effect in health promotion programs: Matching research methods to intervention programs). TSG 1999; 77: 15–23, [in Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Pearson G. Normal drug use: Ethnographic fieldwork among an adult network of recreational drug users in inner London. Substance Use & Misuse 2001; 36: 167–200
   Google Scholar
• Savage J. Ethnography and health care. British Medical Journal 2000; 321: 1400–1402
   Google Scholar
• Seidel J. Appendix E. Qualitative data analysis. The Ethnograph V5.0. A program for the analysis of text based data. Qualis research associates, Canada 1998
   Google Scholar
• Sterk CE. Drug research: Ethnographies or qualitative works. International Journal of Drug Policy 2003; 14: 115–118
   Google Scholar
• Strunin L. Assessing alcohol consumption: Developments from qualitative research methods. Social Science Medicine 2001; 53: 215–226
   Google Scholar
• Van Laar MW, Cruts AN, Verdurmen JEE, Van Ooyen MMJ. National Drug Monitor. Annual Report 2004. Bureau NDM, Utrecht 2005
   Google Scholar
• Van de Mheen D (1999) U.S.- Netherlands Addiction Workshop and Binational Symposium on drug Abuse. October 19–20, 1999, Addiction Research and Innovation. Den Haag: Netherlands Research and Development Program on Substance Use and Addiction/US National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
   Google Scholar
• Van de Mheen D. De Rotterdamse Drugsscene onder de loep. Resultaten van 5 jaar Drugs Monitoring System in Rotterdam (Focus on the Rotterdam Drugs scene. Results of a 5-year Drug Monitoring System in Rotterdam). IVO, Reeks Monitor Alcohol en Drugs, nr 5. IVO, Rotterdam 2000, [in Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Watters JH, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling: Options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems 1989; 36: 416–430
   Google Scholar
• Zinberg NE. Drugs, set and setting; the basis for controlled intoxication. Yale University Press, New Haven 1984
   Google Scholar